UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lesson 1 Mathematics Home Objective Motivation Lesson ExercisesEvaluationEvaluation Assignment Title.
Advertisements

Introduction Cotton producers throughout Tennessee must battle glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds. The most problematic of these is Palmer amaranth, also.
TECH PRO glb LTD. Rubber Technology 1 Wayne State University, Biomechanical Department March 30, 2005 Test Results Reported by: Tech Pro GLB Ltd. 60” Drop.
2009 On-Farm Renewable Energy Production Survey February 25, 2011.
The Distributive Property Section 5.4 Simplifying Expressions 3(4+x)+ x Like terms.
Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist Overview of Cotton Agronomic Research & Extension Program.
DPRK Agriculture Program: SRI Project in four local farms  Brief history of AFSC agriculture development work in DPRK  New program cycle of agricultural.
Taking the Kitchen Sink Seriously: An Ensemble Approach to Word Sense Disambiguation from Christopher Manning et al.
Warmup – Scientific Notation
College Algebra Notes 4.3: Laws of Logarithms
Farm Program Support Mechanisms 2004 Beltwide Cotton Conference San Antonio, TX January 5-9, Beltwide Cotton Conference San Antonio, TX January.
Seed Quality Variety life span. Value Shifts Continue No longer just a seed… Planting unit Technology Vigor Protection Fiber Quality Additional Traits.
Comparative Performance of BARBREN and LONREN David B. Weaver Professor Department of Agronomy and Soils Auburn University AL Dallas, TX, April 4,
Conversions by Dimensional Analysis & Moving the Decimal.
John L. Snider Third Year Review Crop Physiologist University of Georgia Department of Crop and Soil Sciences.
UNIT 1 REVIEW Translating Evaluating Simplifying.
DOW CONFIDENTIAL - Do not share without permission PERFORMANCE OF PHYTOGEN ™ COTTONSEED VARIETIES EXPRESSING WIDESTRIKE ™ INSECT PROTECTION IN 2006 STRIP.
DP 515 BG/RR A New Mid-Full Maturing Picker Variety With Bollgard & Roundup Ready Ken E. Lege’, Ph.D. Dir. of Technical Service East Region Piedmont, AL.
Objectives To evaluate the effects of two simulated drift rates of 2,4-D on non-tolerant cotton at various stages of development. 1 Chandler P. Rowe, 1.
UGA Cotton Extension Program Guy D. Collins, Ph.D. Extension Cotton Agronomist University of Georgia Tifton, GA.
Procreatin-7 – Feed Manufacturer & Dairy Farm Compatible –
Guy Collins rd Year Review S. Culpepper C. Waltz D. Hancock.
VARIETYLINT/ACRELENGTHMIKE Deltapine DP555BG/RR 1038** Deltapine DPLX99X * Phytogen PH98M * Sure Grow 501BR 944*
Reproducibility of check cultivar performance as affected by seed source by Jimmy X. Zumba and Gerald O. Myers Department of Agronomy and Environmental.
Metric Practice: Mass Miss Fogg Fall What is the base unit of measurement for mass? Grams.
63 g 50,000 mg 0.08 kg 4900 cg 420 dg Arrange these measurements in order of decreasing value. HINT: Kids have dropped over dead converting metrics! Convert.
2.7 Piecewise Functions p In real life functions are represented by a combination of equations, each corresponding to a part of the domain. These.
Solving Equations Using Logs. True or False? 1.Log 4 = log Log 15 = log 3 x log 5 3.Log 4 = log 8 – log 2 4.Log 64 = 2 log 8 5.Log 64 = 8 log 2.
Looking Back, Looking Ahead: Cotton Varieties and Fiber Quality Selecting Cotton Varieties for 2003 Steve Brown and Philip Jost.
Cotton and Palmer Amaranth (AMAPA) Response to Milo-Pro Applied at-Plant and POST Lynn M. Sosnoskie and A. Stanley Culpepper UGA, Tifton, GA Jared Whitaker.
7 th Grade World Geography Text: History Alive! Monday, October 21 st Chapter 5 “Ancient Sumer” CW – Read sections 3, 4, & 5 DP – pages 33 & 34 + top of.
Notes Over 1.2.
Scoring the Technical Evaluation Maximum possible score
2011 VIRGINIA COTTON VARIETY SUMMARY
Figure 2 Top panel shows mean (SE) differences in near-final height (cm) (n = 71) in the AI, GH, and AI/GH groups regardless of length of treatment (n.
How Do Our Dominant Cotton Varieties Differ University of Arkansas
2017 Cotton Agronomic Update
DON FM Positions Certification Levels
By: Collin McClain Carlynn Winkelman Jane Herrmann Mandy McGuire
Giant Ragweed Control in Cotton
Rounding Bingo.
Roundup Ready Technology
מדינת ישראל הוועדה לאנרגיה אטומית
L1-6 Notes: Algebra: Variables and Expressions
Agronomic Evaluation of At-Plant Insecticides and Nematicides
Cotton Variety Management – DeltaPine

NCSU OVT 2014 (Edmisten)Statistically highest group

Experiment outcomes outcome trial outcomes experiment possible outcomes.
BRF Naval Safety Center Seconds.
Multiple Documents Document Management Multiple Documents.
St. Mary’s School Financial Picture and Outlook – May 2017
Subtracting Real Numbers
Basfoliar Kelp (Afrikelp) in Starter Treatment in Silage Maize (2)
Basfoliar Kelp (AfriKelp®) in Starter Treatment on Sunflowers
2018 UGA OFT Cotton Varieties (14)
Ուսումնական պլան Հայոց լեզվի, գրականության դասավանդող՝ Լիլիթ Մադոյան
UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program
Radiographic evaluation of foot osteoarthritis: sensitivity of radiographic variables and relationship to symptoms  H.B. Menz, Ph.D., S.E. Munteanu, Ph.D.,
Trial and Improvement Cube root.
Running Race Year 5NG.
Urgent Modification Process Flow Diagram
Why is it important that scientists have the same units of measurement? What do you think would happen if scientists did not use the same measurements.
Basfoliar Kelp (AfriKelp®) in Starter Treatment in Maize (1)
Combining Random Variables
What are the constraints Trial 1 Trial 2 Trial 3 Trial 4
SUPERPOWERS POLICIES EVALUATION BY REGION
Basfoliar Kelp (AfriKelp®) in Starter Treatment in Potatoes
Factory H&M around the world
Presentation transcript:

UGA OnFarm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program

Variety Combined Average % Top 1 % Top 2 % Top 3 DP 1050 B2RF1, DP 1137 B2RF1, DP 1252 B2RF1, CG 3787 B2RF1, NG 5315 B2RF1, PHY 499 WRF1, PHY 339 WRF1, DG 2610 B2RF1, ST 6448 GLB21, PHY 575 WRF1, ST 4946 GLB21, FM 1944 GLB21, UGA On-Farm Cotton Variety Performance Evaluation Program Stability Collins & Whitaker, 2013

Variety Combined Average DP ,076 1,1281,2421,3211,253 1,3321,326 1,4001,4181,6071,659 1,5101,517 1,222 DP ,155 1,091 1,253 1,178 1,259 1,2771,313 1,440 1,394 1,4651,6261,6811,642 1,219 DP ,080 1,259 1,1531,1861,175 1,3731,3821,4421,5451,487 1,480 1,5821,605 1,215 CG ,120 1,0481,035 1,2191,3171,3971,340 1,375 1,539 1,4531,450 1,6601,611 1,215 NG ,141 1,0531,054 1,238 1,2071,261 1,338 1,3021,3901,4241,3701,5551,569 1,166 PHY ,151 1,1291,0761,2031,1951,1921,3461,3691,315 1,613 1,2941,519 1,144 PHY ,0211,0121,1411,1761,2401,0091,1561,2741,3891,2481,4661,4701,457 1,133 DG ,0611,0871,1001,1621,1051,2751,2411,3651,2411,3091,4241,5201,508 1,129 ST ,0021,067 1,249 1,0131,1361,2211,2301,2671,2001,3021,2691,4421,567 1,115 PHY ,2301,0091,0351,0611,3061,2211,3411,3081,4061,4101,422 1,099 ST , ,0861,184 1,337 1,1061,2171,3471,2411,4271,3511,418 1,097 FM ,1121,0901,1561,0141,1571,1421,2641,1851,2281,3511,2541,334 1,064 Loc. Average ,0391,0871,1341,1521,1771,2411,2561,3261,3631,3661,4621,4771, On-Farm Trials (TOP 3) Collins & Whitaker, 2013