Sharing benefits, sharing costs: a discussion Lluís M. Anglada Consorci de Biblioteques Universitàries de Catalunya e-ICOLC Thessaloniki, 5th October 2002.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Managing Access and Purchase. Objectives Examine issues of sustainability, costs and resourcing Examine consortia building issues Evaluate possible consortia.

Advertisements

Models for Increasing Access Leo Walford. Bloomsbury Conference, 29 June 2007 Remember 1997? As a librarian, you: Bought print journals via subscription.

MANAGERIAL ACCOUNTING

VIVA’s View of the Big Deal, Cost Sharing, and Cooperative Collection Management; Why sometimes having just one key is not enough. Museum of Innocence:

Library Consortia in Spain Azucena Blanco Pérez. Consorcio Madroño 2 SELL Meeting. Barcelona, 2002.

Library Haarala,, IATUL The Economics of Services in a Changing Environment by Arja-Riitta Haarala.

Moving to e-only from a library perspective Sarah Pearson 30 th and 31 st March 2009.

Swets Blackwell Consortia and Multiple Site Services for E-Journals Acquisitions Working with Libraries and Publishers.

A Review on the Collection Development of Print and Electronic Resources at the Tsinghua University Library Prof. Xue Fang Yu Director, Tsinghua University.

Helsinki University Library The National Library of Finland FinELib Paula Mikkonen FinELib Consortium E-book Deals ICOLC E-book panel

The Impact of Consortial Purchasing on Library Acquisitions: the Turkish Experience Tuba Akbaytürk 24 th Annual IATUL Conference Ankara, Turkey.

1 Spain (CBUC) Country report 9th SELL Meeting Izmir, May 18 th 2009.

ETD: doing it together Lluís M. Anglada Consortium of Academic Libraries of Catalonia (CBUC) ETD 2003 Berlin, May 22nd, 2003.

User Needs and Usage as Seen Through a Consortium lib.consortium.ch Workshop on E-Journals: Jornades sobre revistes digitals: de l’autor i el productor.

Margot Wiesner1 Competition and Cooperation Frankfurt Bookfair Saturday, Information Cost Sharing and Consortia Structures.

Unica Madrid Oct 2002UvA Universiteit van Amsterdam Licensing: Blessing or Disguise? Nol Verhagen Director of Libraries, University of Amsterdam.

Performance measurement in a changing environment The SCONUL e-measures project 2010.

ALPSP Learned Journal Collection a win-win solution E-ICOLC, Elsinore, Denmark, 24 October 2003 Laura Bonald and Yvonne Campfens.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Electronic Information Resources: An Evaluation of the Middle East Technical University Library Hacer BATI Middle East Technical.

1 Spain (CBUC) Country report 10th SELL Meeting Bordeaux, June 11 th 2010.

Ebook Summit Wednesday 24 th September UK book sales market 2013 The invoiced value of all UK book sales was £3.389m in Digital sales accounted.

Swets Information Services Swets’ Consortia Services.

Collections Support at UMKC Libraries Faculty Library Advisory Committee October 15, 2013.

Managing Serials in an Electronic World the Stirling Experience Sonia Wilson University of Stirling Library 19 October 2004.

Country Report Galician Consortium Consorcio de Bibliotecas Universitarias de Galicia BUGalicia 7th Meeting of Southern European.

1/32 D2/SELL/08 SELL Spain2008.ppt Spain (featuring... CBUC) Country report 8th SELL Meeting Trieste, May 30 th 2008.

K-12 School Spending and Performance Review Preliminary Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee September 14, 2005 Stephanie Hoffman and Lisa.

The ALPSP Learned Journals Collection A presentation by Swets Blackwell.

Find out more about JCS at Importance of online resources from trusted sources...

Greetings From Ohio 1. E-W 360 km N-S 370 km 106,765 sq km 35 th in US Pop: 11.5 M 7 th in US GDP: $373 Billion lowest pt.132 m highest pt. 473 m Greetings.

1 Business models for E- Journals Alternatives for Big Deals.

The Big Deal…A Good Deal! eICOLC October 3-5, 2002 Thessaloniki, Greece David F. Kohl.

The Problem of Measuring E-resources *) Robert Hayes 1, Karin Karlics 2, Christian Schlögl 2 2 University of Graz Institute of Information Science and.

Library European University Institute Library Consortia Structure and governance in Europe Tommaso Giordano Deputy Director, EUI Library, Florence Thessaloniki.

Embracing Change Oliver Pesch Chief Strategist, E-Resources EBSCO Information Services.

20 October 2008Hildegard Schäffler - ICOLC Fall Meeting Munich Requirements for E-Book Standards.

1 How are Catalan University Libraries Coping with the Economic Crisis? Núria Comellas (CBUC) 20th Pan-Hellenic Academic Libraries Conference Thessaloniki,

The International e-Depot to Guarantee Permanent Access to Scholarly Publications Marcel Ras Tartu, June 2012.

5th SELL Meetting Lisboa, Activities report Government agreement to improve libraries 2.ILS change 3.ICOLC 4.Union catalogue 5.Digital.

The University of Oregon Serials Cancellation Project Collection Evaluation During the Economic Crisis: Case Studies in Academia David C. Fowler,

Spain (& CBUC) country report to 7th SELL Meetting Madrid, 16/

Kristiina Hormia-Poutanen Head of National Electronic Library Services (FinELib) National Electronic Library programme and the digital research and study.

Tilburg University Libraries, Publishers and Licensing Practical experiences and Fundamental issues Hans Geleijnse Librarian Tilburg University The Netherlands.

OhioLINK – Reluctant but Successful – depending on your definition Orderly Retreat (Reduction) from the Electronic Journal Big Deal ICOLC Meeting Philadelphia,

Licensing Evolution ICOLC October 2006 – Rome Lorraine Estelle.

1 Southern European Libraries Link (SELL) Núria Comellas (CBUC) ICOLC 11th Fall Meeting Paris, October 28 th 2009.

OhioLINK viewpoint: Consortium Electronic Book Licenses – it’s Just a Serial Common Licensing Expectations and Techniques for E-Book Publishers or E-book.

Licensing e- content & OA perspectives from the South of Europe Lluís M. Anglada i de Ferrer Consorci de Biblioteques Universitàries de Catalunya IATUL.

Could – should – must consortia deals be expanded outside university centers? 7th SELL Meeting Madrid,

Call Me Old Fashioned Common Expectations for E-Book Publishers or E-book Aggregators in a Consortium Context Or… Why OhioLINK Has Focused on Direct Deals.

OhioLINK – ILL Experiences in Licensing ALA June 27, 2004 “The first thing we do, let's kill all the Lawyers.”

A Leap in the Dark A Pilot Project for an Electronic-Only Engineering Collection Laurel Kristick and Margaret Mellinger Oregon State University Libraries.

FinELib Broadening the licensing scope: new user groups, new patterns of use ICOLC Munich Arja Tuuliniemi Head of licensing, FinELib.

FinELib consortium Negotiations and New Initiatives Autumn 2009 ICOLC, Paris th Oct 2009 Paula Mikkonen, Licensing Coordinator.

Southern and Northern consortia Similarities and dissimilarities Lluís M. Anglada i de Ferrer Consorci de Biblioteques Universitàries de Catalunya 10th.

1 News from the battlefield: Spain Núria Comellas (CBUC) ICOLC 11th Fall Meeting Paris, October 26 th 2009.

Licensing in a European Perspective - case Finnish National Consortium ELAG 2001, Prague Kristiina Hormia-Poutanen.

1 The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly…. Peter Reardon Director of Global Consortia Sales The Gale Group.

Kluwer Online Pricing Models CAUL – Industry Think Tank Sydney, 23 May 2002 Peter Coebergh.

NCSU Libraries Collections Budget Presentation University Library Committee October 28, 2013 Greg Raschke Associate Director for Collections and Scholarly.

More than ten years experiences about consortia in Finland Informatio Medicata 2009 Budapest 17. – Pirjo Rajakiili National Library of Health.

Evaluating license renewals Look at the numbers, then decide Monique Dikboom License Manager, Maastricht University Library EIFL webinar, 1 st June 2015.

16/10/2014. Electronic information (e-info) Barbara Lejeune.

Electronic Resources Collection Development Policy : Need and Challenges.

Acquiring e-resources by consortia – efficient, isn’t it? Informatio Scientifica – Informatio Medicata Budapest Pirjo Rajakiili Meilahti.

Approaches and Techniques for Vendor Negotiations

Allocating Collections Budgets in a Changing Environment

Lenny Rhine, Cecilia Botero, Michele R. Tennant and Steven Carrico

The Big“gest” Deal Renewal

Presentation transcript:

Sharing benefits, sharing costs: a discussion Lluís M. Anglada Consorci de Biblioteques Universitàries de Catalunya e-ICOLC Thessaloniki, 5th October 2002

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Plan Approach Some (general) observations Sharing costs: 3 situations

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Important issues in “cooperative games” Focusing on benefits Always remember that you’ll win more that in an “individual game”

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Sharing benefits, sharing costs Background Budget allocation formulae Shared maintenance of computers and union catalogues Now, licensing Databases E-journals E-books

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Present situation Pricing models Are they stable? Benefits Are they stable?

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Stable pricing models (?) Web databases Consortium size e-Journals Expenditures in print + ‘premium’ + minimum e-Books Simultaneous users

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Stable benefits (?) Economic benefits (short term) Savings (sometimes) and costs contention More information (medium term) Cross access and bundled e-journals Intangibles (long term) New money and lobbying

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Plan Approach Some (general) observations Sharing costs: 3 situations

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Some (general) observations Pricing model matters Big/medium/small Collections and size Net or relative benefits “Failure games”

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Pricing model matters A global price for a new product Allows ‘ex-novo’ allocation formulae A global price determined by historical expenditure Suggests formulae based on historical spending

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Libraries in a consortium Few are big Some are medium A lot are small

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Collections and size p- expenditureStudents+budget A49.98%>32.42% B26.60%>20.46% C 7.70%<18.26% D 4.08%< 5.61% E 2.98%< 6.21% F 4.20%< 5.42% G 3.96%< 6.56% H 0.00%< 5.07% I 0.50%> 0.00%

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Net or relative benefits non prev. Subs. Titnpst x students A % B % C % D % E % F % G % H % I %

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Why is size important? Because it has an effect on price Important in the short term Because it has an effect on usage Important in the long term

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Failure games There are a lot of allocation costs systems that are unacceptable by some of the “playing parts”

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Plan Approach Some (general) observations Sharing costs: 3 situations

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Sharing costs: 3 situations Central funding (p+e or e+p) p+e (no central funding) e+p (with or without central funding)

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt A (general?) principle to share costs Two parameters to build the formula: Parameter A: equal shares Parameter B: based on size And a dynamic readjustment system if size changes

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Central funding (p+e or e+p) Total or majority central funding means that almost any allocation formula will be accepted However We cannot rely on this kind of central funding for a long time

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt p+e (no central funding) The relatively low amount (compared to the print amount) of the premium-e allows agreements But, p+e Doesn’t allow cancellations Doesn’t make evolution to e-only easy Is surely transitory

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt e+p (with or without central funding) A: The immediate solution B: A future model

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt A: The immediate solution Cost based on former print expenditure, for instance: Print expenditure + 5%, or Fixed cost, if print expenditure is lower than the minimum required Immediate allocation model Print expenditure + 5%, or Fixed cost

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt But... Historical print expenditure belongs to the past, cooperative subscriptions set up a new framework Will it make any sense to talk about “print expenditure” in 5-10 years time? This model allows a “sub-consortium” of big and medium libraries

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt B: A future model (?) One part in equal shares 20% ?, 30% ?, 40%?, 50% ?... One part based on size What does “size” mean? Dynamic readjustment system if size changes

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt What does “size” mean? Potential users? Budget? Collections? Print expenditure? Research activity? Benefits as non previus subscribed titles? Benefits as (Npst x potential users)? Usage?

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt CBUC formula for e-journals 50% based on historical print expenditure 20% equal shares 30% based on size (students + budget)

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt CBUC: comparisons p- expenCBUCsize dituresdistributionstudents+butget A49.98%36.94%32.42% B26.60%21.66%20.46% C 7.70%11.55%18.26% D 4.08% 5.94% 5.61% E 2.98% 5.57% 6.21% F 4.20% 5.95% 5.42% G 3.96% 6.17% 6.56% H 0.00% 3.74% 5.07% I 0.50% 2.47% 0.00%

L. Anglada, e-ICOLC 2002 B1/eICOLC/0209eICOLC.ppt Final considerations “Big Deal” is a good deal if we can work at a medium-long term A good agreement means to get all members reasonably dissatisfied Central funding always helps