Research Bold Initiative Team. Common Ways We “Use” Research We read about an innovation and say it is “research” We hear someone share an innovation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

PERSONAL LITERACY PLANS AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL December 12, 2003.
ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Action Research Not traditional educational research often research tests theory not practical Teacher research in classrooms and/or schools/districts.
Evidence, Ethics, and the Law Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
IDEA and NCLB Accountability and Instruction for Students with Disabilities SCDN Presentation 9/06 Candace Shyer.
“Scientifically Based Evaluation Methods” Presented by Paula J. Martin COE Conference, September 13, 2004.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Adapted by: Kim Scott (From Vicki Nicolson & Jane Nicholls)
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Response to Intervention Milltown’s RtI model The Office of Curriculum and Instruction Rigorously Preparing our Students for a Successful Tomorrow.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner, National Center for Education Research.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences: Information for the Grants Administrator Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner National.
Evaluating and Revising the Physical Education Instructional Program.
Comparing Assessment to Educational Research. In this session, we will… Construct and discuss the (related but different) goals and attributes of assessment.
Primary vs. Secondary Sources
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.
Timberlane Regional School District
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Biennial Report October 2008.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Graduate studies - Master of Pharmacy (MPharm) 1 st and 2 nd cycle integrated, 5 yrs, 10 semesters, 300 ECTS-credits 1 Integrated master's degrees qualifications.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Evidence-based Education and the Culture of Special Education Chair: Jack States, Wing Institute Discussant: Teri Palmer, University of Oregon.
Technology Enhanced Learning at University - How can learning enhancement be demonstrated? Adrian Kirkwood & Linda Price IET, The Open University.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Leading Beyond the Institution: Graduates as Learners, Leaders, and Scholarly Practitioners Drs. Ron Zambo, Debby Zambo, Ray R. Buss.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Alternative Assessment Chapter 8 David Goh. Factors Increasing Awareness and Development of Alternative Assessment Educational reform movement Goals 2000,
Evaluating Impacts of MSP Grants Ellen Bobronnikov January 6, 2009 Common Issues and Potential Solutions.
An Expanded Model of Evidence-based Practice in Special Education Randy Keyworth Jack States Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Consistency of Moderation
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Response to Intervention Problem Solving Process –Florida’s Model Evaluate Did the plan work? Problem Analysis Why is it occurring?
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
2007. Faculty of Education ► Staff 300 (incl.100 in Teacher training school) ► 20 professorships ► 80 lecturers ► 9 senior assistants ► 12 assistants.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Teaching and Learning Division National Center for Education Research.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. BECOMING A SCHOLAR IN NURSING EDUCATION – Chapter 16 –
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
Distributing Leadership
Michael Kelly, Ed. D. John Gratto, Ed. D. Virginia Tech
Verification Guidelines for Children with Disabilities
Performance Improvement Project Validation Process Outcome Focused Scoring Methodology and Critical Analysis Presenter: Christi Melendez, RN, CPHQ Associate.
EDA 560 Innovative Education- -snaptutorial.com
This presentation will include:
The Texas Science Initiative
Standard Four Program Impact
Roles and Responsibilities
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
Roles and Responsibilities
Schoolwide Programs.
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

Research Bold Initiative Team

Common Ways We “Use” Research We read about an innovation and say it is “research” We hear someone share an innovation and call it “research” We try an innovation and call it “research” We ignore innovations because it is deemed “research”

The problems with using research We listen to charismatic speaker at a conference who says, “…..” We read an article that advocates the use of “…..” We hear about changes in teacher practices or student achievement linked to “…..” We see critiques by educational leaders that evaluate “…..”

We need to learn to be “smart shoppers” of research!

The Role of NCLB in Evaluating Research Major emphasis on Scientifically - Based Research (SBR) Use of control groups for studying results of interventions Meets higher demands for federally funded projects, including grants

Criteria for Evaluating Research Relevance Rigor Systematic Approach Objectivity Replicability Data Analyses/Interpretation

“Brands” of Research Primary sources –Based upon actual studies conducted, complete with data sets –Typically found in scholarly and research journals Secondary sources –Explain or describe actual studies, usually to persuade or argue –Found in various degrees, from professional journals to newspapers to popular magazines

So, what does it look like when teachers use educational research? Significant change occurs when teachers use educational research in instructional decisions Another significant change occurs when teachers move from using secondary sources to primary sources Even more change occurs when teachers work collaboratively on analyzing primary source research NSDC Staff Development Standards, 2001

Teacher uses educational research when making instructional decisions Source: “Moving NSDC’s Staff Development Standards into Practice” Level 1 Works with colleagues and administrators to interview educational researchers, make school visitations, and determine necessary organizational support before adopting a new innovation. Understands the study of research can take an extended period of time. Knows how to interpret research results. Understands what constitutes reliable and valid research. Level 2 Works with colleagues and administrators to conduct an extensive review of all pertinent research and study research to ensure a good match with populations and outcomes before adopting a new practices. Knows how to interpret research results. Understands what constitutes reliable and valid research. Level 3 Works with colleagues and administrators to conduct an extensive review of all pertinent research studies – both positive and negative - when making educational decisions. Knows how to interpret research results. Understands what constitutes reliable and valid research. Level 4 Uses research studies when making educational decisions. Knows how to interpret research results. Understands what constitutes reliable and valid research. Level 5 Uses professional journals that summarize research (not actual research studies) when making educational decisions Level 6 Does not use educational research to make decisions

Principal reads and interprets educational research Source: “Moving NSDC’s Staff Development Standards into Practice” Level 1 Demonstrates advanced skills in determining appropriate research design, interpreting research results, and determining whether results can be generalized Level 2 Demonstrates modest skills on reading and interpreting educational research (validity and reliability. matching populations, and interpreting effect size measures) Level 3 Demonstrates little skill in reading and interpreting educational research Level 4 Does not recognize the need to read and interpret educational research

Central Office Staff read and interpret educational research Source: “Moving NSDC’s Staff Development Standards into Practice” Level 1 Demonstrates advanced skills in analyzing educational research (determining appropriate research design, interpreting research results, and determining whether results can be generalized) Level 2 Demonstrate modest skills in reading educational research and interpreting results ( validity and reliability. matching populations, and interpreting effect size measures) Level 3 Demonstrate little skill in reading and interpreting educational research