Impressions from MC2005 J. Apostolakis G. Folger.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
Advertisements

Title Nuclear Reaction Models in Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System PHITS Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Hiroshi Iwase:
MONTE-CARLO TECHNIQUES APPLIED TO PROTON DOSIMETRY AND RADIATION SAFETY F. Guillaume, G. Rucka, J. Hérault, N. Iborra, P. Chauvel 1 XXXV European Cyclotron.
Using FLUKA to study Radiation Fields in ERL Components Jason E. Andrews, University of Washington Vaclav Kostroun, Mentor.
Pedro Arce Point detector scoring 1 Point detector scoring in GEANT4 Pedro Arce, (CIEMAT) Miguel Embid (CIEMAT) Juan Ignacio Lagares (CIEMAT) Geant4 Event.
BLM review Mario Santana Leitner OUTLOOK ON FLUKA SIMULATIONS FOR UDULATOR DAMAGE AND BLM RESPONSE Mario Santana Leitner, Alberto.
Adapted from G G Daquino, Geant4 Workshop, Catania, 5 Oct 2004 Event Biasing in G4: Why and what? Key User Requirements J. Apostolakis, CERN 19 March 2007.
Highlights of latest developments ESA/ESTEC Makoto Asai (SLAC)
J. Tinslay 1, B. Faddegon 2, J. Perl 1 and M. Asai 1 (1) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center, Menlo Park, CA, (2) UC San Francisco, San Francisco, CA Verification.
P HI T S Advanced Lecture (II): variance reduction techniques to improve efficiency of calculation Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code.
14 User Documents and Examples II SLAC Geant4 Tutorial 17 May 2007 Dennis Wright Geant4 V8.3.
Title Koji Niita: RIST, Japan Hiroshi Iwase: GSI, Germany Tatsuhiko Sato, JAEA, Japan Yousuke Iwamoto, Norihito Matsuda, Yukio Sakamoto, Hiroshi Nakashima:
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Radiological Design Considerations of Synchrotron Radiation Facilities P.K. Job Radiation Physicist National Synchrotron.
Energy deposition for 10 MeV neutrons in oxygen, carbon, argon and hydrogen gaseous chambers (1mx1mx1m). Energy Deposition in 90% argon (1.782mg/cm 3 )
FFAG Fixed Field Alternating Gradient synchrotrons, FFAGs, combine some of the main advantages of both cyclotrons and synchrotrons:  Fixed magnetic field.
Chalmers University of Technology, Sweden
Sergey Ananko Saint-Petersburg State University Department of Physics
Reactor Dosimetry News and Prospects Mladen Mitev BgNS Conference 2014.
Automated Electron Step Size Optimization in EGS5 Scott Wilderman Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan.
Validation and TestEm series Michel Maire for the Standard EM group LAPP (Annecy) July 2006.
Ian C. Smith 1 A portal-based system for quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans using Grid-enabled High Performance Computing clusters CR Baker.
MCNP / X Merger Outline Merger Project Demonstration Implications.
IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Short Course The Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Sunanda Banerjee (Saha Inst. Nucl. Phys., Kolkata,
1 Dr. Sandro Sandri (President of Italian Association of Radiation Protection, AIRP) Head, Radiation Protection Laboratory, IRP FUAC Frascati ENEA – Radiation.
User Documents and Examples II Geant4 Tutorial at Marshall Space Flight Center 18 April 2012 Dennis Wright (SLAC) Geant4 V9.5.
Geant4 Event Biasing Marc Verderi, LLR (Heavily copied from Jane Tinslay, SLAC) June 2007.
Computing Performance Recommendations #13, #14. Recommendation #13 (1/3) We recommend providing a simple mechanism for users to turn off “irrelevant”
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the ILC IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
Atlas Simulation Activities What is Geant 4 Atlas Strategy.
Modeling Production, Interactions and Transport Fermilab November 14, 2005 Fermilab ILC-CAL Nikolai Mokhov, Fermilab.
1 Status and Plans for Geant4 Physics Linear Collider Simulation Workshop III 2-5 June 2004 Dennis Wright (SLAC)
IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Short Course The Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Sunanda Banerjee (Saha Inst. Nucl. Phys., Kolkata,
FLUKA dose and fluence simulations for CBM experiment I.Kadenko, O.Bezshyyko, V.Pluyko, V.Shevchenko National Taras Shevchenko University of Kiev.
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Alex Howard - Event Biasing Geant4 Users - Lisbon Event biasing and Variance Reduction - Geometrical Alex Howard, CERN Geant4 Users Workshop, Lisbon.
Geant4 in production: status and developments John Apostolakis (CERN) Makoto Asai (SLAC) for the Geant4 collaboration.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Release Validation J. Apostolakis, M. Asai, G. Cosmo, S. Incerti, V. Ivantchenko, D. Wright for Geant4 12 January 2009.
TPS & Simulations within PARTNER D. Bertrand, D. Prieels Valencia, SPAIN 19 JUNE 2009.
Hadronic Physics Validation II Dennis Wright Geant4 Review CERN April 2007.
The CMS Simulation Software Julia Yarba, Fermilab on behalf of CMS Collaboration 22 m long, 15 m in diameter Over a million geometrical volumes Many complex.
Introduction What is detector simulation? A detector simulation program must provide the possibility of describing accurately an experimental setup (both.
Alex Howard, ETH, Zurich 13 th September 2012, 17 th Collaboration Meeting, Chartres 1 Geometrical Event Biasing Facility Alex Howard ETH, Zurich Geometrical.
March 2, 2011 TJRPhysics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools 1 Tom Roberts Muons, Inc. This is the current list − Please help us to complete.
Towards comparisons between TFluka and TGeant3 ( within CbmRoot Framework) Denis Bertini (IT-GSI) Antonin Maire (IPHC Strasbourg)
Workshop On Nuclear Data for Advanced Reactor Technologies, ICTP , A. Borella1 Monte Carlo methods.
Target Simulations for Hadron, Electron and Heavy-Ion Beams 2 nd High-Power Targetry Workshop Oak Ridge, TN October 10-14, 2005 Fermilab High-Power Targetry.
Dec 2004 Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White, S Molloy.
LCG – AA review 1 Simulation LCG/AA review Sept 2006.
Neutron measurement with nuclear emulsion Mitsu KIMURA 27th Feb 2013.
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
An introduction Luisella Lari On behalf of the FLUKA collaboration CAoPAC: Computer-Aided Optimization of Particle Accelerator Workshop March 2015.
John Apostolakis & Makoto Asai for the Geant4 Collaboration 1(Draft) SNA-MC 2010.
Physics Performance. EM Physics: Observations Two apparently independent EM physics models have led to user confusion: –Different results for identical.
Maria Grazia Pia, INFN Genova and CERN1 Geant4 highlights of relevance for medical physics applications Maria Grazia Pia INFN Genova and CERN.
Luciano Pandola, INFN Gran Sasso Luciano Pandola INFN Gran Sasso Genova, July 18 th, 2005 Geant4 and the underground physics community.
Marina Golubeva, Alexander Ivashkin Institute for Nuclear Research RAS, Moscow AGeV simulations with Geant4 and Shield Geant4 with Dpmjet-2.5 interface.
1 Giuseppe G. Daquino 26 th January 2005 SoFTware Development for Experiments Group Physics Department, CERN Background radiation studies using Geant4.
2011 Development Plan Makoto Asai (SLAC PPA/SCA) on behalf of the Geant4 Collaboration March 3 rd, Geant4 Technical Forum.
Simulation of Terrestrial Gamma Ray and Neutron Flashes (Small variations of thundercloud dipole moment) L.P. Babich, Е.N. Donskoĭ, A.Y. Kudryavtsev, M.L.
Koichi MurakamiGeant4 Physics Verification and Validation (17-19/Jul./2006) 1 Results from the recent carbon test beam at HIMAC Koichi Murakami Statoru.
A Short Course on Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Introduction
Simulation Project Structure and tasks
Status of MC activities
Physics Processes Missing from our Current Simulation Tools
Hadronic physics validation of Geant4
The Hadrontherapy Geant4 advanced example
Beam Dump Experiments with Photon and Electron Beams
A Short Course on Geant4 Simulation Toolkit Introduction
Status of energy deposition studies IR7
Presentation transcript:

Impressions from MC2005 J. Apostolakis G. Folger

Talk overview The conference The radiation Transport tools ‘present’ Applications Themes and topical issues

Conference overview About 200 participants: providers, users,.. Organisation –Plenaries on MC tools –Parallel sessions on Methods & data advancements (electron/gamma, neutron, hadron) Verification & computer implementation Applications in particular areas –Reactor, medical including dosimetry,.. Wide diversity –Several session in parallel –This summary is a personal viewpoint And relies on notes, as talk presentations not yet available

Codes / Tools / Toolkit Several teams present: M CNP 5 M CNPX F LUKA G EANT 4 P HITS ‘Missing’ E GS (nrc/5) Penelope Tripoli MARS … Different ‘philosophies’ MCNP 5/X, FLUKA –Standard ‘tool’/code driven by input files –Built-in ‘tallies’ chosen by flags –‘Flat’ geometries Delineated by surfaces –Yet more physics options being made available Geant4 –Toolkit –Hierarchial geometry, …

MCNP5 Neutrons, , , protons,.. Long line of codes (60s to now) From Los Alamos National Laboratory –Team of 12 code developers & 4 on data –Funding from ASCI program Capability evolution Great emphasis on Quality Assurance –Revised implementation in F90 Profit from large supercomputer facility –Especially for validation Traditional strengths, include Neutron treatment using data –For E <~ 150 MeV Variance reduction techniques Latest improvements Push for proton radiography –Extend protons up to 50 GeV New intra-nuclear cascade as option –INCL4 (Liege) New data –ENDF/B-VII Built-in parallelization –MPI and OpenMP Generating weights fast –With PARTISN code

MCNPX Is eXtended version of MCNP4C –Transports 34 particle types up to TeV energies Uses –evaluated data libraries (p, n,  - nuclear) –Physics models where libraries are not available –Option for crossover at 20MeV, or as needed (some data up to 150MeV) Written in F90 Many options for radiation tallies, biasing –Weight window generator –Options for sources –Pulse-height (with variance reduction) & coincidence tallies Physics enhancements –CEM 2K and INCL4 (cascade), in addition to older Bertini, HETC, Fluka, Isabel models –  doppler broadening –  – nuclear models Awards for bug reports –‘certificate’ and $$ Support NAG/IBM/Intel f90 complr Parallel computation –For all particles (uses MPI) –High speedup for criticality calculations Future plans –Magnetic fields –Delayed neutrons & g –CAD input with spline tracking

7-Can HEU Test Problem Air HEU Aluminum ~5% Enriched

PHITS Simulate –hadron-neucleus with E up to 200 GeV –Nucleus-nucleus from 10 MeV/n to 100 GeV/nucleon –Transport heavy ions, hadrons & leptons Neutrons down to eV Features –JQMD for nucleus- nucleus using molecular dynamics –JAM hadronic cascade –Photons, electrons and low-energy neutrons as in MCNP4C. From RIST, Japan

FLUKA Tool known at CERN – so just a few remarks Compare to data for  -scopic data only ‘Not a toolkit’ –Physics models are fully integrated –Self-consistent: full cross-talk between EM, hadronics, neutrons (with effort for same level of accuracy) –Correlations preserved enabling predictivity –‘No programming is necessary’ Recent extensions for heavy ions Numerous comparisons & applications –Including CERF, TARC, ATLAS, Atmosphere, AMS, Borexino –Talks on E deposition in LHC magnets,, CERF comparisons

Geant4 One plenary and over 12 parallel talks Much interest –Applications –Methods Some concerns from users –Many choices available –Difficulty to get going without good guidance

A number of other tools –Deterministic tools treating neutrons

Summary - Codes Fewer codes represented –Missing MVP, MCP, MCBEND, TRIPOLI, EGS, ITS, VIM, TART, … More complex questions –Burn-up, activation Remove bridge between MC and depletion codes –Correlated sources and tallies –(Anti)coincidence of events across multiple regions –Moving geometry, stochastic geometry –2 & 3 D graphical output necessary

Selected topics

Summary - Geometry setup GUIs are becoming popular CAD is making progress –Tools to convert to solids start to appear –Still need to achieve arbitrary surface spline NURBS –Would like to see these tools become OpenSource

CAD input H. Tsige-Tamirat Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe Input from STEP/IGES files –Thinned with engineer’s help Tool to read CAD file, process & create MCNP input file –Uses open source CAD as toolkit for reading –Addresses overlaps and gaps (‘voids’) –Created in C++, using MVC Status –Working for realistic JET example Other efforts underway –Delegating navigation to CAD system (speed issues) –Tesselating BREP solids From *Summary talk* GUIs are becoming popular CAD is making progress –Tools to convert to solids start to appear –Still need to achieve arbitrary surface spline NURBS –Would like to see these tools become OpenSource

Human phantoms

Distributions centers Codes primarily available from –Radiation Safety Information Computational Center (RSICC) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). –OECD / NEA (European Nuclear Energy Agency) Nuclear Data Bank computer program services Conditions for distributions are evolving –Personal licenses (not site as in past)

Applications Significant interest in medical applications –Dedicated session on ‘Tomographic Models for Radiation Protection dosimetry’ Reactor applications –Several sessions –Emerging applications for Accelerator Driven Space applications Much interest in CAD-input

Other notable / novel Intercomparisons of ‘tools’ at times MCNP, Geant4, Fluka, data –For proton therapy applications –For accelerator driven applications Novel approach to MC –Using Field Programmable Gate Arrays for Ultra-high Speed Monte Carlo Computation –A.S.Pasciak, J.R.Ford.

Unusual applications Enhanced electron and photon fluxes in thunderstorms –T. Torii (JNDI), T. Sugita (SSL), T. Nishijima, Z.-I. Kawasaki (Osaka U) Japan

Uman, M.A. : The Lightning Discharge (Academic Press, 1987) Japanese Winter Thunderclouds Have Charged Areas in Low Altitude. Altitude & Distribution of Thundercloud Electric Charges

Simulation of the Generation of EM Shower by Muon Irradiation μ + (2 GeV) Emission of massive knock-on electrons μ - (2 GeV) Elevation Angle: 30°, Number of Histories : 5 E-Field : Winter Thundercloud (Tri-pole) Deposition energy in the atmosphere is calculated by using Geant4 code. Muon beam thundercloud

Other topics from the Conference Summary Comments

Summary- Data/libraries More users produce their own data Need better QA of data Little evidence of effort on emerging needs –Delayed gamma, neutron –Improved secondary particle production including correlations Library repository, with graphics good idea –NADS: //nuclear/llnl.gov/CNP/nads

Summary – Physics & Methods New physics models continue to emerge –Users getting frustrated with too wide choices –Provide recommendations Methods improvements –Variance reduction with pulse-height tallies –Some tough issues remain Effort to speed up –Parallelism, some re-write code for this –Algorithm efficiency

Summary - Applications About 25% of talks Codes need to provide results & errors –Users need “convergence score card” –Normality checks, 2 nd moment of analysis, trends Users training more of an issue –Codes have options –Users unaware of “easy” solutions Application work should begin with related benchmark simulation –Eliminate time consuming mistakes

Summary - Benchmarks Not enough benchmark papers –Perhaps most important aspect of MC development Need way to gather results –Web site to post papers Mix “component” benchmarks with integral –Integral result can mask offsetting errors/deficiencies ( e.g. Geant4) Develop quantitative metric for comparisons –Standard toolkit good start, some concern as well