© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 WPEC/SG39 Short updates on.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
United Nations Statistics Division
Advertisements

1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION CLIMATE CHANGE UNIT ICAO/UNFCCC expert meeting Montreal, April 2004 Hartmut Behrend European Commission DG ENV.C.2, Brussels.
DG Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport
Placement Workshop Y2, Sem 2 Professional Practice Module (PPM)
Combined evaluation of PFNS for 235 U(n th,f), 239 Pu(n th,f), 233 U(n th,f) and 252 Cf(sf) (in progress) V.G. Pronyaev Institute of Physics.
Total Monte Carlo and related applications of the TALYS code system Arjan Koning NRG Petten, the Netherlands Technical Meeting on Neutron Cross- Section.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Project Update Monthly Research Administrators Meeting March 11, 2010.
Modeling of Photonuclear Reactions & Transmutation of Long-lived Nuclear Waste in High Photon Fluxes M.-L. GIACRI-MAUBORGNE, D. RIDIKAS, J.-C.
Status of Fusion Nuclear Data Development Mohamed Sawan Tim Bohm U. Wisconsin-Madison Fusion Neutronics Team.
Evaluation and Use of the Prompt Fission Neutron Spectrum and Spectra Covariance Matrices in Criticality and Shielding I. Kodeli1, A. Trkov1, R. Capote2,
U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR Current Status of the NJOY Nuclear Data Processing Code System and Initial ENDF/B-VII Data Testing Results Presented.
Nuclear Data for ADS and Transmutation Joint TREND/SANDAT proposal for FP6 ADOPT- Meeting, Dec E. Gonzalez-Romero (CIEMAT) Introduction Sensitivity.
1 CN formation cross section in nucleon induced reactions on 238 U Efrem Soukhovitski, JINER Frank Dietrich, LLNL Harm Wienke, Belgonucleaire Roberto Capote,
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy Covariance data: Status and Perspective at BNL D. Rochman, M. W. Herman, P. Obložinský National.
National Inventory System in the Slovak republic Janka SZEMESOVA Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute Bratislava April 2005, Wissenschaftszentrum,
The First Carbon Exhibition in North Africa and Middle East Region Jerba, September 2004 CDM-Morocco: Strategy, Organization, Procedures Organization,
Future of the NEA Data Bank: A Dutch perspective Arjan Koning NRG Petten, The Netherlands NSC-EG meeting June , NEA Issy-les-Moulineaux.
IPA Komponenta IV – Razvoj ljudskih potencijala – Program Europske Unije za Hrvatsku Ured projekta: Radnička 37b, 1000 Zagreb, Ured projekta: Radnička.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Region Stavroula Tournaki, Chemical Engineer MSc, ΕU Projects Manager 2 nd SC – Portalegre,
China Nuclear Data Center (CNDC) Progress Report Zhuang Youxiang.
Status of particle_hp Pedro Arce Emilio Mendoza Daniel Cano-Ott (CIEMAT, Madrid)
© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 Compensating Effects due.
1 Sponsorship on Standardisation Gosse van der Veen (Statistics Netherlands) Daniel Defays (Eurostat)
Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe in der Helmholz-Gemeinschaft Karlsruhe Institute of Technology Nuclear Data Library for Advanced Systems – Fusion Devices (FENDL-3)
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe UNECE Transport Division 1 TRANS-EUROPEAN RAILWAY (TER) PROJECT 2 nd Expert Group Meeting (Budapest, 23 September.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TOOLS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCING IRRS EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY Presentation to the Workshop on Lessons Learned.
Current Status of Nuclear Data Processing Activities at KAERI Do Heon KIM Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute Consultants’ Meeting on “The New Evaluated.
Hadronic Validation and Testing Talks Presented  Testing & Improvement of Inelastic Cross Sections  Hadronic Generator Tests for Spallation & Low Energies.
1 st Workshop on issues and trends arising from the European IRRS missions Findings and Conclusions A.Munuera Brussels, 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014.
Interim Alternate Route Adjustment Process Joint Training INTERIM ALTERNATE ROUTE ADJUSTMENT PROCESS Joint Training October 31, 2008 INTERIM ALTERNATE.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency On the Compensating Effects in the Evaluated Cross Sections of 235 U A. Trkov, R. Capote International Atomic Energy.
1 DISCONTOOLS Activities Update Morgane Delavergne – DISCONTOOLS Project Manager 2 nd December 2008 ETPGAH Mirror Groups meeting – Hotel Châtelain, Brussels.
International Atomic Energy Agency October th JTC Meeting1 2.2 Voluntary Contributions from Member States 12th INIS/ETDE Joint Technical Committee.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
International Atomic Energy Agency The Role of the National INIS Centre and the INIS Secretariat INIS Training Seminar November 2011, Vienna, Austria.
Luiz Leal, Wim Haeck, GAIA : Nuclear data processing for transport and criticality safety calculations at IRSN Luiz.
Operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC for NNSA U N C L A S S I F I E D LA-UR-10-draft Slide 1 ENDF/B-VII.0 Data Testing of 233 U/Th ICSBEP Benchmarks.
Benchmarks for Data Testing of Iron China Nuclear Data Center(CNDC) China Institute of Atomic Energy(CIAE) P.O.Box ,Beijing , P.R.China.
Activities Nuclear Data Service Yolanda Rugama OECD/NEA.
Nuclear Data Libraries for Advanced Systems: Fusion Devices FENDL-3 IAEA, Vienna, 2-5 December 2008 A Mengoni IAEA Nuclear Data Section.
MANTRA-2: Proposal for a Second Irradiation Experiment in the ATR G. Youinou, G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores Third Meeting of the Expert Group on Improvement.
1 n_TOF data-analysis workshop CERN, Geneva, February 2015 Roberto Capote, IAEA Nuclear Data Section www-nds.iaea.org NUCLEAR.
National Nuclear Regulatory Portal (NNRP) (Concept, Development and Experience) FNRBA Training Course on Knowledge Safety Networks, 14–18 October 2013,
Plans for Validation and General Observations Mohamed Sawan Fusion Technology Institute The University of Wisconsin-Madison 3 rd RCM on FENDL December.
Update on sensitivity coefficient precise computations E. Ivanov WPEC/Sg. 39 Meeting December 4, , Rue Pierre et Marie Curie, France.
INDONESIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Dr. A. Sarwiyana Sastratenaya Director, Center for.
PCWG 15 th Meeting December 2015 – Kings Langley PCWG 2016 Roadmap: Detailed Survey Results.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency 13th Joint INIS/ETDE Technical Committee Meeting October 2011, Vienna, Austria Dobrica Savić, INIS Unit Head.
Presentation for WPEC/SG39 meeting, 2015 Nov.30 th to Dec. 4 th Paris, France 1/20 A Stress Test on 235 U(n, f) in adjustment with HCI and HMI benchmarks.
1 FRENCH ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISION (CEA) - NUCLEAR ENERGY DIVISION Nuclear Data Needs, SG26, NEA data bank, 3 May 2006CEA/DER Cadarache Centre Gérald Rimpault.
Comparison of deterministic and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis including SAD/SED Ivo Kodeli, SG39 Meeting, NEA, Dec. 4, 2015.
Sustainability of Comenius Networks Comments, Effects, Experiences, Successions Peter Härtel Brussels, 17 th October 2005.
KIT – The cooperation of Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe GmbH and Universität Karlsruhe (TH) Institute for Neutron Physics and Reactor Technology Evaluation.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Region Stavroula Tournaki, Chemical Engineer MSc, ΕU Projects Manager 2 nd SC – Portalegre,
Ciemat Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas D. Cano-Ott, 6 th Geant4 Space Users Workshop Evaluated neutron cross section.
Evaluation Expert Committee 2nd meeting PREPARING for MTE of RDPs: A SURVEY OF THE MEMBER STATES Irina RAMNICEANU Helpdesk Evaluation Manager.
1. Nuclear Data Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
The FAIRMODE ways of communication
Measurement of the fission cross-section of 240Pu and 242Pu at CERN’s n_TOF facility CERN-INTC , INTC-P-280 Spokespersons: M. Calviani (CERN),
Bayesian Monte-Carlo and Experimental Uncertainties
3. The optical model Prof. Dr. A.J. (Arjan) Koning1,2
AMSTRAMGRAM AMélioration de la Section Thermique de capture l’Américium 241 par Mesure intéGRAle dans MINERVE P. Leconte CEA (SPRC/LEPh) A. Gruel, B.
Goals and objectives of Work package 2 of the ESSnet on Consistency of concepts and applied methods of business and trade-related statistics Norbert Rainer,
Improvements of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Simulation System (NFCSS) at IAEA
Criteria for assessing adjustment methodologies
I.Hill, J.Dyrda, N.Soppera, M.Bossant
Electric Vehicles and the Environment (EVE IWG)
Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c
EXP file structure.
The TALYS nuclear model code II
Presentation transcript:

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 1 WPEC/SG39 Short updates on neutron propagation experiments, STEK, CIELO status O.Cabellos NEA Data Bank

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2 ACTION: STEK experiments: Action to be reviewed in future Regarding availability of resources: -NRG activities related to STEK experiment to be clarified/defined in Proposal of transfer STEK models to the SG39 members (TBD) STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 3 STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39 ACTION: Starting from CIELO new files (with uncertainties) attempt new adjustment  Selection of integral experiments (old and new ones)  Use of improved criteria for reliability (as result of methodology studies)  A-posteriori covariance data: proposals on how to use them in evaluation  Need more complete covariance information (e.g. U- 235 data), possibly cross correlations For this point, any future action should be agreed with the CIELO group, in order to check interest and to define a possible schedule. Feedback from CIELO expected.

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 4 Consultant's Meeting on Compensating Effects due to Nuclear Reaction and Material Cross Correlations in Integral Benchmarks. Part of the IAEA activity on the CIELO project (OECD/NEA SG-40). 28 September - 1 October 2015, IAEA, Vienna Objectives  Identify the most common compensating effects in reaction cross sections and cross-material correlations.  Define methodology for selecting a list of benchmarks that can be used to test specific sets of correlations.  Define input files for MCNP for the selected benchmarks. AuthorTitle A. TrkovOn the Compensating Effects in the Evaluated Cross Sections of 235U O. CabellosCompensating Effects due to Nuclear Reaction and Material Cross Correlations D. BernardDecompensating effects in nuclear data integral benchmarking A. KahlerLANL Experience using ICSBEP Benchmarks for Cross Section Data Testing Liu PingBenchmarks for Data Testing of Iron V. PronyaevUncertainties of the Evaluated Nuclear Data and Compensation Effects in the Criticality Go ChibaSensitivity analysis of CIELO test files for fast neutron systems Go ChibaExercise of nuclear data adjustment with fast neutron systems integral data Go ChibaApplication of sub-space method for nuclear data validation STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 5 STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39 Exercise with constraints in nuclear data

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 6 STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39 Change in 235U(n,inel)=MT4: “-9%” in all energy groups)

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 7 STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39 Change in 235U(n,inel)=MT4: “-9%” in all energy groups)

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 8 STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39 Criteria for Clean Experiments (3724 ICSBEP SDFs)  Summing up square sensitivity for isotope and FAST energy range (E> 100 keV):  Ratio of square sensitivity for isotope and energy range: CASES: Pu TOTN_MAT PU-MET-FAST ,910,0299,92 PU-MET-FAST ,790,1499,92 PU-MET-FAST S99,790,1599,92 PU-MET-FAST ,790,1499,92 PU-MET-FAST ,790,1499,92 PU-MET-FAST ,790,1499,92 PU-MET-FAST ,680,27100,02 PU-MET-FAST ,670,2799,92 PU-MET-FAST ,670,2799,92 PU-MET-FAST ,670,2799,92 CASES: U TOTN_MAT HEU-MET-FAST ,610,040,01099,73 HEU-MET-FAST ,610,010,02099,63 HEU-MET-FAST ,60,010,02099,63 HEU-MET-FAST ,60,040,01099,73 HEU-MET-FAST ,590,050,01099,73 HEU-MET-FAST ,590,040,01099,63 HEU-MET-FAST ,580,040,01099,63 HEU-MET-FAST ,580,050,01099,63 HEU-MET-FAST ,580,060,01099,73 HEU-MET-FAST ,580,010,02 99,64 Example: FAST energy range

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 9 STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39 CIELO approach to evaluations To use the best physics, make sure that the models represent the available differential data and use integral data as guidance to set the less-well known parameters, without any attempt to constrain the uncertainties. This is not “fitting” but just an educated guess to prepare a good starting point for a subsequent LSQ analysis, in which the uncertainties will be applied. CIELO is still at the stage of “polishing” the mean values and did not get to the covariances yet. Next meetings planned for 2016: 9-13 May:WPEC /SG40 Meeting Paris, France May:IAEA CM on Current Status and Open Issues in the U-235 Evaluation, Vienna, Austria October: IAEA/TM on Integral Data in Nuclear Data Evaluation 5-9 December: IAEA/TM on CIELO Network

© 2013 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development © 2015 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 10 Provide feedback (including Am-241 issue) to be used in the frame of ND activities towards MA improvement requirements (NSC Expert group). Action: Secretariat to suggest most appropriate form of communication. STEK exp. CIELO files –Selection Bench. –Methodologies –Covariance data –Next Meetings MA improv SG39