MAINE Highway Safety Information System Liaison Meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina September 10 - 11, 2015 Darryl Belz, P.E. Maine Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Worked Example: Highway Safety Modeling. Outline –Safety Modeling »Safety Modeling Process –Set-up for Worked Example –Develop / Build Safety Model »Project.
Advertisements

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
HSM: Celebrating 5 Years Together Brian Ray, PE Casey Bergh, PE.
Company Established in 1969 Infrastructure Information Collection Staff of more than 130 Design and build ARAN ® Largest and longest standing company.
HSM Implementation Tools Safety Analyst
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
Recently Developed Intersection CMFs Nancy Lefler, VHB ATSIP Traffic Records Forum, 2014.
Module 7 Exercise Intersection & Interchange Geometrics (IIG) Innovative Design Considerations for All Users.
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop Exercise IV – US 52 from Sageville to Holy Cross – Group Exercise - Session #8 8-1.
Investigation of the Safety Effects of Edge and Centerline Markings on Narrow, Low-Volume Roads Lance Dougald Ben Cottrell Young-Jun Kweon In-Kyu Lim.
DISTRICT PILOT PROJECT PRESENTATION MAY 2, Highway Safety Manual Implementation.
Overview  Improving highway safety is a priority for all state transportation departments.  Key roadway characteristics can be used to identify sections.
HSM Applications to Two-Lane Rural Highways Predicting Crash Frequency and Applying CMF’s for Two-Lane Rural Highway Intersections - Session #6 6-1.
Enhanced Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges James A. Bonneson August 2012 NCHRP Project
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
Module Use research and appropriate methods for selecting effective countermeasures and targeting diverse cultural and geographic populations. Countermeasure.
Session 10 Training Opportunities Brief Overview of Related Courses in USA / Canada Geni Bahar, P.E. NAVIGATS Inc.
SCOHTS Meeting Robert Pollack - FHWA April 28, 2010.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
Role of SPFs in the Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) Mike Dimaiuta LENDIS Corporation.
Network Screening 1 Module 3 Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho.
Tennessee Roadway Information Management System (TRIMS) Paul Boyd.
Evaluation of Alternative Methods for Identifying High Collision Concentration Locations Raghavan Srinivasan 1 Craig Lyon 2 Bhagwant Persaud 2 Carol Martell.
A Systemic Approach to Safety Management NLTAPA Annual Conference July 30, 2012 Hillary Isebrands, P.E., PhD.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
HSM Use and Training Karen K. Dixon, Ph.D., P.E. Oregon State University.
Role of SPFs in SafetyAnalyst Ray Krammes Federal Highway Administration.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
Applications of Remote Sensing in Transportation.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
NC Local Safety Partnership Selecting Interventions.
The Highway Safety Manual: A New Tool for Safety Analysis John Zegeer, PE Kittelson & Associates, Inc. HSM Production Team Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
MICHIGAN’s INITIATIVES FOR REDUCING HIGHWAY FATALITIES.
Putting Together a Safety Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E.—Traffic Investigations Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Traffic—Roadway Section (Salem,
Evaluation and Redesign of Rojeeb Street. Objectives ▪ Evaluation of existing conditions of Rojeeb Street. ▪ Estimation of future conditions of Rojeeb.
July 29 and 30, 2009 SPF Development in Illinois Yanfeng Ouyang Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM) By Josh Hinds.
Calibrating Highway Safety Manual Equations for Application in Florida Dr. Siva Srinivasan, Phillip Haas, Nagendra Dhakar, and Ryan Hormel (UF) Doug Harwood.
NCHRP Crash Reduction Factors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements UNC HSRC VHB Ryerson University (Bhagwant and Craig)
Fall  Crashes are “independent” and “random” events (probabilistic events)  Estimate a relationship between crashes and covariates (or explanatory.
Highway Safety Analysis: Engineering Kenneth Epstein, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Programs Safety Data and Analysis Tools Workshop.
1 Ian Skinner Crash information Systems Integrating geographical and statistical analysis for maximum benefit.
Impact of Intersection Angle on Safety HSIS Annual Liaison Meeting David Harkey, Bo Lan, Daniel Carter, Raghavan Srinivasan, Anusha Patel Nujjetty May.
Comparative Crash Data Analysis Pasco County, FL US 19 Corridor.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
SUCCESSFUL APPLICATION FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) GRANTS Presented By: Patrick V. DeChellis Deputy Director Los Angeles County Department.
Role of Safety Performance Functions in the Highway Safety Manual July 29, 2009.
6-1 Module 6: Group Activity Wright County Safety Review Identifying Opportunities for Making Roads Safer 6-1.
HSM Applications to Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections Prediction of Crash Frequency for Suburban/Urban Multilane Intersections - Session #9.
1 The Highway Safety Manual Predictive Methods. 2 New Highway Safety Manual of 2010 ►Methodology is like that for assessing and assuring the adequacy.
Exercise I – Prediction of Safety Performance for Rural Multilane Highway and Comparison to Substantive Safety Performance - Session #4 HSM Applications.
Highway Safety Manual (HSM) into Safety Processing
Data and Resources Available for Safety Analysis
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
Highway Safety Team Staff Meeting SMART Portal HSIP Application Demonstration Systemic Safety Improvement (SSI) November 21,2017.
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Safety and Operational Effects of Geometric Design Features for Two-Lane Rural.
Using CMFs in Planning for Virginia’s Project Funding Prioritization
HSM Applications to Multilane Rural Highways and Urban Suburban Streets Prediction of Crash Frequency and CMF’s for Undivided Rural Multilane Highways.
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Transportation Engineering Basic safety methods April 8, 2011
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
HSM Practitioner’s Guider for Two-Lane Rural Highways Workshop
Systematic Identification of High Crash Locations
HSM Applications to Multilane Urban Suburban Multilane Intersections
Clark County, WA Safety Management Program
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Contributing Factors for Focus Crash Types and Facility Types Raghavan Srinivasan University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center (UNC HSRC)
Presentation transcript:

MAINE Highway Safety Information System Liaison Meeting Chapel Hill, North Carolina September , 2015 Darryl Belz, P.E. Maine Department of Transportation

Objective Implementation of the Highway Safety Manual Development of Maine Calibration Factors for the following facility types: Rural two-lane, two-way roads 2-Lane Undivided (R2) 3-Leg Stop Control (R3ST 4-Leg Stop Control (R4ST) 4-Leg Signalized (R4SG) Urban and suburban arterials 2-Lane Undivided (2U) 3-Lane including a TWLTL (3T) 4-Lane Undivided (4U) 4-Lane Divided (4D) 5-Lane including a TWLTL (5T) 3-Leg Stop Control (U3ST) 3-Leg Signalized (U3SG) 4-Leg Stop Control (U4ST) 4-Leg Signalized (U4SG)

Calibration Team Dennis Emidy, P.E. Regional Traffic Engineer, MaineDOT Sarah LeBlanc, E.I. Assistant Engineer, MaineDOT Kara Aguilar, E.I. Assistant Engineer, MaineDOT Greg Costello Senior Technician, MaineDOT Edward Hanscom, P.E. Public Service Mgr II, MaineDOT

The Project Manager, Bullwinkle

5 Maine Conditions

Replace default crash statistics with local values All facilities Crash severity and collision type Ratio of nighttime to total crashes Ratio of driveway-related crashes to total crashes (segments) Urban and suburban facilities Pedestrian adjustment factor Bicycle adjustment factor

What We Did Calibration Factor Calculation Predicted Crash Frequency Calculation Data Collection Site Selection Facility Type Identification

Step 1 - Facility Type Rural two-lane, two-way roads 2-Lane Undivided (R2) 3-Leg Stop Control (R3ST 4-Leg Stop Control (R4ST) 4-Leg Signalized (R4SG) Urban and suburban arterials 2-Lane Undivided (2U) 3-Lane including a TWLTL (3T) 4-Lane Undivided (4U) 4-Lane Divided (4D) 5-Lane including a TWLTL (5T) 3-Leg Stop Control (U3ST) 3-Leg Signalized (U3SG) 4-Leg Stop Control (U4ST) 4-Leg Signalized (U4SG 13 total facility types for calibration

Step 2 – Site Selection 30 to 50 sites 100 crashes per year minimum for each site type Randomly select sites

Step 3 – Obtain Data Obtain crash data Three full calendar years Obtain site characteristics data Appendix Part C, Table A-2 Some default values were used Presence of spiral curves Centerline rumble strips Automated enforcement Intersection red light cameras

Data Needs for Calibration

Data Needs (continued)

Data Sources As-Builts Automatic Road Analyzer (ARAN) MaineDOT databases Route Log Mile Filter Map Viewer Transportation Information for Decision Enhancement (TIDE) Maine Crash Reporting and Analysis for Safer Highways (C.R.A.S.H) Google overhead imagery Google streetview

ARAN Automatic Road Analyzer

ARAN Capabilities Right of Way Video Roughness Pavement Distress Rutting Positioning - GPS Positioning - DMI Texture

Panaramic Photo-Log 640 x x 1080

Custom Angle Photo-Log Right Side View Rear View

Upcoming Automation Roadway geometric data Cross slope Edge of pavement drop-off Horizontal curves Vertical curves Global Positioning System (GPS) coordinates Asset location data to within inches High definition right of way images Three high definition cameras (1920 x 1080 pixel resolution) Single 145 degree image every 4 millimiles (21.12 feet) Vertical clearance measurements

Example Data Collection Results

Step 4 – Calculate the Predicted Crash Frequency Step 1: Predicted crash frequency under base condition Segment: segment length and AADT Intersection: AADT for major and minor roads Step 2: Predicted crash frequency for non-base condition Calculate CMF using roadway characteristics data Step 3: Total crash frequency for the facility type IHSDM Crash Prediction Module was used for rural two- lane, two-way roadways HSM Spreadsheets were used for urban/suburban arterials

Step 5 – Compute Maine Calibration Factor Calculate the SPF Maine calibration factor base on equation A-1 in Appendix A of HSM

Maine Calibration Summary

Maine Specific HSM Spreadsheet Set up for evaluating several alternatives at one intersection Maine-based calibration factors for overall crash rates are included Maine-based crash type and severity information replaces the default values Allowance for up to three additional crash modification factors has been included A crash cost tab has been added to estimate crash costs (and benefits) of intersection alternatives

Maine Specific HSM Spreadsheet Original Spreadsheet developed by: Karen Dixon, Ph.D., P.E. Oregon State University School of Civil & Construction Engineering

28 Maine Specific HSM Spreadsheet Example CMFs: Pavement Markings, Right Turn on Red, Flashing Beacons, Median Width, etc. Worksheet 2B -- Crash Modification Factors for Rural Two-Lane Two-Way Roadway Intersections

Maine Specific HSM Spreadsheet Crash Costs and Benefits of Intersection Alternatives IntersectionIntersection Type Total Crashes per Year Crash Crashes per Year for Compariso n Unit Crash Costs ($)Crash Costs ($) Benefits ($) Alternative3ST (3-leg, 1-stop)ObservedEstimated EstimateTotalFIPDOFIPDOAnnual Pres WorthPresent 4ST (4-leg, 2-stop) PredictedExpectedto (fatal and(property (based onWorth 4SG (4-leg, signal) Compare injury)damage 10 only) years) Baseline/No-Build4ST Expected Alternative 14SG Predicted Alternative 24SG Predicted Alternative 34ST Expected Alternative 44SG Predicted Alternative 54ST Expected Worksheet Source 3A 3B Discount Rate 6% dropdown menu inputsmanual inputs

Local Calibration Case Study HSM with locally calibrated factors on a rural intersection study in South Berwick at State Routes 236 and 91 Five intersection alternative designs were evaluated and compared to the existing or “no-build” option For a comparison, the HSM was also used without the locally calibrated factors 2015 AASHTO Sweet Sixteen High Value Research Project Award

Local Calibration Case Study Proposed Alternatives Alternative 1 Alternative 3 Alternative 2 Alternative 5Alternative 4

Local Calibration Case Study Comparison

Summary Calibration allows for HSM implementation in Maine Calibration factors developed for rural two-lane roadways and urban/suburban arterials (segments and intersections) using state-wide data Significant manual effort involved for some data collection Adapted the HSM spreadsheets for Maine implementation with alternative analysis Case Study shows the benefits of implementing local calibration factors

Future for Calibration in Maine Develop localized calibration factors? 16 counties – probably too much effort and widespread differences 5 MaineDOT regional offices – factors for each regional HSM user 8 geographical regions with varying terrain and weather conditions By County? By Geography? By Region?

Thank You Darryl Belz, P.E. Maine Department of Transportation