IOWA ASSESSMENTS – RED OAK RESULTS JANUARY 2013. THIS IS ALL STUDENTS NOT JUST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR – WHICH IS USED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
North Shelby School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Advertisements

Turning Point Grades Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Burns Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Students with Disabilities in New AYP Targets Reading % 28.4% Math % 11.4% Reading % 30.8% Math % 15.8%
Shelby Intermediate School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Fallston Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Casar Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Union Elementary School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular Assessment.
Kings Mountain Middle School Free/Reduced, AMOs and Percent Proficient data includes Alternate Assessments and Retest One. All EOG Regular.
th Grade Math Placement Placement into Grade 7
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
IUSD English Learner Program October, The English Learner Master Plan is….. A companion piece to the Strategic Plan A description of the procedures,
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
NH Adequate Yearly Progress 2009 Level 0 Below Proficient Level 1a Below Proficient Level 1b Approaching Part. Proficient Level 2a Partially Prof. Level.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Friday, February 7 th 8:30am. Conversation 8:30-9:30 1. Welcome 2. Where is Georgia in comparison to other states? 3. What is making the difference? 4.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
PSSA & Keystone Exams Pa School Performance Profile
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
2011 – 12 AYP & PSSA. AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress Requirement of NCLB (No Child Left Behind) Federal Legislation that will require 100% of students.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Spring 2015 Smarter Balanced (SBA) and Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) update September
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Measuring Teacher Effectiveness Through the Use of Student Data The SLO Process – Part 3 Setting the SLO Achievement.
Red Rock Day School Cove Day School SY Expectations.
A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.
Education & Achievement for Manitowoc County. Manitowoc City Educational Attainment.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Key Stage 3 Information Evening January Changes in colour code progress report Green – progressing ABOVE that expected to achieve target at the.
Will Growth Models Improve School Accountability and NCLB/AYP? Results From New Research Survey and Analysis of Current AYP Growth Proposals Kimberly O'Malley.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
TVAAS Tennessee Value-Added Assessment System
2009 ITBS RESULTS. ITBS Reading Comprehension FAY 2009 Percent Proficient State Performance Targets.
Annual Student Performance Report September
Iowa Assessment Results and Annual Goals.
Clinton County Middle School Winter 2013 MAP Results.
Annual Measurable Objectives (trajectory targets).
Beginning in the school year, the high school Washington Assessment of Student Learning (WASL)
BERTIE COUNTY SCHOOLS STUDENT PERFORMANCE DATA DOCUMENT January, 2014.
Jefferson ITBS – Reading Data Grades 3-5 Multiple Targets ALL LSES SPED %
Thomaston High School 2008 CAPT Report. Math – % at Goal.
RMMS. Commitments All students will have access to high levels of learning All students will be prepared to succeed at WHS.
October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
 Educator Effectiveness System  Comparative Measures  Resource for Professional Development.
3 STUDENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT
Data Riverside Community Schools. Schoolwide Trends Riverside Community Schools.
INDIVIDUAL STUDENT GROWTH IN READING: 1, 1.5, AND 2 OR MORE YEAR’S GROWTH.
You have 10 seconds to name…
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
Update on District and School Accountability Systems 2014 AdvancED Michigan Fall Conference November 7, 2014.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
 Assessment Update February FallWinter 6 th Grade81% (116)78% (131) 7 th Grade91% (119)89% (130) 8 th Grade89% (123)87% (132)
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
STAAR Results.
Cedar Falls Board of Education October 2017
Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?!?!
Mid-year Goals and Data Report
MCAS 2017 Sandwich Public Schools Maureen Wiklund
Flexibility Request Under the Alabama Accountability Act of 2013
College/Career Ready for All
Celebration using Galileo Data
Alaska School Performance Index Annual Measurable Objectives Results
STAR Data Report.
Deeping Deeper into Data and Accountability November 2018
Orange Data Outcomes NJASK and HSPA October 2014.
Dixon Elementary # Dixonscholars
Line Graphs.
Presentation transcript:

IOWA ASSESSMENTS – RED OAK RESULTS JANUARY 2013

THIS IS ALL STUDENTS NOT JUST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR – WHICH IS USED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

DATA FOR THE PREVIOUS GRAPH (APPLES TO ORANGES) Reading Math Science Grade %85%60%79%58%67% 3 70% 78%84%89% 4 70%73%70%87%79%78% 5 61%71%76%81%73%81% 6 44%46%66%62%66%65% 7 51%56%67%72%67%79% 8 64%56%68%69%73%78% 9 88%80% 74%91%79% 10 87% 82%83%88%89% 11 87%86%80%81%87%

A CLOSER LOOK AT READING (APPLES TO APPLES)

A CLOSER LOOK AT MATH (APPLES TO APPLES)

A CLOSER LOOK AT SCIENCE (APPLES TO APPLES)

DATA FOR THE PREVIOUS GRAPHS Reading Math Science Grade % 79% 67% 3 72%70%60%78%58%89% 4 70%73%70%87%84%78% 5 70%71%70%81%79%81% 6 61%46%76%62%73%65% 7 44%56%66%72%66%79% 8 51%56%67%69%67%78% 9 64%80%68%74%73%79% 10 88%87%80%83%91%89% 11 87%86%82%81%88%87%

TARGETS By 2014, all grade levels 100% proficient – if nothing changes at the State Level – no waiver for NCLB This does not show growth – we have made some great gains.

QUESTIONS?