No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

MUIR FUNDAMENTAL SCHOOL May 2012 CST Data Presentation.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Poway Unified Board of Education Academic Performance Index (API) and Annual Yearly Progress (AYP) October 15, 2012.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 6, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report September 20, 2011.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
Assessment & Accountability TEP 128A March 7, 2006.
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
California Standards Test and CAHSEE Correlation Use of Student Data for Targeted Preemptive Intervention November 1, 2006 Dr. Janis Fries-Martinez, Principal.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction The Migrant Education Program State Plan.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.
Arizona’s Federal Accountability System 2011 David McNeil Director of Assessment, Accountability and Research.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 STUDENT PROGRESS AND ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2013 September 10, 2013 HUNTINGTON BEACH CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Academic Achievement Highlights San Francisco Unified School District August 2010.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
Program Improvement/ Title I Parent Involvement Meeting October 9, :00 p.m. Redwood City School District.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
CAHSEE Results Board Report 1 Lodi Unified School District 2009 California High School Exit Examination Results September 15, 2009.
Testing Coordinators: October 4, 2007 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Academic Performance Index (API)
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
Your High School Name 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST Enter School Name Version: Intermediate.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Information About the Accountability Provisions of No Child Left Behind California Department of Education Policy and Evaluation Division July 2003.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Daniel Melendez. School Demographics  Language  English Learners  7% (55 students)  Socio-Economic  35% qualify for free or reduced lunch (276) 
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Sample Elementary School 3-Year Achievement Results Analysis September 2013.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Accountability Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Division of Educational Services August 15, 2014.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
2012 Accountability Progress Report (APR) Office of Accountability October 23, 2012.
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
STAR CST Reports and AYP Predictions
Key Concepts & Questions Adequate Yearly Progress
2009 California Standards Test (CST) Results
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003

2 Adequate Yearly Progress Basics of AYP Components of AYP Reporting Timeline

3 Adequate Yearly Progress The Basics Based on English-language arts (ELA) and mathematics separately All students held to same high academic standards Goal: 100% proficiency by

4 Achievement of ELA and math Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs): percent proficient or above 95% participation rate API for all schools Graduation rate for high schools Adequate Yearly Progress Components

5 AMOs in ELA and Math 95% Participation Rate API Graduation rate AYP

6 Goals & Annual Measurable Objectives Apply to All Schools (including alternative and charter schools) Districts Numerically significant student subgroups within schools and districts (ethnic, socioeconomically disadvantaged, English learners, students with disabilities)

7 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) Elementary and Middle Schools California Standards Tests (CSTs) in ELA and Math California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)

8 Annual Measurable Objectives (AMOs) High Schools Grade 10 California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA)

9 CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB (High Schools Only) English-Language Arts Proficient or above = 387 or above Not Proficient = Below 387 NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.

10 CAHSEE Cut Scores for NCLB (High Schools Only) Math Proficient or above = 373 or above Not Proficient = Below 373 NOTE: Cut scores are independent of the CAHSEE pass score which will remain unchanged.

11 Different AMOs Elementary schools, middle schools, and elementary school districts High schools and high school districts with grades 9-12 Unified districts and high school districts with grades 7 and/or 8 (based on a rounded average of #1 and #2 above)

AMOs for Schools ELAMath Elementary or Middle School 13.6%16.0% High School 11.2%9.6%

AMOs for Districts ELAMath Elementary School District 13.6%16.0% High School District (Grades 9-12) 11.2%9.6% Unified or High School District (Grades 7-12) 12.0%12.8%

14 AMOs English-language arts Elementary and Middle Schools Elementary Districts

15 Participation Rates 95% required on any assessment used for AYP under NCLB. The remaining 5% is the maximum allowable percentage of non-participants, including students who are exempted from testing at parental request.

16 Additional Indicators The API as the “other” indicator for all grades API above the “status bar,” OR Show growth of at least one point Graduation rate an additional indicator for high schools only Demonstrate a one-tenth of a percent increase up to 100%

17 The API ‘Status Bar’

18 Graduation Rate Progress National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES) four-year completion rate. I ncrease of one-tenth of one percent per year until the school reaches 100%

Reporting Timeline 2002 Base AYP Report December 2003 Final AYP Report August 15 July 22 October 2003 Growth API Report 2003 AYP Report September November

AYP Base Report Starting points for each school and district. CDE will post on the Internet on July 22, Districts and schools may determine whether they are at risk for not meeting AYP criteria when the 2003 report is released in August.

AYP Reports CDE will post 2003 AYP reports on the Internet on August 15, Reports will include the “percent proficient” and participation rates based on 2003 testing data. Will be used to identify districts and schools that are not making AYP for 2003.