Adequate Yearly Progress By Allyson, Brette, and Riley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
RATIONALE Why should we raise student achievement? EXTERNAL MANDATES Indiana Public Law 221 Federal No Child Left Behind Act.
Subtitle Title I Federal School Accountability Office of School Improvement and Turnaround Indiana Department of Education March 2012.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I Faculty Presentation (Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation) 1 Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Presenters: Emily & Lily Professor: Dr. James C. Lawlor Date: July 23rd.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
1 Title I Faculty Presentation Department of Federal and State Programs or PX
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
Differentiated Accountability Title I Conference Daytona, Florida April 29, 2009.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
DRAFT, 7/25/ OUSD Board Community Conversations [school] [ date ]
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). About AYP  Initiated by NCLB  Student performance and participation rates on ISTEP+ in English/language arts and mathematics.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Faculty Presentation Faculty Title I and AYP Combined Presentation.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
AYP and Report Card.
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

Adequate Yearly Progress By Allyson, Brette, and Riley

Define AYP Allows the U.S. department of education to determine how every school and corporations in the country is performing academically according to results on standardized tests AYP is a diagnostic tool.

No Child Left Behind Overall student population Each state must establish a timeline for adequate yearly progress. Overall goal by 2014.

Creating the Criteria for AYP Individual States Peer revision Minimum percentage of students that must pass

Indiana’s AYP Requirements Two ways schools and school corporations can make AYP: Meeting all performances, participation, and attendance targets for the overall student population and 30 or more subgroups. Reduce the number of students not meeting performance target and meet attendance rate targets. Consequences for not making AYP: Once the school does not make AYP after two years they enter improvement status. Improvement status consists of a series of interventions that become more extensive for each year that the school does not make AYP.

Performance and Action High performance is required by NCLB. How is it measured? How do schools improve AYP?

Successful Progress State to state basis. Three requirements a year. State education departments must determine the yearly progress of the districts, and find the districts that are in need of improvement.

Unsuccessful Progress When not meeting AYP goals: Improvement status. Supplemental services. Corrective action. After five consecutive years the school has these options: Chartering, reconstitution, contracting, state takeover, or major governance restructuring.

Strategies for Improving Rigorous curriculum Placement of “graduation specialists” in high schools Comprehensive redesign focused in rigorous and relevant education Integrated technology throughout learning Monitoring schools closely and stepping in when needed Flexibility Equal amount of resources Reinforce long term failure is not acceptable

Controversy Special Education The performances of small numbers of students that do not reflect the progress of the whole school. NCLB pays no attention to whether students below average were making strides or those above average.

AYP: Indiana Department of Education School AYP Summary Reports Make AYP easier to understand Created for each corporation/ school Displays the categories in which schools must AYP Colors indicate whether or not each AYP target was met AYP is calculated by performance/participation rates and attendance/graduation rates

School AYP Summary Reports Green- Made AYP Red- Did not make AYP White- NA (Insufficient Number of Students) Schools must meet every AYP target (green) Any red will result in school not making AYP

Check for Understanding Do you agree with No Child Left Behind and Adequate Yearly Progress? What is one corrective action that is taken when a school fails to improve their AYP goals during consecutive years? Does AYP affect all schools and corporations including private, public, and charter schools? Which of the following are strategies for improving AYP?

References U.S. Department of Education Indian Department of Education equate-yearly-progress-ayp Education Commission of the States. (2004) "Indicator 2: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)"