Telescope Access Metrics Presentation to Program Review Panel September 16, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Geometry Section 1.1 Patterns and Inductive Reasoning
Advertisements

Extremely Large Telescopes and Surveys Mark Dickinson, NOAO.
Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Participants Committee Meeting (FCPF PC3) Montreux, Switzerland, June 16-18, 2009 Sources and Uses of Funds in the Readiness.
CUC Oct 2013 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 15 Peer Review  June 2013, Hilton Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 15  13 topical panels,
December 21-22, 2005Subaru Users Meeting, Mitaka Status of Remote Observation / Service Observation Junichi Noumaru Subaru Telescope National Astronomical.
SUGGESTIONS From White Papers received as of 10/06/14.
1 HST Cycle 12 TAC Results Bob Williams TIPS – 17 April 2003.
19 Oct 2005Chandra Users' Committee Cycle 7 Peer Review: June 2005  747 proposals, 12 panels, 101 reviewers  Hilton, Logan Airport.
The AAO: Matthew Colless 17 December 2004.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Apr 2007 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed.
Some thoughts on major challenges ahead for AGIS 27 June 2008 AGIS Collaboration Meeting Rene Ong.
Chandra Users' Committee, 27 April 2010 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 12  CfP Release: Dec  GTO Deadline: 11 March 2010  GO Deadline: 18 March.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 9-10 Apr 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Director's Office Chandra Users’ Committee, Sept 2007 Chandra Cycle 9  661 submitted proposals  *5.5 oversubscribed (based on time)  48 LP, 10.
1/55 EF 507 QUANTITATIVE METHODS FOR ECONOMICS AND FINANCE FALL 2008 Chapter 10 Hypothesis Testing.
Chandra Users’ Committee, 6-7 Apr 2009 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 11  CfP Release: Dec  POG, final A Eff : 15 Jan 2009  GTO: 43 proposals.
Chandra Director’s Office Chandra’s Second Decade  Lifetime: ≥15-20 years (RJB’s presentation)  Is all key Chandra science enabled by current proposal.
Chandra Users’ Committee, Oct 2008 Chandra Director’s Office Chandra Director’s Office Proposal Cycle 10  639 submitted proposals  *5.6 oversubscribed.
Basic Business Statistics, 10e © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Basic Business Statistics.
Technical Performance Measures Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0 SOURCE INFORMATION: The material contained in this lecture was developed.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
Strategies for Optimizing Scientific Productivity for Future Observatories: A “Flat World” for Astronomical Research.
The KPNO 4m “Mayall” Telescope Arjun Dey (NOAO). National Optical Astronomy Observatory Mission: provide the best ground-based astronomical capabilities.
Introduction of Space Technology. The James Webb Space Telescope The James Webb Space Telescope was previously known as the Next Generation Space Telescope.
Kitt Peak National Observatory Status and Plans Richard F. Green Tucson, AZ 23 October, 2003 National Optical Astronomy Observatory.
Keck Observatory and The System: Astro2010 Activities Mike Bolte, Shri Kulkarni, Taft Armandroff Keck Strategic Planning Discussions September 18, 2009.
OIR C OMMITTEE S TATUS R EPORT 2 nd face-to-face meeting Oct , 2014 Beckman Center of the National Academies Irvine, CA.
The evolution of ARC/3.5m Current ARC Partner Institutions University of Washington New Mexico State University Princeton University (until June 2014)
This Week: Testing relationships between two metric variables: Correlation Testing relationships between two nominal variables: Chi-Squared.
Business Statistics, A First Course (4e) © 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Chap 9-1 Chapter 9 Fundamentals of Hypothesis Testing: One-Sample Tests Business Statistics,
OPTICON Access Programme. OPTICON Access Programme. Mid-term review September Corfú OPTICON Trans-national Access Programme under the auspices of.
1 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 11-13, 2012 LSST dark energy science collaboration meeting Penn June 2012 Governance Document.
AAAC Meeting February, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort at a.
SSSC 02/18/2010 P. Marcum Science Utilization Policies SOFIA SCIENCE UTILIZATION POLICIES Pamela M. Marcum SOFIA Project Scientist SSSC Feb 19, 2010.
At A Glance VOLT is a freeware, platform independent tool set that coordinates cross-mission observation planning and scheduling among one or more space.
SSHRC Partnership and Partnership Development Grants Rosemary Ommer 1.
Harvey Tananbaum Director Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 13th HEAD Meeting April 8, 2013 Building International Space.
AAAC Jim Ulvestad February 10, Outline Brief Facility and Science News Budget Outlook & Astro2010 Status Meta-issues 2 02/10/2012.
SAN DIEGO SUPERCOMPUTER CENTER Impact Requirements Analysis Team Co-Chairs: Mark Sheddon (SDSC) Ann Zimmerman (University of Michigan) Members: John Cobb.
Cycle 1 Planning Process B-G Andersson (SOFIA Science Operations Manager) & Ravi Sankrit (User Support Scientist) SSSC, May 11, 2011 Mountain View.
WFMOS Status Report Doug Simons Gemini Observatory January 2008.
AST Supported Programs for Astronomical Instrumentation Division of Astronomical Sciences Program Officers: Andrew Clegg, Jeff Pier, Gary Schmidt.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
1 NOAO – National Optical Astronomy Observatory Overview for the AST Committee of Visitors February 2011 Jeff Pier, Program Officer.
SOFIA 2 nd Generation Instrument Plans & Technology Development Paul Hertz SOFIA Program Scientist & SMD Chief Scientist SOFIA Science Steering Committee.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006 Implications for GSMT.
WFIRST-AFTA Mission Science Alan Dressler, AAS Seattle, January 7, /30/2014WFIRST-AFTA SDT Report 1.
MNRF Management and milestone achievements Chris Evans AAO.
CUC Oct 2012 Chandra Director’s Office Cycle 14 Peer Review   June 2012, Hilton, Logan Airport  No major changes in Cycle 14  13 topical.
What European needs to do to take the lead in Space Astronomy ESO Astronomy Faculty May 2004.
ALTAIR: Access to Large Telescopes for Instruction and Research Chair: Larry Ramsey (14 members, 8.5L, 2S, 3.5U) Report: Submitted Mar 9, 2009
Toward the Senior Review Rob Petre. Senior Review proposal details Due March 12, 2008 Competing against: XMM, INTEGRAL, RXTE, Swift, Galex, WMAP, Spitzer.
7/17/08NASA/USRA Management review- Clocktower TLR - 1 A New SOFIA Science Vision Introduction and Schedule Progress Tom Roellig.
S. Ritz 1 GLAST Science Policy Document Outline Action Item GUC Meeting June 2005 R. Brissenden S. Ritz Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GO Program: Cycle 1 process, results, and Cycle 2 schedule Koji Mukai Astro-E2 Guest Observer Facility.
Bidders Conference PI-SNAP-Ukraine-01 Kyiv, Ukraine _________________________________ February 12, 2015 Matthew Krause Partnership Development Lead Feed.
1 Climate Absolute Radiance and Refractivity Observatory (CLARREO) Welcome David Young Project Scientist CLARREO Mission Formulation Team NASA Langley.
Fermi Science Support Center September 26, 2008 FUG Face-to-Face Meeting Fermi GI Program Update David Band, FSSC CRESST/GSFC/UMBC.
Senior Review of NSF Facilities NOAO Users Committee October 4, 2005.
VLBA Key Science: Making It Happen Bob Dickman AD for New Mexico Operations.
Heliophysics Research Program Arik Posner Heliophysics R&A Lead.
Science Process Skills. What is Science?
Scientific Method Mr. Chon / Science. Introduction Includes purpose Includes purpose What will you learn from this experiment? What will you learn from.
GSMT SWG Meeting November, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort.
Legacy Proposals for GLAST GI Program? (Aug. 04 AI # 11, Josh and Rita) The GI program for GLAST should allow for Legacy Projects defined as: very large.
Telescope Access Metrics
JWST Science Policy & Science Parallels
Letizia Stanghellini NOAO 16 June 2008 – Science with Giant Telescopes
User instrument policy
The Nature of Science What is Science About?.
Presentation transcript:

Telescope Access Metrics Presentation to Program Review Panel September 16, 2004

Ground rules Categorize telescopes as –Large: 6.5m or greater Gemini, others with TSIP (FIP) access –Medium: 3-4.2m Mayall, Blanco, WIYN, SOAR –Small: m KP 2.1m, WIYN 0.9m, SMARTS Count nights available for science for past semesters Extrapolate for future semesters –Gemini ramps up to 60 U.S. nights/telescope/semester Currently averages ~50 –SOAR begins science observations in 2005B and ramps up over 1 year

Precommitments-Surveys Surveys –Note that surveys are subject to the same peer review as regular proposals –20% cap –Proposals only taken once per year –Program started in 1999; none solicited in 2003 or 2004 –Surveys can run up to 5 years –Actual nights committed run 10-20% for both medium and small telescopes –No surveys have been granted on large telescopes

Precommitments - NASA Agreements with HST, Chandra, Spitzer Up to 5% of NOAO time available for complementary (not follow-up) ground-based observations connected with successful proposals Proposals go through NASA peer review and NOAO technical review Actual nights committed typically are 5-15 per semester on all telescopes << 15% maximum

Precommitments – instrument partnerships Aimed at providing new instrumental capabilities on NOAO telescopes for guaranteed time –U Maryland agreement: 20% of Mayall time Exchangable for WIYN or 2.1m U. Md contribution (cash plus manpower) for NEWFIRM –Flamingos: base (4m: 3n, 2.1m: 5n) plus 4-6n for every 14 nights (after first 14) allocated to community –GSFC IRMOS: draft MOU – 4-5 n per semester on 4m, 8-10 n per semester on 2.1m, –Ge Exoplanet Tracker: draft MOU – 21 n per semester on 2.1m All “guaranteed time proposals” go through TAC –If they do not succeed (which is rare), they are deferred to a later semester so the proposal can be improved

Current tally Large-total Precommit remaining Medium-total Precommit remaining Small-total Precommit remaining

Reasonable predictions TSIP will continue to add large telescope- nights per year TSIP will also add medium telescope-nights per year The survey program will resume in 2005, leading to a future level of precommitment about the same as the past The NASA precommitments will continue at a level of a few nights per semester PREST will add approximately 200 nights of small telescope time per year

Tally with reasonable predictions Large-total Precommit remaining Medium-total Precommit remaining Small-total Precommit remaining

Nights remaining with predictions

Oversubscription rates Nights requested divided by nights available after precommitment Even with devolution of small telescopes, access is reasonable Survey proposals (not included in graph) run for medium telescopes; for small telescopes

Conclusions All oversubscription rates are in healthy range – and increase with increasing aperture Status quo results in reasonable access TSIP and PREST are expected to improve the situation – particularly for medium and small telescopes –Large telescope access is limited by willingness of independent observatories to give up more nights (TSIP) and by our fraction of Gemini.