NON-WIGGLER-AVERAGED START-TO-END SIMULATIONS OF HIGH-GAIN FREE- ELECTRON LASERS H.P. Freund Science Applications International Corp. McLean, Virginia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Adnan Doyuran a, Joel England a, Chan Joshi b, Pietro Musumeci a, James Rosenzweig a, Sergei Tochitsky b, Gil Travish a, Oliver Williams a a UCLA/Particle.
Advertisements

1 Optimal focusing lattice for XFEL undulators: Numerical simulations Vitali Khachatryan, Artur Tarloyan CANDLE, DESY/MPY
1 Bates XFEL Linac and Bunch Compressor Dynamics 1. Linac Layout and General Beam Parameter 2. Bunch Compressor –System Details (RF, Magnet Chicane) –Linear.
Representation of synchrotron radiation in phase space Ivan Bazarov 1.
2004 CLEO/IQEC, San Francisco, May Optical properties of the output of a high-gain, self-amplified free- electron laser Yuelin Li Advanced Photon.
Stephen Benson U.S. Particle Accelerator School January 17, 2011 The FEL as a Diagnostic* * This work was supported by U.S. DOE Contract No. DE-AC05-84-ER40150,
Performance Analysis Using Genesis 1.3 Sven Reiche LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop Argonne National Laboratory 10/24/03.
Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation 11 December 2006 CLASSE 1 Focusing and Bending Wilson Lab Tour Guide Orientation M. Forster Mike Forster 11 December.
GINGER Results for the NEW LCLS Undulator Configuration William M. Fawley Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Presented to LCLS Undulator Parameter Workshop.
Overview of Proposed Parameter Changes Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator.
Undulator Specifications Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Modelling shot noise and coherent spontaneous emission in the FEL Brian McNeil*, Mike Poole & Gordon Robb* CCLRC Daresbury Laboratory, UK *Department.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
FEL simulation code FAST Free-Electron Laser at the TESLA Test Facility Generic name FAST stands for a set of codes for ``full physics'' analysis of FEL.
The impact of undulators in an ERL Jim Clarke ASTeC, STFC Daresbury Laboratory FLS 2012, March 2012.
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
A. Doyuran, L. DiMauro, W. Graves, R. Heese, E. D. Johnson, S. Krinsky, H. Loos, J.B. Murphy, G. Rakowsky, J. Rose, T. Shaftan, B. Sheehy, Y. Shen, J.
R&D Towards X-ray Free Electron Laser Li Hua Yu Brookhaven National Laboratory 1/23/2004.
S2E in LCLS Linac M. Borland, Lyncean Technologies, P. Emma, C. Limborg, SLAC.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
Two Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifiers and a Poisson Solver for Periodic Micro Structures Longitudinal Space Charge Amplifier 1: Longitudinal Space Charge.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
Optimization of Compact X-ray Free-electron Lasers Sven Reiche May 27 th 2011.
Optics considerations for ERL test facilities Bruno Muratori ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory (M. Bowler, C. Gerth, F. Hannon, H. Owen, B. Shepherd, S. Smith,
J. Wu In collaboration with Y. Jiao, W.M. Fawley, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H.-D. Nuhn, C. Pellegrini, S. Reiche (PSI), Y. Cai, A.W. Chao, Y. Ding, X. Huang,
Nonlinear Dynamic Study of FCC-ee Pavel Piminov, Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics, Novosibirsk, Russia.
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
X-Ray FEL Simulation: Beam Modeling William M. Fawley Center For Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory ICFA 2003 Workshop.
External Seeding Approaches: S2E studies for LCLS-II Gregg Penn, LBNL CBP Erik Hemsing, SLAC August 7, 2014.
Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee MeetingLCLS February 26, 2001 J. Hastings Brookhaven National Laboratory LCLS Scientific Program X-Ray Laser Physics:
GWENAEL FUBIANI L’OASIS GROUP, LBNL 6D Space charge estimates for dense electron bunches in vacuum W.P. LEEMANS, E. ESAREY, B.A. SHADWICK, J. QIANG, G.
By Verena Kain CERN BE-OP. In the next three lectures we will have a look at the different components of a synchrotron. Today: Controlling particle trajectories.
Design Considerations of table-top FELs laser-plasma accelerators principal possibility of table-top FELs possible VUV and X-ray scenarios new experimental.
Transverse Gradient Undulator and its applications to Plasma-Accelerator Based FELs Zhirong Huang (SLAC) Introduction TGU concept, theory, technology Soft.
ERHIC Orbit Correction Studies (Minor Update) Using Oct’14 lattice and dispersion diagnostic January 5, 2015Stephen Brooks, eRHIC FFAG meeting1.
FEL Simulations: Undulator Modeling Sven Reiche Start-end Workshop DESY-Zeuthen 08/20/03.
J. Wu March 06, 2012 ICFA-FLS 2012 Workshop Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA Tolerances for Seeded Free Electron Lasers FEL and Beam Phys. Dept. (ARD/SLAC),
Vacuum specifications in Linacs J-B. Jeanneret, G. Rumolo, D. Schulte in CLIC Workshop 09, 15 October 2009 Fast Ion Instability in Linacs and the simulation.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
J. Corlett. June 16, 2006 A Future Light Source for LBNL Facility Vision and R&D plan John Corlett ALS Scientific Advisory Committee Meeting June 16, 2006.
1 Tracking study of muon acceleration with FFAGs S. Machida RAL/ASTeC 6 December, ffag/machida_ ppt.
E. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov FEL Seminar, DESY April 26, 2016 Reverse undulator tapering for polarization control at X-ray FELs.
Simulations of X-ray production for different undulator options 19 th of March 2015 Juergen Pfingstner.
Numerical Simulations for IOTA Dmitry Shatilov BINP & FNAL IOTA Meeting, FNAL, 23 February 2012.
8 th February 2006 Freddy Poirier ILC-LET workshop 1 Freddy Poirier DESY ILC-LET Workshop Dispersion Free Steering in the ILC using MERLIN.
Production of coherent X-rays with a free electron laser based on optical wiggler A.Bacci, M.Ferrario*, C. Maroli, V.Petrillo, L.Serafini Università e.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
LCLS-II options: CuRF → SXR, VPU, HXR harmonics G. Marcus 5/13/2015.
SIMULATION FOR TW LCLS-II Tor’s question on the undulator length in the TW FEL senario SASE FEL undulator length 9, 10, and 11:  9 – m, 10.
A. Aksoy Beam Dynamics Studies for the CLIC Drive Beam Accelerator A. AKSOY CONTENS ● Basic Lattice Sketches ● Accelerating structure ● Short and long.
Seeding in the presence of microbunching
EUPRAXIA-PISA JUNE 2016 e-Beam-Laser
Slice Parameter Measurements at the SwissFEL Injector Test Facility
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Sven Reiche UCLA ICFA-Workshop - Sardinia 07/02
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
Limitations of Electron Beam Conditioning in Free-Electron Lasers
Review of Application to SASE-FELs
THE MINERVA FEL SIMULATION CODE
Z. Huang LCLS Lehman Review May 14, 2009
Two-bunch self-seeding for narrow-bandwidth hard x-ray FELs
MEBT1&2 design study for C-ADS
Status of FEL Physics Research Worldwide  Claudio Pellegrini, UCLA April 23, 2002 Review of Basic FEL physical properties and definition of important.
Gain Computation Sven Reiche, UCLA April 24, 2002
LCLS FEL Parameters Heinz-Dieter Nuhn, SLAC / SSRL April 23, 2002
Vitali Khachatryan, Arthur Tarloyan, Vahe Sahakyan, V. Tsakanov
Presentation transcript:

NON-WIGGLER-AVERAGED START-TO-END SIMULATIONS OF HIGH-GAIN FREE- ELECTRON LASERS H.P. Freund Science Applications International Corp. McLean, Virginia 22102, USA Presented at the ICFA Future Light Sources Sub-Panel Mini Workshop on: Start-to-End Simulations of X-Ray FELs August 2002 at DESY-Zeuthen

COLLABORATORS R. BartoliniENEA-Frascati S.G. BiedronMAX Lab G. DattoliENEA-Frascati L. GianessiENEA-Frascati S.V. MiltonAPS/ANL H.-D. NuhnSLAC P.L. OttavianiENEA-Bologna A.RenieriENEA-Frascati etc.

SIMULATION CODE: MEDUSA MEDUSA is the only 3-D FEL simulation code that does not employ wiggler-averaging. It has the following properties: The E & M field is a superposition of Gaussian modes Polychromatic  harmonics & sidebands. Arbitrary wiggler geometry planar, helical, field map 3-D Lorentz force equations without wiggler average step size must resolve wiggle-motion includes entry & exit tapers Arbitrary focusing fields quadrupoles, dipoles, field map Field propagation code without particles Particle tracking code without fields

PREVIOUS BENCHMARKS – HGHG EXPERIMENT Simulations of the experiment using MEDUSA showed good agreement for the fundamental power (28 MW). Harmonic HGHG MEDUSA   4   4     2   2 P harmonic /P fundamental Among the benchmarks made has been the HGHG experiment at BNL: S.G. Biedron, H.P. Freund, S.V. Milton, L.H. Yu, and X.J. Wang, NIMA 475, 118 (2001). HARMONICS FUNDAMENTAL

SIMULATION OF THE SPARC UNDULATOR LINE Wiggler: Amplitude: 6.12 kG Period: 3.3 cm Length: 76 w Transitions: 3 w Quadrupoles (not FODO): Gradient: 0.25 kG/cm Length: m Electron Beam: Energy: 150 MeV Current: 150 A Emittance: 2 mm-mrad Energy Spread: 0.1% The SPARC undulator line has been studied previously, and we begin with a summary of the results. The entry & exit tapers in the wiggler segments were chosen to be 3 periods in length. This is because  B w  0 in the analytic field representation. A realistic model (field map or off- axis expansion) would cure this issue.

MAGNETIC TRANSPORT LINE The Twiss parameters for the initial beam have not yet been fully implemented in MEDUSA, so we start the undulator/focusing line with a half-quad. LQLQ LdLd LdLd L gap wiggler L gap = 2L d + L Q The wigglers (green) include 3 period entry & exit tapers. The quadrupoles (blue) are centered in the gaps, and alternate between focusing in the x- (wiggle-plane) and y-directions to compose a FODO lattice. L Q 2 LdLd

SPARC – VARIATION WITH GAP LENGTH In order to obtain a phase match between the light and electrons propagating through the gaps, the phase slippage between the light and the electrons must be an integer number of wavelengths. This means that L gap = N w (1 + K 2 /2) For the case of the SPARC design, this gives a periodicity of about m. This is seen in simulation. The transition region can be abrupt, and care must be taken in the design.

At the SPARC design point (L d = m), we see saturation after about 15 m at about 62 MW. Mode expansion is rapid in the last segment. The resonant wavelength is nm SPARC – POWER AND MODE EVOLUTION The beam propagation is regular. The quads are chosen to give focusing in the wiggle-plane.

EVOLUTION OF TRANSVERSE MODE IN SPARC

SIMULATION OF HARMONICS in SPARC Harmonic growth lengths scale inversely with the harmonic number. Transverse coherence of harmonics is also included in simulation.

START-TO-END SIMULATION OF THE LCLS These are preliminary simulations of the LCLS transport line. Need to fully implement the Twiss parameters for beam initialization for more complete simulation. Wiggler: Amplitude: kG Period: 3.0 cm Length: 118 w Transitions: 3 w Quadrupoles (FODO): Gradient: 10.8 kG/cm Length: 0.05 m Electron Beam: Energy: GeV Current: 3272 A x-Emittance: mm-mrad y-Emittance: mm-mrad Energy Spread:  10  5 The Twiss parameters are needed to get better match to the beta functions of the transport line. Right now the beam dimensions are chosen using the beta function of the first wiggler.

SIMULATED BEAM PROPERTIES FOR THE LCLS LCLS Simulations of the LCLS beam yield the following slice parameters. Note that the Twiss parameters have not yet been incorporated into MEDUSA.

LCLS – VARIATION WITH GAP LENGTH For the LCLS w (1 + K 2 /2)  0.24 m and this periodicity is reproduced in simulation. Actual gap length for good performance needs to take wiggler entries/exits into account. “Dead-Man’s Gulch”

ELECTRON BEAM AND OPTICAL EVOLUTION Optical guiding depends on beam scalloping which is large for the assumed initial beam conditions. Need to implement Twiss parameters to get initial beam dimensions correct. Actual beam dimensions from the LCLS website give initial x- and y-dimensions of about cm. MEDUSA chooses beam dimensions for a matched beam using the beta function of the 1 st wiggler.

SINGLE-WIGGLER-PERIOD ENTRY/EXIT TAPERS We can estimate the effect of gap spacing using entry/exit transitions of one wiggler period. zero energy spread. LCLS design point is close to the edge of Dead-Man’s Gulch. An example of the beam motion upon exit from one wiggler, propagation through the gap, and entry into the next wiggler by means of the beam centroid in the wiggler-plane is shown at left.

MATCHED BEAM IN LCLS WIGGLER/FODO LINE Limited use of Twiss parameters: x rms & y rms  functions  x =  y = 0 Much more uniform beam envelope Much more regular exponentiation Dead-Man’s Gulch shifts position

PHASE ADVANCE WAVELENGTH DEPENDENCE SASE produces a spectral width comparable to the FEL gain bandwidth. The phase advance in the gaps vary with wavelength as well as with the length of the wiggler transitions. There is a large sensitivity of the phase match for a given gap spacing for wavelengths in the LCLS gain band. This can be a source for spectral narrowing. Must be careful in designing the undulator line which has varying gap lengths not to have destructive interference between gaps.

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS There seems to be more than adequate gain to saturate the LCLS undulator line if this initial beam can be achieved. Caution needed because the optical mode expands rapidly after saturation. The actual gap length between the wigglers needed to achieve peak performance and avoid “Dead-Man’s Gulch” depends on the length of the wiggler transitions. MEDUSA can accept a field map including all magnetic elements so that the transitions can be accurately modeled. Extreme caution required in choice of L gap. Need to run with multi-wavelengths. Harmonics have not yet been studied for the LCLS.