ATS capacity and efficiency improvements by HungaroControl Air Navigation Service Provider Vilmos SOMOSI FAB Coordinator, ATM expert INAIR2015 Amsterdam

1.Introduction2.KOSOVO project3.HUFRA project

1.Introduction3.HUFRA project

Average annual flight growth Source: EUROCONTROL Seven year forecast September2015 (Edition:15/09/ p4)

1.Introduction3.HUFRA project2.KOSOVO project

KOSOVO upper airspace re-opening project April 2014

HungaroControl Contribution Background 2,5 years from concept to the airspace re-opening multi-stakeholder & multi-layer progress Since 2003: NATO efforts 2011 Summer: NATO invitation 2011 Autumn: HU intent2011 Winter: BANM 2012 Apr: NAC decision 2012 Feb: Government decision on participation 2013 July: IA signature 2013 Jun: Government decision on Implementing Agreement (IA) 2014 Apr: Certification 2014 Mar: flight calibration 2014 Jan: LOAs 2013 Winter: Real Time Simulation (CRDS) 2013 Autumn: Thales-Frequentis contracts 2011 Concept Formulation HU - KFOR Agreement Concept development & Stakeholder engagement HCL project Support of legislation & IA development Contracts & Technical implementation 2013 Dec: legislative package

Government Authorities Hungary and HungaroControl NATO IS KFOR ECTL ICAO EU IATA International organizations SMATSA M-NAV AlbControl PIA BHANSA BULATSA Regional contracting partners Regional governments, CAAs HungaroControl and its partners Cooperation and partnership

Technical solutions HungaroControl is not CNS Provider Data & services are provided by regional partners KFOR JOC Hotline telefon Pristina GTS telephone Tirana 1 ATS Q-sig. 1 MFC GTS Datenet Magyar Telekom secured & duplicated lines Belgrade Gradishte ONE + Slovenia Tel. OLDI 1 MFC 1 ATS Q-sig. Murtenica Koviona (Mode-S) SRB Vitosha BG Magyar Telekom Jahorina (Mode-S) BiH Magyar Telekom OLDI 2 MFC Ohrid MD GTS Datanet Skopje ONE telekom secured line Kopaonik

Statistics & Summary Monthly growth of traffic Slow start Capacity adjustments One sector operations No significant technological or operative obstacles Traffic evolves continuously Raising awareness is still required Further utilization of capacities expected Weekly fluctuations Weekend peaks Traffic is still below pre-calculated expectations (EUROCONTROL) Summer peak: flights/day

11 1.Introduction3.HUFRA project

12 HUFRA project Feb 2015

Source of analysis

Entire Budapest FIR except TMAs All routes are deleted at all levels, only NAV points remained Free route planning with conditions  No re-entry  3 NM buffer from FIR boundary  RAD /suspended during night/ Tactical management of TRA-s, floating points, granted paths by military Airspace validity: AoR Plannable direct routes Tactical management for optimized utilization No IFPS checking against TRAs required TRA claim: 2 hours before operation AIP: 5-10 NM extra flight possible during TRA operation time AMC operation remains the same (CRAM) Granted paths for Budapest arrivals System support:  TRA penetration warning at FPL level  Area Proximity Warning Airspace management

DEMOP 6 vs13 PRE POST 1 2 3/1 4/2 5/

TRA MANEGEMENT with Tactical radar vectoring ASM on tactical level (national dimension)

TRA management (regional dimension)

Further steps FAB CE FRA Syncronised national implementations FRA Feasibility Study FAB CE wide implementation Cross-border FRA N-FRAB Night Free Route Airspace Budapest/Bucharest

19 Straight to the point Thank you for your attention!