Current estimation of the background level Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration 1.Overview/Motivation 2.4  data analysis 3.2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Barbara Sciascia – LNF 1 K  semileptonic BR measurement B. Sciascia 4 may 2006 KpmKSL joint meeting.
INTRODUCTION TO e/ ɣ IN ATLAS In order to acquire the full physics potential of the LHC, the ATLAS electromagnetic calorimeter must be able to identify.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
Reconstruction neutral decay modes (E391) Doroshenko M.(KEK) E391 collaboration Outlines: Data summary Analysis strategy Reconstruction K3p,K2p,Kgg decays.
03 Aug NP041 KOPIO Experiment Measurement of K L    Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO collaborations Contents Physics Motivation.
09/30/'06SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.
10/03/'06 SPIN2006, T. Horaguchi 1 Measurement of the direct photon production in polarized proton-proton collisions at  s= 200GeV with PHENIX CNS, University.
August 12, 2000DPF Search for B +  K + l + l - and B 0  K* 0 l + l - Theoretical predictions and experimental status Analysis methods Signal.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
1 Measurement of f D + via D +   + Sheldon Stone, Syracuse University  D o D o, D o  K -  + K-K- K+K+ ++  K-K- K+K+ “I charm you, by my once-commended.
June 2000K_L Reconstruction1 B  J/  K L Reconstruction Beyond e + e - Workshop The Homestead Glen Arbor, MI Daniel Marlow BELLE Princeton University.
16 April 2005 APS 2005 Search for exclusive two body decays of B→D s * h at Belle Luminda Kulasiri University of Cincinnati Outline Motivation Results.
Takeo Higuchi Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, KEK Jan 21, 2004 Hawaii, USA Super B Factory Workshop Charged Higgs Search with B  D   
MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.
Measurement of B (D + →μ + ν μ ) and the Pseudoscalar Decay Constant f D at CLEO István Dankó Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute representing the CLEO Collaboration.
1 K L →π 0 νν 探索実験 KEK-PS E391a における Run3 データ解析の現状 JPS 2008 Spring Meeting Hideki MORII (Kyoto Univ.)
Outline: (1) The data sample (2) Some news on the analysis method (3) Efficiency revised (4) Background revised (5) Data: spectrum + “phi-curve”
Crossed Channel Compton Scattering Michael Düren and George Serbanut, II. Phys. Institut, - some remarks on cross sections and background processes  
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Large Magnetic Calorimeters Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) in a Nufact Nufact04 (Osaka, 1/8/2004)
Status of E391a Search for K L    decay G.Y.Lim IPNS, 32nd ICHEP 19 th August 2004 Beijing.
Kinematics of  + n   p   0  p reaction Susumu Oda 2007/04/10-19.
Search for K L →π 0 νν Takao Shinkawa National Defense Academy Particle Physics August 7, 2008.
New Developments of Flavor Physics Kyoto University H. Nanjo for E391a and K O TO collaboration.
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
Status of E391a G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. K L    decay Experimental difficulties  Tiny branching fraction Great number of K L decays  Weak Kinematical constaints.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.
Experimental Search for the Decay K. Mizouchi (Kyoto University) (1) Physics Motivation (2) Detector (3) Selection Criteria (4) Branching Ratio (5) Background.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
Preliminary results for the BR(K S  M. Martini and S. Miscetti.
Sabino Meola Kloe meeting 10 March 2005 Status of analysis.
Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia K  semileptonic decays Charged Kaon Meeting July, 29 th - LNF Single photon efficiency in KPM events.
2° ILD Workshop Cambridge 11-14/09/08 The sensitivity of the International Linear Collider to the     in the di-muon final state Nicola D’Ascenzo University.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
6-8 March, 2006T. Workshop on "Mass Origin and Supersymmetry Physics"1 Development of an Aerogel-based Photon Detector T. Nomura (Kyoto Univ.)
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Fiber target simulation for S-2S experiment Toshiyuki Gogami 2015/10/15.
Status of E14 G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK. E14 Experiment Step-by-step approach to precise measurement of Br( K L    ) KEK-PS E391a J-PARC E14 (Step-1) J-PARC.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
May 26-27, 2005Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy1 KOPIO Beam Catcher Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U.) Contents –What is Beam Catcher? –Concept.
Villa Olmo, Como October 2001F.Giordano1 SiTRD R & D The Silicon-TRD: Beam Test Results M.Brigida a, C.Favuzzi a, P.Fusco a, F.Gargano a, N.Giglietto.
Current Status of E14 Experiment at J-PARC 정명신, 김용주 1, 우종관 1, 고재우 1, 임계엽 2, 김은주 3, 안정근 4, 이효상 5 한양대학교, 1 제주대학교, 2 KEK, 3 전북대학교, 4 부산대학교, 5 서울대학교.
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
LKr inefficiency measurement
Kyoto University H. Nanjo
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
Jin Huang Los Alamos National Lab
Matteo Negrini Università degli Studi di Ferrara - INFN
 Results from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector
Tadashi Nomura (Kyoto U), KRare05 at Frascati, Italy
The KL reconstruction for the Belle experiment at KEK B-factory
Background understanding and detector inefficiency
Background rejection in P326 (NA48/3)
Charged Current Cross Sections with polarised lepton beam at ZEUS
KEK-PS E391a Run3データを用いたKL→π0νν解析の現状
Experimental Search for the Decay
Experimental Search for the Decay
Understanding of the E391a Detector using KL decay
COMPTON SCATTERING IN FORWARD DIRECTION
Presentation transcript:

Current estimation of the background level Ken Sakashita ( Osaka University ) for the E391a collaboration 1.Overview/Motivation 2.4  data analysis 3.2  data analysis 4.Conclusion

Overview K L   0 decay (BR SM ~ 3x ) –2  + nothing –Require high Pt of  0 Expected Background –K L  2  0 decay ( BR ~ ), 2  missing –Neutron interaction ( n+(material)   0 + …) Key points –How to detect extra photon with high effeciency Hermetic photon veto –How to reduce neutron interaction High vacuum system (10 -5 Pa) Clean pencil beam

Motivation Study of the performance of the  vetoes –Use 4  data –Background(K L  3  0, 2  missing) + Signal(K L  2  0 ) –photon rejection by each vetoes Study of 2  data –Study of the background by using 1-day data sample –Understand events lies in the outside region

Motivation   KLKL MB photon veto   KLKL     KLKL     KLKL     A)K L   0 B)K L  2  0, 2  missing C)K L  2  0 D)K L  3  0, 2  missing CsI calorimeter

4  analysis Reconstruction of 4  data –# of reconstructed  -cluster : exactly equal to 4 (E >= 13MeV) –No other cluster ( thr. = 5 MeV) –  0 reconstruction (assume M  0  vertex Z) –Best chi2 –Kinematics cut Chi2 < 2 Pt 2 < 1x10 -3 (GeV/c) 2 Beam size < 5cm 11 22 33 44 z1z1 z2z2 2  0 momentum beam direction Pt

4  analysis M 4  plot after kinematics cut(w/o photon veto) M 4  ~ M KL Signal(K L  2  0 ) M 4  < M KL Bkg(K L  3  0 ) Estimation S/N - fitting w/ G+p1 Data

Study of  vetoes Performance of MainBarrel photon veto –Simple cut (E dep < Threshold), no timing information R(N sig ) S/N Acceptance loss (no timing info.) Factor ~3 improvement

4  analysis Apply MB veto + other photon vetoes Final M 4  plot –K L  3  0 Contamination ~ 4.7% Data

Consideration on 4  data Remaining Background –K L  3  0 + Fusion –Result of the Monte Carlo simulation of K L  3  0 Performance of the photon vetoes –M 4  plot shows current veto performance –However, we need more detail study to estimate the background level –Study of fusion also necessary Data K L  3  0 MC before vetoes after vetoes  

2  analysis Apply the photon vetoes E  > 200MeV Zvtx distribution, Acoplanarity angle distribution Beam direction 11 22 

Neutron Monte Carlo Assume a core neutron hits a material at the Zvtx = 550 cm –Membrane in front of the Charged veto counter Halo neutron –Single neutron hits CsI and make 2 associated cluster 1g/cm3 0.2mm-thick n n CsI Hadronic shower  2 clusters CsI CV

Neutron MC w/ lose vetoes –Halo n MC well agree with data –Assume the factor 0.22 (material), core n MC also agree with data Halo n MC Core n MC (in right plot : w/ factor 0.22) data Data/MC Neutron Monte Carlo

2  analysis  selection –A kind of cluster shape cut ( ) –Distance between 2  -clusters Signal MC Halo n MC Signal MC R  > 0.9 D > 40 cm

2  analysis applying photon vetoes  selection w/o acoplanarity angle cut

2  analysis Background study (MonteCarlo simulation) High statistics for K L  2  0 and K L   decays Small statistics for other decays and neutron MC Core neutron’s events located in the z=550cm

Summary Study of 4  data –Good performance of the photon vetoes –Need more detail study of the photon vetoes Use timing information / Estimate accidental loss –K L  3  0 contamination ~ 4.7% –In order to estimate the background level, we need more detail study of 4  data Current status of 2  analysis –Events in the side band region Single halo neutron hits in the CsI  2 associated cluster Core neutron makes events at the Zvtx=550 cm –We need shape study in order to separate n/  –We need more statistics of Monte Carlo simulation

Backup slides

Vacuum system Differential pumping system Region-1 : < 0.1Pa Region-2 : ~ Pa Separated by thin membrane

2  analysis  selection (Data) –Distance between 2 clusters –R  Data R  > 0.9 D > 40 cm Data

Neutron Monte Carlo Momentum distribution from GEANT simulation Core neutronHalo neutron Pb abs. C1 C2C3 C4 C5 C6

4  analysis Best chi2 Kinematics –Pt 2, Beam size chi2 < 2 R beam < 5 cm Pt 2 <1 x  data

Study  vetoes(4  data) Other vetoes –Typically 1 MeV E dep cut (w/o timing information) R(N sig )S/N