PATRICK SEJKORA NOVEMBER 17, 2009 GIS IN WATER RESOURCES Yellowstone Fires and Their Hydrologic Effects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHARACTERISTICS OF RUNOFF
Advertisements

DETERMINING LAND DEVELOPMENT EFFECT ON SURFACE RUNOFF USING GIS.
LTHIA – Upgrades and Training Bernard A. Engel Tong Zhai Larry Theller Agricultural and Biological Department Purdue University In conjunction.
Engineering Hydrology Discussion Ch. #1
Standard watershed and stream delineation recipe - Vector stream (ex. NHD data) fusion into DEM raster (burning in) - Sink removal - Flow direction - Flow.
Hydrologic Cycle and Watersheds. Hydrologic Cycle Components Precipitation Infiltration Percolation Runoff Evapotranspiration.
GIS Applications in Meteorology and Hydrology John S. Quinlan NWS Albany, NY.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
Application of Stage IV Precipitation Data to Estimate Spatially Variable Recharge for a Groundwater Flow Model Heather Moser Mentor: Dr. William Simpkins.
Jefferson High School Compton Creek Research Project UCLA and Los Angeles Waterkeeper Funded by the Environmental Protection Agency.
BACTERIAL CONCENTRATIONS IN BULL CREEK AUSTIN, TEXAS Patrick Sejkora.
Tropical Storm Allison & its impact on Harris County
Use of GIS in Determination of the Probable Maximum Flood at Nuclear Plant Sites Presented by: Monica Anderson, GISP Tennessee Valley Authority Carrie.
“Flood monitoring and mapping for Emergency Response in San Antonio-Texas” Part I by Silvana Alcoz Source photo Term.
FNR 402 – Forest Watershed Management
Hydrologic Cycle. Hydrologic Cycle Processes Surface Water Soil water Atmospheric water Groundwater Processes Precipitation Evaporation Surface Runoff.
Digital Elevation Model Based Watershed and Stream Network Delineation Understanding How to use Reading
ArcHydro – Two Components Hydrologic  Data Model  Toolset Credit – David R. Maidment University of Texas at Austin.
Hydrology of the Snake River in Hells Canyon Wil Sarchet GIS in Water Resources.
Development and Land Use Change: Central Potomac River Watershed
Patapsco/Back River SWMM Model Part I - Hydrology Maryland Department of the Environment.
Watershed delineation and data preparation for groundwater modeling using GIS in the Savannah River Site GIS term project presentation November 25, 2003.
CE 424 HYDROLOGY 1 Instructor: Dr. Saleh A. AlHassoun.
Assessment of Economic Benefits of the North Carolina Floodplain Mapping Program Hydrologic and Hydraulic Case Studies Adapted from a Presentation to NRC.
Watershed Modeling using HEC-HMS and EPA-SWMM ©T. G. Cleveland, Ph.D., P.E. 10 July 2012 Lesson 2.
DIGITAL ELEVATION MODELING GEOG 421: DR. SHUNFU HU, SIUE Project One Steve Klaas Fall 2013.
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
North Turkey Creek Watershed. Watershed (Drainage Basin) The area of land that is drained by a river and its tributaries. Surrounded by higher terrain.
CEE 795 Water Resources Modeling and GIS Learning Objectives: Demonstrate the concepts of spatial fields as a way to represent geographical information.
A Soil-water Balance and Continuous Streamflow Simulation Model that Uses Spatial Data from a Geographic Information System (GIS) Advisor: Dr. David Maidment.
Processing Elevation Data. Limitations of DEMs for hydro work Dates Static, does not evolve Matching to linear line work due to scale Processing errors.
Map-Based Flood Hydrology and Hydraulics David R. Maidment Jan 10, 1998.
Characterization of Watersheds from DEMs using Spatial Analyst/ArcHydro Robert G. Burns, P.G. Engineering Geologist DWR – Division of Safety of Dams Watershed.
ARC GIS IN THE SANTA RIVER BASIN IN PERU GIS in Water Resources Fall 2006 Professor: Dr. David Maidment Presented by Presented by Eusebio Ingol.
EPA HWI Comments on CA Assessment June 26, 2013 HSP Call 2 major categories of comments: – Report writing (we will work on this) – Content/Analysis/Discussion.
In the City of Austin Bryan Barnett. Overview Atrophic Effects on the Hydrologic Cycle Potential Effects on the Surface Excessive Run-off High transport.
CONEWAGO CREEK GROUND WATER STUDY Base Flow and Impervious Cover November 7, 2007 Watershed Alliance of Adams County Joe McNally, P.G. GeoServices, Ltd.
A GIS approach to understanding groundwater – surface water interactions in the Logan River and Red Butte Creek, Utah Trinity Stout CEE 6440.
Hurricane Irene in Connecticut River Milena Spirova CE 394 K 2015.
Water Availability Modeling in the State of Texas CE 394 K.2 - Surface Water Hydrology University of Texas at Austin David Mason.
Comparing NEXRAD and Gauge Rainfall Data Nate Johnson CE 394K.2 Final Project April 26, 2005.
Blockhouse Ranch: A Dam Feasibility Study Haley Born November 17, 2011.
Predicting the hydrologic implications of land use change in forested catchments Dennis P. Lettenmaier Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
Graduate Students, CEE-6190
Raster/Map Algebra/Hydrology
Land Data Assimilation System Water Balance
Finishing Precipitation
Hydrologic Analysis (Bedient chapter 2)
DES 606 : Watershed Modeling with HEC-HMS
Lauren Schneider CE394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology Dr. Maidment 4/28/05
L-THIA Online and LID Larry Theller
STREAM NETWORK DELINEATION USING ARC HYDRO AND TauDEM: A comparison of approaches using The Upper Sevier and the Little Bear River Basins Alphonce C. Guzha.
Presented by Bryan Kimball
The Tank Hollow Fire and the Increase of Flood Potential for Spanish Fork Jaxon White.
Welcome to GIS in Water Resources 2017
Comparison of Streamflow and Precipitation in the Provo River Watershed CEE 6440 By: Steven McKee.
Flow Prediction on the Yampa River
Hydrology.
Forest Fire Rehabilitation
Elaine B. Darby GIS – Fall 2005
Provo River Watershed Modeling with WMS Ryan Murdock.
Little Bear River 100-Year Storm Flood
Analysis of the Snow Water Equivalent (SWE) in the Logan River Watershed Paul Ackerson CEE 6440.
CE 384N GIS in water resources Flooding in Houston during Hurricane Harvey Yun Liu (Lorraine) 11/27/2018.
Urbanization and the Effect on Watershed Hydrology
WRE-1 BY MOHD ABDUL AQUIL CIVIL ENGINEERING.
CE 384N GIS in water resources Flooding in Houston during Hurricane Harvey Yun Liu (Lorraine) 11/27/2018.
Creating Watersheds and Stream Networks
Engineering Hydrology (ECIV 4323)
Hydrologic modeling of Waller Creek
Presentation transcript:

PATRICK SEJKORA NOVEMBER 17, 2009 GIS IN WATER RESOURCES Yellowstone Fires and Their Hydrologic Effects

Yellowstone National Park 1988 Fires 1988 driest summer on record 7 major fires burned June-September ,215 km 2 (36% of park) burned  485 km 2 on August 20 alone! Fires extinguished in September by rain/snow

Objectives Did fires augment surface water runoff regimes in Yellowstone? Hypothesis: Evapotranspiration and infiltration rates decrease in burned areas 1, increasing runoff Evaluate using runoff ratio: Is runoff ratio post-fires higher than pre-fires? 1. Robichaud 2000

GIS DATA  Park outline and Digital Elevation Map (DEM)  NHD Flowlines and USGS Gage Sites  Burn Type Raster  Compare runoff ratios between heavily burned and unaffected (control) watersheds  Before Fire  After Fire Firehole River Boundary Creek

Firehole River (burned/ experimental watershed)  Baseflow 7.37 m 3 /s  724 km 2 watershed (obtained with ArcHydro Terrain Preprocessing)  288 km NHD flowline  Drainage Density of 0.40/km  4 th order stream at gage

Boundary Creek (unburned/ control watershed)  Baseflow 1.94 m 3 /s  224 km 2 watershed  151 km NHD flowline  Drainage Density of 0.68/km  3 rd order stream at gage

Firehole RiverBoundary Creek

Precipitation Data  Find similar precipitation events before and after 1988 fires  Obtain data from National Climactic Data Center  Interpolate rainfall across park via Spline

Pre-1988 Precipitation Event  Spline raster can be used to estimate rainfall across watersheds  Zonal Statistics Tool in Spatial Analyst July 10, 1987 July 11, 1987 September 18, cm 1.6 cm 0.5 cm 1.7 cm 1.6 cm Average Precipitation Across Watersheds

Boundary Creek Pre-Fire Post-Fire Storm Event Flow Conditions Firehole River

Runoff Ratios Boundary Creek Pre-Fire RR = 1.1% Post Fire RR = 0.9% Firehole River Pre-Fire RR = 1.1% Post Fire RR = 0.9% Runoff Ratio Example Calculation (Boundary Creek 9/18/1989) These Runoff Ratios aren’t very different!

Conclusions Runoff Ratios before and after fire are indistinguishable in burned watershed An event’s runoff ratio same for both watershed Suggests other factors besides landcover may influence runoff regimes  Antecedent dry period, storm intensity, etc.?

Future Work Evaluate other storm events using same methodology  NEXRAD precipitation data for recent events Similar effects for snow melt?

Questions?

Firehole RiverBoundary Creek

Firehole RiverBoundary Creek