Climate Change and Transportation and Land Use Planning John P. Poorman October 2006

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ATHENS UNIVERSITY OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS AND LOGISTICS LABORATORY (TRANSLOG) © Prof. K. Zografos STEPs STEPs Scenarios for the.
Advertisements

Transport Policy And The Environment Professor David Gray The Centre for Transport Policy The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.
Urban Sprawl and GHG Pollution—SB 375 NCEL Presentation Kip Lipper-CA Senate September 8, 2008 Portland, OR.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
1 What Would it Take? To Reduce Mobile CO2 Emissions Ronald F. Kirby Director of Transportation Planning Presentation to the COG Climate Change Steering.
Alain Bertaud Urbanist Module 1: Introduction and the Context The role of, government, urban planners and markets.
PaMs Report:Transport Sector. 2 Overview GHG Profile of Transport Sector Implementation Aspects Drivers, Policy Options and Action Patterns Success Story.
Energy: Can We Get More? Can We Use Less Amy Myers Jaffe Wallace S. Wilson Fellow for Energy Studies James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy Houston.
Caroline Rodier Research Associate Mineta Transportation Institute 14th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Columbus, Ohio May.
Climate Change Mitigation in Developing Countries Overview and Brazil, China, and Turkey Case Studies William Chandler Battelle.
Shaping the railway of the 21st century Transport Climate talks, UNFCCC web kiosk, COP9, Milan, 9 December 2003 Keep Kyoto on Track – Transport and Climate.
13 th TRB National Planning Applications Conference May 8-12, Reno, Nevada Tara Weidner, Rosella Picado and Erin Wardell Parsons Brinckerhoff.
Overcoming Barriers to Smart Growth: Surprisingly Large Role of Better Transportation Modeling based on a paper presented at the ACEEE Summer Study August.
Leadership Champlain Energy Day “The Future Ain’t What it Use to Be” February 8, 2011.
Metropolitan GHG Target Rule Review March 12, 2015 Land Conservation and Development Commission.
SEEA as a framework for assessing policy responses to climate change Prepared for the IAOS conference Sjoerd Schenau and Roel Delahaye Statistics Netherlands.
Green investment scheme and climate change mitigation policy in Ukraine Stavchuk Iryna Climate change program coordinator National ecological centre of.
Transportation’s share of our carbon footprint Transportation is growing faster than other sectors, accounted for half the growth in emissions from
Virpi PastinenSCATTER WORKSHOP SCATTER SPRAWLING CITIES AND TRANSPORT: FROM EVALUATION TO RECOMMENDATIONS SCATTER WORKSHOP MILAN OCTOBER 24.
1 Multi-Sector Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Metropolitan Washington Region Land Use and Transportation Strategies Prepared for:
Transportation ESP seminar - fall 2007 IPCC 4th report Group 3 chapter 5 Anaïs Orsi.
Oregon Department of Transportation Oregon Department of Transportation Department of Land Conservation and Development Department of Land Conservation.
GLOBAL CHANGES CUTTING DEEP Economics of energy changing based on external global dynamics, particularly with OPEC Oil prices have fallen by more than.
0 © 2013, Investment Consulting Associates Real estate is a strategic asset. Each and every new location decision carries cost, workforce, and other implications.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
Presentation to the Central Lane MPO Policy Committee March 08, 2012 Oregon Sustainable Transportation Initiative Statewide Transportation Strategy Statewide.
Towards sustainable urban freight transport Some reflections with results from RENAISSANCE Barry Ubbels (Panteia/NEA) Rotterdam, 12 October 2012.
FPAC Presentation to: Greening Industry Network Conference Waterloo, Ontario June 16, 2007.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
1 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Vincent Mages Climate Change Initiatives VP Lafarge Greenhouse gas mitigation in the cement.
Pricing policies for reducing CO 2 emissions from transport Huib van Essen Manager Transport CE Delft.
Finance: The Critical Link The Transportation – Land Use – Environment Connection Brian D. Taylor October 2003 Institute of Transportation Studies.
Overview of Climate-Smart Agriculture for livestock production and livelihood in West Africa.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reduction strategies February 2014.
Drafting Sustainability PowerPoint's 1 -Alex Bigazzi, Feb
1 Transit and Climate Change April 10, 2008 Deborah Lipman Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority.
California Measure SB375: Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital Region.
Traffic Management and Transport Demand Management Gladys Frame Consultant Traffic Engineer The World Bank Module 4: Urban Transport Planning.
Transportation Planning Branch The Provincial Role in TDM: Ontario’s Perspective Canadian TDM Summit 2008 October 20, 2008 Jennifer Edwards Ontario Ministry.
10/22/021 Recent Innovations in Transportation Demand Management Peter Valk Transportation Management Services 12 th Annual UCLA Symposium on the Transportation/Land.
Master 2 Making markets work for the environment 1 A Tale of Two Systems The case for a national energy framework A ‘Big Idea’ for Sustainable Prosperity.
GEF and the Conventions The Global Environment Facility: Is the financial mechanism for the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants the.
Policy Analysis Redux. Policy alternatives: Where do they come from? Which should you include? How much detail? Must they be mutually exclusive?
John Cridland Deputy Director General, CBI Economic growth – driving sustainable investment.
Factors Influencing the Automobile Industry. Factors that affect Automobile Industry  Anti pollution issues  Alternatives cars such as electric cars.
Urban Land Institute Moving Cooler – An Analysis of Transportation Strategies for Reducing GHG Emissions Study Authored: July 2009.
30-Year National Transportation Policy Framework to the Future September 12,
Baseline Scenario Quality Growth Strategy.
PAKISTAN SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT PROJECT
Warwick Business School The drivers of low carbon business strategies Andrew Sentance, Warwick Business School Warwick University Climate Policy Workshop.
Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College 1 Congestion Mitigation Strategies: Which Produces the Most Environmental Benefit and/or the Least Environmental.
Defining Alternative Scenarios MTC Planning Committee and ABAG Administrative Committee May 13, 2011.
What Part Does Transportation and Land Use Play in Tackling Climate Change & Greenhouse Gas Emissions? Gordon Garry Director of Research and Analysis,
Climate Policy and Green Tax Reform in Denmark Some conclusions from the 2009 report to the Danish Council of Environmental Economics Presentation to the.
DRAFT INNER MELBOURNE ACTION PLAN Presented by Elissa McElroy IMAP Executive Officer January 2016.
Public Sector Leverages on Land Management in the Present Land Development Process in Asia Paul Baross Regional Development Dialogue 13, no. 1 (1992)
Overview of Sustainability Policy Issues CMAP Board of Directors October 10, 2007.
Transit Oriented Development: Prospects for action on climate change February 16, 2011 Presented to NYMTC David King Columbia University.
Monica Bansal Department of Transportation Planning Presentation to the TPB CAC November 13, 2008 Progress on “CLRP Aspirations” & “What Would it Take?”
Moving People – Changing Expectations London Challenges for Road Transport Phil Goodwin Professor of Transport Policy Centre for Transport and.
New Planning Paradigm 18 April 2013.
The TPB What Would It Take Scenario: Meeting Regional Climate Change Mitigation Goals for the Mobile Sector Presentation to MWAQC CAC June 15, 2009 Monica.
Maine Transportation & Land Use Working Group Update
SOME PRACTICAL SOLUTIONS FOR TRANSPORT EMISSIONS
SEEA as a framework for assessing policy responses to climate change
Electric Mobility Global challenges and what we do in Ukraine
Travel Demand Management
Transport and Climate Change: Priorities for World Bank-GEF Projects
Presentation transcript:

Climate Change and Transportation and Land Use Planning John P. Poorman October 2006

Can transportation and land use planning mitigate the rate of global climate change?

1. We must respect the laws of physics, economics, politics and household behavior.

2. What is possible is not always probable; what is improbable is not necessarily impossible.

3. Public policy typically seeks to accomplish a goal while simultaneously preserving the status quo.

4. American preference is to look to technology for solutions that preserve the status quo.

5. Significant technological change comes unexpectedly and carries unintended consequences.

6. Household behavior is remarkably consistent – if observed at the level of core relationships.

Can transportation and land use planning mitigate the rate of global climate change?

Transp & Land Use Can it reduce climate change? ?

Transp & Land Use Can it Reduce climate change? ? Mitigate impacts of? ?

MacroPolicy Local Planning Can it Reduce climate change? ?? Mitigate impacts of? ??

Market Forces MacroPolicy Local Planning Can it Reduce climate change? ??? Mitigate impacts of? ???

Market Forces MacroPolicy Local Planning Can it Reduce climate change? ??? Mitigate impacts of? ??? Will it Reduce climate change? ??? Mitigate impacts of? ???

Market Forces MacroPolicy Local Planning Can it Reduce climate change? NoYesYes Mitigate impacts of? ??? Will it Reduce climate change? ??? Mitigate impacts of? ???

GHG Emission Reductions State Energy Plans: 18 – 33% State Energy Plans: 18 – 33% Arizona: 72% from policy; 28% planning Arizona: 72% from policy; 28% planning Todd Litman Todd Litman “Win-win” strategies: 26 – 62% split between policy and planning. “Win-win” strategies: 26 – 62% split between policy and planning.

Win-Win Strategies Directly Affects Travel? Total Reductions Cumulative Reductions LowMiddleHighLowMiddleHigh Planning Reforms No 10.0%15.0%20.0%0.0%0%0.0% Regulatory Reforms No 1.0%2.3%4.0%0.0%0%0.0% TDM Programs No 4.0%6.0%8.0%0.0%0%0.0% Commute Trip Reduction Yes 0.8%1.8%3.0%0.7%2%3.0% Commuter Financial Incentives Partly 1.5%3.5%6.0%1.5%4%5.9% Fuel Taxes - Tax Shifting Yes 5.0%10.0%15.0%6.4%13%20.0% Pay-As-You-Drive Pricing Yes 8.0%10.6%13.5%13.9%22%30.8% Road/Congestion Pricing Yes 0.5%1.5%3.0%14.3%24%32.9% Parking Management Yes 2.0%3.4%5.0%16.0%26%36.3% Parking Pricing Yes 4.0%6.8%10.0%19.4%31%42.6% Transit and Rideshare Improvements Yes 2.0%4.5%8.0%21.0%34%47.2% HOV Priority Yes 0.5%1.1%2.0%21.4%35%48.3% Walking and Cycling Improvements Yes 1.0%2.3%4.0%22.2%36%50.3% Smart Growth Reforms Yes 3.0%8.0%15.0%24.5%41%57.8% Location Efficient Housing and Mortgages No 1.0%2.3%4.0%24.5%41%57.8% Mobility Management Marketing Yes 1.5%3.0%5.0%25.7%43%59.9% Freight Transport Management Yes 0.3%1.0%2.3%25.9%43%60.8% School and Campus Trip Management Yes 0.3%0.8%1.5%26.0%44%61.4% Carsharing Yes 0.1%0.3%0.6%26.1%44%61.6% Traffic Calming Yes 0.1%0.2%0.4%26.2%44%61.8%

Market Forces MacroPolicy Local Planning Can it Reduce climate change? NoYesYes Mitigate impacts of? ??? Will it Reduce climate change? NoMaybeNo Mitigate impacts of? ???

US Climate Change Technology Program Strategic Plan: Transportation Sector years20-40 years40-60 years

Market Forces MacroPolicy Local Planning Can it Reduce climate change? NoYesYes Mitigate impacts of? YesYesYes Will it Reduce climate change? NoMaybeNo Mitigate impacts of? ???

Market Forces MacroPolicy Local Planning Can it Reduce climate change? NoYesYes Mitigate impacts of? YesYesYes Will it Reduce climate change? NoMaybeNo Mitigate impacts of? YesMaybeMaybe

In sum Separate can from will Separate can from will Distinguish mitigate climate change from mitigate impacts of climate change Distinguish mitigate climate change from mitigate impacts of climate change Separate market, policy and planning Separate market, policy and planning Respect “truths” in judging potential benefits and outcomes Respect “truths” in judging potential benefits and outcomes

In sum Conclusions Conclusions Policy greater tool to mitigate climate change. Policy greater tool to mitigate climate change. Policy, planning may help adjust to climate change. May need long lead time. Policy, planning may help adjust to climate change. May need long lead time. Market forces may lag – good to help adjust to but weak ally in mitigating climate change. Market forces may lag – good to help adjust to but weak ally in mitigating climate change.