Www.ias2011.org DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to <18 years DRV/r is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can dose-optimization trials be conducted ethically in low-income countries? Dr Andrew Hill World AIDS Conference, Melbourne, Australia July 2014 [TUWS1104]
Advertisements

Phase 2 of new ARVs BMS (maturation inhibitor)
Violari A, et al. 7th IAS Abstract MOAB0102 Safety and efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced pediatric patients aged 3 to
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TC MONARK  LPV/r QD vs BID M M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP. Mallolas J, JAIDS 2009;51:29-36 ATAZIP ATAZIP Study: Switch LPV/r to ATV/r  Design  Endpoints –Primary:
Comparison of INSTI vs PI  FLAMINGO  GS  ACTG A5257  WAVES.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Switch to ATV-containing regimen  ARIES Study  INDUMA Study  ASSURE Study.
1 Atazanavir (ATV) With Ritonavir (RTV) or Saquinavir (SQV) vs Lopinavir/Ritonavir (LPV/RTV) in Patients With Multiple Virologic Failures 24-Week Results.
SMV + PEG-IFN + RBV Open-label W12 W24* or W48* N = years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 4 Treatment-naïve or experienced with relapse or partial.
Combined PI and NNRTI Resistance Analysis of the Pooled DUET Trial: Towards a Regimen-Based Resistance Interpretation J. M. Schapiro, J. Vingerhoets, S.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Patterson P, et al. 12th EACS Abstract PS4/4 A Phase II, open-label trial in treatment-naïve, HIV-1-infected patients who received DRV/r as induction.
Poster # 873 *Sharon Nachman SUNY Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY Background: RAL is a potent selective HIV-1 integrase inhibitor.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI  QDMRK  SPRING-2. Eron JJ, Lancet Infect Dis 2011;11: QDMRK  Design  Objective –Non inferiority of RAL QD: % HIV.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Comparison of PI vs PI  ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089  LPV/r mono vs LPV/r + ZDV/3TCMONARK  LPV/r QD vs BIDM M A5073  LPV/r + 3TC vs LPV/r + 2 NRTIGARDEL.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Agenda  Update on Darunavir: Perry Mohammed  Update on Etravirine: Rekha Sinha  Update on TMC278: Peter Williams  Update on TMC207: Karel De Beule.
 Treatment regimens –Co-formulated ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/rironavir (r) : 25/150/100 mg QD = 2 tablets –Dasabuvir (DSV) : 250 mg BID –RBV.
Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  NEAT001/ANRS 143  MODERN.
Switch to ATV- or ATV/r-containing regimen Switch to ATV/r-containing regimen  ATAZIP Switch to ATV ± r-containing regimen  SWAN Study  SLOAT Study.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
Comparison of EFV vs MVC  MERIT Study.  Design N = 361 N = 360  Objective –Non inferiority of MVC vs EFV: % HIV RNA < 400 c/mL and < 50 c/mL (co-primary.
FLAMINGO Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects SE/HIV/0023/14c January 2014.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Slideset on: Gathe J, da Silva BA, Cohen DE, et al. A once-daily lopinavir/ritonavir-based regimen is noninferior to twice-daily dosing and results in.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Dolutegravir + ABC-3TC and CSF HIV-1 RNA Levels ING Study
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Atazanavir + ritonavir vs. Lopinavir-ritonavir CASTLE Study
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
Saquinavir + RTV versus Lopinavir-RTV in Treatment-Naïve GEMINI Trial
Switching to TDF-FTC from ABC-3TC for Hyperlipidemia ROCKET II
LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Naïve MONARK Trial
Simeprevir in HIV Coinfection, GT-1 C212 Trial
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of EFV vs MVC
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Presentation transcript:

DIONE – 24 week efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of DRV/r QD in treatment-naïve adolescents, 12 to <18 years DRV/r is approved for the treatment of ARV-naïve (QD and BID) and experienced HIV-1-infected adults (BID), and in ARV-experienced pediatric patients aged 6 to <18 years (BID) DIONE is a Phase II, 48-week, open-label trial of once-daily DRV/r 800/100mg in combination with ZDV/3TC or ABC/3TC Enrollment –12 patients, mean age 14.6 years, eight female, mean log 10 HIV RNA of 4.72 copies/mL and CD4 cell count of 282 cells/mm 3 /18.3% –six received ZDV/3TC and six ABC/3TC –five infected via MTCT and three via heterosexual contact DRV/r = darunavir/ritonavir; ARV = antiretroviral; ZDV = zidovudine 3TC = lamivudine; ABC = abacavir; MTCT = mother-to-child transmission WEPDB0101 Inclusion criteria Treatment-naïve adolescents, 12–<18 yrs Weight  40kg HIV-1 RNA  1000 copies/mL Primary analysis at Week 24 DRV/r 800/100mg qd + ZDV/3TC or ABC/3TC (site investigator-selected background regimen)

Efficacy and safety findings 11/12 (92%) patients achieved HIV- 1 RNA <50 copies/mL (ITT-TLOVR) 12/12 (100%) by FDA snapshot algorithm One patient with one DRV RAM (V11I) at baseline was a responder at Week 24 Mean CD4 cell count increased by 175 cells/mm 3 Two patients reported AEs at least possibly related to treatment (all grade 1 or 2) No patient discontinued DRV/r due to an AE No deaths BAS Response (± SE): HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL (ITT-TLOVR; %) Time (weeks) DRV/r (N=12) 92% BAS Mean (± SE) change in CD4 cell count (cells/mm 3 ) (NC=F) Time (weeks) DRV/r (N=12) 175 SE = standard error; ITT = intent-to-treat; TLOVR = time-to-loss of virological response; NC=F = non-completer=failure FDA = Food and Drug Administration; RAM = resistance-associated mutation; AEs = adverse events WEPDB0101

Median: 87.9µgh/mLMedian: 2,196ng/mL 4,000 2,000 3,000 1, Pharmacokinetics DRV exposure similar to adults receiving DRV/r 800/100mg QD 1 All had DRV C 0h above EC 50 for wild-type HIV (55ng/mL) Conclusions Over 24 weeks, once-daily DRV/r 800/100mg (with two NRTIs) was effective and well tolerated in ARV-naïve adolescents aged 12 to <18 years No new safety concerns were identified These findings support the use of once-daily DRV/r in treatment-naïve, adolescent HIV-1-infected patients Rich sampling over 24 hours after 2 weeks of dosing Grey dotted line represents 130%, 100% and 80% (from top to bottom) of mean observed in adults in ARTEMIS 1 AUC  AUC  (µgh/mL) C 0h C 0h (ng/mL) 1. Sekar V, et al. 9th IWCPHIV Abstract P42 AUC = area under the concentration-time curve; C 0h = predose concentration; EC 50 = effective concentration WEPDB0101