Who Is Your Client & How To Protect Them – The Duties and Dangers of Modern Technology Robert Rolfe, Hunton & Williams Leslie A.T. Haley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
Advertisements

Chapter Four Conflicts of Interest In this chapter, you will learn about: Rules governing conflicts involving clients, including simultaneous and successive.
1 WHAT CAN I DO ABOUT OPPOSING COUNSEL TALKING TO OUR EMPLOYEES? James H. Gilliam BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
C. 4 Lawyer's Duty of Confidentiality1 Professional Responsibility Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality Ch. 4 The Lawyer’s Duty of Confidentiality.
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
Law 20 Conflicts of Interest. o Based on duties of o Loyalty o Confidentiality o Rules cover: o Concurrent representation of adverse clients o Representation.
Preparing Your Company Employees to Testify. Types of Company Witnesses Fact Witnesses – Persons with personal knowledge of relevant facts Fact Witnesses.
Confidentiality A Defining Duty. What are sources of confidentiality obligations? Constitutional law Disciplinary rules Fiduciary responsibility Court.
Strategies for Preserving the Attorney-Client Privilege in the World of Electronic Discovery Beth Rose Ford Motor Company.
Week Duty to keep quiet, not talk about cases By product of Fiduciary Duty 2. Right not to be forced to testify about communications --Statutory.
BELMONT UNIVERSITY AMERICAN INN OF COURT SEPTEMBER 9, 2014 PRESENTED BY KRISANN HODGES DEPUTY CHIEF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL - LITIGATION BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL.
COUNSEL: ETHICS TRAINING IS FOR YOU, TOO! Presentation to the SACRS Attorney Breakout November 12, 2008 Harvey L. Leiderman & Jeffrey R. Rieger.
1 Conference of California Public Utility Counsel 2009 Annual Meeting Hot Topics in Ethics -- Recent Conflict of Interest Developments Affecting Practice.
Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Ethical Issues in the Electronic Age Frost Brown Todd LLC Seminar May 24, 2007 Frost Brown.
“Student Due Process” School Administrators of South Dakota April 7, 2015.
Privilege, Privacy, and Waiver. Privilege Attorney/Client In the law of evidence, a client's privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent any other.
D E N V E R L A S V E G A S O R A N G E C O U N T Y P H O E N I X S A L T L A K E C I T Y T U C S O N Nevada Ethics Update for In-House Counsel Cynthia.
Welcome to Class INTRODUCTION TO LEGAL TECHNOLOGY.
ARBITRATION & MEDIATION IN US & TURKEY Tuncay YILDIRAN Supervisor Pf.William C.TYSON.
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Chapter Seven Competence In this chapter, you will learn about: Definitions of lawyer and paralegal competence Key components of competence for paralegals.
1 EFFECTIVE IN-HOUSE COMMUNICATIONS AND PRESERVING THE PRIVILEGES Presented By: John Eldridge Haynes and Boone, LLP (713) and Chris Chaffin BMC.
Louisiana Association for Justice Ethics Webinar December 5, 2013 Robert E. Kleinpeter Yigal Bander.
ACC-SoCal In-House Counsel Conference #IHCC14 Secrets, Lies, And Money! Ethical Rules For Interacting With Non-Lawyers In Litigation And Transactions.
OUR ATTORNEY LEGAL AND INSURANCE ISSUES
Ethical Pitfalls of Representing Multiple Clients in a Transaction Presented by Suzanne Raggio Westerheim, Attorney, Mediator, and Counselor to the Legal.
The Sedona Principles 1-7
Seen and Heard Involving Children in Dependency Court Andrea Khoury ABA Center on Children and the Law Amy LaMere Attorney Guardian Ad Litem.
Attorney-Client Privilege and Privacy Considerations Between US Corporations & Foreign Affiliates General Counsel Conference, Washington, D.C. October.
Goals: The students will 1. Continue with their study of case briefing. 2. Learn about legal ethics and the Model Rules.
Kaiser Permanente and California Minority Counsel Program January CLE Marathon Panel Presentation: Internal Investigations From Employment to White Collar.
Unit 4: Electronic Documents and the Paperless Office.
Avoiding Traps in Internal Investigations H. Lee Barfield II Bass, Berry and Sims PLC November 5, 2010.
John Steele, Attorney at Law
Ethical Considerations for Self Help Center Staff Assisting Self Represented Litigants While Maintaining Neutrality June 10, 2011.
Advanced Civil Litigation Class 11Slide 1 Production of Documents Scope Scope Includes documents of all types, including pictures, graphs, drawings, videos.
Meet and Confer Rule 26(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that “parties must confer as soon as practicable - and in any event at least.
Page 1 Recording of this session via any media type is strictly prohibited. Why Won’t They Pay My Claim? (CLM 018) Tuesday, April 29, 2014, 1:45-3:45 David.
Data Mining Opinions Rita Assetto E-Discovery Fall 2009.
Unit 4: Electronic Documents and the Paperless Office.
Material Covered in Assignment 4-1: The Attorney-Client Privilege A. Rationale for the Attorney-Client Privilege (p. 318) B. Criteria for Attorney-Client.
Metadata – A Summary of Important Concepts and Opinions.
Chapter Three Confidentiality In this chapter, you will learn about: Basic principles of confidentiality The attorney-client privilege and the difference.
Legal Documents Some of the papers in your file cabinet... Note the word “some”. This overview is not comprehensive.
Requirements for a Retainer Agreement Start with a Written Contract! ALWAYS!
ABA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: NAVIGATING THE ETHICAL MINEFIELD.
© 2005 by Thomson Delmar Learning. All Rights Reserved.1 CALIFORNIA CIVIL LITIGATION DISCOVERY OVERVIEW.
Unit 9 Seminar Business Organizations. Things to do this unit: UNIT 9 – Read Chapter 13 and 14 – Respond to the Discussion Board – Attend the Weekly Seminar.
ETHICS: CONFIDENTIALITY OF IFTA DATA IFTA ATTORNEYS’ SECTION MEETING October 7, :30-10:00 a.m. Jim Clark Motor Carrier Services Attorney Indiana.
Session 8 Confidentiality and disclosure. 1 Contents Part 1: Introduction Part 2: The duty of confidentiality Part 3: The duty of disclosure Part 4: Confidentiality.
Carlsmith Ball LLP Confidentiality Issues and Outside Counsel Deborah Bjes October 22 nd, 2015.
TOPIC O: REPRESENTING CORPORATIONS AND GOVERNMENTS 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
TOPIC B: CONFIDENTIALITY 2016 P.R. Prof. Janicke.
Electronic Discovery Guidelines Meet and Confer - General definition. a requirement of courts that before certain types of motions and/or petitions will.
Advocacy and Legal Advice Centre - Internal procedures -
2015 Hon. Michael Williamson, M.D. Fla. Maria Ellena Chavez-Ruark, Saul Ewing LLP Prof. Laurie L. Levenson, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles Joint Defense,
Electronic Discovery Guidelines FRCP 26(f) mandates that parties “meaningfully meet and confer” to consider the nature of their respective claims and defenses.
1.WHO HOLDS PRIVILEGE DURING AND AFTER M&A TRANSACTIONS? 2.AVOIDING WAIVER OF PRIVILEGE DURING M&A TRANSACTIONS AGENDA ACC - M&A From the Seller’s Perspective.
1 Ethical Lawyering Spring 2006 Class 8. 2 Rest. 68 Except as otherwise provided in this Restatement, the attorney-client privilege may be invoked as.
Section 285 Litigation Ethics Conflicts of Interest Prosecution Bars Grab bag
Contemporary Legal and Ethical Challenges in Counseling Law and Ethics in Counseling Conference 2016 New Orleans, Louisiana.
Recognizing the Client
Guide to ethical obligations of in-house lawyers – for non-lawyer colleagues Notes:
Guide to ethical obligations of in-house lawyers – for non-lawyer colleagues Notes:
Guide to ethical obligations of in-house lawyers – for non-lawyer colleagues Notes:
Legal Information ONLY
Bonnie Weiss McLeod Cooley LLP
Navigating ethics issues in FERC enforcement investigations

Presentation transcript:

Who Is Your Client & How To Protect Them – The Duties and Dangers of Modern Technology Robert Rolfe, Hunton & Williams Leslie A.T. Haley

1.A & B seek legal assistance in forming Corporation C. You continue to advise A & B on corporate matters related to C and several years later a dispute arises between A and B. Who is your client?

1. 1.A and B 2.Only C 3.A, B and C 4.Who knows???

2.Who is the client if you are hired to represent Corporation X?

2. 1.Corp X 2.Corp X’s board 3.Corp X’s CEO & specifically named constituents 4. It depends

3.Your firm takes on representation of Corp X which has several subsidiaries. In the course of representing X you routinely interact with and advise the subsidiaries as to the implications of their actions with respect to X. Who is your client?

3. 1.X 2.X & it’s subsidiaries 3.I’m not sure I can represent X & it’s subsidiaries

4.Corp HS has formed a special committee of BOD to investigate stock option backdating and has hired you for advice. You speak with the CEO and other members of the BOD and advise this committee. Litigation ensues and A/C privilege is questioned. Are your communications with the BOD who are not on the special committee protected?

4. 1.Yes 2.No

5.Better yet, has that privilege been waived by sharing this information of the special committee/client with other BOD members not on the committee?

5. 1.Yes 2.No

6.But what if it makes sense to have the firm take on representation of the Corp and several of its officers as they all seem to be on the same page. I understand we can engage in joint representation but if a conflict arises are we then excluded from representing our long-time Corp client?

6. 1.Yes 2.No 3.It depends

7.So sometimes I get confused – which is broader – the A/C privilege or client confidentiality?

7. 1.A/C Privilege 2.Rule 1.6 Confidentiality

8.So which of those apply to the client who comes to me seeking legal advice on his matter?

8. 1.A/C Privilege 2.Confidentiality 3.Both

9.May an attorney communicate directly with a managerial employee of an adverse corporate entity represented by counsel?

9. 1.Not without the consent of the corp’s counsel, b/c a managerial e’ee speaks on behalf of the corp 2.Yes, if the atty explains to the e’ee that his client’s interests are adverse to those of corp. 3.Yes, if e’ee lacks authority to make decisions 4.None of the above

10.What about the case where the executor comes to me to represent the estate and I later learn the executor is misappropriating money. Who is my client and what do I do?

10. 1.The estate; try to fix the problem 2.The estate through the executor; advise the executor 3.The estate/executor; withdraw and tell beneficiaries of defalcation 4.The estate; withdraw and keep quiet

11.So let’s talk about the case where your firm just got disqualified for a conflict and the client is asking for their file. It’s volumes of documents. How must you produce it?

11. 1.Paper copy 2.Electronic copy 3.Whatever way the client wants it

12.In your engagement agreement with clients you would like to stipulate that all files in your office are kept and will only be produced electronically. Can you do that?

12. 1.Yes 2.No

13.In responding to your request for production opposing counsel sends all of the documents electronically. In reviewing them you realize that some do not seem to be “protected” and may contain metadata. Can you “mine” for potentially helpful information?

13. 1.Yes 2.No 3.It depends

14.Metadata in a document can reveal:

14. 1.Amt of time spent with doc open 2.Original authors 3.Creation and access to doc/modification dates 4.Undo changes to reveal original doc 5.2, 3 and 4 6.All of the above

15.SHOULD you “mine” for potentially helpful information?

15. 1.Yes 2.No 3.It depends

16.You get an from opposing counsel and they have cc:d their client. In response you hit:

16. 1.Reply 2.Reply all 3.It doesn’t really matter

17.You receive from opposing counsel and realize that it was inadvertently sent to you because the outlines details of case strategy. From an ethics perspective you must:

17. 1.Contact OC and follow her directive 2.Contact/notify OC 3.Refrain from reading; contact OC and follow their directive

18.If you’re in federal court Fed. R. Civ. P26(b)(5)(B) requires a party receiving privileged or work product documents claimed to be inadvertently produced by the other side to:

18. 1.Notify OC 2.Follow OC’s directive 3.Hold the docs until court can analyze

19.So does that mean any A/C or work product protection has been waived?

19. 1.Yes 2.No 3.I don’t know

20.What can I do if I inadvertently produce protected documents during discovery?

20. 1.Call OC and ask for mercy 2.Immed take to the Ct and ask for protection 3.Have a discovery agreement re: inadvertent disclosures/waiver 4.2 and 3

21. So honestly, what can I do if I don’t understand all of these IT electronic data issues at such a level to advise my corporate clients?

21. 1.Read ab electronic discovery 2.Study Fed Rules of Evidence 3.Hire and consult with experts 4.All of the above