Tiziano Barbui MD Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo, Italy

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASCO 2011;Abstract 6500.
Advertisements

Evaluation of Oral Azacitidine Using Extended Treatment Schedules: A Phase I Study Garcia-Manero G et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 603.
An overview of the differences of different JAK inhibitors
Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Combination therapy for MPNs
15. Oktober Oktober Oktober 2012.
© 2012 National Heart Foundation of Australia. Slide 2.
Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP Benjamin Banneker Charter Academy of Technology Making AYP.
Minimal Residual Disease in Hematologic Neoplasms Lloyd M. Stoolman, M.D. Professor of Pathology and Director, Clinical and Research Flow Cytometry Laboratories.
Bendamustine + Rituximab (BR) Chemoimmunotherapy and Maintenance Lenalidomide in Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Small.
PSSA Preparation.
UK Renal Registry 17th Annual Report Figure 5.1. Trend in one year after 90 day incident patient survival by first modality, 2003–2012 cohorts (adjusted.
Why do we need new drugs in PV and ET?
Srdan (Serge) Verstovsek M.D., Ph.D. Professor of Medicine Department of Leukemia University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas, USA Therapy.
Case Study: Patient with MF has Increasing Blasts, but Not Yet AML -- What to Do? John Mascarenhas, MD Myeloproliferative Disorders Program Tisch Cancer.
Arizona, USA ©2011 MFMER | Ruben A. Mesa, MD Professor & Chairman, Division of Hematology & Medical Oncology Deputy Director, Mayo Clinic Cancer.
GENETICS & biology OF MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS
Benefits of JAK2 Inhibitor Therapy: Why Do They Work in Patients With and Without JAK2 Mutation Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University.
Essential Thrombocythemia Followed by Acute Leukemia
Prognostication in MF: From CBC to cytogenetics to molecular markers
林建廷 April 28,  IPSS for MDS (FAB classification) ◦ Greenberg P et al. International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic.
Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes in Lower-Risk Myelofibrosis Patients Receiving Treatment with Ruxolitinib Davis KL et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Risk Stratification of Patients with Myelofibrosis and the Role of Transplant Alessandro M. Vannucchi Section of Hematology, University of Florence, Italy.
Myeloid Blastic Transformation of Myeloproliferative Neoplasms A Review of 112 Cases Presenter: Syed Jawad Noor, PGY3 Mentor: Meir Wetzler June 09, 2010.
ET vs. Prefibrotic myelofibrosis: Why does it matter
Complete Hematological Molecular and Histological Remissions without Cytoreductive Treatment Lasting After Pegylated-Interferon -2a (peg-IFN-2a) Therapy.
CB-1 MDS Classification and Prognosis John M. Bennett, MD University of Rochester Medical Center Hematomorphologist Chair, MDS Foundation.
Blood Cancers in older adults Cancer and Older Adults 19 November 2015 Matthew Foster, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Leukemia, Lymphoma and Myeloma.
Pei Lin Professor of Pathology Department of Hematopathology
Good morning… My presentation is about Calreticulin and PMF
Low Dose Decitabine Versus Best Supportive Care in Elderly Patients with Intermediate or High Risk MDS Not Eligible for Intensive Chemotherapy: Final Results.
Which Myelofibrosis Patients are Candidates for Upfront Stem Cell Transplantation? Vikas Gupta, MD, FRCP, FRCPath The Elizabeth and Tony Comper MPN Program.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Myeloproliferative Neoplasms: A Contemporary Review.
ASH UPDATE 2014 Las Vegas, Nevada
University Hamburg Medical Center Dept of Stem Cell Transplantation
Myelodysplastic syndrome(MDS)
Julia Geyer and Attilio Orazi
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
CCO Independent Conference Highlights
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
Harrison CN et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 59.
Ruxolitinib + Azacitidine in Newly Diagnosed or R/R, Intermediate- or High-Risk Myelofibrosis New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Combination Ruxolitinib + Sonidegib in Myelofibrosis
PERSIST-1: Pacritinib Improved Spleen Volume Reductions in Myelofibrosis vs Best Available Therapy CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Algoritmo di trattamento nei pazienti con Policitemia Vera
Program Goals Case 1: Woman With MDS Risk: Cytogenetic Subgroups.
Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN) Ph-negative
Kantarjian H et al. Cancer 2009;[Epub ahead of print].
Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis.
Prognostic factors for thrombosis and survival in PV, revisited
Giovanni Barosi Center for the Study of Myelofibrosis.
Chronic Leukemia Kristine Krafts, M.D..
Fenaux P et al. Lancet Oncol 2009;10(3):
Whom should you refer for allogeneic stem cell transplantation?
Which mutations matter in myelofibrosis?
European Focus on MPN and MDS 2014
Prefibrotisk Myelofibros
If platelets are not a prognostic factor
JAK2 INHIBITORS AND ALLOGRAFTING
Tips on using ruxolitinib
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Kantarjian HM et al. Blood 2008;112:Abstract 635.
by Elisa Rumi, and Mario Cazzola
JAK2 or CALR mutation status defines subtypes of essential thrombocythemia with substantially different clinical course and outcomes by Elisa Rumi, Daniela.
Ruxolitinib for Myelofibrosis–An Update of Its Clinical Effects
Stem cell transplant in MF: it’s time to personalize
Current Treatment Landscape in MF
Presentation transcript:

Tiziano Barbui MD Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo, Italy Emerging JAK Inhibitors in Myelofibrosis: Determining the Right Agent for the Right Patient.(Madrid) How to use prognosis assessment criteria for MF management in the clinical practice Tiziano Barbui MD Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo, Italy

FROM PV and ET to MYELOFIBROSIS: The value of bone marrow morphology

Bone marrow fibrosis (reticulin=>1): Yes: 74 pts ( 14%) INITIAL BONE MARROW RETICULIN FIBROSIS IN POLYCYTHEMIA VERA EXERTS AN IMPACT ON CLINICAL OUTCOME (IWG-RT study)   Tiziano Barbui1† , Jürgen Thiele,2† Francesco Passamonti,3 Elisa Rumi,4 Emanuela Boveri,4 Maria Luigia Randi,5 Irene Bertozzi,5 Filippo Marino,5 Alessandro M. Vannucchi,6 Elisabetta Antonioli,6 Valentina Carrai,6 Heinz Gisslinger,7 Veronika Buxhofer-Ausch,7 Leonhard Müllauer,8 Guido Finazzi,1 Alessandra Carobbio,1 Andrea Gianatti,1 Marco Ruggeri,9 Francesco Rodeghiero,9 Emanuele D’Amore,9 Alessandro Rambaldi,1 and Ayalew Tefferi,10 † 526 patients with strictly defined WHO diagnosis of PV Reviewer: JuergenThiele ;Participant centers (Bergamo, Pavia, Padova, Vicenza, Firenze, Vienna) Follow-up, years 5.3 (0-29.8) Bone marrow fibrosis (reticulin=>1): Yes: 74 pts ( 14%) No: 452 pts (86%)

Overt myelofibrosis-free survival (35 events) ------ BM fibrosis 2.2% pts-yr No BM fibrosis 0.8% pts-yr IRR = 2.7, p=0.01 Barbui T et al, Blood 2012

Degree of bone marrow fibrosis to predict events in PVSG-ET N= 361 patients Fibrosis grade (0 to 4) # grade 0-1: 135 # grade 2: 146 # grade 3-4: 80 Bone marrow fibrosis at diagnosis predicts Campbell et al, JCO 2009

WHO-ET vs PMF: Prognostic Value

Incidence of AML OS Incidence of MF Survival, Leukemic Transformation and Fibrotic Progression in Essential Thrombocythemia are significantly influenced by Accurate Morphologic Diagnosis Incidence of AML OS Incidence of MF Barbui et al, Leukemia 2013 Barbui et al, J Clin Oncol. 2011 Aug 10;29(23):3179-84

CLINICAL OVERT MYELOFIBROSIS: How to stratify patients to select therapy

Improving Survival Trends in PMF Median survival: 4.6 versus 6.5 y Cervantes et al. JCO 2012

Causes of Death in PMF 13% 4% 5% 10% 14% 19% 31% Cervantes F et al. Blood 2009;113:2895-901 31% 19% 14% 10% 5% 4% 13%

Current risk stratification in PMF Low risk No factor IPSS Intermediate-1 risk score 1 Age > 60 years Hb <10 g/dL WBC >25 x109/L Blasts ≥1% Constit. symptoms Intermediate-2 risk score 2 High risk score ≥ 3

International Prognostic Scoring System to predict survival (IPSS) 135 months 22% 95 months 29% 48 months 28% 27 months 21% Cervantes et al, Blood 2008

DINAMIC IPSS (DIPSS)

HEPATO-SPLENOMEGALY is not included in the risk classification of MF

CLINICAL OVERT MYELOFIBROSIS: Predictors of blast phase

Myelofibrosis: Prognosis assessment in clinical practice PMF risk stratification is based on IPSS and DIPSS, but cytogenetics and transfusional status may be a compendium Novel prognostic variables deserve further investigations on a large scale