Scientific Peer Review Yixin Chen, Associate Professor Computer & Information Science University of Mississippi April 9, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Peer Review Process and Responding to Reviewers APS Professional Skills Course: Writing and Reviewing for Scientific Journals.
Advertisements

Two Issues Concerning Research Conferences Dave Patterson October 2004.
How to write my paper and have it published in a computational biology journal? Phil Bourne University of California San Diego
Work Flows of the Online Review System Copernicus Office Editor Copernicus Publications | April 2014.
AERA Annual Meeting, April 10, 2011 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Learning the Language of the Review Process Patricia.
What happens after submission? Sadeghi Ramin, MD Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences.
Getting Published in Quality Journals Simon Pierre Sigué, Ph.D. Athabasca University Dealing with Reviewers’ Comments.
ASV Education and Career Development Workshop Put down the pipette and pick up the pen: Getting your work published The third part of the story... The.
Publishing Journal Articles Simon Hix Prof. of European & Comparative Politics LSE Government Department My experience How journals work Choosing a journal.
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Send.
1 Quality Control in Scholarly Publishing. What are the Alternatives to Peer Review? William Y. Arms Cornell University.
The Rosabeth Moss Kanter Award Module 2, Class 2 A Teaching Module Developed by the Curriculum Task Force of the Sloan Work and Family Research Network.
Paper written! Now for the harder part: getting it published! Sue Silver, PhD Editor in Chief Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment Ecological Society.
Publish or Perish! An Editorial Perspective Chung L. Huang University of Georgia Department of Applied Agricultural Economics February 2007.
Experiences from Editing a Journal: Case EJOR Jyrki Wallenius Helsinki School of Economics EJOR Editor Outgoing Editor till June 30, 2005 EJOR.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 11: Addressing Reviews/Revisions.
H E L S I N G I N K A U P P A K O R K E A K O U L U H E L S I N K I S C H O O L O F E C O N O M I C S Orientaatiopäivät 1 Writing Scientific.
ALEC 604: Writing for Professional Publication Week 10: Faculty/Peer Reviews.
Publishing a Journal Article: An Overview of the Process Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH Texas A&M University
Current Situation Strong tradition going back to the 1980s (with very little changes even if community has exploded) Highly competitive/selective conferences.
Publication Process Submitting and peer review. Overview Submit –Where to submit –How to submit Editor –Sends to Reviewers –Reads it themselves –Sends.
Research for History Papers Using Primary and Secondary Sources to Study World War I Nancy McEnery, Librarian.
1 Adapted from Norton, L.S. (2009) Action research in teaching and learning. A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. Chapter.
Refereeing “And diff’ring judgements serve but to declare, That truth lies somewhere, if we knew but where.” – William Cowper, Hope.
Dr. Dinesh Kumar Assistant Professor Department of ENT, GMC Amritsar.
How to Get Research Published in Journals Rafael Ibarra.
Give Your Online Teaching a JOLT Michelle Pilati, PhD Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry, PhD Professor of Mechanical Engineering.
So you want to publish an article? The process of publishing scientific papers Williams lab meeting 14 Sept 2015.
Publishing Your Work Not a Question, But rather an Execution Who? Why? When? Where? How? รัตติกร ยิ้มนิรัญ สาขาวิชาฟิสิกส์ สำนักวิชา วิทยาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยเทคโนโลยีสุรนารี
Passive vs. Active voice Carolyn Brown Taller especializado de inglés científico para publicaciones académicas D.F., México de junio de 2013 UNDERSTANDING.
Sharing research GCSE Science. From ice to paper and beyond Field Research (gathering data) Laboratory work (futher analysis) Submit paper for publication.
Georgia Institute of Technology Publish or Perish Gilda Barabino, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Academic Diversity Professor and Associate Chair for Graduate.
AERA Annual Meeting, April 16, 2012 How To Get Published: Guidance From Emerging and Senior Scholars Ethical Issues and Understanding the Review Process.
Giving Your Vitae a JOLT Michelle Pilati Professor of Psychology Rio Hondo College Edward H. Perry Professor of Mechanical Engineering University of Memphis.
AuthorAID Workshop on Research Writing Tanzania June 2010.
IADSR International Conference 2012 Aiwan-e-Iqbal Lahore, Pakistan 27–29 April 2012.
Natasha Floersch Journal Manager American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research Centers for American Indian and Alaska Native Health, University.
Publication Strategies Gregg Rothermel Professor and Jensen Chair of Software Engineering Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of.
How to publish paper in journal. Step 1.Familiarize yourself with potential publications.
RHD & Early Career Researcher Publishing Workshop Panel Members:Prof Neal Ashkanasy Prof Peter Jordan A/Prof Bob Russell Prof Adrian Wilkinson Chair: Dr.
Publishing Papers© Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid, CS5014, Fall CS5014 Research Methods in CS Dr. Ayman Abdel-Hamid Computer Science Department Virginia.
Open Access Defined An Introduction by Patti McCall.
Dr. Sundar Christopher Navigating Graduate School and Beyond: Sow Well Now To Reap Big Later Writing Papers.
ACADEMIC PUBLISHING How a manuscript becomes an article.
Roadmap for Publication and Maximizing Your Chances for Getting Published Nathan Pickett PhD candidate, Dept. of Geography and Atmospheric Sciences, University.
Dr Karen Smith Educational Development Unit. We will (briefly) cover:  the mechanics of getting published in journals  how to choose the right journal.
Publishing for early career researchers University of Glasgow, october 2015 Suzanne Mekking, sr. Publisher Brill April
Writing scientific papers and publishing your research 1) Writing a paper helps you identify missing information 2) Helps develop new ideas 3) Documents.
Call for the papers. For every researcher, to get published, it became quite difficult how to find a proper call for papers by reputed journals relevant.
How to Get Published: Surviving in the Academic World Stephen E. Condrey, Ph.D. Vice President, American Society for Public Administration Editor-in-Chief,
Being a journal editor: scholar or secretary? Liz Todd Co-editor of International Journal of Research and Method in Education
Getting Academic Works Published in Peer-Reviewed Journals
International Journal Publication: the Editorial Perspective
Publishing a paper.
Publication Strategies
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation Status Report
مقاله نویسی (شناخت مجلات و نحوه چاپ مقاله) تهیه کننده: عبدالرزاق مداحی
CSC 682: Advanced Computer Security
The Process of Getting Published: Reviews and Rejection
Researching Physics Web-based Research.
Writing scientific papers and publishing your research
Bachelor Research Project
Business The test… The peer reviews….
CPSC 699 Fall 2014 PubliCATIONS.
Post-submission Outcomes The review black box Editorial rejection
Dr John Corbett USP-CAPES International Fellow
Presentation transcript:

Scientific Peer Review Yixin Chen, Associate Professor Computer & Information Science University of Mississippi April 9, 2013

What is peer review? Corner stone of science Process to evaluate the quality of a scientist’s research By peers Reviewers and decision makers Peer Review Process for Scholarly Publication

Why do scientists want to publish? I did/discovered/proved it the first. You may create a permanent record with your name Promote research interest “Publish or perish” Reputation of a journal

Peer Review Process An “interesting” research question. Due diligence Do your research Find a “right” place to publish Document your discovery

Peer Review Process Journal Editor Associate Editor Reviewers 4 weeks later … Associate Editor – Accept without changes / Accept with minor changes – Major revision / Rewrite and resubmit / Reject

Peer Review Process Conference program committee Reviewers 4-6 weeks later Rebuttal PC chairs make final decision – Accept or reject

Anonymity Single-blind review Double-blind review Open peer review – arXiv Perelman’s 2002 proof of Thurston’s geometrization conjecture Vinay Deolalikar’s proof of P!=NP in 2010 (unfortunate, the proof has an error)

The Value of Peer Review Quality control Authors Journals Other scientists Outside the science community

Limitations of Peer Review Peer review may not increase the quality of published research Peer review is not fraud-detection system – Jan Hendrik Schön Does peer review increase the pace of scientific research?

Impact Factor (IF) Year Journal Citation Reports IF = number of citations the papers published in that journal in the previous two years / total number of papers published in the two years in that journal IF should be used cautiously 5-year IF

How do I get my paper published? Select a research topic Literature review Do the research, hopefully get interesting results Identify a target journal/conference Write, revise, polish Submit Be a reviewer!

After first round of review Read it and put it aside for a few days Most reviewers are trying to help you Address all the review comments and resubmit