Understanding the lake breeze and other drivers of ozone in Southeast Wisconsin Kohler Andrae State Park, Sheboygan, WI

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observing U.S. urban NO x emissions from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) satellite retrievals Zifeng Lu, David G. Streets Decision and Information Sciences.
Advertisements

PM 2.5 in the Upper Midwest Michael Koerber Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium.
Objective: Work with the WRAP, CenSARA, CDPHE, BLM and EPA Region 8 to use satellite data to evaluate the Oil and Gas (O&G) modeled NOx emission inventories.
AMATS Air Quality Update April 2012 Municipality of Anchorage Department of Health and Human Services.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair “Telling the ozone story with data”
Air Quality Challenges In South Central Texas Issues and Demand to Infrastructure in the Eagle Ford Region Eagle Ford Consortium Peter Bella, Natural Resources.
1 An Update on EPA Attainment Modeling Guidance for the 8- Hour Ozone NAAQS Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS/EMAD/AQMG November 16, 2005.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Evaluating.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
Lindsey Kuettner and Dr. Patricia Cleary  Department of Chemistry  University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Back Trajectory Analysis and Measurement of Ozone.
2009 Ozone Season Summary and Air Quality Trends Jen Desimone and Sunil Kumar MWAQC Meeting, COG September 23, 2009.
Regional Issues Facing Colorado and Other Western States WESTAR Spring Business Meeting Denver, Colorado March 30, 2010 Paul Tourangeau Director Colorado.
1 Summary of LADCO’s Regional Modeling in the Eastern U.S.: Preliminary Results April 27, 2009 MWAQC TAC June 15, 2009.
Regional Air Quality Issues in the Midwest Rob Kaleel Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium June 2, 2015.
Updated Ozone CART Analysis, AQAST Meeting St. Louis, MO June 3-4, 2015.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Utah May 2013.
Ozone Season to Date (as of September 22, 2015) 2015 data is preliminary Tom Downs, CCM Chief Meteorologist Maine DEP.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Relationships and Trends among Satellite NO 2 Columns, NO x Emissions, and Air Quality in North America Tiger Team Update David Streets, Greg Carmichael,
Why is the Low Level Jet Important to the Baltimore/DC Region? MWAQC-TAC Meeting January 21, 2005.
Monitoring IVMS Reporting – Does it impact driver behaviour? 1.
HRM Houston Regional Monitoring 1 Hazardous Air Pollutants Ambient Air Monitoring Data Review Air Toxics: What We Know, What We Don’t Know, and What We.
How well can we model air pollution meteorology in the Houston area? Wayne Angevine CIRES / NOAA ESRL Mark Zagar Met. Office of Slovenia Jerome Brioude,
Current and Future Air Quality Issues Facing the States Bart Sponseller Air Management Bureau Director Joseph Hoch Regional Pollutants Section Chief NASA.
OTAG Air Quality Analysis Workgroup Volume I: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Dave Guinnup and Bob Collom, Workgroup co-chair Telling the OTAG Ozone Story with Data.
Continued improvements of air quality forecasting through emission adjustments using surface and satellite data & Estimating fire emissions: satellite.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer Studying.
A N EW H AMPSHIRE G ROUND -L EVEL O ZONE P OLLUTION F ORECASTING T OOL U SING M ETEOROLOGICAL C RITERIA Northeast Regional Operational Workshop Presenter:
EPA’s New National Ambient Air Quality Standard for Sulfur Dioxide (SO 2 ) Sunil Kumar MWAQC July 28,
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Midwestern States July 2013.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Air Resources Laboratory 1 Comprehensive comparisons of NAQFC surface and column NO 2 with satellites, surface, and field campaign measurements during.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Michigan July 2013.
John Vandenberg, PhD Human Health Risk Assessment National Program Director Division Director National Center for Environmental Assessment (NCEA) Office.
AQAST NOAA/NESDIS Liaison Highlights and Planning for a Future Great Lakes Airborne Mission Brad Pierce, NOAA/NESDIS 10 th Air Quality Applied Sciences.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
A New Great Lakes Waterspout Prognostic System
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Iowa May 2013.
Presentation to the Air Quality Forum – August 9, 2005 C lark C ounty R egional O zone and P recursors S tudy (CCROPS) Robert A. Baxter, CCM T & B Systems,
Fire impacts – Natural event data exclusions/ozone monitoring Colleen Delaney, Utah Division of Air Quality March 11, 2004.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Wisconsin July 2013.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Rui Zhang1,2, Daniel Cohan1, Alex Cohan3, and Arastoo Pour-Biazar4
Western Ozone Issues WESTAR Fall Business Meeting Salt Lake City, UT
Source Apportionment Modeling to Investigate Background, Regional, and Local Contributions to Ozone Concentrations in Denver, Phoenix, Detroit, and Atlanta.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Importance of Offroad to Ozone Formation in Midwest
Ozone Monitoring Network
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Science Panel Perspective
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

Understanding the lake breeze and other drivers of ozone in Southeast Wisconsin Kohler Andrae State Park, Sheboygan, WI Angela Dickens, Ph.D. – with Mike Majewski, Bob Lopez & David Bizot Policy Analyst LADCO and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources

Lake Michigan Shoreline: WI’s worst ozone problems 2 Draft ozone design values: data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA

Lake Michigan Shoreline: WI’s worst ozone problems 3 Nonattainment for 2008 standard Draft ozone design values: data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA

Lake Michigan Shoreline: WI’s worst ozone problems 4 Nonattainment for 2008 standard Draft ozone design values: data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA

5 Lakeshore Ozone in Wisconsin Chicago Milwaukee

76 ppb 71 ppb 66 ppb 61 ppb Emissions and ozone are way down, but… LADCO model projections for 2018 From Alex Cohan, LADCO 6

One problem: Models don’t do a good job reproducing the lake breeze Can’t accurately model ozone along the lakeshore Needed for attainment demonstrations, etc. Major needs for Wisconsin: Understand the lake breeze better Improve modeling of the lake breeze 7

8 Use of paired lakeshore-inland monitors DRAFT Design Values Data have been QA’ed but have not been reviewed by EPA Operated miles inland Operated 2013 & miles inland

9 Use of paired lakeshore-inland monitors DRAFT Design Values Data have been QA’ed but have not been reviewed by EPA Operated miles inland Operated 2013 & miles inland 1-hour ozone concentrations

Wind conditions leading to high ozone Kenosha lakeshore site ( ) 10

Wind conditions leading to high ozone Kenosha lakeshore site ( ) 11

Inland Wind conditions leading to high ozone Lakeshore-inland comparison (2014 only) Lakeshore 12

Inland Wind conditions leading to high ozone Lakeshore-inland comparison (2014 only) Lakeshore Different wind directions lead to high ozone 13

Comparison of lakeshore and inland monitor concentrations One-hour ozone concentrations for 2013 & 2014 (June-August only) Kenosha 14

Comparison of lakeshore and inland monitor concentrations One-hour ozone concentrations for 2013 & 2014 (June-August only) Kenosha 15

Comparison of lakeshore and inland monitor concentrations One-hour ozone concentrations for 2013 & 2014 (June-August only) Kenosha 16

17 Comparison of lakeshore and inland monitor concentrations One-hour ozone concentrations for 2014 (June-August only) Kenosha Lakeshore exceeds standard Inland exceeds standard >80

18 Comparison of lakeshore and inland monitor concentrations One-hour ozone concentrations for 2014 (June-August only) Only one inland 8-hour average exceeded the standard Kenosha Lakeshore exceeds standard Inland exceeds standard >80

19 Comparison of lakeshore and inland monitor concentrations One-hour ozone concentrations for 2014 (June-August only) Only one inland 8-hour average exceeded the standard Kenosha Lakeshore exceeds standard Inland exceeds standard >80 Lakeshore-inland difference (ppb)

20 Comparison of lakeshore and inland monitor concentrations One-hour ozone concentrations for 2014 (June-August only) Only one inland 8-hour average exceeded the standard 7-12 ppb (10-17%) Larger differences in Sheboygan (11-17 ppb) Kenosha Lakeshore exceeds standard Inland exceeds standard >80 Lakeshore-inland difference (ppb)

Differences in ozone concentrations Kenosha lakeshore-inland sites (2013 & 2014) (winds shown are for the lakeshore monitor) 21

Differences in ozone concentrations Kenosha lakeshore-inland sites (2013 & 2014) (winds shown are for the lakeshore monitor) 22

Conclusions: Ozone drops off sharply within a few km of the shoreline Ozone concentrations and concentration differences are largest with southerly winds Exact direction varies depending on geography Very narrow range of wind direction for a site Different wind conditions lead to high ozone inland versus on the lakeshore 23

Other Efforts: 1) Fine-scale modeling of the Lake Michigan lake breeze AQAST Re-Analysis Tiger Team project: Brad Pierce & Scott Spak 2) Model validation from the LADCO Aircraft Project Theresa Foley, Army Research Laboratory 3) Ground-based and satellite analysis of ozone precursors in WI Tracey Holloway & students 4)Comparison and origins of ozone trends in WI and Chicago Ping Jing (Loyola U.) and David Streets 5) New field campaign??? 24

Thank you! 25

Effects of the lake breeze on ozone concentrations 2014 data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA

Effects of the lake breeze on ozone concentrations pre/post-lake breeze Lake breeze Average of events 2014 data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA

Effects of the lake breeze on ozone concentrations pre/post-lake breeze Lake breeze Average of events 2014 data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA

Effects of the lake breeze on ozone concentrations 2014 data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA

Effects of the lake breeze on ozone concentrations Pre/post lake breeze Lake breeze 2014 data have been QA’ed but are not yet been reviewed by EPA