NIST Workshop on a Common Data Format for Electronic Voting Systems October 29-30, 2009 National Institute of Standards and Technology 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

IEEE P1622 Meeting, Oct 2011 IEEE P1622 Meeting October 24-25, 2011 Overview of IEEE P1622 Draft Standard for Electronic Distribution of Blank Ballots.

Advertisements

September 30, 2011 OASIS Open Smart Grid Reference Model: Standards Landscape Analysis.

TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Review of VVSG 1.1 Nelson Hastings, Ph.D. Technical Project Leader for Voting Standards, ITL

Election Data Standards Requirements: Getting on with what we’ve got John L. McCarthy, volunteer Verified Voting Foundation Common Elections Data Format.

Working Group 2: Next Generation Alerting December 16, 2011 Co-Chairs: Damon Penn, Asst. Administrator, Nat’l Continuity Programs, DHS-FEMA Scott Tollefsen,

United States Election Assistance Commission Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA Pilot Program Testing and Certification Manual & UOCAVA.

Common Data Format in Election Results Reporting Mid-Atlantic Election Officials Consortium efforts to produce a unified platform for election results.

Voting System Qualification How it happens and why.

12/9-10/2009 TGDC Meeting TGDC Recommendations Research as requested by the EAC John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

Electronic Poll Book Statutory Overview and VSTOP December 18, 2013 Brad King Co-Director, Indiana Election Division 2014 Election Administrators Conference.

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 UOCAVA Pilot Projects for the 2012 Federal Election Report from the UOCAVA Working Group Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of.

TGDC Meeting, July 2011 Overview of July TGDC Meeting Belinda L. Collins, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Voting Standards, ITL

U.S. National Committee for CODATA Overview of Recent Activities and Plans September 2006 U.S. National Committee for CODATA Overview of Recent Activities.

Copyright OASIS, 2001 OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee John Borras Office of e-Envoy Cabinet Office UK Government May 2002.

EAC-requested VVSG Research Overview and Status June 2008 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division National Institute of.

FLEX Day Presentation August 13, Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM)

TGDC Meeting Presentation July 26 th, 2011 Ian S. Piper Director, Certification Dominion Voting Systems, Inc. TGDC Meeting,

TGDC Meeting, July 2011 IEEE P.1622 Update John P. Wack Computer Scientist, Software and Systems Division, ITL

NIST – Who We Are and What We Do 1 NIST is a world class scientific and technical agency uniquely focused on driving innovation and economic competitiveness.

Open Source Digital Voting: Overview of Data Format Definition Positions and Activities JOHN SEBES Chief Technology Officer OSDV FOUNDATION NIST Common.

8-May-08 For Computer Society Internal Use Only Walz1 IEEE-CS Constitution Standards Activity Board request to amend John Walz Prepared for IEEE CS C&B,

Making every vote count. United States Election Assistance Commission HAVA 101 TGDC Meeting December 9-10, 2009.

IEEE P1622 Meeting, Feb 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

Workshop On STRATEGY FOR PROVIDING ATMOSPHERIC INFORMATION Planning to Exploit our National Investment in Weather Technology December 3 - 5, 2001.

IEEE Working Group P1622 Meeting February 24-25, 2013 National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD.

TGDC Meeting, December 2011 IEEE P1622 Common Data Format Standardization Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

IEEE P-1622 Voting Systems Electronic Data Interchange February 8–9, 2011 Meeting at the US Election Assistance Commission Arthur M. Keller, Ph.D., P-1622.

Improving U.S. Voting Systems Interoperability in Election Data and Devices TGDC Meeting July 20 – 21, 2015 Improving U.S. Voting Systems 1 John P. Wack.

Working Group 2: Next Generation Alerting March 22, 2012 Co-Chairs: Damon Penn, Asst. Administrator, Nat’l Continuity Programs, DHS-FEMA Scott Tollefsen,

UK LEADS THE ADOPTION OF E-VOTING STANDARDS John Borras Chair Election & Voter Services Technical Committee

The OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee Progress Report John Borras Chair Technical Committee COE e-Voting Review Meeting Madrid 16 October.

Usability and Accessibility Working Group Report Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology TGDC Meeting,

TGDC Meeting, December Common Data Format Directions John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

2005 ANSI Annual Conference From A to Veeck: Standardization and the Law October 6, 2005 Washington, DC.

Briefing for NIST Acting Director James Turner regarding visit from EAC Commissioners March 26, 2008 For internal use only 1.

NIST Voting Program Activities Update February 21, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Accessibility and Usability Considerations for UOCAVA Remote Electronic Voting Systems Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute.

April 8, 2011Page 1 April 8, 2011 The University of Texas Interdisciplinary Energy Conference Overcoming Barriers to Smart Grid & New Energy Services Panel.

5.2 Scope: This standard defines common data interchange formats for event records for voting systems. Voting systems, including election administration.

Standards for e-Enabled Elections: The work of the OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee John Borras Chair Technical Committee

The OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee EML Interoperability Demo

Oct 15-17, : Integratability and Data Export Page 1Next VVSG Training Voting devices must speak (produce records) using a commonly understood language,

TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report of the UOCAVA Working Group John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology DRAFT.

NIST Voting Program Page 1 NIST Voting Program Lynne Rosenthal National Institute of Standards and Technology

TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Report on Other Resolutions from Dec 2009 TGDC Meeting John Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

Planning and Budgeting Integration Model (PBIM) Workshop November 19, 2015.

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Common Data Format (CDF) Update John P. Wack National Institute of Standards and Technology

P1622 Audit Use Case Neal McBurnett IEEE P1622 meeting

NIST Voting Program Activities Update January 4, 2007 Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division.

1 DECEMBER 9-10, 2009 Gaithersburg, Maryland TECHNICAL GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE Commissioner Donetta Davidson.

Race to the Top Assessment Competition Public & Expert Input Meetings Procurement Washington, DC January 14, 2010.

NIST Common Data Format Workshop Lowell Finley Deputy Secretary of State Voting Systems Technology and Policy California Secretary of State Debra Bowen.

© Copyright 2002 TEM Consulting, LP - All Rights Reserved Presentation To GTRI Voting Technology WorkshopRev – 05/31/02 - HSB GTRI Future of Voting Technology.

Support for a Common Data Exchange Format Election Systems & Software IEEE Standards Working Group P1622 Voting Systems Electronic Data Interchange February.

TGDC Meeting, July 2010 Overview of NIST Activities and TGDC Meeting Agenda Martin Herman, PhD National Institute of Standards and Technology

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Development of High Level Guidelines for UOCAVA voting systems Andrew Regenscheid National Institute of Standards and Technology.

TGDC Pre-Meeting July , 2015 NIST Facility - Gaithersburg, Maryland Members : Designated Federal Official Matthew V. Masterson, EAC Commissioner,

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 Report from Workshop on UOCAVA Remote Voting Systems Nelson Hastings National Institute of Standards and Technology

Board on Enterprise Strategic Topics (BEST)* 2013 Annual Report and looking ahead into 2014 Chris Strager and Andrea Bleistein * Formally known as the.

Interoperability Voting Public Work Group Jeramy Gray, CIO, LA County John Wack, NIST.

1 Karen Ray Branch Chief, Office for Interoperability and Compatibility Command, Control and Interoperability Division Science and Technology Directorate.

P1622 Voting Systems Electronic Data Interchange Arthur Keller, chair (self employed at Minerva Consulting, Affiliated with Univ. Calif., Santa Cruz) 1IEEE.

TGDC Meeting, Jan 2011 VVSG 2.0 and Beyond: Usability and Accessibility Issues, Gaps, and Performance Tests Sharon Laskowski, PhD National Institute of.

Copyright OASIS, 2001 OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee John Borras Office of e-Envoy Cabinet Office UK Government Dec 2002.

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Gordon Day Chair, IEEE Global Public Policy Committee 11 August 2017

CDF for Voting Systems: Human Factors Issues

UOCAVA Electronic Blank Ballot Delivery Use Case

At the polls on Election Day

October 15 October 30 by 5:00 p.m. November 3 by 5:00 p.m. November 6

Presentation transcript:

NIST Workshop on a Common Data Format for Electronic Voting Systems October 29-30, 2009 National Institute of Standards and Technology 1

Page 2 Opening Remarks Cita Furlani, Director, Information Technology Laboratory, NIST John Wack, Technical Manager, NIST Voting Program James Long, Computer Engineer, Election Assistance Commission

Page 3 To identify and agree upon a set of requirements for a common data format for voting systems interoperability of different equipment auditability transparency publishing (communication with consumers of election data, such as media outlets) integration between polls and registration transition to electronic record-keeping CDF Workshop Goals

Page 4 Stakeholders include voters manufacturers election officials consumers of election data organizations with existing data formats (e.g., OASIS) academics and others with related work CDF Workshop Goals

Page 5 CDF Workshop Conclusions We will catalog requirements as they are identified and discuss them on Day 2 Panels moderated by Mark Skall Requirements determined by the end of this workshop will be distributed to you for review and comment, using and

Page 6 Workshop Structure Opening Remarks Four Panels Election official and State experiences Common data format research OASIS EML overview Manufacturer and integrator panel Requirements summaries and next steps

Page 7 The TGDC’s VVSG 2007 Does not identify a specific standard, but encourages formats such as OASIS EML or output of IEEE Voting System Electronic Data Interchange Project 1622 Has mostly SHOULD requirements: The voting system SHALL use a non-restrictive, publicly-available format with respect to export of report data. Voting systems SHOULD use a common, consensus-based format for export and interchange of data and reports. The voting system manufacturer SHOULD use a common format for export and interchange of data and reports across its major device categories.

Page 8 Panel 1: Election Officials and State Experiences with Common Data Formats This panel presents state election official experiences dealing with election data and common formats. The goal of the panel is to discuss and derive requirements for a common data format. Panel is from 9:45 till 12 noon Break at 10:15 – 10:30 Each speaker has 20 minutes including questions

Page 9 Panel 1: Election Officials and State Experiences with Common Data Formats Paul Miller, Voting Systems Manager, State of Washington, Office of the Secretary of State Lowell Finley, Deputy Secretary, Voting Systems Technology & Policy, California Paul Lux, Supervisor of Elections, Okaloosa County, Florida Paul Stenbjorn, Information Services Manager, Virginia State Board of Elections Scott Hilkert, Managing Principal and COO, Catalyst Consulting Group, Inc. Neal McBurnett, Consultant, ElectionAudits

Page 10 Panel 2: Common Data Format Research This panel presents research and other industry conclusions regarding common data formats, including What data needs to be represented by a CDF Usability issues with a CDF A data model for a CDF Points within the election process where data in a CDF is needed Panel is from 1 PM till 4 PM Break at 2:15 – 2:45 Each speaker has 30 minutes including questions

Page 11 Panel 2: Common Data Format Research Andrea Mascher, The University of Iowa Sharon Laskowski, NIST David Flater, NIST John Sebes, Co-Director, Open Source Digital Voting Foundation Kim Brace, Election Data Services

Page 12 Panel 3: OASIS Election Markup Language (EML) Overview This panel presents information about OASIS Election Markup Language (EML). The goal of this panel is to learn more about EML in light of requirements generated by this workshop. Panel is from 4 PM till 5:30 PM Each speaker has 30 minutes including questions

Page 13 Panel 3: OASIS Election Markup Language (EML) Overview John McCarthy, Verified Voting John Borras (via phone), Chair of OASIS E & VS Technical Committee David Webber, OASIS / Open Voting Solutions Inc.

Page 14 Panel 4: Manufacturer and Integrator Panel Discussion This panel presents manufacturer and integrator information about specific common formats, how common formats affect manufacturers, interoperability issues, and requirements. Panel is from 9:00 till 11:00 AM Break at 10:15 – 10:30 Each speaker has minutes including questions

Page 15 Panel 4: Manufacturer and Integrator Panel Discussion Duncan Buell, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of South Carolina Ed Smith, Dominion Eric Coomer, Sequoia Parker Abercrombie, Open Voting Consortium Daemmon Hughes, Overseas Vote Foundation Aaron Strauss, Voting Information Project

Page 16 Requirements Roundtable Discussion

Page 17 Next Steps

Page 18 Adjourn