Division of Astronomical Sciences Update (Life After the Senior Review) Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 11 October 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope News since the February update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee Telecon May 2012 Fred Borcherding/Nigel.
Advertisements

The Federal Budget Outlook and NSF Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management Budget Division/Program.
THE NSF BUDGET Overview of Agency Funding Processes Presented by Beth Blue National Science Foundation Office of Budget, Finance, and Award Management.
NSF Regional Grants Conference St. Louis, MO
Conversation with ACCORD on GSMT 21 January 2005 Michael S. Turner, Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical & Physics Sciences National Science.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Office of High Energy Physics, Cosmic Frontier Mid-Scale Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (MS-DESI) Experiment Fermilab PAC Oct.
AAS Congressional Visits Day Tom Statler & Maria Womack March 12, 2013.
FACET: The Proposal Process with Q & A Carsten Hast SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
USGS Realignment, Science Planning, and FY 2012 Budget Matthew C. Larsen Associate Director Climate and Land Use Change U.S. Department of the Interior.
NSF Program Update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee 13 February 2006.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
Division of Astronomical Sciences Program Update AAAC 11 February 2008.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
1 1 AST Committee of Visitors February 2011 National Solar Observatory Overview Craig Foltz Program Officer NSO.
Competition for the Management of NCAR Unidata Policy Committee September 7, 2006.
1 TMT Project Update 29 November 2006 UCSC Astronomy Faculty Some of this information is sensitive or confidential.
Office of High Energy Physics View on Dark Energy Collaborations Kathleen Turner Office of High Energy Physics (HEP) Office of Science (SC), U.S. Department.
AAAC Meeting February, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort at a.
NCAR Annual Budget Review October 8, 2007 Tim Killeen NCAR Director.
Activities of and Prospective Issues before the Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics Report by David Spergel, CAA Co-Chair Disclaimer: These slides.
NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee February 15, 2005.
NSF Program Update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee 11 May 2006.
AST Portfolio Review Tom Statler, NSF/AST AAAC Telecon, 11 May 2012.
NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee May 16, 2005.
A Roadmap forNationalOIRFacilities AAAC May 2005 OIR Long Range Planning Committee Document for submission to NSF AST and CAA May 2005.
AAAC Jim Ulvestad February 10, Outline Brief Facility and Science News Budget Outlook & Astro2010 Status Meta-issues 2 02/10/2012.
NSF Division of Astronomical Sciences AAAC October 15-16, 2009 Craig Foltz.
SBCC CONSULTATIVE PLANNING PROCESS. The Consultative Planning Process A holistic planning process has not been undertaken at Santa Barbara City College.
0 United Nations Capital Development Fund Summary of Strategic Partnership Between UNDP and UNCDF Moving Closer Together in the Context of the UNDP Strategic.
NSF Update AAAC 8 February Update Topics FY2007 Budget Situation FY2007 Budget Situation FY2008 Request FY2008 Request Senior Review Status and.
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
Exo-Planet Task Force (ExoPTF) Jonathan Lunine (LPL) Stephen Ridgway (NASA)
Brinkman Report: Setting Priorities for Large Facility Projects Sponsored by the NSF Key Issues Raised in Report Transparency of process (next slide) Involvement.
NSF Program Update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee 12 October 2006.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
Morris Aizenman Senior Scientist Directorate for Mathematical & Physical Sciences National Science Foundation Physics and Engineering Sciences Committee.
NRAO Users Committee Meeting May 20-21, National Radio Astronomy Observatory NRAO Users Committee Meeting – May 20-21, 2008 ALMA Operations Chris.
National Science Foundation Division of Astronomical Sciences Facility/Large Project Oversight and Role of Managing Organization Committee of Visitors.
1 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope Status Update for AAAC October 13, 2011 Nigel Sharp Division of Astronomical Sciences, NSF Kathy Turner Office of High.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006 Implications for GSMT.
Brian Dewhurst Feb 9, 2007 Board on Physics and Astronomy NRC Astrophysics Update AAAC Feb 8-9, 2007 Brian Dewhurst BPA Staff.
6/6/08NASA/USRA Management review- SETI TLR - 1 A New SOFIA Science Vision Charter, Progress, and Plans Tom Roellig.
AST Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 10 May 2007.
NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Oct 11, 2005.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006.
AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the.
Office of Core and Shared Resources Faculty Council Meeting October 9, 2012.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
UlvestadEVLA Advisory Committee Meeting September 6-7, Future EVLA Operations Jim Ulvestad.
1 LSST Town Hall 227 th meeting of the AAS 1/7/2016 Pat Eliason, LSSTC Executive Office Pat Osmer, LSSTC Senior Advisor.
Report of the Committee of Visitors of the Division of Materials Science and Engineering (DMSE) to the Basic Energy Sciences Advisory Committee Review.
Senior Review of NSF Facilities NOAO Users Committee October 4, 2005.
Division of Astronomical Sciences Senior Review Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 10 May 2007.
Mid-Scale Projects Vernon Pankonin Team Leader. Mid-Scale Projects Programmatic Characteristics Not a formal funding program. Collection of proposals.
GSMT SWG Meeting November, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N.
OMB Status 03/31/05 Monday, June 6, 2005 OMB Progress 03/31/05 Vicki Novak Tom Luedtke Gwen SykesPat DunningtonGwen Sykes Best in Government! Steps to.
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
NSF-NAC Jim Ulvestad, Division Director, MPS/AST
NSF Commitment to Diversity NAC Meeting September 16, 2017
Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Oct 11, 2005
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Observatory Science Operations
Observatory Science Operations
Scientific Potential Current Design Efforts Complementarity with JWST
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

Division of Astronomical Sciences Update (Life After the Senior Review) Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 11 October 2007

Outline Senior Review implementation Senior Review implementation  Progress  Concerns Interagency and AST News Interagency and AST News FY2008 and beyond FY2008 and beyond

Finding 1 - The Scientific Challenge NSF finds this the most important conclusion of the report: “Proper maintenance of current facilities while simultaneously developing and beginning operation of the proposed new facilities is infeasible under any reasonable expectations for federal budget support based on past funding levels. The cuts that are proposed to the existing program are as deep as possible without causing irreparable damage and will only allow a start to be made on new initiatives.”

“Senior Review” Recommended changes Recommended changes  Reduce support to VLBA to $3M by FY2001, closure if sufficient outside funds not found  Reduce support to Arecibo/NAIC to $8M by FY2009 and to $4M in FY2011, closure if additional outside funds not found  Support of GONG++ to cease 1 year after successful deployment of NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory (unless other support forthcoming)  Investigate possible reductions in administrative costs, scientific staff costs, selective observatory programs and site operations  Shift balance of NOAO programs to provide increased access to an optimized suite of high performance telescopes of all apertures in both hemispheres

From the Conclusion “It should be emphasized that, in none of the proposed actions can the facilities targeted be seen as redundant to the scientific enterprise. Instead, the SR is recommending reduced AST funding or closure of some telescopes that could be unique and productive for 20 years.” “These findings, which go beyond the SR’s charge, may appear defeatist to some. However, the SR developed the more optimistic view that, with patience, cooperation and wise planning, it will be possible to realize the promise of the next generation of major observatories.”

Executive Summary Radio-millimeter-submillimeter Program

NRAO Transition Program Very Long Baseline Array Very Long Baseline Array  Seek partners who will contribute personnel or financial support to the operations of the VLBA by  Limit AST support to $3M, close if remaining costs are not found elsewhere. Reduction in operating costs of GBT Reduction in operating costs of GBT Reduction in the cost of administrative support Reduction in the cost of administrative support Reductions in scientific staff costs Reductions in scientific staff costs

NAIC (Arecibo) Transition Program Taper to $8M per year AST support over next 3 years   Concentrate on surveys   ~20% time for individual PIs   Assumes ATM support at ~$2M/yr continues   Need to consider alternate operational models   See cost review slides Seek other sources of support for operations By 2011, AST support limited to $4M. If other support not sufficient to produce a viable operational model, recommends closure. Cornell plan closes planetary radar ~ Oct 2008

Executive Summary Solar Program

NSO Transition Program NSO should:   organize an orderly withdrawal of personnel and resources, including the SOLIS telescope, from Kitt Peak/Tucson and Sacramento Peak and start to close down operations at these sites as soon as ATST funding begins.   consolidate its management and science into a single headquarters as soon as possible.   Support of the Global Oscillations Network Group (GONG++) project should cease one year after the successful deployment of NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory, unless the majority of operations support is found from other sources.

Towards a National GSMT Program Need to assure a healthy scientific enterprise going into the GSMT era (community was heard in SR process) Need to assure a healthy scientific enterprise going into the GSMT era (community was heard in SR process)  Define the “System”  Appropriate range of aperture and access  Necessary instrumentation, maintained and supported  Assure that the system is robust against delays and uncertainty along the GSMT path Path from development through construction and into operations, including successful partnership formation, is complex Path from development through construction and into operations, including successful partnership formation, is complex  Requires leadership and planning at unprecedented level at NSF

Towards a National GSMT Program NOAO’s Role NSF has asked AURA/NOAO to act as NSF’s “Program Manager” for GSMT development NSF has asked AURA/NOAO to act as NSF’s “Program Manager” for GSMT development  Role similar to NASA center in development of major space missions Lead in defining the “system” and assuring its long-term health Lead in defining the “system” and assuring its long-term health Understand and champion national needs for a GSMT Understand and champion national needs for a GSMT  National Science Working Group (Meeting 8-9 November)  National “Design Reference Mission” to set scientific performance expectations, operational models Promote development at a pace that recognizes both private and federal timescales Promote development at a pace that recognizes both private and federal timescales Establish appropriate, symmetrical interfaces with TMT and GMT Establish appropriate, symmetrical interfaces with TMT and GMT

Developing an NSF Response and Implementation Plan AST is working closely with facilities to understand implications of recommendations as we consider possible implementation paths NSF is active in encouraging and engaging in discussion with other possible partners in facility operations, including international partners and other funding agencies.   NASA for Arecibo, VLBA, GONG++   Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Puerto Rican Universities; local business   International agency meetings convened by AST AST is working with the community and NOAO to determine where re- investment in existing OIR facilities should occur and in the development of an integrated and coordinated “System”   NOAO’s ReSTAR deliberations

Developing an NSF Response and Implementation Plan AST is undertaking detailed cost reviews of each observatory necessary to understand where cost reductions can be made   Understand operational costs, appropriate staffing levels   Consider other operational and business models   RFP has been issued; three bids likely Explore costs and legal issues associated with recommendations e.g. environmental, deconstruction, divestiture, termination costs – engaging outside studies over the next year; first study is for Arecibo and first site visit just finished yesterday (report due ~ 1 Feb) Now constructing the forward look - What can we accomplish as the funds become available under various budget models?

The Operations Challenge We have a 50 year tradition of operations that we must examine, both for now and for future facilities We have a 50 year tradition of operations that we must examine, both for now and for future facilities Can current level of service be delivered for less? Can current level of service be delivered for less?  Some opinions based on university-scale ops  We must understand the costs thoroughly  Answer may well be, “No” Do we need to look at different service models? Do we need to look at different service models?  Changes similar to those at NAIC may be necessary at all AST facilities  Facilities managers and NSF must have an open dialogue  Domenici press release, e.g., is not a healthy reaction

AST Concerns Apparent short half-life of community attention Apparent short half-life of community attention  Many rumors  Statements indicating report not read/assimilated  AST met with community leaders in Chicago and jointly crafted “Dear Colleague” letter recently circulated by AAS Increasing political pressure and interference with science community-based process and plan. Increasing political pressure and interference with science community-based process and plan.  Budget doubling removes need for Senior Review and invalidates conclusions?  Growth in MREFC account can easily cover Arecibo problem?  Arecibo future being determined without ATM consultation?  Letters from members of Congress to Director  Bill introduced to guarantee continued support of Arecibo

Good Interagency News! Virtual Observatory MOU signed! Virtual Observatory MOU signed!  Onward to a joint solicitation Excellent interactions with both NASA and DOE Excellent interactions with both NASA and DOE  Joint consideration of decadal survey proposal review and structure (including OMB and OSTP)  Regular, fruitful discussions between AST and NASA Astrophysics Division  NSF AST – DOE HEP interface very effective in on- going, joint reviews, decisions, and oversight

Other AST News 2008 Committee of Visitors 2008 Committee of Visitors  Planning underway - John Carlstrom will chair the committee  Dates: 6 – 8 February  Consider serving if asked! FY2007 Close out FY2007 Close out  Success rate – 24% NSB declared ATST to be ready for inclusion in a future budget NSB declared ATST to be ready for inclusion in a future budget

Charting the Future Sine qua non Sine qua non  Healthy grants program  Successful completion and operation of ALMA  Robust support of base facilities (as defined by Senior Review) Progress on GSMT, LSST, SKA → “TDPs” Progress on GSMT, LSST, SKA → “TDPs” Resources for mid-scale projects → “Mid- scale” {CMB, DETF, ExoPlanet, next Decade Survey small and moderate} Resources for mid-scale projects → “Mid- scale” {CMB, DETF, ExoPlanet, next Decade Survey small and moderate} Models of budget outlook Models of budget outlook

Looking Forward to 2008 (At President’s Request Level) Healthy increase (~10%) in grants program Healthy increase (~10%) in grants program  Grant support for facility users under study Partnerships in Astronomy and Astrophysics Research and Education (PAARE, NSF ) Partnerships in Astronomy and Astrophysics Research and Education (PAARE, NSF ) New program helping young investigators start instrumentation careers (grad students, post-docs, beginning faculty) New program helping young investigators start instrumentation careers (grad students, post-docs, beginning faculty) Increases in ATI (30%), TSIP (25%) and UROs Increases in ATI (30%), TSIP (25%) and UROs NOAO up $2.3M to refurbish and modernize KPNO and CTIO facilities NOAO up $2.3M to refurbish and modernize KPNO and CTIO facilities NRAO up $2M for ALMA early operations NRAO up $2M for ALMA early operations GSMT program at $5M and SKA TDP at $3M per year GSMT program at $5M and SKA TDP at $3M per year