1 A Snapshot of Travel Modeling Activities 12 th TRB Planning Application Conference May 20, 2009 Fred Ducca & Supin Yoder, FHWA David Kurth, Cambridge.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

RE-THINKING ACCOUNTABILITY Social Accountability and the Search for More Effective Public Expenditure Jeff Thindwa Participation and Civic Engagement.
Transportation Conformity Basics. What is Transportation Conformity? Transportation conformity (conformity) is a way to ensure that Federal funding and.
Structural Design Program Review Massachusetts Department of Transportation September 20-23, 2011.
Transportation Planning Capacity Building Indiana MPO Conference October 15-17, 2003.
Building blocks for adopting Performance Budgeting in Canada Bruce Stacey – Executive Director Results Based Management Treasury Board Secretariat, Canada.
Transportation Planning for Federal Land Management Agencies (FLMAs) SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006 SAFETEA-LU Training Webcast April 2006.
Forecasting Traffic and Toll Revenue for Public-Private Partnerships (P3) vs. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO): A comparison 14 th TRB National.
Iowa Travel Demand Model Management Phillip J. Mescher, AICP, CPM Iowa Department of Transportation Office of Systems Planning Ames, Iowa
Wade E. Kline, AICP Community Development Planner.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA’s Talking Freight Seminar presented by Michael Williamson Cambridge Systematics, Inc. April.
1 How to Succeed in Statewide and MPO Transportation Planning.
First home-interview survey (1944). Gravity model Where do the trips produced in TAZ 3 go? ? ? ? ?
1 IS112 – Chapter 1 Notes Computer Organization and Programming Professor Catherine Dwyer Fall 2005.
Analytical Needs SEMCOG Travel Model Improvement Program Donnelly, Davidson, Binkowski & Arens 12-Dec-2011.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group presented by Ron West Cambridge Systematics, Inc.
Current Events In Activity-Based Modeling Ken Cervenka, P.E., AICP North Central Texas Council Of Governments For AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group Meeting.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Transportation Planning Applications Committee (ADB50) presented by Sarah Sun Federal Highway Administration.
Ohio Transportation Planning Conference July 16, 2014.
Ed Christopher Resource Center Planning Team Federal Highway Administration 4749 Lincoln Mall Drive Matteson, IL 60443
FY BUDGET SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 17, 2014 BUDGET UPDATE.
Metropolitan Planning Organization Travel Forecasting State of the Practice Presented To AMPO Modeling Work Group By Guy Rousseau, Atlanta Regional Commission.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Chapter 11: Strategic Leadership Chapter 8 Production and operations management.
2 Systems Architecture, Fifth Edition Chapter Goals Describe the activities of information systems professionals Describe the technical knowledge of computer.
Metropolitan Travel Forecasting: Current Practice and Future Direction AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group December 10, 2007 Washington, DC.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented to 13 th Transportation Planning Applications Conference prepared and presented by David.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
Urban Growth Modeling Approaches Discussion 1. Overview Planning Theory Meets Modeling Planning Theory Meets Modeling UrbanSim as an example of complex.
Transportation Conformity in North Carolina. Transportation Planning Framework Required by NCGS §136 ‑ In MPOs, includes 20 year fiscally constrained.
November 30, 2012 Beverly Davis, AICP Ron Ratliff, AICP.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Status Report on the AMPO Pooled Research Initiative on Travel Modeling Presentation to AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group November 4, 2010 MWCOG / NCRTPB.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Preparing Your Budget to Meet the ASBO Meritorious Budget Award Criteria Illinois ASBO Annual Conference May 20, 2010.
August 29, 2007 Metropolitan Travel Forecasting TRB Special Report 288 Mn/DOT Statewide Travel Demand Modeling Committee August 29, 2007.
1 Operations Academy Senior Management Program Next Offering September 16-26, 2008.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Consulting with Idaho Tribes in Planning Transportation Development 14 th Annual NW Tribal Transportation Symposium Patti Raino, ITD.
TRB Policy Study- State of Practice in Metropolitan Area Travel Forecasting Presented To AMPO Travel Model Working Group By Jon Williams March 20, 2006.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop presented by Krista Jeannotte Cambridge Systematics, Inc. March.
Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Overview on Performance Management National Forum on Performance-Based.
Linking Planning and Operations in Las Vegas Talking Operations Seminar March 23, 2005.
Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.
Update: NCHRP Synthesis /Topic Advanced Practices in Travel Forecasting Presented to: AMPO Travel Modeling Work Group October 1-2, 2009 Chicago.
ITS Architecture Development in a Regional Planning Context Central Ohio Case Study Erika Witzke Principal Engineer Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission.
Incorporating Connected/Automated Vehicles into the Transportation Planning Process November, 2015 Max Azizi US DOT.
Strategies for making evaluations more influential in supporting program management and informing decision-making Australasian Evaluation Society 2011.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Status Update on Developing Guidance for Travel Demand Modeling Office of Transportation Data and Analysis August 11, 2009 Mark Flinner, Traffic Forecast.
Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.
1 Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Travel Modeling Working Group Ronald Milone Principal Transportation Engineer National Capital Region.
1 Review of Draft FY2009 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Ronald F. Kirby Director, Department of Transportation Planning National Capital Region Transportation.
1 Briefing on the TPB Transportation Planning Process Certification Summary Report Sandra Jackson Federal Highway Administration Transportation Planning.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
2004 National Conference on Community Volunteering and National Service Volunteer Management Capacity Study: Summary Results Mark A. Hager, Urban Institute.
VISION – NJ ITS Architecture Update Kick Off. Project Goals Establish the vision for innovation in operations and technology’s role for improving mobility,
Addressing Freight in the Planning and Programming Process presented by Jim Brogan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. July 11, 2001 FHWA Freight Planning Workshop.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
Module 9: Transition and Exit Strategy ASEAN Training of Trainers (TOT) on Disaster Recovery.
TSMO Program Plan Development Roundtable
Chapter 1 Computer Technology: Your Need to Know
Integrated Dynamic Travel Models: Recent SHRP2 Projects
What is the state of transportation in the Middle Tennessee area?
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan Update
Lessons Learned from Backcasting and Forecasting Exercises
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
2045 LRTP Overview United Way of St Johns County May 10, 2019.
“Strategic Mobility Research: Enhancing Mobility, Stimulating Economic Activity, Saving Lives” NCHRP Project 8-36 (147): Research Team WSP USA EDR Group,
Presentation transcript:

1 A Snapshot of Travel Modeling Activities 12 th TRB Planning Application Conference May 20, 2009 Fred Ducca & Supin Yoder, FHWA David Kurth, Cambridge Systematics

2 Presentation Outline Impetus of the Snapshot Project NAS Report 288 Summaries of MPOs with good practice

3 TRB Special Report 288: Metropolitan Travel Forecasting Determine state of practice in metropolitan travel forecasting Determine capability of models to address current issues Recommend actions needed to ensure models can address current issues

4 Snapshot of Good Modeling Practice In-depth understanding of MPOs with good modeling practice Interviewed five MPOs Atlanta, Columbus, Dallas-Fort Worth, Sacramento and Seattle, Project Report: A Snapshot of Travel modeling Activities Detailed technical reviews of Activity Based Models Columbus & Sacramento Project Report: Activity Based Travel Demand Forecasting, Reviews of MORPC and SACOG Modeling Practices

5 Snapshot – MPO Models MPOCurrent ModelEmerging Practice Model ARCTrip-basedDeveloping MORPCActivity-/tour- based Existing NCTCOGTrip-basedDeveloping PSRCTrip-basedDeveloping SACOGBothExisting

6 Snapshot – MPO Model Components MPOGenerationDistribution ARCLogit & Cross-ClassGravity MORPCLogitDestination Choice NCTCOGCross-ClassGravity PSRCCross-ClassGravity SACOGCross-ClassDest. Choice & Gravity

7 Snapshot – MPO Model Components MPOMode ChoiceTime-of-Day ARCNested LogitDiurnal Factors MORPCMultinomial LogitLogit-Based Choice NCTCOGNested LogitDiurnal Factors PSRCMultinomial LogitLogit-Based Choice SACOGNested LogitDiurnal Factors

8 Snapshot – MPO Model Components MPOLand UseTruck Model ARCIPEF/DRAM-EMPAL3-Step-Local Data MORPCGIS-BasedQFRM-based NCTCOGDRAM-EMPAL3-Step-Local Data PSRCDRAM-EMPAL3-Step-WS Data SACOGNone3-Step-Local Data

9 Snapshot – MPO Typical Applications ARCMORPCNCTCOGPSRCSACOG Conformity●●●● Project Prior. ●●● EIS● ●●● LRTP ● ●●●● SIP●●● New Starts●●●●● TSM/TDM●●

10 MPO Interview Topic Areas Role of the travel model in the transportation planning process; Primary challenges and emerging issues regarding use of travel models/forecasts; Support for the travel modeling process; Future plans for travel model updates.

11 MPO Interview Topic Areas Role of the travel model in the transportation planning process; Models play a central role More pronounced as funding lags needs

12 MPO Interview Topic Areas Primary challenges and emerging issues regarding use of travel models/forecasts; 2 broad groups of challenges Those addressed with existing models, ad hoc analysis, major assumptions, or less detail than desired. Those that cannot be credibly addressed with current models.

13 MPO Interview Topic Areas Support for the travel modeling process; Strong in each of the areas Financial support provides evidence Annual budgets for modeling, planning, data collection, land use, consultants & misc. ranged from $1.85 M – $5.6 M

14 MPO Interview Topic Areas Future plans for travel model updates 2 MPOs have ABMs 3 MPOs developing ABMs

15 Snapshot – Findings Fiscal constraint puts more focus on evaluation Need to establish model credibility with MPO Board Current models’ limited ability to address emerging issues Short term solutions developed

16 Snapshot - Findings Motivation for activity models Activity based models promising Address more complex issues Parallel Approach to Model Improvements Continuous improvement to existing four step model Incremental move to advanced model Need for time dependent network models SHRP C-10

17 Snapshot - Findings Need for freight models Challenges Develop and maintain quality data Limited resources for advanced model Training Computer resources Budgetary Staffing for modeling / training

18 Snapshot - Conclusions Four step remains basic approach Inherent shortcomings Need for quality data Context specific applications Obstacle to improvement Limited resources Findings support TRB SR 288

19 Links TRB SR Snapshot of Good Modeling Practice owse/list/6/ owse/list/6/1276 TMIP