CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner, Hector Garcia Morales 12 th of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ECE 8443 – Pattern Recognition ECE 8423 – Adaptive Signal Processing Objectives: The Linear Prediction Model The Autocorrelation Method Levinson and Durbin.
Advertisements

Tests of DFS and WFS at ATF2 Andrea Latina (CERN), Jochem Snuverink (RHUL), Nuria Fuster (IFIC) 18 th ATF2 Project Meeting – Feb – LAPP, Annecy.
Summary of the discussion for the commissioning session 2 nd ATF2 Project Meeting KEK, Tsukuba, Japan 6/ 1/ 2006 T.Okugi (KEK)
Testing and Development of Feed-Forward System for ATF2 A. Kalinin Accelerator Science and Technology Centre, Daresbury Laboratory, UK Fifth ATF2 Project.
Author - Title (Footer)1 LINEAR LATTICE ERRORS AT THE ESRF: MODELING AND CORRECTION A. Franchi, L. Farvacque, T. Perron.
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
Active Calibration of Cameras: Theory and Implementation Anup Basu Sung Huh CPSC 643 Individual Presentation II March 4 th,
“AC” Dispersion Measurement David Rubin Cornell Laboratory for Accelerator-Based Sciences and Education.
Searching for CesrTA guide field nonlinearities in beam position spectra Laurel Hales Mike Billing Mark Palmer.
ATF2 FB/FF layout Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 11, 2007.
Some simulation results on FF/FB system for ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group FONT meeting January 25, 2008.
Luminosity Stability and Stabilisation Hardware D. Schulte for the CLIC team Special thanks to J. Pfingstner and J. Snuverink 1CLIC-ACE, February 2nd,
Simulation of IP beam size with orbit jitter + wakefield in EXT-FF ATF2 Project Meeting K.Kubo.
Analysis of ATF EXT/FF Orbit Jitter and extrapolation to IP (Data of ) ATF2 Project Meeting K. Kubo.
Direct Wakefield measurement of CLIC accelerating structure in FACET Hao Zha, Andrea Latina, Alexej Grudiev (CERN) 28-Jan
STRIPLINE KICKER STATUS. PRESENTATION OUTLINE 1.Design of a stripline kicker for beam injection in DAFNE storage rings. 2.HV tests and RF measurements.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner Hector Garcia Morales 25 th of January.
Ground Motion + Vibration Transfer Function for Final QD0/SD0 Cryomodule System at ILC Glen White, SLAC ALCPG11, Eugene March 21, 2011.
ATF2 Javier Resta Lopez (JAI, Oxford University) for the FONT project group 5th ATF2 project meeting, KEK December 19-21, 2007.
Beam based calibration for beam position monitor 15-SEP-2015 IBIC2015 Melbourne M. Tejima, KEK TUBLA01.
ATF2 optics … 1 3 rd Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF ATF2 optics, tuning method and tolerances of initial alignment, magnets, power supplies etc.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML and BDS Orbit feedback design for the CLIC ML.
Technical Board ATF2 GM FF progress report A.Jeremie ATF2 GM System team: K.Artoos, C.Charrondière, A.Jeremie, J.Pfingstner (a lot of figures from him),
ATF2 Tuning Updates Glen White, SLAC Sept
Vibration Measurement on the Shintake Monitor and Final Doublet Takashi Yamanaka (Univ. of Tokyo) Benoît Bolzon (LAPP) ATF2 weekly meeting 26 November,
Matching recipe and tracking for the final focus T. Asaka †, J. Resta López ‡ and F. Zimmermann † CERN, Geneve / SPring-8, Japan ‡ CERN, Geneve / University.
Wireless Communication Technologies 1 Phase noise A practical oscillator does not produce a carrier at exactly one frequency, but rather a carrier that.
CERN, BE-ABP-CC3 Jürgen Pfingstner Verification of the Design of the Beam-based Controller Jürgen Pfingstner 2. June 2009.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner, Hector Garcia Morales 15 th of.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline A. Lyapin, Wakefield Calculations for the ATF2 Beamline 1 S. Boogert, J. Snuverink (JAI/RHUL, UK)
Vibrationdata 1 Unit 15 SDOF Response to Base Input in the Frequency Domain.
J. Pfingstner Jitter studies February 12, 2014 Optics corrections in the ATF damping ring Jürgen Pfingstner, Yves Renier.
LCLS_II High Rep Rate Operation and Femtosecond Timing J. Frisch 7/22/15.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Warm-Up Write the equation of each line. A B (1,2) and (-3, 7)
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB/FF - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University FONT meeting 1th August.
J. Pfingstner, LCWS13 Jitter and ground motion studies November 13, 2013 Beam jitter at ATF2: A. Source localisation and B. Ground motion correlation Jürgen.
Multibunch beam stability in damping ring (Proposal of multibunch operation week in October) K. Kubo.
Beam stability in damping ring - for stable extracted beam for ATF K. Kubo.
J. Pfingstner Imperfections tolerances for on-line DFS Improved imperfection tolerances for an on-line dispersion free steering algorithm Jürgen Pfingstner.
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Jürgen Pfingstner Adaptive control scheme for the main linac of CLIC Jürgen Pfingstner 21 th of October.
N. BlaskovicFONT Meeting1 ATF November 2013 shift plan N. Blaskovic.
Ground motion studies at ATF2 June 11, 2014 Orbit jitter source identification via ground motion studies at ATF2 (Results of the June run) Marcin Patecki,
Xiaoying Pang Indiana University March. 17 th, 2010 Independent Component Analysis for Beam Measurement.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) Garcia, Pfingstner, Renier ATF operations training Report about the ATF operations training Hector Garcia.
Beam-Beam simulation and experiments in RHIC By Vahid Ranjbar and Tanaji Sen FNAL.
Tools in CTF3 Simona Bettoni for the CTF3 operation team.
FJPPL-FKPPL ATF2 Workshop Jitter studies March 18, 2014 Beam jitter localization and identification at ATF2 Marcin Patecki Jürgen Pfingstner 18 th of March.
Wakefield effect in ATF2 Kiyoshi Kubo
ATF2 Software tasks: - EXT Bunch-Bunch FB - IP Bunch-Bunch FB - FB Integration Status and plans Javier Resta-Lopez JAI, Oxford University ATF2 commissioning.
J. Snuverink and J. Pfingstner LinSim LinSim Linear Accelerator Simulation Framework with PLACET an GUINEA-PIG Jochem Snuverink Jürgen Pfingstner 16 th.
CLIC Workshop 18 th -22 nd January 2016, CERN 1 Alfonso Benot Morell Manfred Wendt.
Progress in CLIC DFS studies Juergen Pfingstner University of Oslo CLIC Workshop January.
Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free Steering in the Main Linac of CLIC Effects of Accelerating Cavities on On-Line Dispersion Free.
Beam jitter experiment of exchanging power supplies
Original analyses All ROIs
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Emittance Diagnostics
Vertical emittance measurement and modeling Correction methods
Wake field limitations in a low gradient main linac of CLIC
Analyzing Redistribution Matrix with Wavelet
ATF2 Recent Wakefield (Beam size Intensity dependence) Studies
Application of Independent Component Analysis (ICA) to Beam Diagnosis
Towards a ground motion orbit feed-forward at ATF2
Analysis of Audio Using PCA
Feed forward orbit corrections for the CLIC RTML
TI8 analysis / J. Wenninger
Presentation transcript:

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Jürgen Pfingstner, Hector Garcia Morales 12 th of February 2013

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Content 1.Search for beam jitter sources 2.Additional data analysis with MIA 3.Tracking studies 4.Conclusions Many thanks to Y. I. Kim, J. Snuverink, G. White and M. Woodley for supporting us with all necessary information at ATF and for the many very helpful discussions !

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 1. Search for beam jitter sources

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Motivation of the measurement For ATF2 goal two, it is necessary to limit the beam jitter at the IP below 5% of the beam size. Currently the beam jitter is between 10% and 20%. Measurements with all BPMs in the ATF2 beam line were performed to identify the origin(s) of the current beam jitter. The main analysis methods are correlation studies as shown on the next slides.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Method of finding beam jitter sources Step 1: Starting at BPM N, try to find correlation pattern by calculating the correlation coefficient r for all BPMs. Step 2a: If there is no significant correlation -> N=N+1. Step 2b: If there is significant correlation -> source has to be expected close to BPM N. Step 3: Remove motion that corresponds to found jitter source (see next slide). Step 4: Go to step 1 with N=N+1, or stop if N=N max. … standard deviation … cross correlation

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Removal of correlated beam motion To not disturb the search for jitter sources by sources already identified, the according beam jitter is removed. Idea: De-correlate all other BPMs j from the BPM i corresponding to the source, by finding a new motion such that the covariance Using the definition of the covariance and solving the last equation for k j gives

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Example for source localisation (source 2) Only a weak correlation pattern can be observe for BPM 110 Strong correlation pattern observed for BPM 112

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Signal and noise levels BPM noise calculation from data as described in Kim et al. PRST Accel. and Beams 15, BPM 102 is the first BPM with sufficient signal to noise ratio. Location of the first source can only be determined before BPM 102. Better BPMs would help

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Three identified sources Source 1: Located between BPMs 97 and 102 (MQF7X and MQD12X) Position can only be determined before BPM 102, since signal to noise ration is too bad before. Cavity BPMs instead of strip-line BPMs would help Source 2: Located at BPM 112 (MQM16FF) Very strong source Candidates: Wire scanner: MW3X, MW4X, Profile monitor: OTR3X, Correctors: ZH1FF, ZV1FF, QP: QM16FF Source 3: Located at BPMs 118 and 119 (MQD10BFF and MQD10AFF) Candidates: Ref. cavity: MF3FF, Monitor MFB1FF QPs: QD10B, QD10AFF, QM11FF

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 2. Additional data analysis with MIA

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Model Independent Analysis (MIA) Try to use methods described in paper by J. Irwin et al. PRL 82(8) about Model Independent Analysis (MIA) (thanks Young-Im) 1.Data cleaning via SVD decomposition: –Remove noisy BPMs –Remove BPM noise floor 2.Degree-of-Freedom plot (DoF-plot) –Connection of SVs for SVDs with increasing number of used BPMs. –Lines are the connections of largest, second largest, … SVs. –Change of slope indicates physical source. Methods all just try to find location of sources, but are not capable of determining the form of the according oscillation: “Note that each of the eigenmodes in Eq. (4) does not correspond uniquely to the physical pattern in Eq. (2).”

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 DoF-plot for beam jitter data Change of slope indicates physical source. Only cavity BPM with good signal to noise ratio are used Change around BPM 118 (MQD10BFF), but also around 130 (MSD4FF) No clear localisation possible Observation of direction does not give good hinds of oscillation shape.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 DoF-plot of the jitter correlation matrix Much clearer localisation of sources is possible: BPM 112 (MQM16FF) and BPM 118 (MQD10BFF) Also a small change in slope around BPM 130 (MSD4FF) Result is the same as for manual method Tool for faster source localisation in the future!

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 3. Tracking studies

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Kick tracking with Lucretia Best “guess” for shape of beam jitter along the beam line is the motion removed to de-correlate from a certain source. Try to localise sources better, by introducing dipole kicks along the beam line and compare shape of oscillations with removed correlated jitter motion. Using lattice version 5.1: 10x1 optics with non-linearities and new QF1 matching Track beam with perfect beam line to a certain position Apply dipole kick by adding const. Δy’ to beam. Use same beam to track to the end of the beam line. Compare BPM readings in the region of the cavity BPMs with good signal to noise ratio.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Matching tracking results with removed correlated beam jitter motion Different kicks between BPM 111 and 112 fit the combination of both source 2 and source 3 reasonable well. Δy’ = -4e-7 (Lucretia units) Devices in this area: MW3X, OTR3X, TILTM, IPBPM, ATIPBPM, MW4X Separately sources were not fitted well

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 PSD and IRMS of removed correlated beam jitter motion Source 1 and source 2 have obvious components at 0.945Hz and 0.963Hz These components do not contribute significantly to the overall jitter. Source 3 has no such components.

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 4. Conclusions 1.Three beam jitter sources have been identified with correlation studies. 2.Source 1 can be not clearly localised due to limitations of the BPM system. 3.Complementary studies with MIA have been performed and results fit for correlation data. 4.Tracking simulations with Lucretia have been performed The removed jitter motion of the individual sources could not be fitted. But the combination of both motions can be fitted reasonable well. Some beam diagnostics devices are located in this region. No clear signature has been found however. 5.The removed jitter motion of source 1 and 2 show significant frequency peaks in PSD (0.945Hz and 0.963Hz).

CERN, BE-ABP (Accelerators and Beam Physics group) J. Pfingstner Beam jitter studies at ATF and ATF2 Thank you for your attention!