BoltJoin3-7-2011.ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011. NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOLTS TENSION MEMBERS AISC / LRFD WILD CARD
Advertisements

Beams Stephen Krone, DSc, PE University of Toledo.
REVIEW OF STEEL DESIGN KNOWLEDGE BASE REQUIRED: STRENGTH OF MATERIALS
Lecture 9: Screws (Chapter 16)
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Bending Moments A bending moment exists in a structural element when an external force is applied to the element so that the element bends (or wishes to.
PCI 6th Edition Connection Design.
Abstract/Objectives Better understand the effects of typical GD&T variations on Bolt Stresses in Torque Carrying Bolted Flanges Create Trend Curves for.
BOLTS TENSION MEMBERS AISC / LRFD WILD CARD
Fasteners, Powers Screws, Connections
CM 197 Mechanics of Materials Chap 20: Connections
Component Testing Test Setup TapLok Insert Shear Key Copper Threads Friction Tests Collar Shear Tests NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03 Michael Kalish.
Status of Coil Structural Design and Magnetic-Structural Analysis Presented by X.R. Wang Contributors: ORNL: D. Williamson UCSD: S. Malang, A.R. Raffray.
NSTX ARMOR PLATE 2/18/10 NEUTRAL BEAM ARMOR PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS.
One-Dimensional Problems
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 4/10/03.
Analysis of Basic Load Cases Axial Stress
Fasteners / Joint Design Michael Kalish NSTX TF FLAG JOINT REVIEW 8/7/03.
Static and Fatigue Bolt Design
By: Prof Dr. Akhtar Naeem Khan
Screws, Fasteners, and the Design of Nonpermanent Joints
1 THERMAL & MECHANICAL PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ELM COIL ALTERNATE DESIGN Interim Review July 26-28, 2010 In-Vessel Coil System Interim Review – July 26-28,
ITER-D-3G3SQN v1.1 1 THERMAL & MECHANICAL PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ELM COIL ALTERNATE DESIGN Interim Review July 26-28, 2010 In-Vessel Coil System Interim.
Chapter 1 Stress.
Composite Beams and Columns
Jerid Sutton Daniel Smith.  To prove an already employed analysis tool, improve it, or create new analysis tools for joints and fasteners. In doing this.
Multiple Coil Lift Calculation. Purposes of the Study  To investigate the stress distribution in the MCWF and the lifting device.  To make sure mounting.
Jurg Conzett – Traversina Bridge
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Shear Load with Stainless Steel Bushing and Frictionless Shim-Flange Interface Two cases of shim plates were investigated.
Chapter 1: Stress Review important principles of statics
LAT-TD GLAST LAT Project 1x4 Grid Lift Fixture Weld Analysis September 19, 2003 Youssef Ismail.
Mechanics of Materials – MAE 243 (Section 002) Spring 2008 Dr. Konstantinos A. Sierros.
STRENGTHS Chapter Intro Dealing with relationship between the external loads applied to an elastic body and the intensity of the internal forces.
Screws, Fasteners, and the Design of Nonpermanent Joints
Modular Coil Assembly Bolted Joint PDR 2/22/07. Objectives The review objectives include... Define the location of additional inboard bolts Finalize the.
LRFD-Steel Design Dr. Ali Tayeh Second Semester
Supported by NSTX Centerstack Upgrade Project Meeting P. Titus October Aluminum Block Analyses.
BOLT IN FRICTION (left) The bolt preload provides a resistance to lateral movements of the flanges, by combining with friction. The max lateral force R.
1.5 AVERAGE SHEAR STRESS Shear stress is the stress component that act in the plane of the sectioned area. Consider a force F acting to the bar For rigid.
An Analysis of Shell Structure for Dead Load H.M. Fan PPPL September 16, 2005.
Analyses of Bolted Joint for Bolt Preload and Shear Load
Forging new generations of engineers
Finite Element Analysis of the18 Turn Beam H. F. Fan November 5, 2004.
1 MC Assembly over the VV FPA Station 3 FDR Review July 13, 2007 T. Brown.
NSTX TF Flag Joint Design Review SUMMARY C Neumeyer 8/7/3.
Update: TF Outer Ring and Clevis Design TF Outer Ring – Implemented recommendations from P. Rogoff. Modified Bolted Joint. Modified weldment to reduce.
Engineering Analysis October 23, 2006 Team Moondogs Chris Culver Rahul Kirtikar Elias Krauklis Christopher Sampson Michael Widerquist.
Reinforcement Information - Code
Beam Design Beams are designed to safely support the design loads.
(a) (b) A325-N or A325-X or A490-N A490-X Shear plane
Andrew Biehl.  The objective of this project is to develop a method for determining the nut factor of a bolted joint using the finite element method.
FEM Analysis of the Stage3 Support Frame H.M. Fan March 14, 2007.
Final_Bellows.ppt. The purpose for these analyses was to justify and select the appropriate NSTX Center Stack Update project VV Bellows. The bellows should.
[14] SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF THE NATIONAL COMPACT STELLERATOR EXPERIMENT (NCSX) PSFC/JA Peter H. Titus May Mode 7 Run #4 Mode 8 Run #4 Run #7.
1 - An AISI 1020 cold- rolled steel tube has an OD of 3.0 inch. The internal pressure in the tube is 6,840 psi. Determine the thickness of the tube using.
Structural Drafting Shear stress in Bolts. Fastener Loads and Stresses Load:External force applied to a member. Stress: Internal force acting on a member.
ME 307 Machine Design I ME 307 Machine Design I. ME 307 Machine Design I ME 307 Machine Design I 8-1 Thread Standards and Definitions 8-2The Mechanics.
TORSION OF A SHAFT WITH A SHOULDER FILLET
Screws, Fasteners, and the Design of Nonpermanent Joints
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
Four-Stage of Engineering Analysis
TQS Structure Design and Modeling
1.6 Allowable Stress Allowable Load < Failure Load
Fasteners, Powers Screws, Connections
Supplement To Chapter 1 on OVERVIEW OF ENGINEERING ANALYSIS With additional information on Four-Stage of Engineering Analysis by Tai-Ran Hsu, Professor.
Find: Lightest I Beam fy=50,000 [lb/in2] unfactored axial
ENCE 455 Design of Steel Structures
Forging new generations of engineers
Fasteners, Powers Screws, Connections
Structural Fasteners Chap. (4) Non-Structural (A-307) Bolts A325
Presentation transcript:

BoltJoin ppt P. Rogoff 3/24/2011

NSTX Supported by P. R. 3/9/2011 Update Ring Bolted Joint Design and Recommend the Joint Geometry using bolts with necessary pre loads to keep the contact surfaces from sliding using the NSTX Global model extracted loads. This is done via Nastran FEA and hand calculations. Explanation: Bolt preloads apply a compressive force “Fn” between the contact surfaces which must have a reasonable coefficient of friction in order to create a sufficient shear force “Fs” to resist the tensile force created by the applied loads. Selection of the Friction coefficient value “Mu” critical. Ti=Fp(KD)- torque K is the “nut factor” and dimensionless Ti=Fp(KD)- torque K is the “nut factor” and dimensionless Fp=UTS x As – tension P.L. As=.785(D-(.9743/n))^2 316 cold finished: Yield strength =100. ksi, Tensile (uts)= 125. ksi, Shear = 25. ksi n = # of threads per inch.

Node: Node: ” OD and 0.25” thick 3”x 3.5” solid Beam length: m R= m Theta: ° R= m Theta: ° R= m Theta:-90 dsys,50 Beam model Data Received from the Global ANSYS model 3/19/2011 L=30.4 inches

Displacement (m) Von Mises stress (Pa) Node: Node: Node: Node: THE FOLLOWING DEGREE OF FREEDOM RESULTS ARE IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 50 unit: m NODE UX UY UZ USUM E E E E E E E E-03 THE FOLLOWING DEGREE OF FREEDOM RESULTS ARE IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 50 unit: m NODE ROTX ROTY ROTZ RSUM E E E E E E E E-02 THE FOLLOWING X,Y,Z SOLUTIONS ARE IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 50 Unit: N NODE FX FY FZ THE FOLLOWING X,Y,Z SOLUTIONS ARE IN COORDINATE SYSTEM 50 Unit: N-m NODE MX MY MZ Scenario 49 Data from the ANSYS Global model 3/19/2011 Stresses from the global model Pa

Conversion of the ANSYS Global data into Pounds and Inches Note: Data in the green fields used in the Nastran Loads. Other combinations can be used if desired

Typical Bolt load distribution For demonstration purposes only For demonstration purposes only

Problem: 1.0 in. dia. Bolt, As=.663 in^2, Yield = 100.ksi, Based on 2/3 yield = 66.7 ksi. Fp = 66.7ksi x.663in^2 = Kips per bolt, If mu =.3, Fs = Kips X.3 = 13,266 lbs/bolt Typical “nut factor” see the torque equation For two bolts Fs= lbs And required torque = 44,220 lbs. x.2 x 1.0 in.= 8,844 lb-in Problem: 1.0 in. dia. Bolt, As=.663 in^2, Yield = 100.ksi, Based on 2/3 yield = 66.7 ksi. Fp = 66.7ksi x.663in^2 = Kips per bolt, If mu =.3, Fs = Kips X.3 = 13,266 lbs/bolt Typical “nut factor” see the torque equation For two bolts Fs= lbs And required torque = 44,220 lbs. x.2 x 1.0 in.= 8,844 lb-in Calculations based on standard equations, See above Bolt Pre Load = 44,000. lbs Total Distance between nodes #47432 and #47431 = 30.4 inches See next slide

Additional Explanations and Justifications Based on the NSTX Structural Design Criteria document “ NSTX-CRIT ” Section # , Bolt Preload shell not exceed 0.75Sy. For the above calculations, 2/3Sy was used which is considered conservative, and, it demonstrates that a significant margin exists in case loads need to be increased. Coefficient of friction “mu =.3” was used for the above calculations assuming standard material finish for steel products. This seems to be reasonable. Appendix A page #3 presents test data for certain plates (finish unknown) in the range up to m=.26 and only for four tests. Based on the present Global model loads even this value would produce conservative results. As =.663 in^2 was used. This is based un the “Designer Handbook Stainless Steel Fasteners” page#9, Table 5, 1.0 inch bolt Fine Thread (12 threads per inch). “n” in the As equation represents number of threads per inch. “K” -nut factor- value is the average recommended by manufacturers. see: Taylor & Francis Group.LLC publication, Section 7.4.

Model Solution Sequence and Statistics

Loads: Axial Displacements Only, See SPCDs Loads: Axial Displacements Only, See SPCDs

Loads: Axial Displacements Only. See SPCDs Loads: Axial Displacements Only. See SPCDs

Loads with SPCDs and Moments Total Load Loads with SPCDs and Moments Total Load

Loads with SPCDs and Moments Total Loads Loads with SPCDs and Moments Total Loads

Loads with SPCDs and Moments Total Loads Loads with SPCDs and Moments Total Loads

APPENDIX A Page #1 Ref.: From NCSX “Friction Coating Peer Review”, and “FrictionPeer(3).ppt”

APPENDIX A Page #2 Ref.: From NCSX “Friction Coating Peer Review”, and “FrictionPeer(3).ppt”

APPENDIX A Page #3 Ref.: From NCSX “Friction Coating Peer Review”, and “FrictionPeer(3).ppt”