Network Level Cataloging: The View from a Member Library Diana Brooking University of Washington Libraries Jan. 14, 2008 ALA.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

When parallels collide: Parallel records, parallel fields and hybrid records OCLC Users Group Annual Meeting 3/6/2004 Hsi-chu Bolick University of North.

Advertisements

Larry L. Haight, Director of Library Services Redding, CA WMS: The Whole Enchilada.

1 Subject Authority Control and Cooperative Cataloging May 18, 2005.

Batch Loading and Editing of Vendor MARC records Anastasia (Nastia) Guimaraes University of Notre Dame Presented at the ALA Midwinter meeting in Philadelphia,

Basic Copy Cataloging (Books) Prepared by Lynnette Fields, Lori Murphy, Kathy Nystrom, Shelley Stone as an LSTA grant “Funding for this grant was awarded.

Moving libraries to Web scale Matt Goldner Product & Technology Advocate 14 June 2011.

MARC Records From Serials Solutions ( Jennifer Bowen Presentation to UR Library Staff February 2004.

Managing Series Using the Cataloger’s Toolkit. ELSUG 2008 October 9, 2008 Wichita State University Wichita, KS.

GPO, OPACs and Bibliographic Access in the 21 st Century Laurie Beyer Hall, Director Office of Bibliographic Services U.S. Government Printing Office ALA.

M AKING E - RESOURCE ACCESSIBLE FROM ONLINE CATALOG *e-books *serials Yan Wang Senior Librarian Head of Cataloging & Database Maintenance Central Piedmont.

Batch-conversion of Non-standard Multiscript Records by XSLT Lucas Mak Metadata and Catalog Librarian Michigan State University Catalog Management Interest.

Jee Davis University of Texas Libraries ALCTS Technical Services Directors of Large Research Libraries Interest Group 2014 ALA Annual Conference in Las.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Partnering with OCLC for Cataloging and Selection ALA Midwinter January 20, 2007.

Global Update with Confidence Mary M. Strouse Innovative Users Group May 19, 2009.

MarcEdit Basics and Beyond By Mary Aycock Head, Catalog Department Missouri University of Science and Technology MOBIUS 2012 Conference.

The world’s libraries. Connected. Batchload Process for Alberta Libraries Carol Ritzenthaler Customer Support OCLC July 2013.

AGent 2.0 Cataloging AGCat –Replaces WindowsCat/FullCat UDMM Interactive authority control Subject heading translation Bibliographic resources Cataloging.

The Dis-integrated Library System of the Future Kristin Antelman NCSU Libraries October 28, 2005.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center MFHD Local Holdings Project Status (a.k.a. UL Migration) Myrtle Myers Product Manager, Holdings and Local Data.

Megan Drake Pacific University Al Cornish Orbis Cascade Alliance Migrating to a Shared ILS Using Alma and Primo May 1, 2014.

Only Connect: Better Use of Library, Publisher and End-User Metadata in a Networked World 31 st International Supply Chain Seminar Tuesday 13 th October,

How to handle the Multitude Successfully handling thousands of E-Book records using MARCEdit and BIBLOAD reports Kelly Swickard Decker Library Maryland.

Maximising Te Puna Value Programme Te Puna Libraries Forum 31 st March 2011.

WorldCat Local and Voyager Z39.50 Challenges and Solutions Andy Kohler - UCLA Library IT - Voyager Developer Meeting - March 25-26,

Open Source ILS: Preparing Your Data Carol Love. Choosing Open Source: Make Your Own Set of Tools Your library’s characteristics –Type, patrons, collections,

Using Voyager Reports Linda Taylor Oklahoma State University Edmon Low Library February 21, 2007.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Kathy Kie December 2007 OCLC Cataloging & Metadata Services an introduction.

Copy Cataloging Gets Some Respect From Administrators ALCTS CaMMS Copy Cataloging Interest Group January 21, 2012, ALA Midwinter.

Library needs and workflows Diane Boehr Head of Cataloging National Library of Medicine, NIH, DHHS

Macro Express. What is a Macro? “A macro is a way to automate a task that you perform repeatedly or on a regular basis. It is a series of commands and.

Demystifying Batchload Analysis Yael Mandelstam Fordham Law Library AALL 2009 Annual Meeting.

Starting Ongoing MARCIVE Authorities Processing Without Doing a Backfile: History File Creation + Notification + Overnight Authorities Joan Chapa and Carol.

1 Prepared by Cooperative Programs Section & Associates NACO Training for OCLC Libraries.

Connecting with Connexion: The UGA Experience Presenters: Robin Fay K.R. Roberto Beth Thornton.

By Cathy Gerhart OLAC Biennial Conference September 2008.

Building User Services with OCLC’s WorldCat Local Washington State University Libraries Al Cornish, Head of Library Systems Lihong Zhu, Head of Technical.

Module 6: Preparing for RDA... LC RDA for NASIG - June 1, 2011.

Planning for Life after OCLC Passport for Cataloging An overview of the new OCLC cataloging service Revised April 2002.

Integrating Resources Cataloging Workshop Instructors Place/Date 1-1.

Demonstration of HKCAN database Outline Database system overview Software characteristics Database status.

IR Applications at University of Saskatchewan Library: present and future CARL Institutional Repository Luncheon Saskatoon, SK June 8, 2005 David Fox Head,

MARCIt records for e-journals project to implement MARCIt service McGill University Library Feb

A & M Libraries Voyager Training Bulk Export, Import, and Prebulk Processing February 21, 2007 Co-ming Chan Oklahoma State University, STW.

The world’s libraries. Connected. RDA & OCLC Cynthia M. Whitacre OCLC WorldCat Quality Management & Partner Content.

Envisioning Culture Shift: Building a Strategic Framework for Service Oriented Cataloging Jennifer O’Brien Roper Head, Cataloging and Metadata Services.

30/01/2016 Oulun yliopiston kirjasto BookWhere and UseMARCON as copy cataloguing tools in Voyager E-EndUser2003 Timo Mäntyvaara Oulu University Library.

OCLC Record Use - Background Dec – Trustees resolution authorizing copyright of OLUC May 1983 – After pushback from members, record use policies.

Renee Register Senior Product Manager OCLC Cataloging and Metadata Services Sandy Piver OCLC Publisher Services Consultant OCLC Services for the Publisher.

Once you acquire thousands e-books, then what? Shi Deng, UC San Diego OCLC CJK User Group Meeting March 24, 2007.

Legal Issues with Cataloging Supplied by MARCIVE Joan Chapa.

NC Shared ILS (Integrated Library System) Library Cooperation Summit Boone, NC August 12, 2009.

Authority Control Mary Marchio What is Authority Control? Formulation and recording of authorized heading forms in a library catalog Headings must be.

The world’s libraries. Connected. RDA & OCLC Glenn Patton Director, WorldCat Quality Management.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center World Cat Cataloging Partners service Affordable records, delivered with your library materials.

Batchload User Group Meeting Ted Fons, Director, WorldCat Global Metadata Network Pam Harper, Product Manager, Batchload services Tony Chirakos, Consulting.

Cataloging Department Cataloging Statistics  Total added: 47,267 Titles / 50,318 Volumes DLC: 34,366 / 2 nd Lvl: 10,224 / Original: 1,499.

NextGen Acquisitions Systems: Seeking A Paradigm Shift for a New Era Kelly Smith EKU Libraries November 6, 2009 Charleston Conference.

Respect My Authoritay! Mary S. Konkel, College of DuPage Illinois Library Association Conference 9/26/2008

Image from: Catalog Management in the Cloud: Two Years In Catalog Management IG Meeting, ALA Annual June 25, 2016 Stacie Traill and Betsy.

AN ARCHETYPE FOR INFORMATION ORGANIZATION AND CLASSIFICATION OCLC WorldCat.

Assignment of Cataloging Staff Levels at Penn State: a Case Study

Mary S. Konkel Head of Technical Services College of DuPage Library

The Koha Experience: An Academic Library Perspective

Tools and Techniques to Clean Up your Database

What’s in it for your library? The lowdown direct from OCLC …

LTS All Staff Meeting Spring 2008.

Expert Community Experiment

E-Resources in Prospector

IDEALS at the University Of Illinois: A Case Study of Integration Between an IR and Library Discovery Systems Sarah L. Shreeves University of Illinois.

OCLC, WorldCat and Connexion

Presentation transcript:

Network Level Cataloging: The View from a Member Library Diana Brooking University of Washington Libraries Jan. 14, 2008 ALA Midwinter

Origins of the Paradigm Shift: Cataloging in Local ILS vs. OCLC UW is beta testing WorldCat Local –WCL based on searching/display of master records OCLC WorldCat Master records Institutional records (new)

Local ILS –Copies of OCLC records –3 rd party vendor records (500,000) –Local brief bibs UW local catalog contains corrections & improvements not present in WorldCat WorldCat also contains improvements we don’t get

Cataloging on OCLC Control by utility with trend toward decentralization –Report changes to OCLC –Enhance (1983- ): libraries must qualify for enhance status for each format –Minimal level upgrade (1985- ) –Database enrichment (1991- ) No regular database-wide authority control cleanup Member libraries edit one record at a time

Cataloging in Local ILS Local control with trend toward batch processing Only some changes made to master recs –Many recs not reviewed by catalogers at time of download from OCLC (quick cataloging) –Post-cataloging processing (authority control, other cleanup) –UW has Enhance only for bks, vis, com –Some changes not suitable for shared recs?

Working in local ILS: more efficient Services: authority control vendors (outsourcing cleanup on a regular basis) Services: additional sources of MARC recs (not licensed to go to OCLC) Tools in the ILS: global update, create lists, headings reports, etc. Tools outside the ILS: MARCEdit

Institutional Records? Not clear how IRs will work in WorldCat Local May be the only solution for legacy data Not scalable or sustainable if institutions continue maintenance locally Master record: starting point or end product?

Network-level today? Taking on effort that may not be offset by others yet? Lack of tools: less efficient, more costs Staff implications: More time reviewing records? More FTE for database maintenance? More training? Role of LC/PCC? Need for member libraries or OCLC to supply much more support for national level programs?

Suggestions Improve participation in Enhance/other programs Standards and practices when many libs share one master record as local record Provide a conflict resolution process (signed edits with editor history and easy reversion) Network-level maintenance tools Network-level authority control processes More granular bib notify service CONSER, open source software development, other models?