St.Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009 Leniency Programme – Access to File, Discovery Rules Vladimíra Glatzová, Glatzová & Co.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f) and In re Bristol-Myers Squibb Securities Litigation Lina Carreras.
Advertisements

Dr Daniele Calisti European Commission – DG Competition
Private and Public law lesson 12 “Interessi legittimi” and “diritti soggettivi”; the regimes regulating protection against unlawful decisions of public.
Corporate Governance and Administration Conference Jury’s Hotel, Ballsbridge 30 March 2004.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
Waiver of Client Legal Privilege Presented by Prof Les McCrimmon William Forster Chambers & Charles Darwin University NTBA-CDU 2014 CIVIL LAW CONFERENCE,
EU Cross-Border Care Directive from the Primary Care perspective Results of a simulation Rita Baeten Gothenburg, 3 September 2012.
National implementation of REMIT Henrik Nygaard, Wholesale and transmission (DERA)
IMPLEMENTING PRINCIPLE 10 OF THE RIO DECLARATION IN THE CONGO BASIN: A CONDITION SINE QUA NON FOR EFFECTIVE REDD A.B. Njamnshi 1 and A.M. Mpoyi 2 1 Bioresources.
Fifth Annual Conference on Competition Enforcement in the CEE Member States Due process in competition law Michaela Nosa Antimonopoly Office of the SR.
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Marko Jovanovic, LL.M. MASTER IN EUROPEAN INTEGRATION Private International Law in the.
Economic analysis in German competition law enforcement
Onscreen cover – Alternative 5 Joint and several liability for cartel fines: lessons from Gigaset and Siemens Austria 73 TH LUNCH TALK OF THE GCLC Winfred.
Rome II Regulation Conflict rules for torts. Rome II Regulation The Regulation defines: the conflict-of-law rules applicable to non- contractual obligations.
1 Access to file An effective right of defence? Karen Williams Hearing Officer EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Towards a Freedom of Information Law in Qatar Fahad bin Mohammed Al Attiya Executive Chairman, Qatar National Food Security Programme.
Yusuf İ slam Ş EFLEK 11 TM/A 85.  An acceptable use policy is a set of rules applied by the owner/manager of a network, website or large computer system.
Data Protection Overview
Continuing Professional Development
Sanctions, Leniency and Settlement WHAT MAKES COMPETITION POLICY WORK? Stefano Macchi di Cellere 3rd Lear Conference on the Economics of Competition Law.
Privacy Codes of Conduct as a self- regulatory approach to cope with restrictions on transborder data flow Dr. Anja Miedbrodt Exemplified with the help.
State Alliance for e-Health Conference Meeting January 26, 2007.
European Commission, DG Competition, Cartel Directorate 1 RECENT TRENDS AND DEVELOPMENTS IN COMPETITION LAW AND POLICY 2008 Leniency – experience, practical.
The Court of Justice of the European Union and its case law in the area of civil justice European Commission specific programme “Civil Justice” project.
Leniency Programme Igor Pospíšil Director of the Cartel Department St. Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009.
Leniency and Obtaining Evidence Hiroshi Nakazato Investigation Bureau Fair Trade Commission of Japan April 6 th 2006 OECD-KOREA.
Social Science.  The main purpose of civil law is to settle disagreements fairly  People file lawsuits, or cases in which a court is asked to settle.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
© Konrad Ost Private Enforcement – What for? The perspective of the competition authorities Konrad Ost CLF-Meeting London 15/03/2006.
Conference Pan-European eGovernment services for citizens & enterprises E.3 Services for enterprises Development and improvement of Information Systems.
Copyright © 2008 Delmar Learning Chapter 7 Legal Issues.
Practical Analysis of Obstacles Encountered by Legal Services as Part of Access to Information Requests Presentation to the Canadian Institute at the Conference.
What is the court’s expectation of doctors? British Medical Association 17 November 2006.
Open Meetings, Public Records, Conflicts of Interest, EMC Bylaws, and Penalty Remissions* Jennie Wilhelm Hauser Special Deputy Attorney General Presentation.
František Nonnemann Skopje, 10th October 2012 JHA Data protection and re-use of PSI as a tool for public control–CZ approach.
Wisconsin Department of Health Services Purchase of Services Contract Guide Julie Anstett and Lucinda Champion Friday, May 6, 2016 Wisconsin Department.
Competition law enforcement from private undertakings’ perspective Risto Rüütel Glikman & Partnerid.
The Reform of Belgian Arbitration Law and the UNCITRAL Model Law Johan Billiet.
ICC roundtable Istanbul, 30 April 2010 Procedural Fairness: Update on Recent OECD Activities Antonio Capobianco OECD Competition Division
The Protection of Confidential Commercial or Industrial Information in Environmental Law: Analysis and Call for a Graded Concept of Protection Prof. Dr.
Dr. Anastasios Xeniadis Dr. Luca Schicho
THE UNIDROIT PRINCIPLES 2010:
Regulatory Adjudication in Resolution of Disputes
Guide to ethical obligations of in-house lawyers – for non-lawyer colleagues Notes:
Complainant's rights within the competition proceedings Access to file
ANTITRUST DAMAGES CLAIMS UNDER EU AND NATIONAL LAW A TRANSPORTATION SECTOR FOCUS Pedro Callol.
State aid rules Ole Damsgaard, Joint Secretariat
Guide to ethical obligations of in-house lawyers – for non-lawyer colleagues Notes:
Calculated risk between the leniency benefits and class actions in Colombia Gabriel Ibarra Pardo - Ibarra Abogados December 2015.
the antitrust administrative proceedings
Discovery / disclosure issues in EU cartel enforcement
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
ICN Cartel Working Group SG-1
Commissioner’s Legal Advisor - Italian Competition Authority
The interaction between public and private enforcement of EU competition rules Helena Penovski European Competition Network and Private Enforcement Unit.
Discovery and Disclosure in the United States ICN Cartel Working Group September 14, 2016 Webinar Jackie Lem Trial Attorney U.S. DOJ, Antitrust Division.
State Aid Rules Kirsti Mijnhijmer, Joint Secretariat
SC Decision Making.
Arbitration Proceedings II
The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
UNCITRAL Transparency Rules and the Mauritius Convention
What is a Privilege? A privilege is a relationship between a witness and the subject of potential testimony (whether that subject be a person or something.
Supervision of Financial Reporting
Judicial Powers of Case Management
Mediation Law in Austria
Briefing on High Court Application: AFRIFORUM NPC v CHAIRPERSON OF THE JOINT CRC OF PARLIAMENT AND OTHERS Date:
What are you liable for? – Diversity of civil liability of mediators across EU Mag. iur. Dana Rone Turība University.
Konrad Ost CLF-Meeting London 15/03/2006
Calculated risk between the leniency benefits and class actions in Colombia Gabriel Ibarra Pardo - Ibarra Abogados December 2015.
Competition Authority
Presentation transcript:

St.Martin Conference 2009 November 12, 2009 Leniency Programme – Access to File, Discovery Rules Vladimíra Glatzová, Glatzová & Co.

Importance of Confidentiality for Leniency Confidentiality - condition sine qua non for Leniency. Two Risks of Leakage of Information: –leakage of information on leniency proceedings to other cartel members –leakage of information about cartel to consumers

Leniency Proceedings Leniency Application Opening of Administrative Proceedings (opening of the file) Dawn-rides (místní šetření) Statement of Objections (sdělení výhrad)

Confidentiality of Leniency Documents Access to File –When? »Opening of proceedings –By whom? »Participants to proceedings »Third parties with legal interest Content of File -Corporate Statement excluded until SO, -Business secret entirely excluded from file

Conflict with Discovery Rules Discovery Rules –incriminating Leniency documents might be requested in private civil actions for damage –namely USA (+England and Wales, Germany)  hamper effectiveness of Leniency Programme –potential economic harms in the form of damages x economic benefit of Leniency Programme

Conflict with Discovery Rules 2 Consequence  Oral Leniency –attempt to frustrate discovery requests Possible solution of conflict – application of Principle of International Comity –possible exemption of Leniency documents from discovery based on Rule 26 –current downsides: inconsistency of interpretation of the principle by courts

Conclusion 1 Relevant changes in Czech legislation to be adopted to secure confidentiality: –access to file only after SO –no access for third parties

Conclusion 2 Consistency in application and interpretation of the Principle of International Comity to be ensured

Thank you for listening! Glatzova & Co., v.o.s Husova 5, Praha 1