© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Providing Feedback: Structural Assessment 2 Results & Exposure Receipt.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PREVENTION OF CATHETER ASSOCIATED URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS (CAUTIs)
Advertisements

Eliminate Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia. What Is a Ventilator? A machine that supports breathing for those that have lost the ability to breathe Short.
Healthcare Safety: How will your next patient be injured?
Reducing Ventilator Associated Pneumonia in Adults Intensive Care Units Confidential: Quality Improvement Material.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP: EVAP NHSN VAE Surveillance Definition Review Call in.
OUR LADY OF LOURDES MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Binghamton, New York Reducing Complications From Ventilators in ICU: Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)
Sean Berenholtz, MD MHS FCCM September 20, 2011 at 2ET/1 CT/12 MT/11 PT Ventilator Associated Pneumonia Prevention CLABSI Supplemental Call Series.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 How Your Unit’s Policies and Protocols Compare to Other’s Kathleen.
Safer Healthcare Now! Ventilator Acquired Pneumonia Presented by Amanda Thompson, Safer Healthcare Now Facilitator April 12, 2007.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Onboarding: Introduction to Daily Care Process Measures & Structural Assessment ARMSTRONG.
Reports: Daily Process, VAE, NHSN
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Kristina Weeks, MHS, DrPH(c) January 13, 2015 Designing and Using Scorecard for SUSPtainability 1.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Audit Your Care A Closer Look at CLABSI and SSI Audit Forms Armstrong.
CSTS: The Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study Senior Leadership of Quality and Safety Initiatives in Health Care Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD The.
SUSP: Improving Surgical Care through TRIP and CUSP
Oral Care for Patients at Risk for Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Issued April 2010.
Building Your CUSP Team Part I Michael Rosen, PhD August 28, 2012 Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality Conference Number(s):
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Sustaining and Spreading surgical safety improvements with SUSP Mike.
VAP Intervention Information
LEARN FROM A DEFECT Emily Pasola RN, MSN, CNL Clinical Nurse Leader Surgical Intensive Care Unit Saint Joseph Mercy Hospital Ann Arbor, Michigan.
The Cardiac Surgery Translational Study (“CSTS”) The Quality And Safety Research Group Data We Can Count On Lisa H. Lubomski, PhD April 8, 2011 Immersion.
Welcome to the GHA Infection Prevention Power Hour January 17, 2013 Denise M. Flook, RN, MPH, CIC Georgia Hospital Association
Linking Quality Improvement and Infection Prevention Manoj Jain, MD, MPH Medical Director, QSource 19 February, 2009.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP Adaptive CUSP Sustainability Sustainment and Spread David.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Strategies for Collecting and Entering Early Mobility ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Implementation Assessment Kisha Ali, MS May 13, 2015 ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Data Webinar 5 Defining the Early Mobility Measures ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP: Year in Review Sean Berenholtz, MD, MHS Kathleen Speck,
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Content 1: Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 VAP Prevention Bundle: Evidence Review for Oral Care and Subglottic.
Lou Ann Bruno, MD Chief of Infectious Diseases and Medical Director Of Infection Prevention NHSN Benchmark Med-Surg ICU:
CUSP for VAP: EVAP Shadowing Another Professional Kathleen Speck, MPH November 14, 2013.
11/10/20111 On The Cusp Journey: Sentara CarePlex Hospital Gail J. Rudder RN, CRNI Infection Preventionist November 10 th, 2011.
The Comprehensive Unit-based Safety Program (CUSP)
Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program    A webinar series for QI Managers, Nurse Leaders and others supporting healthcare improvement in Wisconsin’s.
NEXT STEPS Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 1.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Cohort 2 Data Webinar 2 How to Complete the Exposure Receipt Assessment | Preliminary Structural Assessment Data Reports Wednesday, February.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Content Webinar Data Feedback and Team Presentation on All Sedation Data From Daily Care Processes Wednesday, February 11, 2015, 2:00-3:00.
***Please note some slides have been removed since the webinar at the presenter’s request. CUSP for VAP Revisiting Your Action Plan: Using Reports to.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Revisiting Science of Safety & Identifying Defects ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
DRAFT – final pending AHRQ approval Perform an SSI Investigation Deb Hobson, RN BSN March 10 & 12,
CUSP 4 MVP-VAP: Subglottic Suction ETT Implementation
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Data Entry Training Welcome to our new CECity platform! Armstrong.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Quantitative Implementation Assessment 1: Aggregated Results Kisha Ali, MS Mayo Levering, BS September 2, 2014.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Data Feedback: SubG ETT, Head of Bed Elevation and Delirium Assessment Utilization.
Staff Safety Assessment 1. Learning Objectives To understand Step 2 of CUSP:Identify Defects To understand how to Implement the Staff Safety Assessment.
AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care: HAIs/CAUTI Long-Term Care Safety Toolkit: Building a Culture of Safety National Content Webinar April 16, 2015.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Exposure Receipt Assessment 1: Aggregated Results (Cohort 1) Kisha Ali, MS Roshanak Hakimian October 8, 2014.
Strategies to Prevent Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Acute Care Hospitals 2014 Update Dr Neda Alijani.
Context, Interpretation, Next Steps Linda Greene MS, RN Michael Klompas MD, MPH November 12, 2014 CUSP for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Interim Results.
CUSP 4 MVP – VAP Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Early Mobility: Data Feedback and Team Presentations ARMSTRONG INSTITUTE FOR PATIENT.
© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 CUSP for VAP: Year in Review 2014 Sean Berenholtz, MD, MHS Kathleen.
Identifying Defects Chris Goeschel June Identifying Defects What DO you know? What SHOULD you know?
ABHB Interventions aimed at reducing - CAUTI
Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a form of hospital-associated pneumonia (HAP) which develops in mechanically.
Yousef I. Aljeesh, PhD, RN Said Abusalem, PhD, RN Naeem Alkariri, MSN, RN John A. Myers, PhD, MSPH Fawwaz Alaloul, PhD, RN Staff Developed IP Program Increases.
The AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
The Comprehensive Unit-Based Safety Program: How Will This Work?
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
The AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
The AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Antibiotic Use
Staff Safety Assessment
Staff Safety Assessment
ICU Safe Care Initiative/CUSP November 16, :30 am – 3:30 pm
CUSP 4 MVP-VAP Data Facilitator Discussion – 1
Meeting Objectives Build skills among care team members that will improve teamwork, communication, and create a patient safety culture in your unit Hear.
MA ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program (CUSP) 2010.
MA ICU Safe Care Initiative: Comprehensive Unit Based Safety Program (CUSP) October 25, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Providing Feedback: Structural Assessment 2 Results & Exposure Receipt Assessment 1 Results Kathleen Speck, MPH Nishi Rawat, MD The Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality April 3, 2014

© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Structural Assessment: Comparative Findings

Objectives To review the Structural or Policy-based Measures included in the VAP Prevention Bundle To assess improvements made in the implementation of the Policy-based Measures in your unit’s policies To identify opportunities to focus improvement efforts and facilitate horizontal learning 3

Structural Measures, Use a closed ETT suctioning system 2.Change closed suctioning catheters only as needed 3.Change ventilator circuits only if circuits become damaged or soiled 4.Change HME every 5-7 days and as clinically recommended 5.Provide easy access to NIVV equipment and institute protocols to promote use 4

Structural Measures, Periodically remove condensate from circuits, keeping the circuit closed during the removal, taking precautions not to allow the condensate to drain toward the patient 7.Use an early mobility protocol 8.Perform hand hygiene 9.Avoid supine position 10.Use standard precautions while suctioning respiratory tract secretions 5

Structural Measures, Use orotracheal intubation instead of nasotracheal 12.Avoid the use of prophylactic systemic antimicrobials 13.Avoid non-essential tracheal suctioning 14.Avoid gastric over-distention 6

The Structural Assessment Survey of Unit Leaders conducted at the baseline and in Dec – Jan Evaluates your implementation of the 14 Structural Measures included in the VAP Prevention Bundle 34 sites answered the assessment at baseline 22 sites answered the assessment during the second administration 7

How have the policies in your unit changed for the care of MVP? 8 Question % Best Response T1 (n=34) T2 (n=22) For intubated/trached patients, how often do you change the ventilator system? (Best response – Not routinely changed unless soiled or malfunctioning) 76%63% When used, how often do you change the closed endotracheal suction system? (Best response – Not routinely changed unless soiled or malfunctioning) 39%50%

How have the policy changes been implemented in your unit? 9 Question % Best Response T1 (n=34) T2 (n=22) In the absence of a difficult airway, how often is an orotracheal route used for elective intubation in your unit? (Positive) 82%81% For patients receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, how often is a closed endotracheal suction system used? (Positive) 94%100% When mechanical ventilation is required, how often are prophylactic intravenous antibiotics used to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia? (Negative) 82%81%

How have the policy changes been implemented in your unit? Question % Best Response T1 (n=34) T2 (n=22) In your ICU, how often are patients placed in a supine position, when there is no contraindication? (Negative) 71%86% In your ICU, how often are standard precautions used while suctioning the respiratory tract? (Positive) 85%100% In your ICU, how often is tracheal suctioning performed when it is not clinically indicated? (Negative) 74%68% In your ICU, how often are mechanically ventilated patients experiencing g gastric over- distention? (Negative) 82%91% 10

How have the policy changes been implemented in your unit? Question % Best Response T1 (n=34) T2 (n=22) In your ICU, how often is condensate drained away from the patient while the circuit remains closed? (Positive) 47%50% In your ICU, how often do healthcare providers perform hand hygiene prior to contact with respiratory equipment? (Positive) 97%91% How often is non-invasive ventilation used in your ICU? (Positive) 76%59% In your ICU, how often is an early mobility protocol used for patients receiving mechanical ventilation? (Positive) 35%55% 11

In the policies for care of MVP in your unit, is there guidance to: Question % Yes T1 (n=34) T2 (n=22) Avoid supine (flat) patient positioning unless clinically indicated 91% Use standard precautions while suctioning respiratory tract secretions? 94%100% Avoid non-essential tracheal suctioning?59%77% Avoid gastric over-distention?59%77% Periodically remove condensate from circuits?56%77% Assure that circuits are closed during removal of condensate to assure that condensate doesn’t drain toward the patient? 62%77% Perform hand hygiene prior to contact with respiratory equipment? 88%100% 12

Does your ICU actively promote: Question% Yes T1 (n=34) T2 (n=22) Use of non-invasive ventilation protocol?47%68% Early mobility protocol in patients receiving mechanical ventilation? 41%64% 13

Summary More sites have changed policies to be in line with CUSP for VAP recommendations General improvement or consistency in the care of patients with MVP Paradoxical implementation in care vs changes in written policies and/or procedures –Tracheal suctioning performed without clinical indications –The use of non-invasive ventilation 14

Barriers? Protocols? Discussion What barriers have you faced in changing policies in your unit? Do you have policies regarding any of these measures that you would be willing to share? The Structural Assessment - –Do you have any suggestions for improving the survey? 15

© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Exposure Receipt Assessment Results

Exposure Receipt Assessment 17 Evaluates the penetration of the CUSP and VAP interventions to front-line staff Anonymous assessment Completed by staff with direct patient care on the unit for only one shift

Exposure Receipt Assessment Measures Results divided into 4 categories based on question type to allow similar components to be examined together. The categorical measures are as follows: –Response Rate on Assessment –Distribution of Participants –CUSP Components of the Intervention –VAP Components of the Intervention 18

Response Rate Administered 18 months into the pilot February - March 2014 Results from 11 sites 133 observations –103 observations from MD –30 observations from PA 19

Distribution of Participants 1: What is your role in the Unit? 20

CUSP Components of the Intervention 3. Have you watched a Science of Safety presentation 4. Have you completed a Staff Safety Assessment 21

CUSP Components of the Intervention 5. Have you used the Learning from Defects tool? 6. For how many patients has your unit used Daily Goals? 22

CUSP Components of the Intervention 7: How familiar are you with CUSP? 23

CUSP Components of the Intervention 8. Do you have a CUSP team on your unit? 9. Has CUSP been active at improving patient safety? 24

Summary CUSP Components of Intervention A high proportion of units have CUSP teams Providers believe that these teams are active at improving patient safety. Penetration CUSP toolkit tools appears low (Daily Goals, Staff Safety Assessment, Learning from a Defect, Science of Safety video) 25

VAP Components of Intervention 9. How many interventions are used in your unit? 26

VAP Components of Intervention 10. Do you believe these interventions will help prevent VAE? 27

VAP Components of Intervention 11. Which of the following interventions are most likely to prevent VAE? 28

VAP Components of Intervention 12. Where is the biggest opportunity to improve the care of ventilated patients? 29

VAP Components of Intervention 13. How much training have you been given on the VAP Prevention Toolkit? 30

Summary VAP Components of Intervention High proportion of front-line providers believe that the technical intervention prevents VAE Process measure implementation could be improved –50% of providers report using at least 4 Implementation not related to training –high proportion of providers received a significant amount of toolkit training Early mobility represents the biggest opportunity to improve care 31

Your Feedback is Important Was this ERA assessment helpful? –If yes, what was helpful? –If no, could we do anything differently so it would be helpful? Will anyone do anything different based on results? What do teams think about paper based distribution vs. survey monkey? How often do teams think these assessments should be completed? 32

© The Johns Hopkins University and The Johns Hopkins Health System Corporation, 2011 Opportunities: CUSP4MVP-VAP National Project

CUSP4MVP-VAP: MD and PA Opportunities MD and PA opportunities with National Project: - Joining National Project content calls for continued education on CUSP and VAE prevention - Share your experience on content/coaching calls: as implementation experts to discuss implementation successes and barriers 34

CUSP4MVP-VAP: Join Content Calls Date: First Tuesday of every month (* Please note that this call does not follow the regular content call schedule) Time: 2pm EST Webinar Link: CUSP4MVP-VAP Content CallsCUSP4MVP-VAP Content Calls Call-in Information: ; Access code:

Additional Resources Society for Critical Care Medicine ICU Liberation Group – AHRQ CUSP Toolkit – tools/cusptoolkit/ tools/cusptoolkit/ Armstrong Institute CUSP Tools – _services/cusp_offerings/cusp_guidance.htmlhttp:// _services/cusp_offerings/cusp_guidance.html Armstrong Institute Training Opportunities – _services/cusp_offerings/ _services/cusp_offerings/ 36

Reminder: Next Steps Complete 2 nd HSOPS (March-April) Begin data collection sampling strategy between process measures and early mobility (April) Begin data collection for Low Tidal Volume Ventilation measure (August) 37

Data Collection Sampling Strategy: Begins April 1st 38

Enhancing Support for MD and PA Teams Objective Outcome Data - Armstrong will analyze your data for outcome measures if you provide needed information to your state leads. Forms will be provided: –decreasing duration of mechanical ventilation –decreasing hospital length of stay –decreasing mortality How do we enhance horizontal learning? What can the AI/MHA/HAP team do to better support your efforts to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia? 39

Thank You THANK YOU for all of your effort and hard work. 40