Illinois Evaluation Tools SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting Kansas City, MO October 5 & 6, 2009 Kathryn Cox Illinois State Board of Education 217-782-5589.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.

Advertisements

Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -

Overview Activities Handout ASPIRE North. By the end of the modules... Each building team will create a PowerPoint presentation (15-20 minutes) that includes:

BEST PRACTICES in RtI to Theresa M. Janczak, Ph.D.

Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12

Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.

Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches

Response to Intervention (RtI) A Basic Overview. Illinois IDEA 2004 Part Rules Requires: use of a process that determines how the child responds.

CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.

RtI Initiative at Ingham ISD MASP Annual Conference October 17, 2011 Emily Sportsman, PhD RtI Implementation Consultant Jeanne Tomlinson, MA RtI Supervisor.

The Role and Expectations for School-wide PBS Coaches Rob Horner and George Sugai OSEP TA-Center on PBS Pbis.org.

MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.

Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.

VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.

1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,

Eugene Field Elementary School “Inspiring and empowering each other to positively impact our community and our world.” Our Journey to Responsive Intervention.

Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.

Coming June 30,  Purpose of PBIS Assessment  Implications of the move from PBIS Surveys  Overview of available Tools and Surveys  Criteria for.

Progress Monitoring and Action Planning Using the Team Implementation Checklist The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges.

Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.

Fall Data Review Continuous Improvement Work Day School Leadership Teams Fall 2014.

9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.

By Jo Ann Vertetis and Karin Moe. Self-Assessment Can you define RTI? What is its purpose? Rate your understanding of RTI and how to implement it on a.

MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.

PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.

Scaling up and sustaining an integrated behavior and reading schoolwide model of supports November 18, 2008.

Measuring Implementation: School-Wide Instructional Staff Perspective Amy Gaumer Erickson, Ph.D. University of Kansas Evaluator: Kansas & Missouri SPDGs.

New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Update Cambrian School District March 8, 2012.

Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.

1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.

Gary L. Cates, Ph.D. Illinois State University Kathryn Cox Illinois State Board of Education State Personnel Development Grant – Illinois U.S. Department.

Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.

1. Learn how data tools can be used to: ◦ help staff get started with School-wide PBIS ◦ check implementation fidelity ◦ monitor progress and establish.

Evaluating Professional Development At the School Site Level Cheryl “Li” Walter, Ph.D. CA SIG Evaluator.

L EADERSHIP : Contributions to Student Outcomes. Context: Michelle White, FLPBSClark Dorman, FL PS/RtI.

IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.

PBIS Assessment PCOE Coaches Training :. Today’s Agenda Overview of PBIS Assessment site Navigating PBIS Assessment o School User o Coordinator Practice.

 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Recognition Process Materials available on

DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.

Office of Child Development & Early Learning Project MAX: Maximizing Access and Learning Project MAX Maximizing Access and Learning Managing and Sustaining.

Community Planning Training 5- Community Planning Training 5-1.

DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.

Targeted Behavior Interventions Data Driven Decision Making for Targeted Behavior Support Cohort 5 December Page 30.

IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.

By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.

Notes for Trainers (Day Training)

Overview Check for Understanding - Activity Collaboration/Discussion WASD Oct RtII is: [Student] Reponse to Instruction and Intervention:

Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1/31/20161 If you modify this powerpoint, update the version information below. This.

Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.

INITIAL TEAM TRAINING Presented by the MBI Consultants MODULE 7: Establishing Procedures for Data Collection.

Scaling Up in Illinois Illinois STS Team Deb Kunz Brenda Melcher Barbara Sims.

Supporting District Structures & Teams through a State-Level Plan Susan Barrett, Implementer Partner Center on PBIS Brenda Melcher Central Region Coordinator.

Quality Standards for Supported Employment Wednesday 09 November 2005 NIUSE Facilitators:- Teresa Hazzard & Heather Logan.

Leadership Teams Implementing PBIS Module 14. Objectives Define role and function of PBIS Leadership Teams Define Leadership Team’s impact on PBIS implementation.

Project Template for use at any tier ASPIRE North.

Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.

SISEP IN ILLINOIS INTEGRATED SYSTEM FOR STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT October 8, 2009 PBIS National Forum.

District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.

V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.

Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.

PBIS DATA. Critical Features of PBIS SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Culturally Knowledgeable Staff Behavior Supporting Culturally Relevant Evidence-based.

RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.

PBIS IMPLEMENTATION & FIDELITY October 21, 2015 VICTORY IN OUR SCHOOLS WITH PBIS.

School-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports District-wide Implementation: Ensuring Success Kentucky Center for Instructional Discipline.

Teacher-Based Problem-Solving for Groups (TBIT)

RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo

Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist

PBIS Coaches Training Day 4

Presentation transcript:

Illinois Evaluation Tools SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting Kansas City, MO October 5 & 6, 2009 Kathryn Cox Illinois State Board of Education

Illinois Evaluation Framework 1.If people are trained, do they implement? 2.If people implement, do they do so with fidelity? 3.If people implement with fidelity, do they sustain the practice(s) over time? 4.If people sustain the practice(s), what is the impact on student outcomes (school, group, individual)?

IL ASPIRE Evaluation of Implementation, Fidelity & Sustaining Practices  Self-Assessment of Problem Solving Implementation (SAPSI) Assesses the degree of implementation of the problem solving process at the building level as self-reported by the schools Increases in and maintaining implementation levels over time can also provide a measure of fidelity and degree to which practices are being sustained  Fidelity of Implementation Checklist Allows for external evaluation by ASPIRE regional staff of implementation in the school sites

Illinois SAPSI  _SAPSIv2.4_200.doc _SAPSIv2.4_200.doc  Areas of Assessment Comprehensive Commitment and Support Three-Tiered System Establish and Maintain Team Process Self-Assessment Implementing Evidenced-Based Practice Monitoring and Action Planning  Rating Scale Maintaining: All components of definition implemented consistently for 2 or more school years Achieved: All components of definition implemented consistently for at least one school year In Progress: At least one of the components of definition implemented consistently for at least 3 months Not Started: No components of definition have been implemented

IL ASPIRE Fidelity of Implementation Checklist  elityToolv4.6_ pdf elityToolv4.6_ pdf  Designed to monitor the adherence of implementation of problem solving activities and products at the school level  Involves a review of products: School Improvement Plan/Action Plan Instructional Planning Forms Screening data (CBM, SWIS) Evidence of progress monitoring (Tier 2, Tier 3 Graphs; Benchmark Data for Tier 1) Training (Training Logs or Sign in Sheets)