Super resolving pupils: beyond the diffraction limit * Anedio Ranfagni, Daniela Mugnai, Rocco Ruggeri In an attempt to transfer the results obtained with.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
 In our analysis of the double slit interference in Waves we assumed that both slits act as point sources.  From the previous figure we see that the.
Advertisements

Topic 11.3 Diffraction.
Diffraction of Light Waves
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Lecture Outline Chapter 28 Physics, 4 th Edition James S. Walker.
1 EE 542 Antennas and Propagation for Wireless Communications Array Antennas.
Interference & Diffraction
c = km/sec I F = I 0 x (cosθ) 2.
Diffraction Physics 202 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 26.
1 Sinusoidal Waves The waves produced in SHM are sinusoidal, i.e., they can be described by a sine or cosine function with appropriate amplitude, frequency,
If we have a screen 10 m away from a 1 mm slit, can we use “far field diffraction” analysis? A] yes B] no C] can’t tell.
1 Chapter 10 Diffraction March 9, 11 Fraunhofer diffraction: The single slit 10.1 Preliminary considerations Diffraction: The deviation of light from propagation.
Chapter 25: Interference and Diffraction
METAMATERIALS and NEGATIVE REFRACTION Nandita Aggarwal Laboratory of Applied Optics Ecole Polytechnique de Federal Lausanne.
The Maryland Optics Group Far-Field Optical Microscope with Nanometer-Scale Resolution Igor I. Smolyaninov and Christopher C. Davis Department of Electrical.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Ultrasound – Physics & Advances
Chapter 37 Wave Optics. Wave optics is a study concerned with phenomena that cannot be adequately explained by geometric (ray) optics.  Sometimes called.
Lecture 14 Images Chapter 34 Geometrical Optics Fermats Principle -Law of reflection -Law of Refraction Plane Mirrors and Spherical Mirrors Spherical refracting.
1 Components of Optical Instruments, Cont… Lecture 7.
Figure 2.1 Block diagram of a generic projection imaging system.
The wave nature of light Interference Diffraction Polarization
Lecture 15 Interference Chp. 35 Topics –Interference from thin films –Due to the wave nature of light –Change in wavelength and phase change in a medium.
Chapter 36 In Chapter 35, we saw how light beams passing through different slits can interfere with each other and how a beam after passing through a single.
Circular aperture Rectangular aperture Fraunhofer Diffraction.
Maximum Gain Amplifiers For the two-port network shown below, It is well known that maximum power transfer from the source to the transistor occurs when:
1 Electromagnetic waves: Multiple beam Interference Friday November 8, 2002.
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Optics 2----by Dr.H.Huang, Department of Applied Physics1 Diffraction Introduction: Diffraction is often distinguished.
Physics 1C Lecture 27B.
Interference in Thin Films, final
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
Diffraction Introduction to Diffraction Patterns
1© Manhattan Press (H.K.) Ltd. Young’s double slit experiment Young’s double slit experiment 9.10 Interference of light waves Relationship between x,,
Congresso del Dipartimento di Fisica Highlights in Physics –14 October 2005, Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Milano An application of the.
1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Single, multiple slit(s) & Circular aperture Fri. Nov. 22, 2002.
Lecture Nine: Interference of Light Waves: I
Chapter 38 Diffraction Patterns and Polarization.
Fundamental of Optical Engineering Lecture 5.  Diffraction is any behavior of light which deviates from predictions of geometrical optics.  We are concerned.
Physics 1202: Lecture 26 Today’s Agenda Announcements: –Midterm 2: Friday Nov. 6… –Chap. 18, 19, 20, and 21 No HW for this week (midterm)No HW for this.
1 Fraunhofer Diffraction: Circular aperture Wed. Nov. 27, 2002.
The law of reflection: The law of refraction: Image formation
Modelling and Simulation of Passive Optical Devices João Geraldo P. T. dos Reis and Henrique J. A. da Silva Introduction Integrated Optics is a field of.
Diffraction at a single slit a = λ Semi circular wave fronts a = 2 λ First minima & maxima become visible a = 4 λ Diffraction is the spreading of wavefronts.
C Virginia Tech Effect of Resist Thickness Resists usually do not have uniform thickness on the wafer –Edge bead: The build-up of resist along the.
Diffraction. b S S’ A B According to geometrical optics region AB of Screen SS’ to be illuminated and remaining portion will be dark.
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 35-Diffraction.
Date of download: 7/5/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Basic principle of the proposed circuit. The lower portion of the figure contains.
Phys102 Lecture 26, 27, 28 Diffraction of Light Key Points Diffraction by a Single Slit Diffraction in the Double-Slit Experiment Limits of Resolution.
Date of download: 9/20/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Top view of the studied mask and the splitting strategy for the investigated LELE.
Chapter 25 Wave Optics.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
ICEAA 2013 LENS ANTENNA Based on Fresnel Zone Lens of Flat Dielectric Rings Conformal.
Diffraction through a single slit
Wave superposition If two waves are in the same place at the same time they superpose. This means that their amplitudes add together vectorially Positively.
Interference Requirements
Fraunhofer Diffraction: Multiple slits & Circular aperture
Light Through a Single Slit
Chapter 35-Diffraction Chapter 35 opener. Parallel coherent light from a laser, which acts as nearly a point source, illuminates these shears. Instead.
Klas H. Pettersen, Gaute T. Einevoll  Biophysical Journal 
Example: 633 nm laser light is passed through a narrow slit and a diffraction pattern is observed on a screen 6.0 m away. The distance on the screen.
Diffraction vs. Interference
Fraunhofer Diffraction
Scalar theory of diffraction
NEGATIVE REFRACTION AND FOCUSING USING PHOTONIC CRYSTALS
Volume 114, Issue 4, Pages (February 2018)
Fraunhofer diffraction from Circular apertures:
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages (March 2003)
Presentation transcript:

Super resolving pupils: beyond the diffraction limit * Anedio Ranfagni, Daniela Mugnai, Rocco Ruggeri In an attempt to transfer the results obtained with super-gain antennas to optical systems for increasing the resolving power, an original way for overcoming the diffraction limit was proposed in 1952 by Toraldo di Francia. Recent microwave experiments, performed by using a composed pupils set-up, demonstrate the correctness of these predictions. By employing special kinds of pupils, consisting of a paraffin torus placed in the middle of a metallic frame (the outer pupil), we have a composed (three coronae) system suitable to test the improvement in the resolving power. The presence of the paraffin torus (refractive index n=1.49) assures the exact relationships among phases and amplitudes in the three coronae. In particular, the required phase inversion of the wave was obtained since the thickness of the torus (= 34 mm) was about one wavelength: thus the optical path inside the paraffin is about 1.5, while in the surrounding space and in the central bore it is. In figure to left, the measured amplitude patterns relative to the composed pupil is shown: in the presence of the paraffin torus (full points and small crosses), and to the simple pupil (open circles and small squares). The results show a strong narrowing of the beam, from a width of about 6 cm, in the absence of the ``open pupil", to about 3 cm, when the “open pupil" is present. Moreover, we had also a strong increase in the beam intensity with an amplification of the maximum of about a factor two. The open-end detector has been moved in the near field of the pupil, as sketched in the inset. The data marked with open and full circles were obtained from a series of measurements at 9.30 GHz, while the ones marked by small crosses and small squares were obtained from another series of measurements at 9.27 GHz. In figure to right, the measured amplitude pattern obtained in the far field limit (Fraunhofer optics) is shown in the case of composed pupil (open circles and full line), and for simple pupil with the same outer diameter (full points and dashed line). The far field is simulated by putting a paraffin lens with a focal length of about 15 cm beyond the pupil under test. The detector was moved in the focal plane of a paraffin lens placed beyond the pupil, as sketched in the inset. The frequency was taken at 9.37 GHz. The amplitudes, which are reported in a logarithmic scale, show a narrowing of the central peak (taking, for instance, the width at 3 dB of attenuation) of a factor of about two. This case (far field) should be considered to be a more convincing test of the theory described previously, although these results essentially confirm the prior ones by showing the same narrowing of the central peak of a factor of about two. It seems that the theoretical predictions made by Toraldo di Francia on 1952 have been confirmed, to a large extent, by the present experiments. The improvement demonstrated in the resolving power was only of about a factor of two, and this was due to the simplicity of the system adopted. However, we are confident that this improvement can be greatly increased, provided that the pupil consists of an adequate number of coronae, in order to obtain a resolution power well beyond the diffraction limit. ________________________________________________________________________________________ * A. Ranfagni, D. Mugnai, and R. Ruggeri, Phys. Lett, A 311, 77 (2003) ; J. Appl. Phys., in press. Istituto di Fisica Applicata “Nello Carrara” IFAC – CNR, Firenze In the two upper figures, we compare the pattern-amplitude obtained experimentally in the two cases with their theoretical curves. The amplitudes acting on the three circular coronae were approximately proportional to 1, , and 0.234, respectively, as required by the theory. These values were roughly satisfied by the amplitude profile in the absence of the paraffin torus, at the values of r =7.5, 22.5, 37.5 mm, which correspond to the mean radius of each corona. We observed a narrowing of the beam by a factor of more than two and an amplification of the maximum of almost the same amount.