Section 508 Refresh WCAG 2.0 A and AA Information & Comparison CB Averitt – Deque Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCAG 2 Compliance With PDF
Advertisements

Developed with material from W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) IMPORTANT: Instructions Please read carefully the Instructions for.
Developed with material from W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) IMPORTANT: Instructions Please read carefully the Instructions for.
IMPORTANT: Instructions
Member FINRA/SIPCThursday, November 12, 2009 Resource Menu Changes - Report User Experience Study | Kevin Cornwall.
Website Accessibility Testing Todd M. Weissenberger Web Accessibility Coordinator University of Iowa
Web Accessibility Web Services Office of Communications.
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 by Julius Charles Serrano, Even Grounds.
Introduction to Web Accessibility. What is Web Accessibility Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web Disabilities including.
HCI 201 Week 4 Design Usability Heuristics Tables Links.
Technology Accessibility New Regulations, New Reporting.
Introduction to WCAG, ATAG and UAAG Jan Richards, Project Manager Inclusive Design Research Centre OCAD University
WCAG 2.0 California State University, Los Angeles.
Web Accessibility. Ensuring people of all abilities have equal access to web content Disability Discrimination Act – Web Access Advisory notes 2010 Required.
Dhananjay Bhole, Coordinator, Accessibility Research Group, Department of Education and Extension, University of Pune.
Web Accessibility John Rochford UMMS Shriver Center Director, INDEX Program Rich Caloggero WGBH National Center for Accessible Media MIT Adaptive Technology.
Debi Orton, Co-Chair NYS Forum IT Accessibility Committee.
Accessibility IS 403: User Interface Design Shaun Kane 1.
WEBINAR SERIES: ACCESSIBLE INTERACTIVE DOCUMENTS Week 3: Accessible Web Forms Norman Coombs
Website Accessibility
Week 2 Web Site Design Principles. 2 Design for the Computer Medium Craft the look and feel Make your design portable Design for low bandwidth Plan for.
Java Application Accessibility Awareness Lawrence Najjar.
Understanding WCAG Elizabeth J. Pyatt, Ph.D. Information Technology Services.
The Internet Writer’s Handbook 2/e Web Accessibility Writing for the Web.
Web Accessiblity Carol Gordon SIU Medical Library.
Measuring PDF Accessibility PDF a11y Testing for the Rest of a11yBOS 2013 Deque Systems, Inc.
Is Your Site Accessible? Web Site Testing for Accessibility Presented by: The NYS Forum IT Accessibility Committee The NYS Forum Webmasters Guild Northeast.
How to evaluate technology for accessibility Terrill Thompson Technology Accessibility Specialist University of
1 Usability and accessibility of educational web sites Nigel Bevan University of York UK eTEN Tenuta support action.
Accessibility in Flash 508 is the Law, Accessibility is the Goal.
Accessibility of online instructional tools and documents Terrill Thompson Technology Accessibility
9 August 2012 Museum of Contemporary Art, Sydney Roger Hudson Web Usability Arts, Media and Technology at the MCA.
1 WCAG2 for ICT Working Draft.
WEB ACCESSIBILITY. WHAT IS IT? Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web. Web accessibility encompasses all disabilities that.
+ A11y assessment Lisa Liskovoi. + WCAG POUR some accessibility sugar on me Perceivable – Can I see it? Hear it? Feel it? Operable – Can I scroll it?
© All Rights Reserved1 Web Accessibility Intro For Web Accessibility in India Community Rakesh Paladugula Deque Software Pvt Ltd.
Technical Communication A Practical Approach Chapter 14: Web Pages and Writing for the Web William Sanborn Pfeiffer Kaye Adkins.
© 2014 Adobe Systems Incorporated. All Rights Reserved. Adobe Confidential. How to Explain WCAG 2.0 to Your Web Team Andrew Kirkpatrick | Adobe Accessibility.
Fortune 500 Apps Smackdown John Rempel Quality Control & Training Specialist AMAC Accessibility Solutions & Research Center at Georgia Tech.
Talks! An Overview of Website Accessibility January 14, 2010 Audio is only available by calling this number: Conference Call: ; Access Code:
1 Mark Malamud February 23, 2016 Based on the presentation prepared by Bruce Bailey and Katie Haritos-Shea December 15, 2015 Using WCAG 2 for Section.
Web Content Accessibility Leila Styer Washington State University CAHNRS/Computer Resource Unit rev. November 2006.
Color Theory. Primary Colors Colors that cannot be created by mixing others.
Developed with material from W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) IMPORTANT: Instructions Please read carefully the Instructions for.
Update: Revising the VVSG Structure Sharon Laskowski vote.nist.gov April 14, 2016 EAC Standards Board Meeting 1.
Web Accessibility June 2, 2016 Evaluation and Workflow.
Web Accessibility Web Community Meeting July 22, 2016 July 29, 2016.
1 ​ Updating your Section 508 testing process to address the new WCAG 2 standards of the refresh Jonathan Avila Chief Accessibility Officer SSB BART Group.
Section 508 At long last, two of the most looming accessibility questions in the United States have been answered.
Widening the web Resources Readable. Keyboard navigable.
AODA Website Accessibility at York
Community Engagement Web Community Manger (WCM) - Schoolwires
Logistics Audio is also available over a phone line:
Screen Reader Testing and Website Support for Beginners
Information Architecture and Design I
Screen Reader Testing and Website Support for Beginners
Introduction to Web Accessibility
WCAG 2.0 training & orientation
Understanding the State of University Web Site Accessibility   Stephen Dannelly and Michael Whitney Department of Computer Science.
Basics of Accessibility in Adobe PDF
Presented By: Bill Curtis-Davidson
Section 508 CT310 Spring 2018.
Unit 14 Website Design HND in Computing and Systems Development
Lakeshore Public Schools
International University of Japan
From compliance to usability
Information Architecture and Design I
Demystifying Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
Accessible Design Top 10 List
Accessibility.
Presentation transcript:

Section 508 Refresh WCAG 2.0 A and AA Information & Comparison CB Averitt – Deque Systems

Section 508 Timeline Began in 2006 February 18, 2015: The Access Board released the proposed rule to update Section 508 Standards and 255 guidelines. The proposed rule is currently available for public comment. February 27, 2015: The proposed rule will be published in the Federal Register. March 5, 2015: The Board will hold a public hearing on the rule in San Diego. March 11, 2015: The Board will hold a public hearing on the rule in Washington, DC. March 31, 2015: The Board will conduct a public webinar to review the proposal. May 28, 2015: The deadline for submitting public comment on the proposed rule to the Access Board. After May 28, 2015: The Board will publish their final rule in the Federal Register sometime after they have received and reviewed public comment on the proposed rule. 6 Months After the Final Rule: The effective date for the ICT refresh will be 6 months after the final rule is published in the Federal Register. However, the Board is also seeking comment on the effective date, so it is possible that the 6-month window will change. We should expect finalization no earlier Q4 of 2015

Section 508 Refresh Will mirror WCAG 2.0 A and AA

Notable Push for global harmonization of accessibility standards – WCAG 2.0 standards Human testing and Verification – not just automated ( % accurate) Applies to web content, web applications, software, documents Addresses new technology

4 Main Principles of Refresh (POUR) Perceivable – Information cannot be invisible to all of a user's senses Operable – An interface must not require a user to perform tasks that they are not able to perform. No matter the tools they use to access the site, they must have a way to use it. Understandable – User interfaces and content must not be beyond the understanding and predictability of the users Robust – As technology and user agents evolve, the content should remain accessible. Don't lock into a specific thing.

WCAG 2.0 A and AA There are 38 Level A and AA Success Criteria Technology Neutral Requirements are Objectively Testable

38 Level A and AA WCAG Success Criteria Quick Review

Section 508 Refresh / WCAG 2.0 Comparison 22 of the 38 are phrased differently but are equivalent to current 508 requirements 16 success criteria are new

16 New Success Criteria & Summary Meaningful Sequence [A] – Provides for a reasonable and logical reading order when using assistive technology Sensory Characteristics [A] – Provides that instructions are not conveyed only through sound, shape, size, or visual orientation Audio Control [A] – Provides that there is a way to stop, pause, mute, or adjust volume with audio that plays automatically Contrast (Minimum) [AA] – Provides for specified contrast between foreground and background of text and images of text

16 New Success Criteria & Summary Resize Text [AA] – Provides for content that remains readable and functional when the font size is doubled No Keyboard Trap [A] – Provides that the keyboard focus is not trapped when the keyboard is used for navigation Focus Order [A] – Provides for a keyboard oriented navigation order that is reasonable and logical. Provides that links, form elements, and other user interface controls and components have a reasonable and logical navigation order Link Purpose (In Context) [A] – Provides that the purpose of any link is understandable for its text or context

16 New Success Criteria & Summary Multiple Ways [AA] – Provides for two or more means to locate content Headings and Labels [AA] – Provides that headings and labels are descriptive Language of Page [A] – Provides that the default language of content is exposed to assistive technology Language of Parts [AA] – Provides that changes in language are exposed to assistive technology

16 New Success Criteria & Summary Consistent Navigation [AA] – Provides that repeated navigational components occur in the same relative order each time they are encountered Error Suggestion [AA] – Provides that the system makes suggestions for correction when input errors are automatically detected and suggestions are available Error Prevention (Legal, Financial Data) [AA] – Provides that when legal, financial, or test data can be changed or deleted the changes or deletions can be reversed, verified, or confirmed Parsing [A] – Provides that significant HTML/XHTML validation and parsing errors in source code are avoided

Questions? Contact Information CB Averitt – –