1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

MONITORING OF SUBGRANTEES
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
MSCG Training for Project Officers and Consultants: Project Officer and Consultant Roles in Supporting Successful Onsite Technical Assistance Visits.
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
California Child Welfare Co-Investment Partnership Children’s Conference Monterey, California May 29, 2008.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
Everyone has been trained on the development of the SIP First draft of the SIP should be entered on the state website,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Performance management guidance
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
MONITORING INDISTAR® STATE-DETERMINED IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOOL.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Continuing Accreditation The Higher Learning Commission provides institutional accreditation through the evaluation of the entire university organization.
Session 5 Integrating CLAS Into Policy and Practice CLAS Training [ADD DATE] [ADD PRESENTER NAME] [ADD ORGANIZATION NAME]
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Performance-based Contracting and Maine’s State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) Dawn Kliphan March 28, 2010.
Atlanta Board of Education AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” February 14, 2011.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Evaluation Plan New Jobs “How to Get New Jobs? Innovative Guidance and Counselling 2 nd Meeting Liverpool | 3 – 4 February L Research Institute Roula.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Workshop on Implementing Audit Quality Practices Working Group on Audit Manuals and Methods March 2006 Vilnius (Lithuania) Hungarian Experiences.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
2009 OSEP Project Directors Meeting Martha Diefendorf, Kristin Reedy & Pat Mueller.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
International Speedway Boulevard Stakeholders Task Force (STF) Meeting 1 Wednesday, May 19, 2010.
Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Enhancing capacity in the Child & Youth sector through situated supported distance learning Building Capacity through a Participatory Institutional Assessment.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
Connecticut Department of Public Health - Keeping Connecticut Healthy Connecticut Department of Public Health PHABuloCiTy! Public Health Accreditation.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
IV&V Facility 7/28/20041 IV&V in NASA Pre-Solicitation Conference/ Industry Day NASA IV&V FACILITY July 28, 2004.
Improving the Lives of Mariposa County’s Children and Families System Improvement Plan October 2008 Update.
PILOT SCHOOL PRINCIPAL EVALUATION
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
ESEA Consolidated Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute

2 Mission and Purpose CBC Peer Review Quality Assurance and Technical Assistance Teams, in partnership with DCF, CBC Lead Agencies, and Community Alliances, will assist in the quality assurance review and provision of technical assistance to insure that Districts and new Lead Agencies are fully prepared to implement their Community-Based Care services.

3 Background 1998 – CBC Office produces Prototype Lead Agency Readiness Assessment – District 5 Start-Up –Focus on Lead Agency readiness activities and deliverables –Criteria centered on infrastructure development and operational implementation of programmatic plans Incorporated into Start-Up Deliverables for all subsequent start-up projects through 2002 January 2003 – Prototype Peer Review Concept Implemented through FMHI Partnership Contract

4 January 2003–June 2003 Prototype Peer Review Concept Implementation Steps B. Initial Peer Reviews: District 10: -Initial Review and Report: March 5 th and 6 th Final Review and Report: June 23, 2003 District 4 Duval County: -Initial Review and Report: April 22 nd 23 rd Final Review and Report: June 18, 2003 Background con’t A. February 2003 – Completed Collaborative Planning and Development Workshops  Produced initial District/CBC Integrated Tool  Developed Review Process and Procedures

5 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. C.Additional Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures for: January 2003–June 2003 Prototype Peer Review Concept Implementation Steps

6 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures Action Steps Completed: Community Alliance members added to Peer Team Process for all remaining Projects Establish process and role for Alliance member participation

7 Alliance Participation DA and CBC CEO request local Alliance participation Alliance Member(s) appointed by local Community Alliance to the Team Included as member of the Team throughout the Process Identifies for the Team the Alliance’s local priorities. Role is as a member, but not a Team Leader: o Only Team Leads sign final report with recommendation o Absence of consensus to the Leads’ report will result in an attached “minority opinion” report.

8 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…services to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures Action Steps Completed: 1) Readiness Assessment Tool reviewed and aligned with statutory requirements: A Set of Uniform Criteria reflecting national accreditation standards that evaluate:  Programmatic Competency  Financial Competency  Technical Assistance  Training Competency  Organizational Competency 2) Local Criteria including community alliance priorities provide by Alliance member

9 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures Action Step Completed: 3) Readiness Assessment Instrument revised to include Criteria for District Readiness and collaborative planning and development between District and Lead Agency, including local priorities

10 District/Lead Agency Readiness Tool Excerpt Lead Agency EvidenceYNDistrict/Region Evidence Y N  The provider has worked with the district to plan start-up and transition activities which reflect partnership through joint planning, collaborative communication, mutual support, and shared vision.  The district worked with the provider to plan start-up and transition activities which reflect partnership through joint planning, collaborative communication, mutual support, and shared vision.  Written plan is evident that describes stakeholder relationship and includes providers, foster parents, and families receiving services, and a mechanism for soliciting feedback and input is included in their plan.  The district has established mechanisms for communicating issues relating to the transition to CBC to foster parents, families receiving services and existing providers/contractors.  A community stakeholder planning and program implementation group is established.  A mechanism for soliciting feedback and input is included in their plan.  The plan is submitted to the department within 120 days after the effective date of the Start-Up contract.  Meetings, correspondence, public hearings, or other such communication is evident with major stakeholder groups.  DCF approval of stakeholder plan is documented.  The district has established timeframes for the review process to ensure timely feedback consistent with the readiness review and transition schedule.

11 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures Action Step Completed: 4) Annual Schedule for Initial and Final Peer Review Team Site Visits established and promulgated

12 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements, con’t The Readiness Assessment shall be conducted by a joint team of district and lead agency staff with direct experience with start-up and operation of a CBC service program…with representatives from the appropriate Community Alliance. Review and Modification of Readiness Instruments and Process and Procedures Action Step Completed/In-Progress: 5) Peer Review Team members and Lead’s recruited and Scheduled for all Start-Up projects

13 Selection of Peer Reviewers Team Leads Identified based on: –District or Lead Agency Leadership position – willingness and availability to assist in the entire review process Remaining members identified based on: –Demonstrated competency in area of need –Willingness and availability to assist in the entire review process –Areas of expertise chosen for an individual review are based on local request for assistance

14 Senate Bill 1454 Requirements The Department, in consultation with the local community alliance, determines and certifies through a readiness assessment that the district is prepared to transition…service to the lead agency, and that the lead agency is ready to deliver and be accountable for such service provision. Other Statutory Requirements Managed through Process: Team Exit Conference Written and documented specific evidence of readiness on each element of the readiness instrument. Description of each element of readiness needing improvement and strategies being implemented to address each.

15 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

16 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Assists the District and Lead Agency in a preliminary Project assessment and preparation for Team Site Visit. Provides an external quality assurance review of Readiness deliverables On-site Visits Provision of model start-up deliverables, best practice information. Review of project deliverables and plans; feedback and technical assistance Identify available technical assistance from other districts/projects

17 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Coordinates the recruitment of peer review team members, schedules site visit dates and associated logistics Provides Team with project information including all desk review material Supports team’s activities during site visit; moderates group meetings Prepares initial and final reports Provides follow-up and coordination of technical support to the districts as needed

18 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS

19 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS District DCF and Lead Agency Budget side-by-side Comparison Lead Agency Table of Organization System of Care Overview Services Implementation Plan Quality Assurance Plans Interim Services Contract (Service Scope and Tasks) Other as May be Requested by Team

20 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS DRAFT AGENDA Day 1 1) 9:00 – 4:00– Meet at District HQ a) Welcome and Introductions b) Presentation by CBC Lead Agency and District Key Personnel i. Overview of CBC Project – The System of Care ii. Highlights of Transition/Implementation Plan iii. Human Resources iv. Highlights of Budget/Financial Issues v. Highlights of IS Issues vi. Quality Assurance/Quality Improvement Plans (CBC and District) vii. Status of Readiness Deliverables/Criteria – District and CBC viii. Other as desired by CBC and District

21 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Day 2 8:30 Meet at HQ or CBC Offices 8:430 – 11:00 BreakOut Groups Meet Topics Include: Implementation Plan Details Budget and Financial management Transition Phase-In Planning Quality Assurance Plans

22 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Day 2 8:30 Meet at HQ or CBC Offices 11:00 – 12:00 Peer Team Meeting Initial Assessment Development Initial Recommendations

23 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Day 2 8:30 Meet at HQ or CBC Offices 12:00 – 1:00 Exit Conference with District and Lead Agency

24 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Written Initial Team Report provided to District DA and lead Agency CEO within 7 calendar days Includes listing of Community Priorities Project Strengths Areas of Assessed Need Specific Recommendations for improvement and strategies for achieving

25 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Final Team Site Visit Review of Written, Completed Readiness Assessment Instrument – signed by DA and LA CEO Report of Document Audit by Team Coordinator Presentation and Written Response and discussion regarding Initial Team Recommendations Written Communication with supporting documentation, sign ed by Team Leads prepared and submitted to Headquarters.

26 QUALITY ASSURANCE PEER REVIEW TEAM PROCESS Observations and Feedback from Prior Team Members: Observations and Feedback from Districts Reviewed: