RTF Delivery Verification Guidance Batch 2 Jennifer Anziano Regional Technical Forum September 22, 2015

Overview Today, we are seeking adoption of delivery verification guidance (and revised specs as appropriate) for the second batch of measures Review history and general approach Walk through delivery verification guidance If the RTF is not ready to adopt the guidance today, we need clear direction on how to proceed 2

Delivery Verification Work to Date For proven measures, impact evaluation only requires claim and delivery verification June 2014: RTF adopted updated version of the Guidelines that calls for delivery verification guidance – RTF will provide guidance on delivery verification for UES and Standard Protocols – Guidance describes key data that needs to be collected as part of delivery verification February 2015: Previewed framework proposed by BPA and team March 2015: Reviewed “simple” vs “complex” split and examples May 2015: RTF approved first batch of guidance Today: Addressing second batch 3

Reminder on Proposed Approach Identify key data that needs to be collected (or checked) to ensure reliability of RTF savings estimate Update measure specifications (as appropriate) for greater clarity and to focus on those aspects that impact the RTF savings estimates – Ex 1: Identifying specific ENERGY STAR specification – Ex 2: Move safety and best practices to “recommended” section Create a measure specification table on summary sheet of measure workbook that maps the delivery verification checklist directly to the measure specification Based on RTF direction, staff generally considers the following to be out of scope: – Defining how the data should be collected – Defining which methods of verification are sufficient to claim savings – RTF may choose to define the how on a case-by-case basis 4

Staff Highlighted Areas Some delivery verification data may be challenging or impractical to get after the fact (ex: pre-conditions) – Guidelines focus on “what” matters for energy savings estimates – RTF will be mindful of this when defining measure specifications and avoid impractical delivery verification guidance where possible – Program design should consider delivery verification requirements 5

Second Batch of Measures Ag Irrigation Hardware Ag Area Lights Ag Stock Watering Tanks Ag Variable Frequency Drives – Potato/Onion Shed Com Clothes Washers* Com Combination Ovens Com Convection Ovens Com Fryers Com Hot Food Holding Cabinets Com Pre-Rinse Spray Valves Com Steamers Com Efficient Tanks* Com Showerheads* Com Anti-sweat Heater Controls Res DHP for FAF in SF and MH Res DHP for Zonal Heat MH Res New Construction – Slab Insulation 6 See workbookworkbook * Denotes measures for which specification was refined for clarity

Proposed Motion “I ________ move the RTF adopt the delivery verification guidance, and related specification refinements, as presented for the following measures: 7 Agricultural Irrigation Hardware Agricultural Lighting – Area Lights Agricultural Stock Watering Tanks Agricultural Variable Frequency Drives – Potato/Onion Shed Commercial Appliances – Clothes Washers Commercial Cooking Equipment – Combination Ovens Commercial Cooking Equipment – Convection Ovens Commercial Cooking Equipment – Fryers Commercial Cooking Equipment – Hot Food Holding Cabinets Commercial Cooking Equipment – Pre- Rinse Spray Valves Commercial Cooking Equipment – Steamers Commercial DHW – Efficient Tanks Commercial DHW – Showerheads Commercial Grocery – Anti-sweat Heater Controls Residential Heating/Cooling – DHP for FAF in SF and MH Residential Heating/Cooling – DHP for Zonal Heat MH Residential New Construction – Slab Insulation”

Additional Slides 8

Plan for Finishing Delivery Verification Guidance Development Batch 1 – Complete Batch 2 – Revisit if needed (goal: Nov meeting) Batch 3 – Present (goal: Nov meeting) Batch 4 – Update as measure comes to RTF See workbook for batch numberworkbook 9