The Ethnic Landscape Brokerage and Machine politics Transition to Function Based Power
Irish Jews Italians Poles
The ethnic network: Is it an ethnic trap? Arrival in Urban America Journey to America Famine Beginning in 1840’s Religion as community development Politics viewed as a business venture
Arrived after the Civil War Competition with the Irish Political relevance of Italian social structure (compadrasco) Political ramifications of an ethnic business class Organized crime & the melting pot
Recent conflict with Afro- Americans Philadelphia: Jewish Quarter Migration – Central & Eastern Europe Strong ideological bias Liberalism Socialism Anti-machine reformism More middle class
Arrived beginning in 1870’s Especially numerous in Great Lake cities Ethnic communities cohesive & strong Late arrival placed them at bottom of ethnic totem pole Disdain of intellectual class diminished their influence until closing decades of twentieth century
Relationship of Ethnic Politics, Brokerage and Machine Politics Significance of Ethnic Politics, Brokerage and Machine Politics Today The Bias of Ethnic and Machine Politics
Variation in the Midwest More job oriented Greater attention to issues Examples Chicago – Mayor Richard Daley Kansas City – Pendergast Machine Kansas City: Midwest Urban Center
Nature of Brokerage Politics Ethnicity predominates Leader of ethnic group acts a middleman Nature of Machine Politics Behind the scene bosses in control Weak elected officials Patronage central Examples Tammany Hall Model (Manhattan) Republican machine in Philadelphia
Impact of the frontier Progressive Movement
Ethnicity continues to trump party identification Concern over Afro-American influence has blurred ethnic politics`
Conservative bias Bias against minority groups Bias against systematic social policy making
Organized labor Church Raises question as to whether new minority groups can develop ethnic institutions that contribute to upward mobility