Mid-cycle Review (MCR) & Library Review

Develop Framework Library Self Study Strategic Directions Review Process External Review & Report Final Report to Provost & Associate Provost, Resources Library Review July - Sept 2011 Oct 2011 – Feb 2012 March - June Summer 2012 Fall 2012

Overall approach Engaged Open Iterative Evolving Listening Synthesizing Strategic & forward looking

Change 1.0 & 2.0 “…What happens to learning as we move from the comparative stability of the twentieth century to a more fluid and dynamic new century, where technological innovation is inciting almost constant change?”

Campus context Mid-Cycle Review (MCR) Foundational pillars MCR - 3 key strategic goals Campus narrative & story “Life cycle” planning Accountabilities framework

Annual planning & priorities process Aligning our resources with our strategic directions Integrating with campus directions & plans The Library Review sets the stage for:

Campus Consultation Document MCR 3 key goals Mid-Cycle Review foundational pillars 5 Life Cycle planning working groups Library Mission Statement - redraft Ongoing engagement & consultation

Feedback – who we heard from Executive Council members Deans Department heads Faculty, students and staff Four ARL and CARL University Librarians

Feedback – what we heard Our four strategic directions resonate A focus on all four strategic areas is important Alignment of Library’s strategic directions with the University’s MCR key goals is very good to see Partnerships are key, e.g. in “online learning” Our mission statement still needs work Some things need clarification Extent of engagement in Library Review is excellent Ongoing engagement & communication are critical

Frameworks Strategic Operational Organizational Accountability / assessment

Moving forward Implementation issues Annual planning & priority setting Priority setting Framework for prioritizing Strategic directions as touch-stones Organizational structure issues Assessment & accountability framework(s) Communications framework(s)

Some Next Steps The Working Group Reports 31 recommendations Blend of strategic, operational, goals, etc. Need to review & prioritize etc. Create our story – and tell it! Mission Statement - a crisp revised version based what we have heard A succinct one or two pager

Next steps The report to the Provost will address Strategic directions & mission statement Key feedback Next steps Time frames/staging/etc. AUL, Head Special Collections, Head of Acquisitions, etc. Things we can do asap, sooner rather than later Ongoing engagement & listening

Sallie Ann Keller provided a brief presentation followed by a question and answer period

Questions