Luminosity monitor at LHCb Tomáš Laštovička (CERN ) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration LHC workshop on the luminosity monitoring and measurement January.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb Alignment 12 th April 2007 S. Viret Coseners Forum « LHC Startup » 1. Introduction 2. The alignment challenge 3. Conclusions.
Advertisements

First results from the ATLAS experiment at the LHC
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Measurement of charmonia at mid-rapidity at RHIC-PHENIX  c  J/   e + e -  in p+p collisions at √s=200GeV Susumu Oda CNS, University of Tokyo For.
7 Nov 2002Niels Tuning - Vertex A vertex trigger for LHCb The trigger for LHCb ….. and the use of the Si vertex detector at the first and second.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Halo calculations in ATF DR Dou Wang (IHEP), Philip Bambade (LAL), Kaoru Yokoya (KEK), Theo Demma (LAL), Jie Gao (IHEP) FJPPL-FKPPL Workshop on ATF2 Accelerator.
27 th June 2008Johannes Albrecht, BEACH 2008 Johannes Albrecht Physikalisches Institut Universität Heidelberg on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration The LHCb.
Impact of LHCf on BRAN and beam monitoring Y.Itow, H.Menjo (Nagoya University) The 1 st TAN integration workshop Mar10, 2006.
Lausanne, Generator Miniworkshop, March 2001 Massimiliano Ferro-Luzzi, CERN/EP Beam-gas background in LHCb What nuisances for LHCb from p-A background.
My work for HERA, LHC and ILC. Tomáš Laštovička Tuesday seminar November 27, 2007.
Increasing Field Integral between Velo and TT S. Blusk Sept 02, 2009 SU Group Meeting.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, for the LHCb Collaboration, 16 December 2014
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
Beam profile measurements based on modern vertex detectors and beam-gas interactions Slides from: Colin Barschel - TIPP 2014 third international conference.
Tracking, vertexing and Luminosity monitor at LHCb Tomáš Laštovička (CERN ) VERTEX Perugia 15th International workshop on vertex detectors.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
1 Luminosity monitor and LHC operation H. Burkhardt AB/ABP, TAN integration workshop, 10/3/2006 Thanks for discussions and input from Enrico Bravin, Ralph.
1 Performance of the LHCb VELO Outline LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb Detector and its performance in Run I LHCb VELO LHCb VELO VELO performance.
Tracking at LHCb Introduction: Tracking Performance at LHCb Kalman Filter Technique Speed Optimization Status & Plans.
The LHCb VErtex LOcator Olaf Behrendt on behalf of the VELO group Novosibirsk,
Chris Parkes First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator Act 1: LHCb Intro. Act 2: Velo Design Act 3: Initial Performance for LHCb VELO groupVienna Conference.
Experimental equipment interacting with beam operation D. Macina TS/LEA Many thanks to my colleagues both from the experiments and the machine for their.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
LHCb VErtex LOcator & Displaced Vertex Trigger
Tracking, PID and primary vertex reconstruction in the ITS Elisabetta Crescio-INFN Torino.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Precision Cross section measurements at LHC (CMS) Some remarks from the Binn workshop André Holzner IPP ETH Zürich DIS 2004 Štrbské Pleso Štrbské Pleso.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
The RICH Detectors of the LHCb Experiment Carmelo D’Ambrosio (CERN) on behalf of the LHCb RICH Collaboration LHCb RICH1 and RICH2 The photon detector:
1 Experience at CERN with luminosity monitoring and calibration, ISR, SPS proton antiproton collider, LEP, and comments for LHC… Werner Herr and Rüdiger.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
D 0 reconstruction: 15 AGeV – 25 AGeV – 35 AGeV M.Deveaux, C.Dritsa, F.Rami IPHC Strasbourg / GSI Darmstadt Outline Motivation Simulation Tools Results.
CHIPP meeting Appenberg, 24 Aug 2009 Preparation for LHC beam, Jeroen van Tilburg 1/15 Jeroen van Tilburg (Universität Zürich) LHCb: Preparation for LHC.
Open and Hidden Charm production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Collisions Presented by Marko Starič for the Hera-B collaboration The.
2 nd Workshop on CKM Unitarity Triangle – April 5-9, 2003, DurhamMassimiliano Ferro-Luzzi 1 The LHCb trigger strategy and performance Overview Level-0Detectors,
Calibration of energies at the photon collider Valery Telnov Budker INP, Novosibirsk TILC09, Tsukuba April 18, 2009.
Penny Kasper Fermilab Heavy Quarkonium Workshop 21 June Upsilon production DØ Penny Kasper Fermilab (DØ collaboration) 29 June 2006 Heavy Quarkonium.
Parton-level study of Z  l + l - for luminosity measurement Motivation PDF uncertainties Parton-level study & rate estimation Relaxed cuts & Conclusions.
1 Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Fergus Wilson, RAL 1.Introduction & Accelerators 2.Particle Interactions and Detectors (2) 3.Collider Experiments.
Mike AlbrowFP420 – May Timing and Pile-up Considerations 1 Pile-up in trigger and pile-up off-line (HLT) very different issues. Here I consider.
A novel approach to detector calibration parameter determination and detector monitoring Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb VELO Group CHEP 2010,
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
Alignment Challenge at LHCb Steven Blusk Syracuse University LHC Alignment Workshop, Aug 3-5, 2006.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
Iterative local  2 alignment algorithm for the ATLAS Pixel detector Tobias Göttfert IMPRS young scientists workshop 17 th July 2006.
First collisions in LHC
Luminosity monitor and LHC operation
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Emmanuel Tsesmelis TS/LEA 26 January 2007
Simulated vertex precision
Integration and alignment of ATLAS SCT
The LHC collider in Geneva
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Parasitic Run Physics Simulations
Special Considerations for SIDIS
The LHCb vertex detector
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
The LHCb VErtex LOcator
T. Laštovička / M. Ferro-Luzzi
First results from the LHCb Vertex Locator
Presentation transcript:

Luminosity monitor at LHCb Tomáš Laštovička (CERN ) on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration LHC workshop on the luminosity monitoring and measurement January 26, 2007

Tomáš Laštovička2  A method to measure absolute luminosity  LHCb case study - simulations  2007 LHC pilot runs  Outlook Overview I will focus on a novel ‘beam-gas’ absolute luminosity measurement method. A (‘zero-counting’) method to measure the relative luminosity was presented on this workshop in the past (2002).

Tomáš Laštovička3  Luminosity measurement at LHCb LHCb does not have a devoted system to measure absolute luminosity  not needed for vast majority of measurements  however, if it comes ‘for free’ there are interesting applications A novel method proposed: use high precision vertex locator (VELO) to measure parameters of both beams To actually ‘see’ the beams we employ beam-gas interactions It is just like to light a laser beam (LHC beam) in fog (gas)

Tomáš Laštovička4 LHCb experiment VELO Magnet RICH1 Trigger Tracker T Stations Inner Tracker Outer Tracker RICH2

Tomáš Laštovička5 Vertex Locator (VELO) 21 tracking stations on two sides  42 modules, 84 sensors  plus pile-up sensors Optimised for  tracking of particles originating from beam-beam interactions  fast online 2D (R-z) tracking  fast offline 3D tracking in two steps (R-z then phi) Velo halves move from the LHC beams (by 30mm) during the beam injection and tuning nominal vertex area pile-up veto sensors

Tomáš Laštovička6 Vertex Locator (VELO) Each module consists of 2 sensors: R and φ type (Δz ~ 2mm) Each sensor contains 2048 strips in total distributed in 4 (R) and 2 (φ) zones with pitch varying from ~40um (inner region) to ~100um (outer region). Primary vertex reconstruction resolution <10um in x-y plane, ~50um in z-coordinate, IP~14+35/p T um  –measuring sensor (radial strips with an stereo angle) φ -sensors 2048 strip in inner and outer regions strip pitch increase with R : 36um→97um 42 mm 8 mm FE chip R-sensors 2048 strip in 45 o sectors strip pitch increase with R : 40um→100um

Tomáš Laštovička7 A method to measure luminosity Reminder of general formula for two counter-rotating bunches:  all particles in bunch i move with velocity v i in the lab frame  position and time dependent density functions ρ i (x,t) normalized to 1  the bunch populations N i  revolution frequency f Velocity term taken out of integral if negligible angular spread bunch populations crossing anglebeam overlap integral see e.g. in Napoly, Particle Acc., 40 (1993) 181. see M. Ferro-Luzzi, Nucl.Instrum.Meth.A553: ,2005

Tomáš Laštovička8 Luminosity via beam-gas interactions Set and crossing angle : Proposed method:  Inject a tiny bit of gas (if needed at all) into the vertex detector region  Reconstruct bunch-gas interaction vertices get beam angles, profiles & relative positions (note σ x,y ~ 70um) calculate overlap integral  Simultaneously reconstruct bunch-bunch interaction vertices calibrate ‘reference’ cross-section Measured by the experimentsMeasured by AB-BI For more, see e.g. the last Hera-LHC wkshp, MFL&TL, and refs therein

Tomáš Laštovička9 Method requirements Vertex resolution in x and y significantly smaller than beam transverse sizes and well understood  much less tracks than beam-beam events → worse resolution Sufficiently high beam-gas interaction rate  data must be taken in time << min (t beam decay, t beam drift ) Ability to reconstruct/distinguish beam1-gas and beam2-gas events  and to trigger on them ! Any dependence on x/y (gas density, efficiency,...) must be small  or known to some precision Conditions to start with  zero crossing angles – large bunch spacing  wide beam profile (large beta*)

Tomáš Laštovička10  First studies at LHCb Beyond 14TeV pp simulations:  Pythia pp 115 GeV (p-hydrogen)  Hijing p-nucleus 115 GeV – Xenon simulated Analysis performed so far:  Beam-gas vertex reconstruction resolution  Beam-gas acceptance  Dependence on target species

Tomáš Laštovička11 Beam1 – 1 H simulations resol=  0 /sqrt(N tr ) x y N tr > 5  0 / mm ~30um for Ntr>5 around z=0 is it enough? beam size > 100 um,beta* > 20 m ~30um for Ntr>5 around z=0 is it enough? beam size > 100 um,beta* > 20 m x y  0 / mm Velo is here

Tomáš Laštovička12 Number of tracks per vertex (beam1- 1 H) (-1500,-1350) (-1350,-1200) (-1200,-1050) (-1050,-900) (-900,-750) (-750,-600) (-600,-450) (-450,-300) (-300,-150) (-150,0) (0,150) (150,300)

Tomáš Laštovička13 Beam1 – Xe simulations Available data tell us that  cross section  pA (A) ~ A 0.71  track multiplicityN pA (A) ~ A 1/3 look for a heavy gas N tr > 14 Velo is here Many more tracks allow for improved resolution, below 20um.  Acceptance is even increasing when moving more far from VELO, due to many flat tracks

Tomáš Laštovička14 Weak boson production at LHC See e.g. Dittmar, Pauss & Zürcher, PRD 56 (1997) 7284: ‘Measure the x distributions of sea and valence quarks and the corresponding luminosities to within ±1% … using the I ± pseudorapidity distributions from the decay of weak bosons. ’ K. Ellis, HCP2005 Here, we propose the opposite: to measure proton luminosities at LHCb and use weak boson production to constrain and check PDFs. An example of luminosity measurement utilisation

Tomáš Laštovička15 Z 0 →µ + µ - kinematic coverage Z 0 →µ + µ - At LHC center of mass energy is √s = 14TeV LHCb acceptance in terms of rapidity: 1.8 < y < 5 Corresponds to a mixture of high/low x at high values of Q 2 x1x1 x2x2

Tomáš Laštovička16  2007 LHC pilot runs LHC beam commissioning is expected to start in November 2007  beam energy 450GeV  we should be able to see first beam-gas events  VELO will be in its open position → worse acceptance After few weeks first beam-beam √s=900GeV  43 bunches on 43 scheme (4 are displaced for LHCb)  zero crossing angle  β* = 10m at point 8 → large beam size σ x,y = 280μm  bunch charge N ~  longer bunches (that at 7TeV) σ z = 11.2cm (instead of 7.5cm)  LHCb magnet off  VELO opened or semi-opened risk for closed VELO and B=0 to be assessed very unlikely to have Velo closed and field ON

Tomáš Laštovička17 LHC pilot runs – physics? Pilot runs will play a major role in LHCb commissioning. Opportunity to practicise reconstruction of beam-gas events. Is there any physics we could do?  Only a handful of visible b-events.  How large is pp cross section? It could be measured… Pilot runs Nominal LHC

Tomáš Laštovička18 Expected event rates pp √s=900GeV  estimated to be around 50Hz per bunch pair “useful” beam-gas √s=29GeV  assumed 1 H and the predicted vacuum of mbar  over 0.5m z-range 1 mHz per bunch The beam-gas rate is very low, we may need to help it…  VELO system adaptation to control the residual gas pressure in a range roughly mbar to mbar (still very high vacuum not affecting the beam lifetime)  Expected to be tested and estimated in Q1/2007 1Hz per bunch and 50cm seems realistic (~10 -8 mbar pressure)

Tomáš Laštovička19 Expected event rates - 7TeV conditions For comparison below are the estimates for nominal running conditions  gas injection for luminosity measurement  and larger beam (β * = 34m → σ x,y =130μm) pp √s=14TeV  estimated to be around 3.3 kHz per bunch pair “useful” beam-gas √s=114.5GeV  assumed Xe injection and vacuum of mbar  bunch population  over 0.5m z-range ~80 Hz per bunch

Tomáš Laštovička20 Summary & Outlook Beam-gas lumi method is being studied at LHCb from the reconstruction side  7 TeV already advanced  now starting on 450 GeV – LHC pilot runs Technical implementation of the "residual gas target"  residual gas for LHC pilot runs – tests to be done in the coming months.  gas injection for 2008 or later, conceptual design being worked out, to be discussed within LHCb and with AT-VAC Trigger implementation to be studied  concerns especially beam2-gas events