The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Positioning Students for Success with NAEP Data The Clear Route Iris Garner, Ph.D., North Carolina NAEP Coordinator.

Advertisements

Stuart Kerachsky Acting Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics October 14, 2009 EMBARGOED until October 14, :00 a.m. E.D.T.

Dennis J. Kennedy NAEP State Coordinator West Virginia Department of Education.

Jamesville-DeWitt School Report Card Presented to the Board of Education May 10, 2010.

The Social and Educational Factors Contributing to the Outcomes of Hispanics in Urban Schools.

2013 Mathematics and Reading Trial Urban District Assessment National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8 Dr. Peggy Carr Associate Commissioner.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 10, 2012.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 27, 2013 #NAEP.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Leonie Haimson & Elli Marcus Class Size Matters January.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics March 24, 2010.

Dianne Chadwick Iowa NAEP Coordinator Iowa Department of Education November 8, 2011.

Stephanie Aberger, Expeditionary Learning

1 Cold Water Elementary English Language Arts Standard Status: Approaching (2010) MAP Performance Index Status Targets (2011)

Inside America’s Math Courses The Release of the Algebra I and Geometry Curricula: Results from the 2005 High School Transcript Mathematics Curriculum.

1 NAEP th Grade Economics Assessment. 2 ► First NAEP assessment of economics ► Content areas: market economy, national economy, and international.

NAEP 2008 Trends in Academic Progress in Reading and Mathematics.

Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,

The Nation’s Report Card Mathematics National Assessment of Educational Progress 1.

Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

Friday, February 7 th 8:30am. Conversation 8:30-9:30 1. Welcome 2. Where is Georgia in comparison to other states? 3. What is making the difference? 4.

1 Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2011.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 7, 2011.

NYC ACHIEVEMENT GAINS COMPARED TO OTHER LARGE CITIES SINCE 2003 Changes in NAEP scores Class Size Matters August

1 NCES and NIEA Web Session July Today’s Native American Student American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) students make up about 1 percent of 4th-

Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.

NAEP and International Assessments August 28, 2013 DAC Annual Meeting.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 24, 2011.

1 The Nation’s Report Card: 2007 Writing. 2 Overview of the 2007 Writing Assessment Given January – March 2007 – 139,900 eighth-graders – 27,900 twelfth-graders.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 8, 2009.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Results of the 2005 National Assessment of Educational Progress.

0 Michele Sonnenfeld NAEP State Coordinator Florida Department of Education October 2006 Florida Association of Science Supervisors.

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts English Language Arts Grades 3, 4, and 5 Total Public.

LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP June 20, 2012 Science in Action: Understanding what students know and can do in the classroom, in the lab, and.

Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results Challis Breithaupt November 1, 2011.

2005 NAEP Results Mathematics San Diego City Schools Board of Education Workshop January 17, 2006 S D CS.

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.

2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress: National and State-Level Science Results JANUARY 25, 2011.

The Nation’s Report Card: U.S. History National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

The Nation’s Report Card Science National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.

Uri Treisman Professor of Mathematics Director, Charles A. Dana Center The University of Texas at Austin URBAN MATH LEADERSHIP.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics February 21, 2013.

United to Make a Difference: Improving the Achievement of Young Men of Color Council of the Great City Schools Fall 2014.

1. 2 Overview of the 2006 NAEP Assessments Administered in January–March 2006 National results for grades 4, 8, and 12 Results by scale scores and achievement.

The Nation’s Report Card: Geography National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.

NAEP Grade 4 Math by Race/Ethnicity, Nation Source: National Center for Education Statistics, NAEP Data Explorer,

The Nation’s Report Card 4th-Grade Reading SOURCE: National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP),

N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Office of Data and Accountability OCTOBER 26, 2015.

N ATIONAL ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATIONAL PROGRESS BPS 2015 NAEP RESULTS Nicole Wagner Lam, Office of Data and Accountability Presentation to Boston School Committee.

Stuart Kerachsky Deputy Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics May 20, 2010.

Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics December 6, 2012.

The Nation’s Report Card: Trial Urban District Assessment: Science 2005.

NAEP 2005 Reading and Mathematics Results. Overview of the 2005 Reading and Mathematics Assessment 1.

SIP Reading Goal Our Reality: An average of 78% of the students met standard on the state reading assessment in Our SMART Goal: The average.

Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics June 2010 Peggy G. Carr Associate Commissioner National Center for Education.

NAEP What is it? What can I do with it? Kate Beattie MN NAEP State Coordinator MN Dept of Education This session will describe what the National Assessment.

1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.

NAEP Grade 12 Results.

NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.

Gloria Ladson-Billings University of Wisconsin

The Excellence Gap.

Using NAEP Results to Examine State Trends in Mathematics Achievement

Focus on the Learner: Who are the students states serve?

2017 TUDA NAEP Results for Miami-Dade

2017 NAEP RESULTS: DC PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS

NAEP and International Assessments

Presentation transcript:

The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments

Background of TUDA 1

2005 Trial Urban District Assessment Map 2 SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.

Overview 3

Overall Findings – Grade 4 4

Overall Findings – Grade 4 (cont.) 5

Overall Findings – Grade 8 6

Overall Findings – Grade 8 (cont.) 7

2005 Mathematics Assessment 8

Score Results, Grade 4: 2003 and * Significantly different from SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 4: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 4: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score Changes by Race/Ethnicity, Grade 4: NOTE: Shaded area indicates reporting standards not met. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments. 12

White – Black Score Gap, Grade 4: 2005 NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment. 13

White – Hispanic Score Gap, Grade 4: 2005 ‡ Reporting standards not met. NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment. 14

Score Results, Grade 8: 2003 and * Significantly different from SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 8: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 8: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score Comparisons to Large Central City for Students Eligibile for Free/Reduced-Price School Lunch, Grade 8: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

2005 Reading Assessment 19

Score Results, Grade 4: * Significantly different from SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2002–2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 4: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 4: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score Results by Race/Ethnicity, Grade 4: ‡ Reporting standards not met for Hispanic students in Atlanta. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score Results, Grade 8: * Significantly different from SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2002–2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 8: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 8: SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

White – Black Score Gap, Grade 8: ‡ Reporting standards not met. NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

White – Hispanic Score Gap, Grade 8: ‡ Reporting standards not met. NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

For More Information 29