Optimization Strategies for the NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool James Muzerolle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIRES Technical concept and design E. Oliva, HIRES meeting, Brera (Milan, Italy)1.
Advertisements

White Dwarfs in the HET Dark Energy Experiment Bárbara G. Castanheira The University of Texas at Austin Universität Wien 17 th European White Dwarf Workshop.
Echelle Spectroscopy Dr Ray Stathakis, AAO. What is it? n Echelle spectroscopy is used to observe single objects at high spectral detail. n The spectrum.
Simulations with ‘Realistic’ Photon Spectra Mike Jenkins Lancaster University and The Cockcroft Institute.
FMOS Observations and Data 14 January 2004 FMOS Science Workshop.
Impact of Cost Savings Ideas on NGAO Instrumentation December 19, 2008 Sean Adkins.
X-shooter A Wideband Spectrograph for GRBs
Astronomical Spectroscopy
Physical Modelling of Instruments Activities in ESO’s Instrumentation Division Florian Kerber, Paul Bristow.
JWST calibration requirements Harald Kuntschner. JWST - an overview NIRCam –0.6-5 microns –FoV: 2.16x4.4 arcmin (0.0317” for short band and ” for.
6e-1 Science Data Products Daryl Swade DMS Systems Engineer S&OC System Design Review #1.
5-1 DMS Data Products Nov. 6, 2013 S&OC Data Management System Design Review 3.
IVC : a simulation and model-fitting tool for optical-IR interferometry Abstract I present a new software tool, called “Interferometry Visibility Computations”
14 October Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPY and spectrometers Kitchin, pp
Near Infrared Spectro-polarimeter (NIRSP) Conceptual Design Don Mickey Jeff Kuhn Haosheng Lin.
First results of the tests campaign in VISIBLE in VISIBLE for the demonstrator 12 October 2007 SNAP Collaboration Meeting Paris Marie-Hélène Aumeunier.
Multi-slit spectroscopy In sky-noise dominated conditions (most interesting!) the use of slits is essential: eg: Faint object, extra-galactic, surveys:
JWST NIRSpec Dithering Strategies (and a Cross-SI View) Jason Tumlinson JIM / TIPS Oct 15, 2009.
NIRSpec Operations Concept Michael Regan(STScI), Jeff Valenti (STScI) Wolfram Freduling(ECF), Harald Kuntschner(ECF), Robert Fosbury (ECF)
Hubble Science Briefing
INS NIRSpec, 12 May 2005 Introduction to NIRSpec Michael Regan.
DRM1 design description SDT 5/17/12 1. WFIRST DRM candidate design summary At SDT6 2/2-3/2012 consensus for full-up mission, aka “DRM1” was: 1.3m aperture,
JWST Calibration Error Budget Jerry Kriss. 15 March 20072/14 JWST Flux & Wavelength Calibration Requirements SR-20: JWST shall be capable of achieving.
KMOS Instrument Overview & Data Processing Richard Davies Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics  What does KMOS do?  When will it do it?
WFIRST IFU -- Preliminary “existence proof” Qian Gong & Dave Content GSFC optics branch, Code 551.
1-D Flat Fields for COS G130M and G160M Tom Ake TIPS 17 June 2010.
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Summary J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001 CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001.
Science Concept for Additional Functionality in the Mosaic Planning Tool Jeff Valenti.
Two-Gyro All-sky Scheduling Study TIPS April 15, 2004
E-ELT-HIRES possible design and capabilities E. Oliva (INAF-Firenze) B. Delabre (ESO) E. Oliva B. Delabre, ELT-HIRES, Cambridge1 o A very brief.
Improving the Rectification of Spectral Images Linda Dressel, Paul Barrett, Paul Goudfrooij, and Phil Hodge.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
SKA: Configurations and Simulations Ramesh Bhat Colin Lonsdale Roger Cappallo Shep Doeleman Divya Oberoi Joanne Attridge MIT Haystack Observatory.
APT Overview for Transiting Exoplanet Proposals Chris Moriarty – APT Developer.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
RAW DATA BIAS & DARK SUBTRACTION PIXEL-TO-PIXEL DQE CORR. LOCATE EXTR. WINDOW THROUGHPUT CORRECTION (incl. L-flat, blaze function, transmission of optics,
STScI Slitless Spectroscopy Workshop November 2010 aXe Advanced Topics – becoming more dextrous, using aXe with other instruments, making calibration.
Observations with AMBER  General overview  P2VM  OB preparation with P2PP P2PP / OB / templates Available templates for observation procedure Typical.
Competitive Science with the WHT for Nearby Unresolved Galaxies Reynier Peletier Kapteyn Astronomical Institute Groningen.
- page 1 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Spectrometer AORs Phil Appleton 1Roberta Paladini.
The STIS NUV-MAMA objective prism … … and looking beyond for HST UV slitless spectroscopy Jes ú s Ma í z Apell á niz HST Calibration worskhop 26 October.
F. Pepe Observatoire de Genève Optical astronomical spectroscopy at the VLT (Part 2)
NIRSpec - the JWST Multi-Object Spectrograph P. Ferruit (ESA), S. Arribas (CSIS), S. Birkmann (ESA), T. Böker (ESA), A. Bunker (Oxford), S. Charlot (IAP),
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Single Object Spectroscopy and Time Series Observations with NIRSpec
The JWST Exposure Time Calculator
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
Observing Strategies and Constraints
Diane Karakla JWST Community Lecture Series Feb 28, 2017
JWST Pipeline Overview
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
NIRSpec pipeline concept Guido De Marchi, Tracy Beck, Torsten Böker
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
Diane Karakla ESAC “On Your Mark” Workshop Madrid, Sept
NIRSpec simulation data-package
Observing Modes Available for Cycle 1
JWST Overheads Jeff Valenti S&OC Mission Scientist
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
Summary Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy Jeff Valenti JWST Mission Scientist Space Telescope Science Institute.
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool (MPT)
FRED A software tool for modern optical engineering
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Motivation for a 95% Guide Star Acquisition Probability with JWST
How to implement coordinated parallels
Echidna: current status and expected performance
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
GEOMETER Update Get new version of GEOMETER from Team web site after August 8. Some new parameters now computed (illum angles for “near point” of non-intersecting.
MIRI Low Resolution Spectroscopy
X-ray high resolution spectra in the VO: the case of XMM-Newton RGS
Presentation transcript:

Optimization Strategies for the NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool James Muzerolle

Special thanks to NIRSpec teamlet members and APT developers: Diane Karakla Tracy Beck Jason Tumlinson Jeff Valenti Tom Donaldson Rob Douglas Karla Peterson

Quick NIRSpec overview 3 spectroscopic modes: MOS, fixed slit, IFU 3 resolutions: R ~ 100 (prism), 1000 and 2700 (gratings) effective wavelength range 0.6 – 5 microns FOV ~ 3.6’ x 3.4’

Microshutter Array (MSA) 4 x 365 x 171 shutters, individually addressable shutter pitch = 0.26” x 0.51”, (actual FOV = 0.2” x 0.45”) activated with magnet sweep

prism spectral layout R=2700 spectral layout

MSA planning tool prototype (APT v17.0.3)

Preliminary optimization study IDL code to simulate planning tool analysis of target placement within MSA shutters heuristic iterative scheme to optimize the number of targets per MSA configuration from an input “candidate” target sample –grid of MSA center pointings and position angles –optimized solution = grid point with largest number of targets –loop for multiple configurations test cases to evaluate various parameters: –input sample size/spatial distribution –number of “sky” shutters –including known failed shutters –dithers –target priorities

# candTarg Set 1Targ 1/2Config 1/2Fails?Test case n1 center n3x3 center grid, 3-shutter slitlets y y2-shutter slitlets yshutter dither (0.26”) ygap dither (17.9”) yconcentrated source distribution ysparse sample, 3 orients 1009 (99, 100)71 (24, 11)528 (88, 76)8ytarget priorities Optimization results

Default test case: UDF-derived input candidate target catalog (1009 objects) 3x3 center pointing grid, 20.1” x 36.2” offsets 3-shutter slitlet ideal MSA 1 configuration per target set (no cross-slitlet dithers)

# candTarg Set 1Targ 1/2Config 1/2Fails?Test case n1 center n 3x3 center grid, 3-shutter slitlets y y2-shutter slitlets yshutter dither (0.26”) ygap dither (17.9”) yconcentrated source distribution ysparse sample, 3 orients 1009 (99, 100)71 (24, 11)528 (88, 76)8ytarget priorities Optimization results

Default test case with failed shutters

# candTarg Set 1Targ 1/2Config 1/2Fails?Test case n1 center n3x3 center grid, 3-shutter slitlets y y2-shutter slitlets yshutter dither (0.26”) ygap dither (17.9”) yconcentrated source distribution ysparse sample, 3 orients 1009 (99, 100)71 (24, 11)528 (88, 76)8ytarget priorities Optimization results

Default test case with failed shutters, 2-shutter slitlet

# candTarg Set 1Targ 1/2Config 1/2Fails?Test case n1 center n3x3 center grid, 3-shutter slitlets y y 2-shutter slitlets yshutter dither (0.26”) ygap dither (17.9”) yconcentrated source distribution ysparse sample, 3 orients 1009 (99, 100)71 (24, 11)528 (88, 76)8ytarget priorities Optimization results

Default test case with failed shutters, 1-shutter dither (0.26”) in dispersion direction

# candTarg Set 1Targ 1/2Config 1/2Fails?Test case n1 center n3x3 center grid, 3-shutter slitlets y y2-shutter slitlets y shutter dither (0.26”) ygap dither (17.9”) yconcentrated source distribution ysparse sample, 3 orients 1009 (99, 100)71 (24, 11)528 (88, 76)8ytarget priorities Optimization results

Default test case with failed shutters, detector gap dither (18”)

prism spectral layout R=2700 spectral layout

# candTarg Set 1Targ 1/2Config 1/2Fails?Test case n1 center n3x3 center grid, 3-shutter slitlets y y2-shutter slitlets yshutter dither (0.26”) y gap dither (17.9”) yconcentrated source distribution ysparse sample, 3 orients 1009 (99, 100)71 (24, 11)528 (88, 76)8ytarget priorities Optimization results

# candTarg Set 1Targ 1/2Config 1/2Fails?Test case n1 center n3x3 center grid, 3-shutter slitlets y y2-shutter slitlets yshutter dither (0.26”) ygap dither (17.9”) yconcentrated source distribution ysparse sample, 3 orients 1009 (99, 100)71 (24, 11)528 (88, 76)8ytarget priorities Optimization results

Recommendations Tool should incorporate iterative scheme for optimizing the number of targets in a configuration using a grid of center pointings and/or position angles. Account for “acceptance zone” where flux losses are minimized. Failed shutters must be tracked and updated. No targets in failed closed. Generate warnings for targets in rows with failed opens. Include an option for dithers requiring separate configurations (e.g., detector gap coverage), for an arbitrary number of dithers. Target priorities, with an arbitrary number of layers, should be a key part of the optimization scheme. Include a diagnostic plot summarizing characteristics of all targets in a given configuration, such as relative shutter position, priority, dither status, user-defined properties (magnitude, redshift, etc).

To do optical distortion across the FOV must be included, with the ability to update the distortion solution as needed better treatment of prism spectra (can fit more than one in the same shutter row without overlap) target acquisition: visualization and selection of reference stars, avoiding failed closed shutters explore more observing scenarios