TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary Status, Motivation, and Directions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
Advertisements

Chapter 10 Schedule Your Schedule. Copyright 2004 by Pearson Education, Inc. Identifying And Scheduling Tasks The schedule from the Software Development.
Experimental set-up at E.S.R.F. L. Farvacque. 1/04/2004L. Farvacque - E.S.R.F.2 Experimental set-up Hardware Kickers Bpms Software Data acquisition processing.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project Manager Overview Stephen Wolbers Tev BPM Technology Choice Review December 16, 2003.
F Tevatron Software Digital Receiver Beam Line Tuner Vic Scarpine Instrumentation Instrumentation Meeting July 13, 2005.
Key Specifications for Tevatron BPM Hardware Architecture Choices Jim Steimel.
ATF2 Q-BPM System 19 Dec Fifth ATF2 Project Meeting J. May, D. McCormick, T. Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH) B. Meller (Cornell) Y. Honda (KEK)
3/7/05A. Semenov Batch-by-Batch Intensity Monitor 1 Two-Channel Batch by Batch Intensity Monitor for Main Injector BBI.
Proton Plan PMG 3/22/07 E Prebys 1 Proton Plan Status February Eric Prebys.
Digital Signal Processing and Generation for a DC Current Transformer for Particle Accelerators Silvia Zorzetti.
1 FermiLab Recycler Ring BPM Upgrade Based on Digital Receiver Technology R. Webber, J. Crisp, P. Prieto, D. Voy, C. Breigel, C. McClure, M. Mengel, S.
INTRODUCTION  RECYCLER BPM – Original system not adequate to measure beam position precisely. It is being upgraded to meet the required physics precision.
Tevatron BPM System Upgrade Technical Update Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
F Antiproton Source Apertures Steve Werkema DOE Tevatron Operations Review March 22, 2006.
Run II PMG 2/16/06 Martens/Sims 1 Run II Upgrades Status February 2006.
Figure 2 gives an overview of the hardware components of the upgraded Main Injector BPM system. The figure shows 2 signal channels which produce one position.
BI day 2011 T Bogey CERN BE/BI. Overview to the TTpos system Proposed technical solution Performance of the system Lab test Beam test Planning for 2012.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
Measurement opportunities with the LHC transverse damper W. Hofle, D. Valuch.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
The Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Front-End Software Luciano Piccoli, Stephen Foulkes, Margaret Votava and Charles Briegel Fermi National Accelerator.
Check lists to mouse clicks Automation Session : WAO The Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) research laboratory,
The ATF Damping Ring BPM Upgrade Nathan Eddy, Eliana Gianfelice-Wendt Fermilab for the ATF Damping Ring BPM Team.
BPM Upgrade Projects Status & Technical Update Bob Webber DOE Review of Tevatron Operations March 2005.
F Beam Line Tuners Vic Scarpine Instrumentation DoE Review Oct 28-31, 2002.
October 2002 Jean Slaughter SDA – Shot Data Analysis Outline Description of SDA Examples Plans for 2003 SDA is a system for acquiring and analyzing data.
BI day /12/00 1 PIPOS Project (TT2 & TT10) (Beam performances) G. Vismara  Present situation  Proposals  Beam parameters  Technical solution.
TeV BLM Review 4/19/041 Tevatron BLM Review - Schedule BLM Replacement Prototype schedule: Provide prototype digitizer cards, crate, readout path by ~
Beam Line BPM Filter Module Nathan Eddy May 31, 2005.
Present Uses of the Fermilab Digital Signal Receiver VXI Module Brian Chase,Paul Joireman, Philip Varghese RF Embedded Systems (LLRF) Group.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting August 3, 2004.
18 December 2007 ATF Damping Ring BPM System Upgrade Joe Frisch, Justin May, Doug McCormick, Janice Nelson, Tonee Smith, Mark Woodley (SLAC) Charlie Briegel,
Fermilab February 17, 2003Recycler BPM Front-end1 Duane C. Voy
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Stephen Wolbers CD Accelerator Coordination Meeting September 21, 2004.
Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture – Keith Gollwitzer – May 9, Recent Work Towards Increasing the AP2 & Debuncher Aperture.
Updated Overview of Run II Upgrade Plan Beam Instrumentation Bob Webber Run II Luminosity Upgrade Review February 2004.
Simultaneous Position Measurements of Protons and Anti-Protons in the Tevatron R. K. Kutschke †, J. Steimel, R.Webber, S. Wolbers, Fermilab*, Batavia,
LHC-CC Validity Requirements & Tests LHC Crab Cavity Mini Workshop at CERN; 21. August Remarks on using the LHC as a test bed for R&D equipment.
Run II PMG 1/19/06 Pushpa Bhat 1 Run II Upgrades Status January 2006 Pushpa Bhat.
F Beam Instrumentation Department Instrumentation -- present and future (Jean’s title) Bob Webber Accelerator Run II Meeting Thursday, January 8, 2004.
RECYCLER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RECYCLER RING & ASSOCIATED TRANSFER LINES BPMs Brajesh Choudhary for the MI Dept.
Specifications of Tevatron BPM Upgrade Jim Steimel.
November 1, 2004 ElizabethGallas -- D0 Luminosity Db 1 D0 Luminosity Database: Checklist for Production Elizabeth Gallas Fermilab Computing Division /
Main Injector Beam Position Monitor Upgrade: Status and Plans Rob Kutschke All Experimenters’ Meeting April 3, 2006 Beams-doc-2217-v3.
ATF DR BPM Upgrade Janice Nelson, Doug McCormick, Justin May, Andrei Seryi, Tonee Smith, Mark Woodley.
9/2/2003Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM and BLM requirements Mike Martens.
A Monte Carlo Model of Tevatron Collider Operations Elliott McCrory, BD/(Linac & Integration) 4, 5 December 2003 A phenomenological model of Tevatron Collider.
9/25/2006All experimenters meetingA. Jansson 1 Tevatron Ionization Profile Monitors Andreas Jansson.
SNuMI: WBS 1.1 Booster Upgrades Eric Prebys $642K FY06$ (no contingency, no G&A) xx% contingency Main Injector & Recycler BNB NuMI Tunnel Booster Ring.
Robert R. Wilson Prize Talk John Peoples April APS Meeting: February 14,
Beam time structures 1 At any particular instance of time there will be only one kind of beam in the MI. It will be either protons or anti-protons. The.
12/16/03Tev BPM requirements1 Tevatron BPM requirements Mike Martens.
PAC Meeting, December 12, Prebys 1 The Problem.
Tevatron Beam Position Monitor Upgrade Stephen Wolbers (for the Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project) PAC05, Knoxville, TN May 16-20, 2005.
Beam Diagnostics Seminar, Nov.05, 2009 Das Tune-Meßverfahren für das neue POSI am SIS-18 U. Rauch GSI - Strahldiagnose.
Collimation Aspects for Crab Cavities? R. Assmann, CERN Thanks to Daniel Wollmann for presenting this talk on my behalf (criticism and complaints please.
S. Smith LCLS Facility Advisory October 12, Beam Position Monitors Facility Advisory Committee October 12, 2006.
10/3/2003Andreas Jansson - Tevatron IPM review1 Tevatron IPM Proposed design.
Tevatron BPM Upgrade Project Review Summary Stephen Wolbers December 19, 2003 Tevatron Department Meeting.
LEReC BPM Status P. Cernigla, R. Hulsart, R. Michnoff, Z. Sorrell June 2, 2016.
Cons Gattuso 2/23/10 Status/Changes to Pbar Transfer Program.
A Survey of TBT Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Tevatron Department Meeting February 18, 2005 Beams-doc-1583-v2.
A Survey of the Capabilities of the Upgraded TeV BPMs Rob Kutschke, CD/EXP Run II Meeting March 24, 2005 Beams-doc-1752-v2.
Bunch by bunch feedback systems for KEKB Makoto Tobiyama KEK Accelerator Laboratory.
SDA- Shot Data Analysis Jean Slaughter DOE Review July 21, 2003.
Fill-pattern Control System for KEKB
Beam Current Monitoring with ICT and BPM Electronics
Status of TTF HOM Project Aug 9, 2005
Presentation transcript:

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary Status, Motivation, and Directions

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary 1 – Where We Stand Available, engineered hardware solutions indicate a path that utilizes digital down-conversion signal processing in an under-sampling regime –Performance of an under-sampling system has yet to be demonstrated in the Tevatron –Two systems (Recycler EchoTek and DSR) are being readied to that end We assume that frequency domain de-convolution of p and pbar signals is possible –This is not guaranteed and has yet to be demonstrated 14 bit digitizer/down-converter resolution performance has been demonstrated in a system operating on 30 MHz TeV signals (no under- sampling)

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 ~35 Micron RMS Single Bunch Resolution Four separate single bunch injections Processing 30Mhz signal component Blue trace – position at 500 microns/div. Yellow trace – beam intensity

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Crystal BPM Comparison During Pbar Load (Store 2671) Injection orbit bumps during pbar loading into TeV <~10 micron resolution RMS for 36 proton bunches Processing 30Mhz signal component with few kHz BW Blue trace – position at 250 microns/div. Red trace –crystal/AM-PM BPM for comparison

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary 2 Cables for pbar signals have been readied during recent shutdown Efforts to specify and design the trigger- timing subsystem and built-in monitoring, testing, and calibration functions have yet to begin Detailed system and support software specifications are yet to be considered

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Summary 3 The system as conceived will not: –measure injection first turn except for first injected bunch or un-coalesced bunch train –measure turn-by-turn positions with both protons and pbars circulating –support bunch-by-bunch measurements in general (except possibly turn-by-turn with only protons or pbars circulating) –offer continuous turn-by-turn processing rates at the front-end as the present system does

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 And so … Remember the Objectives –Maximize integrated luminosity over the next 5 years What is better in 20 months may be worse than what is good in 10 months –Provide Tevatron with a serviceable and maintainable if not optimal BPM system for what may follow Run II And the Requirements –First turn Flash robustness (avoid critical timing set-ups) –Measure pbars in the presence of protons in a way that does not compromise the proton measurement –And, more importantly, measure proton orbits accurately throughout Collider cycle with proton/pbar intensity ratios as low as 2:1 –Provide post-mortem closed orbit data buffers

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 And … Remember the Reality –The critical resource for the entire Run II plan is engineering talent with accelerator physics and operations insight (or vice versa) (to wit: vital aspects of this conceptual design are yet to be addressed!) –TeV BPMs represent only one piece (and in fact only one of the BPM systems) of the effort required to complete the Run II luminosity upgrade plan –Yet it is a large scale effort Replacement of system in operational accelerator 1000 precision measurement channels Distributed in 24+ buildings around 4 mile ring

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 In the big picture … The Tevatron BPM system does not live in nor will it be upgraded in isolation –The corollary of a Tevatron hardware platform choice is that it will become the default choice for Run II Plan BPM upgrades in MI and Transfer Lines; a total of ~300 additional BPM locations –Impact of build/buy decision is multiplied beyond the scope of the Tevatron system –The machinery that builds the TeV system must be kept running to accomplish these other systems; we cannot support building a new project group for each system –The NUMI beamline BPM system is on the same “need by” schedule as the Tevatron –A 53MHz under-sampling solution has implications for MI and Transfer Lines where 2.5MHz signals must also be observed

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 On the technical side … Risks in this conceptual design –Frequency domain p/pbar signal de-convolution –Trigger/timing system robustness –Time to switch modes - TBT or Flash to Closed Orbit, dead time of circular buffer Has not been investigated in detail for either DSR or Echotek solution May be key difference between Recycler Echotek board and modified Echotek board

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 On the technical side … Tasks requiring immediate attention –Quantitative demonstration of the viability of the frequency domain p/pbar signal de-convolution with real signals in the Tevatron –Conceptual design, specification, and detailing of timing and triggering plan and components –Conceptual design, specification, and integration of built- in monitor, test, and calibration sub-systems with minimal impact on position measuring performance (analog switches are likely key components) –Quantifying the overhead, dead-time, inherent in mode switching from flash and/or turn-by-turn to closed orbit –Increasing the number of people with skills and experience in ACNET VME front-end programming and BPM (and other) board driver programming

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 On the schedule/resource side … A near-term hardware platform decision will eliminate that component from the critical path! –That decision should not distract resources needed to address the numerous then-critical system issues. Schedule Risks –Seeking the ideal solution –Underestimating the total effort required to complete the project –Unavailability or over-commitment of key human resources Concerns –Actual commitment of adequate engineering talent with accelerator physics and operations insight (or vice versa)

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 On the schedule/resource side … A system might be ready by October if and only if key “accelerator wise” resources are committed to lead the willing contributors and to make sound, speedy, and “eyes open” decisions when there may not be right answers

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 The Plan We intend to pursue the modified EchoTek (EchoTek2) solution –At a cost of ~1M$ (over all Run II BPM systems) –At the benefit of freeing individuals who have other key responsibilities in this or other Run II projects from supporting down-converter board production, testing, trouble-shooting etc. Given an EchoTek solution, the Recycler BPM system should be the example and starting point for front-end software Immediately turn full attention (except board procurement effort) to the tasks identified a few slides earlier

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Conclusion Damper board –can continue to help us with p/pbar signal de-convolution studies –should continue to be developed at its own pace as a general purpose high-speed solution RF department resources that might have guided down-converter production, testing, and trouble shooting can yet make key contributions to vital project aspects including: –analog filter specification, procurement, and acceptance test development –digital processing optimization –analog calibration circuit considerations

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Everyone who has to this point given time, support, and input offering and urging considerations of hardware solution alternatives are sincerely thanked and urged to remain interested and stay tuned.

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Backup slides

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Wobbles During Pbar Load #2673 Injection orbit bumps during pbar loading into TeV 36 proton bunches Processing 30Mhz signal component with few kHz BW Blue trace –crystal/AM-PM BPM for comparison Red trace – position at 550 microns/div.

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Pbar contamination of Protons

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Pbar Errors Correction phase matters!!!

TeV BPM Review 12/16/2003 Tough to fix even at 25% pbars