Office of Service Quality

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
PORTFOLIO.
Head of Learning: Job description
Paulding County School District Stakeholder’s Meeting
Long Beach School District Stakeholder Survey Results Results from and Parent, Student, and Staff Surveys.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading the Learning and Creating High Expectations for Student Achievement- Make AYP Now! Theresa West NAESP Convention April 11, 2010.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
External Review Exit Report Anderson School District 4 November , 2014.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
School Improvement Plan (SIP) Accreditation Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #1: PURPOSE AND DIRECTION Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement.
SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY: TRADEWINDS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
Accreditation Overview Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Presented by Dr. Jonathan Leff Parent iZone Meeting, 11/12/2015.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #4: RESOURCES & SUPPORT SYSTEMS
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Accreditation External Review
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Comprehensive Planning
Themes Collaboration – vertical and horizontal Autonomy at all levels
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Office of Service Quality Accreditation (AdvancED) Standard #3: TEACHING & ASSESSING FOR LEARNING Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator, School Improvement

IMPORTANCE OF ACCREDITATION • Accreditation lays the groundwork for success for schools and students. • Accreditation insures a rigorous, sound curriculum based on quality standards, a range of student activities and support services. • Accreditation focuses on increasing student achievement through a safe and enriching learning environment. • Accreditation requires that qualified teachers work to improve their methods and focus on student learning.

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS Standard 1: Purpose and Direction The system maintains and communicates at all levels of the organization a purpose and direction for continuous improvement. Standard 2: Governance and Leadership The system operates under governance and leadership that promote and support student performance and school effectiveness. Standard 3: Teaching and Assessing for Learning The system’s curriculum, instructional design and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning. Standard 4: Resources and Support Systems The system has resources and provides services in all schools that support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students. Standard 5: Using Results for Continuous Improvement The system implements a comprehensive assessment system that generates a range of data about student learning and system effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.

AdvancEd Standard #3: TEACHING AND ASSESSING FOR LEARNING The school’s curriculum, instructional design, and assessment practices guide and ensure teacher effectiveness and student learning.

TEACHING AND ASSESSING FOR LEARNING: INDICATORS Indicator 3.1 -The school’s curriculum provides equitable and challenging learning experiences that ensure all students have sufficient opportunities to develop learning, thinking, and life skills that lead to success at the next level. Indicator 3.2 - Curriculum, instruction, and assessment are monitored and adjusted systematically in response to data from multiple assessments of student learning and an examination of professional practice. Indicator 3.3 – Teachers engage students in their learning through instructional strategies that ensure achievement of learning expectations. Indicator 3.4 - School leaders monitor and support the improvement of instructional practices of teachers to ensure student success. Indicator 3.5 -Teachers participate in collaborative learning communities to improve instruction and student learning.

TEACHING AND ASSESSING FOR LEARNING: INDICATORS Indicator 3.6 - Teachers implement the school’s instructional process in support of student learning. Indicator 3.7 - Mentoring, coaching, and induction programs support instructional improvement consistent with the school’s values and beliefs about teaching and learning. Indicator 3.8 -The school engages families in meaningful ways in their children’s education and keeps them informed of their children’s learning progress. Indicator 3.9 – The school has a formal structure whereby each student is well known by at least one adult advocate in the school who supports that student’s educational experience. Indicator 3.10 - Grading and reporting are based on clearly defined criteria that represent the attainment of content knowledge and skills and are consistent across grade levels and courses. Indicator 3.11 - All staff members participate in a continuous program of professional learning.

EXAMPLES of EVIDENCE: TEACHING & ASSESSING FOR LEARNING: PRACTICES • Student engagement in the classroom and classroom strategies that encourage active involvement of students in their own learning • Staff research and use of data on the effectiveness of improvement strategies • Ability of the staff to support selected instructional strategies and services that impact teaching and assessing for learning • Willingness of the school leadership to support the investigation of strategies for improved services to impact teaching and assessing for learning • The degree to which all staff are included in strategies for improvement • Support of differentiated instruction provided to students with specific needs

EXAMPLES of EVIDENCE: TEACHING & ASSESSING FOR LEARNING: PRACTICES • Various means employed to protect student learning time • Efforts within and among the schools in the school to articulate learning both horizontally and vertically • Ways in which the school supports students who have not met expectations • A variety of services provided that impact teaching and learning • Indication that school climate is important and is used to help guide school decisions • Promotion of instructional activities that include support and interaction with information and media services

EXAMPLES of EVIDENCE: TEACHING & ASSESSING FOR LEARNING: ARTIFACTS • Guides to services • Agendas/minutes of department meetings • Agendas/minutes of services provided to its schools • Practices based on research • Program and/or project descriptions • Evaluation criteria for innovation • Stakeholder perception data • Student achievement results within the school

The BEST Blueprint & AdvancED Accreditation Standards Correlation 1. Purpose and Direction: The BEST Blueprint maintains and communicates at all levels of the organization a purpose and direction for continuous improvement that commits to high expectations for learning as well as shared values and beliefs about teaching and learning. 2. Governance and Leadership: The BEST Blueprint is a part of a system of governance and leadership that promotes and supports student performance and system effectiveness. 3. Teaching and Assessing for Learning: The BEST Blueprint supports the district’s practices for curriculum, instructional design, and assessment, ensuring teacher effectiveness and student learning across all grades and courses. 4. Resources and Support Systems: The BEST Blueprint leverages BCPS resources and provides services in all schools to support its purpose and direction to ensure success for all students. 5. Using Results for Continuous Improvement: The BEST Blueprint supports the district’s comprehensive assessment process that generates a wide range of data about student learning and system effectiveness and uses the results to guide continuous improvement.  

Office of Service Quality THANK YOU! Veda Hudge, Director Office of Service Quality 754-321-3850