AO4ELT, Paris 2009 1 A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AN ALIGNMENT STRATEGY FOR THE ATST M2 Implementing a standalone correction strategy for ATST M2 Robert S. Upton NIO/AURA February 11,2005.
Advertisements

TMT.OPT.PRE DRF011 Thirty Meter Telescope Secondary and Tertiary Mirror Systems International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging.
National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Experimental Laboratory for Instrument Development in Astrophysics Jean-Pierre Véran.
AO4ELT3 May 31, 2013 Fourier-Based Predictive AO Schemes for Tomographic AO systems S. Mark Ammons Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory May 31, 2013.
The Project Office Perspective Antonin Bouchez 1GMT AO Workshop, Canberra Nov
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena, CA V. Velur Caltech Optical Observatories Pasadena,
NGAO Companion Sensitivity Performance Budget (WBS ) Rich Dekany, Ralf Flicker, Mike Liu, Chris Neyman, Bruce Macintosh NGAO meeting #6, 4/25/2007.
Aug-Nov, 2008 IAG/USP (Keith Taylor) ‏ Instrumentation Concepts Ground-based Optical Telescopes Keith Taylor (IAG/USP) Aug-Nov, 2008 Aug-Sep, 2008 IAG-USP.
Caltech Optical Observatories1 NGAO Point and Shoot Trade Study Status Richard Dekany, Caltech Chris Neyman, Ralf Flicker, W.M. Keck Observatory.
Low order wavefront sensor trade study Richard Clare NGAO meeting #4 January
NGAO Trade Study : LOWFS type and architecture Stephan Kellner, Ralf Flicker NGAO Team meeting #4, WMKO Kamuela HI, 1/22/2007 Status report.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
WFS Preliminary design phase report I V. Velur, J. Bell, A. Moore, C. Neyman Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
MMT Real-Time-Reconstructor. Hardware CPU: Quad-core Xeon 2.66 GHz RAM: 2GB OS: CentOS with RTAI real-time extensions Frame Grabber: EDT PCI-DV.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
PSWG March Adaptive Optics Systems Engineering on GMT Peter McGregor.
Tomography for Multi-guidestar Adaptive Optics An Architecture for Real-Time Hardware Implementation Donald Gavel, Marc Reinig, and Carlos Cabrera UCO/Lick.
PALM-3000 Systems Engineering R. Dekany, A. Bouchez 9/22/10 Integration & Testing Review.
Anchor to LAO Lab Experiments Agenda for this discussion: 1.Role of a MOAO testbed 2.Improved results on LAO MCAO/MOAO testbed / verification of tomography.
Telescope Errors for NGAO Christopher Neyman & Ralf Flicker W. M. Keck Observatory Keck NGAO Team Meeting #4 January 22, 2007 Hualalai Conference Room,
5 th February 2010 FP7 Prep WP9000 Progress Meeting 1 Update Tim Morris Durham University FP7 Prep WP 9340.
What Requirements Drive NGAO Cost? Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
NGAO Wavefront Error Performance Budgets R. Dekany 13 May 2010.
TMT.AOS.PRE REL01 Ellerbroek, AO4ELT, Paris, June Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corporation Adaptive Optics for.
TMT.SEN.PRE REL01 Development and validation of vibration source requirements for TMT to ensure AO performance Hugh Thompson and Doug MacMartin.
1 On-sky validation of LIFT on GeMS C. Plantet 1, S. Meimon 1, J.-M. Conan 1, B. Neichel 2, T. Fusco 1 1: ONERA, the French Aerospace Lab, Chatillon, France.
Adaptive Optics Nicholas Devaney GTC project, Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias 1. Principles 2. Multi-conjugate 3. Performance & challenges.
Developing Performance Estimates for High Precision Astrometry with TMT Matthias Schoeck, Tuan Do, Brent Ellerbroek, Gilles Luc, Glen Herriot, Leo Meyer,
Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO
Adaptive Optics with Adaptive Filtering and Control Steve Gibson Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering University of California, Los Angeles
GLAO simulations at ESO European Southern Observatory
1 Manal Chebbo, Alastair Basden, Richard Myers, Nazim Bharmal, Tim Morris, Thierry Fusco, Jean-Francois Sauvage Fast E2E simulation tools and calibration.
1 TMT.AOS.PRE DRF01 Design and Testing of GPU Server based RTC for TMT NFIRAOS Lianqi Wang AO4ELT3 Florence, Italy 5/31/2013 Thirty Meter Telescope.
NSF Center for Adaptive Optics UCO Lick Observatory Laboratory for Adaptive Optics Tomographic algorithm for multiconjugate adaptive optics systems Donald.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
The on-sky NGS/LGS MOAO demonstrator for EAGLE Tim Morris Durham University.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Tomographic reconstruction of stellar wavefronts from multiple laser guide stars C. Baranec, M. Lloyd-Hart, N. M. Milton T. Stalcup, M. Snyder, & R. Angel.
IRIS OIWFS Concept Study D. Loop1, M. Fletcher1, V. Reshetov1, R
TMT.PMO.PRE REL011 Thirty Meter Telescope Background and Status.
1 Characterization of the T/T conditions at Gemini Using AO data Jean-Pierre Véran Lisa Poyneer AO4ELT Conference - Paris June , 2009.
MCAO System Modeling Brent Ellerbroek. MCAO May 24-25, 2001MCAO Preliminary Design Review2 Presentation Outline Modeling objectives and approach Updated.
ATLAS The LTAO module for the E-ELT Thierry Fusco ONERA / DOTA On behalf of the ATLAS consortium Advanced Tomography with Laser for AO systems.
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
Improved Tilt Sensing in an LGS-based Tomographic AO System Based on Instantaneous PSF Estimation Jean-Pierre Véran AO4ELT3, May 2013.
The Active Optics System S. Thomas and the AO team.
1 MCAO at CfAO meeting M. Le Louarn CfAO - UC Santa Cruz Nov
Evaluation of Astrometry Errors due to the Optical Surface Distortions in Adaptive Optics Systems and Science Instruments Brent Ellerbroek a, Glen Herriot.
AO4ELT, June Wide Field AO simulation for ELT: Fourier and E2E approaches C. Petit*, T. Fusco*, B. Neichel**, J.-F. Sauvage*, J.-M. Conan* * ONERA/PHASE.
Shack-Hartmann tomographic wavefront reconstruction using LGS: Analysis of spot elongation and fratricide effect Clélia Robert 1, Jean-Marc Conan 1, Damien.
Introduction of RAVEN Internal meeting on future instrument projects at Subaru Shin Oya ( Subaru Telescope/NAOJ) ‏ Hilo.
Experimental results of tomographic reconstruction on ONERA laboratory WFAO bench A. Costille*, C. Petit*, J.-M. Conan*, T. Fusco*, C. Kulcsár**, H.-F.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Gemini AO Program SPIE Opto-Southwest September 17, 2001 Ellerbroek/Rigaut [SW01-114] AO … for ELT’s 1 Adaptive Optics Requirements, Concepts, and Performance.
Wide-field wavefront sensing in Solar Adaptive Optics - its modeling and its effects on reconstruction Clémentine Béchet, Michel Tallon, Iciar Montilla,
March 31, 2000SPIE CONFERENCE 4007, MUNICH1 Principles, Performance and Limitations of Multi-conjugate Adaptive Optics F.Rigaut 1, B.Ellerbroek 1 and R.Flicker.
GLAO Workshop Leiden April 2005 Remko Stuik Leiden Observatory.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova A study of Pyramid WFS behavior under imperfect illumination Valentina Viotto Demetrio Magrin Maria Bergomi Marco Dima.
Comète axe 2 - TC1 : RSA n°2 - SPART/S t Cloud Workshop Leiden 2005 Performance of wave-front measurement concepts for GLAO M. NICOLLE 1, T. FUSCO.
Keck Precision Adaptive Optics Authors: Christopher Neyman 1, Richard Dekany 2, Mitchell Troy 3 and Peter Wizinowich 1. 1 W.M. Keck Observatory, 2 California.
François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 François Rigaut, Gemini Observatory GSMT SWG Meeting, LAX, 2003/03/06 GSMT AO Simulations.
Introduction of RAVEN Subaru Future Instrument Workshop Shin Oya (Subaru Telescope) Mitaka Adaptive Optics Lab Subaru Telescope Astronomical.
Gemini AO Program March 31, 2000Ellerbroek/Rigaut [ ]1 Scaling Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics Performance Estimates to Extremely Large Telescopes.
Computationally Efficient Wavefront Reconstruction for Multi-Conjugate Adaptive Optics (MCAO) Brent Ellerbroek AURA New Initiatives Office IPAM Workshop.
Page 1 Adaptive Optics in the VLT and ELT era Beyond Basic AO François Wildi Observatoire de Genève.
Page 1 Lecture 15 The applications of tomography: LTAO, MCAO, MOAO, GLAO Claire Max AY 289 March 3, 2016.
SSA Module Assembly ANNEX 0 - Assembly sequence
Trade Study Report: Fixed vs. Variable LGS Asterism
Presentation transcript:

AO4ELT, Paris A Split LGS/NGS Atmospheric Tomography for MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Luc Gilles and Brent Ellerbroek Thirty Meter Telescope Observatory Corp. AO4ELT Conference Paris, June 22-26, 2009

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Presentation Outline Standard (integrated) tomography architecture for LGS MCAO and MOAO –Formulation –Benefits and practical considerations A split tomography architecture for LGS MCAO –Formulation –Benefits and practical considerations A Strehl optimal split tomography architecture for LGS MCAO and MOAO –Formulation –Benefits and practical considerations Comparative Monte Carlo simulation results for NFIRAOS

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 LGS MCAO and MOAO on ELTs Under consideration/development for the E-ELT, GMT, and TMT Demonstrators: MAD, Canopus, CANARY Typical wavefront sensing requirements: –~6-9 sodium LGSs for atmospheric tomography –~3 low-order NGS WFSs  Sense tip/tilt and tilt anisoplanatism errors  Sense focus errors due to sodium layer range variations Standard approach to tomographic wavefront reconstruction: –Minimal variance estimation + least squares DM fitting –LGS and NGS measurements concatenated into a single vector –“Pseudo open-loop” measurements used

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Standard (Integrated) Control Architecture for LGS MCAO and MOAO “Open-loop” LGS Gradients Minimal Variance Atmos Tomo DM fitting Modal Projection and Servo filtering Tip/Tilt and Diff. Focus removal DM/TT commands “Open-loop” NGS Gradients (~12) Low Pass Filtering Concatenate

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Benefits and Practical Considerations Strehl optimal in the limit of accurate tomographic solution Applicable to both MCAO and MOAO NGS and LGS WFS measurements are very different: –NGSs are typically faint, and measurements require pre- filtering to optimize servo compensation Requires efficient joint estimation of both low- and high-order atmospheric modes –Impacts tomography algorithm (choice of “solver,” number of iterations, memory …) Tomography step mixes LGS and NGS WFS operators –Impacts practical implementation of ray-tracing Split LGS/NGS architecture preferred

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 A Split Tomography Control Architecture for LGS MCAO “Open-loop” LGS Gradients Minimal Variance LGS Atmos Tomo DM fitting Modal Projection and Servo filtering Tip/Tilt and Diff. Focus removal LGS DM commands Closed-loop NGS Gradients (~12) Least-Squares Rank-5 Modal Reconstruction Servo filtering NGS DM commands TT commands NGS-controlled modes are invisible to tip/tilt-removed LGS WFSs –Consist of Tip/Tilt and 3 “cancelling” quadratic modes on 2 DMs

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Benefits and Practical Considerations Tomography step contains only LGS operators –Relaxes computational requirements Separate NGS servo compensation in 5 modes NGS reconstruction and servo compensation easy to update for each new NGS asterism Simple NGS reconstruction/control model requires good LGS correction to minimize aliasing of LGS DM commands into NGS loop (may impact sky coverage) Applicable to MCAO, inappropriate for MOAO (oversimplified definition/control of NGS modes)

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 A Strehl Optimal Split Control Architecture for LGS MCAO and MOAO Concept derived from standard (integrated) tomography by application of the Sherman-Morrison matrix inversion formula Analytically equivalent to integrated tomography in the limit of an exact tomography matrix system solution NGS modes dependent upon NGS asterism (location and magnitudes) and seeing –Must be pre-computed accurately and updated at ~0.1 Hz –A practical approach has been defined

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Benefits and Practical Considerations Robust to LGS/NGS loop cross-coupling Practical, similar to previous split MCAO control architecture Strehl optimal in the limit of accurate LGS tomographic solution Applicable to both MCAO and MOAO Cost of NGS reconstruction dominated by background computation of NGS modes

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Sample NGS Mode Distortion Patterns for NFIRAOS

Comparative Performance Evaluation for NFIRAOS in the high SNR Regime 4 NGS asterisms of 16th magnitude Common 800 Hz sampling of LGS and NGS loops Simulated NGS WFSs: Z-Tilt NGS reconstruction: Z-Tilt WFS model Simulated LGS WFSs: physical optics with short- exposure matched filters Tomography algorithms: CG30 and FD3 (split, new split, integ)

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Sample Split Tomography Performance Median seeing Includes 116 nm RMS in quadrature of implementation errors 15 arcsec FoV averaged WFE 2400 frames averaged; single turbulence realization

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Sample Comparative Performance

14 Summary and Plans A split wave-front control architecture has been introduced for LGS MCAO –NGS reconstruction and servo compensation easy to update for each new NGS asterism –Requires good LGS correction to limit aliasing into NGS loop –Applicable to MCAO, unsuitable for MOAO A Strehl optimal split control architecture has been developed for LGS MCAO and MOAO –Practical, similar to previous split LGS MCAO architecture –Applicable to both MCAO and MOAO –35-60 nm RMS improvement for sample asterisms in the high SNR regime for NFIRAOS Detailed sky coverage simulations planned in near-future MOAO analysis planned at completion of MCAO analysis

AO4ELT, Paris 2009 Acknowledgements The work is supported by the TMT project. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the TMT partner institutions. They are: –the Association of Canadian Universities for Research in Astronomy (ACURA) –the California Institute of Technology, and –the University of California This work was supported as well by –the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation –the Canada Foundation for Innovation –the Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation –the National Research Council of Canada –the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada –the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund –the Association of Universities for Research in Astronomy (AURA) –and the U.S. National Science Foundation