1 TASK 3.2 C CMEP Mandate 2010-2012 Mario Carere, Chiara Maggi, Bernd Gawlik, Valeria Dulio.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water.europa.eu Review of priority substances under the WFD Chemicals and Water Workshop European Environment Agency Copenhagen 6-7 December 2010 Helen.
Advertisements

Chemicals in the context of the Water Information System for Europe (WISE) Bo N Jacobsen EEA Chemicals and Water workshop 6-7 December 2010, EEA, Copenhagen.
1 Whole Effluent Assessment (WEA) Dutch Perspective and Initiatives Gert Jan de Maagd Marijke Ferdinandy Erwin Roex Ministry of Transport, Public Works.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
WG 3: Impact assessment ► 9 members – good discussions ► Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle ?? COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off.
WG 3: Impact assessment ► Conceptual framework for impact assessment for xenobiotics in the urban water cycle ► Biotests as analytical tool ► Are we measuring.
Water.europa.eu Policy update with regard to Priority and Emerging Substances SOCOPSE Final Conference Maastricht, June 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates Black Sea Basin Directorate – presentation of the scope, responsibilities and project interests Mrs. TANYA.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 Pau-Plenary Session 14 may 2008 CMA developments and state.
Mats Wallin Swedish Univ. of Agricultural Sciences Dept. of Environmental Assessment Catarina Johansson Swedish Environmental Protection Agency Development.
Water.europa.eu Water Framework Directive - a framework for Community action in the field of water policy Marieke van Nood WFD Team, DG ENV.D.2, European.
© WRc plc 2010 Agenda item 3b: Summary of WISE electronic delivery: presentation of an example.
Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais Metrology to support a validated effect based monitoring strategy within the Water Framework Directive (WFD-2013/60/EC).
EU Project: Trans-Boundary River Management Phase II and Phase III for the Kura River basin – Armenia, Georgia, Azerbaijan ( Transboundary.
Water.europa.eu CMEP progress CMEP progress Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, WG E
Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David Bratislava 25 November 2010 First meeting of CMEP group.
Water.europa.eu CMEP progress CMEP progress Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David Mario Carere, Bernd Gawlik, Madalina David WG E
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
Date/event: Water accounts and economics workshop, 7-8/10/2010, Copenhagen Author: Dr Manuel Lago (Ecologic Institute, Berlin) ETC/Water 2010 Overview.
European Commission - DG Environment Unit D.2: Water & Marine 1 Need for continuous exchanges on chemical monitoring issues, in the light of the on-going.
1 European Topic Centre on Water Workshop on: Identification of surface water bodies under the Pilot River Basin Initiative Monitoring Water Bodies Steve.
Water.europa.eu Draft mandate WGE Chemical Status WG E Priority Substances 8-9 October 2009 Jorge Rodriguez Romero Madalina David DG Environment, European.
Effect-based monitoring tools Ispra 18 June 2012; CMEP meeting Ann-Sofie Wernersson, Mario Carere, Chiara Maggi
Water.europa.eu Compliance Checking of River Basin Management Plans Strategic Coordination Group Meeting, 4-5 November 2009 DG Environment, European Commission.
Building WFD into impact assessment Richard Sharp Geomorphology IEMA webinar Thursday 31 March 2016.
Principles and Key Issues
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
D8 and D9 REVIEW PROCESS April-June 2014: February 2015:
Agenda item 6e) Update on progress elaboration of Article 4.7 Guidance
Water reuse CIS working group PoM 15 October 2015 Thomas Petitguyot
Berlin 2 May CMA 6° Plenary Meeting
Bruxelles 17 october-2007 WG E Meeting
Chemical Monitoring Activity (CMA)
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Development of a protocol for identification of reference conditions, and boundaries between high, good and moderate status in lakes and watercourses (REFCOND)
European Commission DG ENV Unit C1 Water
Philippe QUEVAUVILLER
Two main areas identified
Groundwater monitoring within the WFD
Chemical Monitoring Activity 9° Plenary Meeting Ghent
Philippe Quevauviller
WGC-2 DG Meeting Towards a Guidance on Groundwater Chemical Status and Threshold Values 14:00 – 16:00 21 April 2008 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Chemical Monitoring Activity (CMA) ( )
CIS progress June-November 2011: main highlights
WG C Groundwater Draft Mandate
Mario Carere, Ann-Sofie Wernersson, Teresa Lettieri, Robert Kase
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Strategic Coordination Group 4-5 November 2009
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
Drafting group Mixing Zones
Water reuse Drafting process for the guidance document
Agenda Item 10: Feedback on dangerous substances workshop and Implementation Guidance WG-E(1)-07/04/INERIS - Implementation guidance.
Meeting of Water Directors Future Work Programme of the CIS
Project 2.7 Guidance on Monitoring
CMA Drafting group on sediment/biota monitoring
Ongoing work on CIS Guidance Article 4.7
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Plenary Session 21° October Paris
Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive
Brussels 7 November 2007 SCG Meeting
Preparation of the second RBMP in Romania
THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (WFD)
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-GEEL
WG A ECOSTAT Draft Mandate
SCG May 2005 CIRCA review.
Strategic Coordination Group Brussels, 5-6 November 2008
CMA-1 activity Berlin – 2 May 2007
Presentation transcript:

1 TASK 3.2 C CMEP Mandate Mario Carere, Chiara Maggi, Bernd Gawlik, Valeria Dulio

Mandate (CMEP)  Report on the use of alternative effect-based monitoring methods (e.g. biomarker, bioassays, TIE) needed for investigative monitoring and to better evaluate the link between chemical and ecological status and the effects of mixture of pollutants and emerging pollutants.

Which are the real effects? Chemical analyses risk? hazard chemical status ecological monitoring ecological status Chemical monitoring WFD Monitoring Scheme

Thanks to Jos Brils for this slide Monitoring Toolbox Assesses: Detects: Tools: risk a.o. toxic effects (bio)assays ecosystem impacts impact field inventory hazard contaminants chemical analysis

COMMON IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE (2000/60/EC) Technical Report Guidance Document No. 19 GUIDANCE ON SURFACE WATER CHEMICAL MONITORING UNDER THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE guidance_documents&vm=detailed&sb=Title 5

6

Complementary methods can be used in the design of WFD monitoring programmes for: Identification of problem, e.g., by using screening methods (test kits) or passive sampling devices. Selection of monitoring points, (e.g., in the grouping of water bodies for operational Monitoring): complementary methods may be used to demonstrate the representativeness of sampling points. Selection of quality elements, e.g., the selection of other pollutants that are part of the ecological status. Information derived from bioassays and toxic identification and evaluation (TIE) may be used to select compounds based on ecological relevance.. 7

Complementary methods in investigative monitoring Use for investigative monitoring to identify the reason for any failure to achieve environmental objectives, in circumstances where the reason is unknown and to ascertain the magnitude and impact of accidental pollution. Test kits including, e.g., immunoassays specific to certain priority substances or other pollutants allow fast screening of large number of samples and can be cost-effective tools to identify pollution sources as well as to characterise the extent of accidental pollution. In case of MAC-EQS exceedance, investigative monitoring should be used to ascertain this non-compliance in more detail. Both, spot sampling and time-integrated measurements may not detect acutely toxic spikes of seasonally-variable compounds like pesticides; the use of bioassays may be beneficial. 8

TGD/WFD- (methodology to derive EQS) Sediment Chapter-EQS with high uncertainty 9

Technical Report-way to work Exchanges Possible Skype /Call Conference Drafting Group Meeting (2011) Tentative Tematic Workshop

Technical Report-Roadmap Comments on the technical Report Index: 3 weeks (15 th December) Drafting Group Definition: 3 weeks (15 th December) First Draft: May 2011 (to be presented to the CMEP meeting) Second Draft: Autumn 2011 Spring 2012: Finalisation and Approval June 2012: Approval of WG E and SCG