Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Longitudinal Data David A. Kenny December 23. 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Working with Under-identified Structural Equation Models
Advertisements

The STARTS Model David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
G Lecture 10 SEM methods revisited Multilevel models revisited
SEM PURPOSE Model phenomena from observed or theoretical stances
Structural Equation Modeling Using Mplus Chongming Yang Research Support Center FHSS College.
Confirmatory factor analysis GHQ 12. From Shevlin/Adamson 2005:
Inference for Regression
Standardized Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Objectives (BPS chapter 24)
Growth Curve Model Using SEM
Structural Equation Modeling
T-Tests.
t-Tests Overview of t-Tests How a t-Test Works How a t-Test Works Single-Sample t Single-Sample t Independent Samples t Independent Samples t Paired.
The Two Factor ANOVA © 2010 Pearson Prentice Hall. All rights reserved.
CHAPTER 4 ECONOMETRICS x x x x x Multiple Regression = more than one explanatory variable Independent variables are X 2 and X 3. Y i = B 1 + B 2 X 2i +
Intro to Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences PSYC 1900
Econ 140 Lecture 171 Multiple Regression Applications II &III Lecture 17.
Structural Equation Modeling
G Lecture 51 Estimation details Testing Fit Fit indices Arguing for models.
The Autoregressive Model of Change David A. Kenny.
Business 205. Review Survey Designs Survey Ethics.
5-3 Inference on the Means of Two Populations, Variances Unknown
Change Score Analysis David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Multivariate Methods EPSY 5245 Michael C. Rodriguez.
Item response modeling of paired comparison and ranking data.
Active Learning Lecture Slides
Multiple Sample Models James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
AM Recitation 2/10/11.
Example Models for Multi-wave Data David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Understanding Multivariate Research Berry & Sanders.
Issues in structural equation modeling Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Purpose ● Takes factor analysis a few steps further. ● Impose theoretically interesting constraints on.
Measurement Invariance of the Pediatric Version of PROMIS Symptom Scales between American and Chinese Children with Cancer Changrong Yuan 1,* , Pamela.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 7: fitting a model, fit indices, comparingmodels, statistical power.
Multi-sample structural equation models with mean structures Hans Baumgartner Penn State University.
Cross-lagged Panel Correlation (CLPC) David A. Kenny December 25, 2013.
ROB CRIBBIE QUANTITATIVE METHODS PROGRAM – DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHOLOGY COORDINATOR - STATISTICAL CONSULTING SERVICE COURSE MATERIALS AVAILABLE AT:
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
Confirmatory Factor Analysis Psych 818 DeShon. Construct Validity: MTMM ● Assessed via convergent and divergent evidence ● Convergent – Measures of the.
With or without constraints? An empirical comparison of two approaches to estimate interaction effects in the theory of planned behavior Eldad Davidov,
Measurement Models: Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Controlling for Baseline
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny January 25, Background Introduction to Measures of Fit.
Measurement Models: Identification and Estimation James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University.
Multiple Regression. Simple Regression in detail Y i = β o + β 1 x i + ε i Where Y => Dependent variable X => Independent variable β o => Model parameter.
Environmental Modeling Basic Testing Methods - Statistics III.
SEM Basics 2 Byrne Chapter 2 Kline pg 7-15, 50-51, ,
Social Relations Model: Multiple Variables David A. Kenny.
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling Class 8: Confirmatory Factory Analysis.
SEM Model Fit: Introduction David A. Kenny January 12, 2014.
Two-wave Two-variable Models David A. Kenny December 24, 2013.
Example of Models for the Study of Change David A. Kenny December 15, 2013.
Statistical Inference for the Mean Objectives: (Chapter 8&9, DeCoursey) -To understand the terms variance and standard error of a sample mean, Null Hypothesis,
From Loss to Loneliness: The Relationship Between Bereavement and Depressive Symptoms Eiko Fried KU Leuven ICPS Amsterdam March 2015.
Chapter 22 Inferential Data Analysis: Part 2 PowerPoint presentation developed by: Jennifer L. Bellamy & Sarah E. Bledsoe.
Testing the Equality of Means and Variances in Over-Time Data David A. Kenny.
Measures of Fit David A. Kenny.
Approaches of Model Specification for Testing Factor Mean Differences in Multi-group Higher-order CFA Model Jichuan Wang, Ph.D. Children’s National Medical.
The University of Manchester
Two-wave Two-variable Models
CJT 765: Structural Equation Modeling
The Trait Model of Change
APIM with Indistinguishable Dyads: SEM Estimation
The University of Manchester
Ch. 13: The Comparison of Two Conditions
Confirmatory Factor Analysis
More About Tests Notes from
James G. Anderson, Ph.D. Purdue University
Financial Econometrics Fin. 505
Chapter 13: Using Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Longitudinal Data David A. Kenny December

2 Task Same set of measures that form a latent variables are measured at two or more times on the same sample.

3 Example Data Dumenci, L., & Windle, M. (1996). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, Depression with four indicators (CESD) PA: Positive Affect (lack thereof) DA: Depressive Affect SO: Somatic Symptoms IN: Interpersonal Issues Four times separated by 6 months 433 adolescent females Age 16.2 at wave 1

4 Equal Loadings Over Time Want to test that the factor loadings are the same at all times. If the loadings are the same, then it becomes more plausible to argue that one has the same construct at each time. Many longitudinal models requires temporally invariant loadings.

5 Correlated Measurement Error Almost always with longitudinal data, the errors of measurement of an indicator (technically called uniquenesses) should be correlated. To be safely identified, at least, three indicators are needed. Identified with just two indicators, but must assume the loadings are equal (i.e., both set to one).

6 Equal Error Variances Another possibility is that error variance of the same measure at different times are equal. As in the example with four indicators at four times, each indicator would have one error variance for each of the four times, a total of 12 constraints.

7 Equal Loadings Correlated Errors Equal Error Variances

8 Latent Variable Measurement Models Model ²² dfRMSEA  ² diff df diffp Comparison Model I No Correlated Errors II Correlated Errors (CE) >.001I III CE and Equal Loadings (EL) II IV CE, EL, and Equal Error Variances III

9 Conclusion Definitely need correlated errors in the model (something that will almost always be the case). Forcing equal loadings, while worsening the fit some, seems reasonable in this case. Equal error variances is also reasonable.

10 Means of a Latent Variable Fix the intercept of the marker variable at each time to zero. Free the other intercepts but set them equal over time; a total of (k – 1)(T – 1) constraints. –9 constraints for the example dataset Free factor means and see if the model fits.

11 Equality of the Means of a Latent Variable Assuming good fit of a model with latent means, fix the factor means (m1 = m2 = m3 = m4) to be equal to test the equality of factor means; T – 1 df.

12 Equal Intercepts

13 Example Means: Latent Variable, Base Model Model with No Constraints on the Means –  2 (83) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.034; TLI =.985 Model with Latent Means and Constraints on the Intercepts –  2 (92) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.041; TLI =.979 Fit is worse with the constraints, but the model fit (RMSEA and TLI) are acceptable. Can test if means differ.

14 Example Means: Latent Variable The four means: 25.34, 25.82, 21.72, Base Model –  2 (92) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.041; TLI =.979 Equal Latent Means –  2 (95) = , p <.001 – RMSEA = 0.046; TLI =.973 Test of the null hypothesis of equal variance:  2 (3) = 25.44, p <.001 Conclusion: Means differ.

15 Equal Variance: Latent Variable Fix the T factor variances to be equal (s1 = s2 = s3 = s4). Compare this model to a model in which factor variances are free to vary with T – 1 df.

16

17 Example: Latent Variable The four latent variances: 25.34, 25.82, 21.72, Base Model –  2 (83) = , p =.003 – RMSEA = 0.034; TLI =.985 Equal Variances –  2 (86) = , p =.001 – RMSEA = 0.036; TLI =.984 Test of the null hypothesis of equal variance: –  2 (3) = 9.76, p =.021 Variances significantly different, but model fit is not all that different from the base model.