The NMP: An Introduction Amy Getz Washington State Community College Mathematics Conference May 10, 2013 Amy Getz Washington State Community College Mathematics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

The NMP: An Introduction an initiative of the Charles A. Dana Center and the Texas Association of Community Colleges Amy Getz, Manager of Community College.
THE NEW MATHWAYS PROJECT NMP Alison Garza & Cynthia Martinez.
Goodbye 19 th Century Math Courses – Hello... Modern Accelerated Pathways Amy Getz Strategic Implementation Lead, Higher Education Team Amy Getz Strategic.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
“The Primary Goal of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District is to become a premier school district in the United States of America.” The Cleveland.
United States Department of Labor Employment & Training Administration Career Pathways: Pathways to Opportunity U.S. Department of Labor Employment and.
Math: Two-semester model Mary Parker Austin Community College
Listening to the Future Presented by Larry Johnson and Kristi Nelson Transforming Lives, Education, and Knowledge.
Remedial Education Reform Bruce Vandal, Education Commission of the States September 25, 2012.
CBMS Forum 5: October 2014 Treisman, Rotman, Fong.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The Path Less Completed
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation Lisa Hood, LINC Project Director Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University Presentation.
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
project DATA. Agenda Entry task Welcome and introductions project DATA –Background –Purpose and.
May 18, Two Goals 1. Become knowledgeable about the QEP. 2. Consider your role in making the QEP a success.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Welcome! Thank you for joining today’s webinar! Please make sure you’ve called in using the audio conference function so that you can ask questions While.
Forces Shaping Undergraduate Education in Mathematics Jenna Cullinane, Ph.D. Washingtin October 16, 2014 Jenna Cullinane, Ph.D. Washingtin October 16,
Addressing the Pre-service Learning Needs of Education Majors in Math and Science Through Technology
RPM Summer Institute 2012: Exploring Key Themes to Build a Model for Pre- College Math.
ABLE State Update Jeff Gove, State ABLE Director.
EDUCATION INITIATIVE The Next Generation Cosumnes River College.
Texas High School Project and the Texas Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Texas Regional Collaboration March 6, 2007.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
EL-Civics Application Remember! If in a consortium: –Must complete Budget Detail page for each consortium member EL-Civics Application.
SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS TEACHER INITIATIVE Improving the Undergraduate Pipeline to Math and Science Teaching Credentials Program Overview.
Reform at Scale: Lessons from the Dana Center’s New Mathways Project Uri Treisman and Amy Getz Innovations 2014 March 4, 2014 Uri Treisman and Amy Getz.
Presentation Title XX XX, We’re a pathway to success that connects people to higher education and the skills they need to be job-ready. We’re constantly.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Engaging Mathematics at Roosevelt University College Algebra: Modeling the City Barbara Gonzalez and Cathy Evins Engaging Mathematics 1 Timeline: Fall.
NCWE: National Council for Workforce Education  An affiliate council of the American Association of Community Colleges (AACC)  A national forum for administrators,
Statway What worked well and what we’re improving Mary Parker Austin Community College austincc.edu Joint Math Meetings Jan. 12, 2013
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
DeAnn Huinker, UW-Milwaukee MMP Principal Investigator 26 August 2008 This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Mathematics Pathways for Student Success in Community Colleges In cooperation with the Charles A. Dana Center.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Rethinking Developmental Mathematics, High School Math Courses, and College Readiness Advisory Team for Quantitative Reasoning HS and HE courses Charles.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Getting Started with NAF’s New Curriculum
ENGAGING FACULTY IN REFORM / MARCH 4, COMMUNITY COLLEGE RESEARCH CENTER MARCH 4, 2014 Building Buy-in, Supporting Instructional Improvement Susan.
The Role of Mathematics in Structured Pathways Amy Getz Strategic Implementation Lead, Higher Education an initiative of the Charles A. Dana Center and.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Indiana Commission for Higher Education September 1, 2015 Jenna Cullinane, Ph.D. Building Math Pathways to Programs of Study.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Student Unit Record Data Use Division of Florida Colleges December 8, 2015.
National Perspective on Mathematics Pathways Amy Getz, New Mexico Mathematics Summit Amy Getz, New Mexico.
Teaching Statistics with Developmental Math Mary Parker Austin Community College

A Professional Development Series from the CDC’s Division of Population Health School Health Branch Professional Development 101: The Basics – Part 1.
Student success is the highest priority of every community college in Texas and our legislative priorities reflect this core principle. The member colleges.
New Approaches to Old Problems: how “guided pathways” can lead to student success Paul N. Markham Program Officer, Postsecondary Success TASS Conference.
Pathway to Excellence. School’s Out Washington provides services and guidance for organizations to ensure all young people have safe places to learn and.
Modernizing Undergraduate Mathematics Programs a Charles A. Dana Center higher education initiative Dr. Uri Treisman, Professor of Mathematics and Public.
Modernizing Mathematics Pathways: A Call to Action a Charles A. Dana Center higher education initiative Amy Getz, Strategic Implementation Lead, Higher.
1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
TAP Math: Teachers and Administrators Partnering for Mathematics Learning Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Department of Education funded through.
Tarrant County College New Math Pathways
State Mathematics Transfer Inventory Guide Webinar
Washington Math Pathways to Completion
Improving Student Success with Mathematics Pathways at Scale
The Right Math for the Right Student at the Right Time
Maine is IT! at SMCC Grant Playbook for
Presentation transcript:

The NMP: An Introduction Amy Getz Washington State Community College Mathematics Conference May 10, 2013 Amy Getz Washington State Community College Mathematics Conference May 10, 2013 an initiative of the Charles A. Dana Center and the Texas Association of Community Colleges

Who?  Charles A. Dana Center at the University of Texas at Austin  Over 20 years of state and national leadership in mathematics education  Led development of original Statway and Quantway curricula in partnership with the Carnegie Foundation  Staff comprises math educators, policy experts, student success experts  Texas Association of Community Colleges  Represents all 50 community college systems in Texas  Represents the interests of community colleges in state policymaking and budgeting 2

What am I doing at a conference in Washington? 3

1.Response to interest and questions about the project and materials 4

What am I doing at a conference in Washington? 1.Response to interest and questions about the project and materials 2.Share some of our “lessons learned” about reform at scale 5

What am I doing at a conference in Washington? 1.Response to interest and questions about the project and materials 2.Share some of our “lessons learned” about reform at scale 3.Looking for an excuse to get out of Texas and see some mountains? 6

What? A systemic approach to improving student success and completion by reforming developmental and gateway mathematics based on four fundamental principles: 1.Multiple pathways with relevant and challenging mathematics content aligned to specific fields of study 2.Acceleration that allows students to complete a college- level math course more quickly than in the traditional developmental math sequence. 3.Intentional use of strategies to help students develop skills as learners 4.Curriculum design and pedagogy based on proven practice 7

Lesson #1 Reform of this magnitude and scale requires collective action across institutions and systems. 8

Dana Center’s Role: State Level Broadly support reform based on the four principles:  Work with TACC, state agencies, and two- and four-year institutions to address policy obstacles  Leverage resources and build support through collaboration with partners:  Other reform initiatives  Professional organizations 9

Lesson #2 Colleges need support to plan and implement systemic reform: especially in working across the system. 10

Dana Center’s Role: Institutional Level Build tools and services that help colleges implement systemic reform  Detailed implementation guide  Data templates  Tools and strategies to help train advisors and plan for student recruitment  Services that support planning:  Data-Based Mobilization Workshop 11

Dana Center’s Role: Faculty & Classroom Level Develop materials and services to support on-the-ground implementation  Course materials  Professional learning opportunities – general and specific to the Dana Center’s course materials  Online modules, workshops, institutes, and written support materials The development process is based on input from and engagement with community college faculty and staff. 12

Lesson #3 Build for scale from the beginning: everyone has a role. 13

Working with Colleges  Codevelopment partners: Participate in original development of materials and services; first to implement; take a leadership role in supporting other colleges  Active Learning Sites: Implement one to two years later; prepare for implementation through a mentoring relationship with codevelopment partners  Capacity Building Sites: Implement three to four years later; focused on informing faculty and building buy-in 14

Lesson #4 Build structures that work within existing systems as much as possible. 15

The NMP Courses 16

Key Characteristics of NMP Courses  Common entry point: Students create a completion plan and, through a structured process in the student success course, select the appropriate math pathway.  Pathways designed to create a coherent and consistent experience for students and reinforce retention across terms.  Student success strategies are embedded in math courses to apply and reinforce concepts from the student success course. 17

Key Characteristics of NMP Courses  Strong embedded support for instructors is provided.  College-level content is integrated into developmental course so that students are challenged and engaged  Courses are designed to support the development of strong reasoning and problem-solving skills. 18

Lesson #5 For scaling across large systems, materials need to be easy to access, easy to use and sustained over time. 19

Delivery and Costs of Curricular Materials  Materials will be developed in an online platform.  Similar to an e-textbook except that lesson activities will be supported through the platform  Online homework and gradebook system  Students pay a fee for access to the materials in lieu of a textbook.  Fees are TBD, but we anticipate they will be lower than the price of standard textbooks 20

Timeline for Development and Implementation *A PDF version of the Frameworks course will be published for open use. 21 CoursesFirst Implementation in Texas Publically Available Frameworks for Mathematics and Collegiate Learning* Spring 2013Fall 2013 Foundations of Mathematical ReasoningFall 2013Fall 2014 Statistical ReasoningSpring 2014Spring 2015 Quantitative ReasoningSpring 2015Spring 2016 STEM-Prep and bridge courseSpring 2016Spring 2017

Sample Lesson Materials: Please Note  These are drafts!  The lessons are broken into 25-minute blocks:  Research shows students learn better in 20 – 25-minute sessions with brief “reset” transitions  Allows faculty to group blocks to fit different class lengths  As of Spring 2014, materials will be in an online platform 22

Opportunities for Involvement  Individual faculty members  Sign up for monthly updates to hear about activities  Individual colleges  Curricular materials available on timeline shown previously  Selected tools and services will become available in the next year to support implementation in fall 2014  Groups of colleges  The Dana Center is most effective when working on a regional scale  Opportunities to leverage and maximize resources and support 23

Contact Information  General information about the Dana Center:  Higher Education work:  To receive monthly updates about the NMP, contact us at: 24

Staff Contacts  Amy Getz (general project issues):  Connie Richardson (math course development):  Nancy Stano (student success course development):  Tom Connolly (professional learning opportunities):  Erica Moreno (website, materials, information about events): 25

About the Dana Center 26 The Charles A. Dana Center at The University of Texas at Austin works with our nation’s education systems to ensure that every student leaves school prepared for success in postsecondary education and the contemporary workplace. Our work, based on research and two decades of experience, focuses on K–16 mathematics and science education with an emphasis on strategies for improving student engagement, motivation, persistence, and achievement. We develop innovative curricula, tools, protocols, and instructional supports and deliver powerful instructional and leadership development.