Chapter 9 Negotiating & Institutional Decision Making.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Criteria of Effective Shared Governance Below are some criteria that I believe characterize successful and effective shared governance, with comments.
Advertisements

Research Integrity and Assurance Protections and Support Human Subjects Animal Care and Use Biosafety Conflicts of Interest Export Controls Responsible.
Conditions for Using Negotiation Two or more parties –Conflict of interest such that what one party wants is not what the other party wants –Both willing.
Negotiation Cultural Analysis Framework
A Matter of Motivating People to Prepare and Work as a TEAM
Business culture- China vs US Presentation Outline Foundation of US ethics- basic discussion Comparison of Business culture-China vs US Strategies and.
Definition  The informal group in an organization is the interlocking social structure that governs how people work together in practice.  It is the.
Organizational Effectiveness
Irwin/McGraw-Hill© McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2000 Chapter 7 ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES AND DIVERSITY.
© 2005 Prentice-Hall 7-1 Foundations of Group Behavior Chapter 7 Essentials of Organizational Behavior, 8/e Stephen P. Robbins.
L.E.A.D.ing Teams Creating Synergy and Productivity.
Leadership styles By: Gabija Pelikšaitė.
16-1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved CHAPTER SIXTEEN International and Cross-Cultural Negotiation.
THE PRINCIPLES OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT. DEFINING QUALITY Good Appearance? High Price? The Best? Particular Specification? Not necessarily, but always: Fitness.
Fundamentals of Organization Structure
15-1 Virtual Teams Chapter Use of Communication Technologies Creation of virtual teams  Mediated by time, distance, technology  Continuum Two.
Chapter 10 Improving Performance Through Empowerment, Teamwork, and Communication Learning Goals Describe why & how organizations empower employees. Distinguish.
> > > > Improving Performance Through Empowerment, Teamwork, and Communication Chapter 10.
Quiz 1  Availability – check calendar. Chapter 4 Managing Organizational Culture and Change.
ELEMENTS OF SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND CULTURE
Team Building WHY?.
Case Studies. The ‘Fits-and-Starts’ Organization 2-16.
Building Effective Interpersonal Relationships
Managing Across Cultures
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
SOCIAL INTERACTION & GROUPS, ORGANIZATIONS, BEAURACRACIES.
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Part II Organizational Perspectives Chapter 5 Contemporary Organizational Theories and Management Systems.
Ch. 5-2 Forms of Ownership.
Chapter 3 ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURES AND DIVERSITY Organizational Cultures and Diversity School of Economics and Management Xidian University.
Part C – CHANGE MANAGEMENT AS (3.1): Demonstrate understanding of how internal factors interact within a business that operates in a global context.
Additional Internet Sites
TEAMWORK AND TEAM BUILDING KEYS TO GOAL ACHIEVEMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY.
S3 Business Management Unit 1.3.
Why Teams?. Teams Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Outperform individuals acting alone or in groups Often necessary to lead deep and lasting.
Chapter 8 Group Behavior. Human Behavior in Organizations, 2 nd Edition Rodney Vandeveer and Michael Menefee © 2010 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River,
Thoughts Before Requirements Gathering. Requirements Gathering Functional Requirements – Functional requirements explain what has to be done by identifying.
Copyright 2004 Prentice Hall 1 Organizational Theory, Design, and Change Text and Cases Fourth Edition Gareth R. Jones.
Some Tools For Team Building an Introduction 2010 Faith and Light International Formation Project Team.
Leadership Chapter 7 – Path-Goal Theory.  Path-Goal Theory Perspective  Conditions of Leadership Motivation  Leader Behaviors & Subordinate Characteristics.
HOFAM vak Organisatie & Management les 12. Het vier-instrumentenmodel van managementcontrol 2.
Social Groups andOrganizations Chapter 6. Social group  Consists of a number of people who have a common identity, some feeling of unity, and certain.
Meaning and Dimensions of Culture
INTEREST BASED PROBLEM SOLVING UniServ Academy October 2007.
6.4 Formal Organizations. The Nature of Formal Organizations Deliberately created to achieve one or more long-term goals Deliberately created to achieve.
The Manager as a Leader Chapter 12. The Importance of Leadership Definition: Leadership is the ability to influence individuals and groups to cooperatively.
Culture and negotiation
Managing Across Cultures Chapter 5, pages
Social Structure and Group Behavior
Business Management Chapter five. Management  What makes a “good” manager?  What makes a “bad” manager? 5-2.
1 The 7 Elements of a High Performance Healthcare Team Cohesiveness Healthy Climate Team Members’ Contribution.
Organizational Effectiveness
Fundamental of International Business Negotiation
Negotiation Cultural Analysis Framework Salacuse 1991.
Organisations – Groups and Teams
Fundamentals of Organization Structure
Evaluation Chapter 9. Chapter Objectives Learn: –How evaluation incorporates into the overall problem solving process. –Ethical considerations for solution.
Motivating and Managing People and Groups in Business Organizations © 2007 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Introduction.
Hofstede Five Cultural Dimensions Dimensions. Hofstede’s Cultural Framework 1.Power Distance 2.Individualism vs. Collectivism 3.Masculinity vs. Femininity.
Chapter 7 FOUNDATIONS OF PLANNING 7.1© 2003 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
1 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. International Business Negotiation.
The Denison Organizational Culture Model & Link to Performance
Contracts Across Cultures Shao Guangqing. Outline Introduction Role and Importance of Contracts in Different Countries  USA  Japan  China  Russia.
Chapter 5 Groups and Organizations
MGT 210 CHAPTER 13: MANAGING TEAMS
DISC Behavior Profile Module 00-2 Modified: 9/20/2018.
MSE602 ENGINEERING INNOVATION MANAGEMENT
CE362 Technical Communication & Documentation
Chapter 3 Simpler Structures
EMBA 225 Week 2: Foundations of Teams.
Pricing Decisions and Cost Management
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 9 Negotiating & Institutional Decision Making

Decision Making in Chinese Institutions Decisions are usually arrived at through a group process Decisions are usually arrived at through a group process They use a leader-mediated compromise – meaning the leader listens to the opinions of many people then makes a decision that takes all opinions into account. They use a leader-mediated compromise – meaning the leader listens to the opinions of many people then makes a decision that takes all opinions into account.

In short, Chinese group members typically have more input in the decision-making process than do American group members. In short, Chinese group members typically have more input in the decision-making process than do American group members. Decision making requires much more time for Chinese decision-making groups than American decision- making groups. Decision making requires much more time for Chinese decision-making groups than American decision- making groups.

A basic fact of institutional life in China is that decision making in most institutions operates under the jurisdiction and authority of governmental leaders at some level. A basic fact of institutional life in China is that decision making in most institutions operates under the jurisdiction and authority of governmental leaders at some level. Because of the top-down structure of guidance and control emanating from the provincial capital or local seat of government, decisions of any consequence must be referred for approval up the hierarchical ladder. Because of the top-down structure of guidance and control emanating from the provincial capital or local seat of government, decisions of any consequence must be referred for approval up the hierarchical ladder. Hierarchical ladders in US too, but they are much shorter. Hierarchical ladders in US too, but they are much shorter.

2 typical Frustrations of Americans who are working in or with Chinese institutions: 1) They cannot determine who makes the decisions about the issue or problem on which they need action. 1) They cannot determine who makes the decisions about the issue or problem on which they need action. 2)That they cannot get decisions made within a time frame that they believe is reasonable. 2)That they cannot get decisions made within a time frame that they believe is reasonable.

The Cultural Bases of American and Chinese Decision Making USA: culture emphasizes individual initiative and personal achievement, making things work and getting things done, efficiency and timeliness of action, and making the lives of individuals more comfortable and convenient. USA: culture emphasizes individual initiative and personal achievement, making things work and getting things done, efficiency and timeliness of action, and making the lives of individuals more comfortable and convenient.

An employee in U.S. institutional settings have as their objective moving up the status hierarchy. An employee in U.S. institutional settings have as their objective moving up the status hierarchy. Higher status = greater wealth Higher status = greater wealth

Institutional Decision-Making Values in the People’s Republic Chinese values stress the importance of the major primary groups to which each person belongs. Chinese values stress the importance of the major primary groups to which each person belongs. American assumptions reflect equality of opportunity; Chinese assumptions focus on equality in the sharing of output. American assumptions reflect equality of opportunity; Chinese assumptions focus on equality in the sharing of output. Conformity to group norms is viewed positively; distinguishing oneself from other group members in any way that disrupts the smooth flow of human relationships is criticized. Conformity to group norms is viewed positively; distinguishing oneself from other group members in any way that disrupts the smooth flow of human relationships is criticized.

Five Differences Between Chinese and American Negotiating Practices 1) Types of Institutions Represented: 1) Types of Institutions Represented: Chinese will ultimately represent the interests and viewpoints of the government.Chinese will ultimately represent the interests and viewpoints of the government. American negotiators are preoccupied with the profitability of their company.American negotiators are preoccupied with the profitability of their company.

2) Types of Relationships Envisioned Chinese institutional representatives expect that negotiation will lead to a partnership characterized by trust, obligations of mutual support, and permanence. It is more of an important social occasion and opportunity to foster a relationship. Chinese institutional representatives expect that negotiation will lead to a partnership characterized by trust, obligations of mutual support, and permanence. It is more of an important social occasion and opportunity to foster a relationship. Americans are not averse to good social relationships but rarely see the building of permanent partnership as one of their principal goals. Americans are not averse to good social relationships but rarely see the building of permanent partnership as one of their principal goals.

3) Basic Approaches to Negotiating The Chinese are not nearly as legalistic as are Americans and do not completely share the American view that a contract is a complete, binding, limiting set of specifications. The Chinese are not nearly as legalistic as are Americans and do not completely share the American view that a contract is a complete, binding, limiting set of specifications. Americans tend to strive for an agreement through a contract, while Chinese institutions want to discuss mutual interests and general principles.Americans tend to strive for an agreement through a contract, while Chinese institutions want to discuss mutual interests and general principles.

4)Perspectives on the Nature of Contracts Chinese negotiators usually arrive at the bargaining table either with no draft contract or with a rather simple on based on a standard pattern often used in China. Chinese negotiators usually arrive at the bargaining table either with no draft contract or with a rather simple on based on a standard pattern often used in China. American negotiators usually arrive with a long and complicated draft contract that is situation-specific and reflects the highly legalistic nature of business in the U.S. American negotiators usually arrive with a long and complicated draft contract that is situation-specific and reflects the highly legalistic nature of business in the U.S.

5) Amounts of Time Required to Complete the Process Reasons for the slow pace of Chinese negotiations and decision making: Reasons for the slow pace of Chinese negotiations and decision making: The Chinese must fully discuss in detail all final decisions with colleaguesThe Chinese must fully discuss in detail all final decisions with colleagues The two sides have differing views about the ultimate purpose of the document they are attempting to fashion.The two sides have differing views about the ultimate purpose of the document they are attempting to fashion. The Chinese want to develop a partnership with a feeling of mutual trust and an aura of permanence.The Chinese want to develop a partnership with a feeling of mutual trust and an aura of permanence.

The End