Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment City of San Buenaventura Public Works Department Engineering and Operations Division January 25, 2010.
Advertisements

Statewide Local Streets & Roads Needs Assessment Moraga Town Council February 24, 2010 RTPA RCTF Left click to continue.
County Transportation Systems Association of MN Counties, MN County Engineers Association, MN Inter-County Association Presentation to MN Senate Transportation.
Transportation Legislation Overview Presented By: Dwight L. Farmer, P.E. Executive Director/Secretary Hampton Roads Metropolitan Planning Organization.
City of Willows Pavement Management Program Road Maintenance Needs March 25, 2014.
Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.
Street Maintenance Funding Issues City Council Workshop April 1, 2013.
Division of Budgets Caltrans July Presentation State Highway Account Balance Presented to the California Transportation Commission July 22, 2003.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Finance Committee Budget Overview April 26, 2010.
Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF.
Your Roads The Future, Some History, and Alternatives For Wasco County April 23, 2013.
Once again the State adopted a budget without realistically solving its own major deficit problem. “Mid-Year Triggers” is the latest catch phrase for.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Fuel Tax Revenue Revenue Drivers  Miles Driven (VMT)  Fuel Efficiency.
California State Association of Counties Capitol Update & CSAC Programs and Services Presented to the Fresno County Board of Supervisors Elizabeth Howard.
City Transportation Funding Overview House Transportation Committee January 13, 2004 Ashley Probart AWC Transportation Coordinator.
LAO California’s Budget Outlook for Michael Cohen Legislative Analyst’s Office April 23,
Todd Long, GDOT. Transportation in Georgia 10 th Largest Road System in Nation – 17,967 Centerline Miles of State Routes/Interstates – 85,738 Centerline.
April 1, UPDATE Texas Business Leadership Council John A. Barton, P.E. – Deputy Executive Director.
New Mississippi River Bridge EWGCOG Presentation New Mississippi River Bridge EWGCOG Presentation January 8, 2007.
WHAT THE HAPPENED TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN CALIFORNIA!? Steve Andrews Senior Policy Advisor Mayor’s Office of Economic Development City of Los.
Statewide Water Needs and future estimated costs September 20, 2011.
STATE FISCAL CRISIS: UPDATED IMPACTS ON K-12 AND RUSD August 16, 2012.
Association of Indiana Counties Community Forum Indiana Road and Highway Funding Neal Carboneau Research Manager Indiana Local Technical Assistance Program.
Fiscal Years Outlook Preliminary Six-Year Financial Plan and Six-Year Improvement Plan Strategy John W. Lawson, Chief Financial Officer Reta.
California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Brenda O’Brien, P.E. Engineer of Construction Field Services.
California’sInfrastructureCrisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment 2011 “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.
Michigan Infrastructure and Transportation Association A STATE IN NEED.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
What Kind Of Colorado Do You Want?. 3 Proposals on 2010 Ballot Prop 101: Significantly reduces local and state support for public services, in particular.
2006 Annual Report on the Status of the Implementation of Proposition 400 Management Committee 9/6/06.
Metro Cities Transportation Policy Committee August 10, 2015 Overview of Minnesota Highway and Transit Finance.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
The Road to New Hampshire's Future. Transportation Funding Overview/summary Operational deficit Preservation and Maintenance Capital needs.
Bae Army Cost Experience: Fort Monroe Fort Monroe Federal Area Development Authority April 28, 2008.
Public Hearing August 11, :00 pm. On May 3, 2011, the West Bountiful City Council adopted a balanced tentative budget maintaining current service.
Department of Transportation Report on Condition of County Maintained Road System Agenda Item 53 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting April 26, 2005.
Division of Budgets July 6, 2011 Transportation Funding in California.
TRANSIT REVENUE AND FUNDING UPDATE Robert Dunlavey – Director Transit & Parking Joanne Parker – Transit Planner March 10, 2009.
Local Pots of Gold Local Pots of Gold Maintaining Fiscal Constraint for Local Funds in the TIP Srikalyani Srinivasan Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
January Cal Poly Budget Presentation UPBAC January 2009.
MEC’S BLUEPRINT MISSISSIPPI LONG-TERM TRANSPORTATION/ INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN.
1 Streets and Highways: Not Making the Grade Hamid Bahadori Automobile Club of Southern California (AAA)
FY16/17 Governor’s Budget Estimated Revenues Community Mental Health Revenue Overview January 18, 2016.
Division of Budgets January 25, 2012 Budget and Allocation Capacity Update Presented to the California Transportation Commission Tab 13.
California State Association of Counties January 2010 Governor’s Proposed Budget Unrealistic Assumptions, Significant Risks, and Cost Shifts.
Resolving Regional Challenges SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION GOVERNMENTS of Resolving Regional Challenges.
CITY OF FLAGSTAFF – PROP. 406 ROAD REPAIR AND STREET SAFETY 1.
Revenues Sources for Transportation Financing Jeffery A. Richard Foster Pepper & Shefelman.
PUBLIC WORKS FY 2012 Proposed Budget May 24, 2012.
1 City Council Work Session September 24, 2012 State of Transportation in San Leandro.
Transportation Management and Policy Spring Colloquium.
Road Services Funding Options Bridges and Roads Task Force October 28,
The Roads Most Traveled: California’s Transportation Funding Needs
State Legislative Update and Government Relations Overview
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Transportation Funding
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Budget Update nd Interim Assumptions
Second Interim March 14, 2017.
First Interim December 13, 2016.
Funding the Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP): A Discussion of Cash Flows Town Council Meeting February 15, 2017.
Efforts to Pass Prop 69 & Protect SB 1
Comprehensive and Dependable Transportation Plan
Presentation transcript:

Statewide Transportation Funding At Risk Your Name or Agency Date RTPA RCTF

March 2010 Transportation Tax Swap Revenues in Jeopardy Propositions 22 & 26 have potentially severe negative implications for existing transportation funding in California. Prop. 22 restricts the State from using gasoline excise taxes (Highway User Tax Account or HUTA) for general fund relief and bond debt service, an integral part of the March 2010 Transportation Tax Swap. Prop. 26 invalidates the 17.3-cent replacement excise tax enacted when the State eliminated the sales tax on gasoline (Prop. 42) under the Transportation Tax Swap. Unless the Legislature and Governor take immediate and comprehensive action, $2.5-$3.5 billion in annual transportation funding and 45,000-63,000 jobs will be lost. The 2010 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment Update demonstrates that not only must the State act to save the existing bare bones transportation funding streams, there is a significant unfunded backlog on the local street and road system.

2010 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment Update What is the condition of California’s system of local streets and roads? What will it cost to bring them up to a Best Management Practices (BMP) condition, which is most cost effective to maintain? What will it cost to maintain them in the BMP condition? Considering existing revenues, is there a funding shortfall? If so, what is it? What are the potential solutions policy makers can consider? What are the impacts to the local transportation network of different funding scenarios?

Local Streets & Roads are Huge Part of State Network 82% of California’s pavements are owned by cities and counties!

It’s Not Just Pavements … Sidewalks ADA ramps Curb & gutter Storm drains Lighting

Data Collection Total of 406 agencies –56 counties –350 cities Missing 130 agencies –Mostly small cities –No data –No resources 71% data rec’d 29% no data Data received 93% of centerline miles No Data 7% of centerline miles

Pavement Condition Index Failed Poor At Risk Good - Excellent

Statewide Average PCI = 66

Why is 68 Critical? 68 $2/sy $15-40/sy $40-70/sy $60-100/sy

Condition of City/County of BLANK Local Roads City/ County of ______ has an average PCI of _____. This is up/down from _____ in Other City/County specific details on condition of your local system.

Funding Sources Annual Funding FY 2006/07 & 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 onward State41.0%40.5%52.9% State - Prop 1B10.0%0% Federal with ARRA*10.8%35.9%10.4% Local38.1%23.6%36.8% * ARRA local share is assumed to be 40% of $1.6 billion.

Critical Revenues Gas Tax (Highway Users Tax Account or HUTA): Cities and Counties will receive approximately $1.629 billion FY –$1 billion in “old” HUTA –$629 million in “new” HUTA (Prop 42 replacement revenues under the Transportation Tax Swap) –City/County of _____ receives _____ of this amount.

What Happens If We Don’t Get More Funding? 68 (at risk) 48 (poor) PCI Backlog ($ billion) $37B $79B

Total 10 Year Shortfall ($B) Transportation Asset 10 Year Needs Existing Funding 10 Year Shortfall Pavements$ 67.6 $ 15.9 $ 51.7 Essential Components $ 32.1 $ 12.4 $ 19.7 Total shortfall $ cents/gal 53 cents/gallon!

Funding Shortfall for City/County of BLANK City/County of _____ has a funding shortfall of _____. City/County of _____ has a backlog of _____. This is up/down by ______ since Other city/county specific details on the financial needs of the system.

Summary Good News –Data received represents 97% of local system –Statewide average PCI = 66 Not so good news –PCI = 66 is at risk category & drops to 44 by 2033 with existing funding –Need to more than double existing funding to maintain transportation assets

Questions?