Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 2 A deeper look at arguments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Last week Change minds; influence people Premises Conclusion
Advertisements

KEY TERMS Argument: A conclusion together with the premises that support it. Premise: A reason offered as support for another claim. Conclusion: A claim.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
1.4 Validity, Truth, Soundness, Strength and Cogency Goal: Learn the terms used to evaluate inductive and deductive arguments.
Hume’s Problem of Induction 2 Seminar 2: Philosophy of the Sciences Wednesday, 14 September
DEDUCTIVE REASONING We reason deductively when we draw a conclusion from a set of given facts using the laws of logic.
{ Introduction to Logic The two types of logos. Induction  Definition: compiling of evidence/reasons/ examples that support an argument  Example: “Wow!
Chapter 1 Critical Thinking.
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Other Info on Making Arguments
2 Basic Types of Reasoning Deductive Deductive Inductive Inductive.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
Deduction and Induction
This is Introductory Logic PHI 120 Get a syllabus online, if you don't already have one Presentation: "Good Arguments"
Reasoning Automated Deduction. Reasonable Arguments Argument: An attempt to demonstrate the truth of a conclusion from the truth of a set of premises.
Science and induction  Science and we assume causation (cause and effect relationships)  For empiricists, all the evidence there is for empirical knowledge,
Logic. what is an argument? People argue all the time ― that is, they have arguments.  It is not often, however, that in the course of having an argument.
1 Arguments in Philosophy Introduction to Philosophy.
Moral Reasoning   What is moral reasoning? Moral reasoning is ordinary critical reasoning or critical thinking applied to moral arguments.
DEDUCTIVE & INDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS
Basic Argumentation.
Lecture 7: Ways of Knowing - Reason. Part 1: What is reasoning? And, how does it lead to knowledge?
MGF 1107 Mathematics of Social Choice Part 1a – Introduction, Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Tutorial 3 Understanding Arguments 24 August 2015.
Historical Argument OCTOBER 3, AN ARGUMENT IS AN ATTEMPT TO ESTABLISH THE TRUTH OF A CLAIM. AN ARGUMENT OFTEN INCLUDES PREMISES, OR SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS.
THIS CD HAS BEEN PRODUCED FOR TEACHERS TO USE IN THE CLASSROOM. IT IS A CONDITION OF THE USE OF THIS CD THAT IT BE USED ONLY BY THE PEOPLE FROM SCHOOLS.
1 Lesson 11: Criteria of a good argument SOCI Thinking Critically about Social Issues Spring 2012.
MA 110: Finite Math Lecture 1/14/2009 Section 1.1 Homework: 5, 9-15, (56 BP)
Deduction, Validity, Soundness Lecture II – 01/25/11.
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
9/20/12 BR- Who are the 3 Argument Brothers (from yesterday) Today: How to Argue (Part 1) MIKVA!!
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 An introduction to Deductive arguments By David Kelsey.
Deductive vs. Inductive Logic This course is about deductive logic. But it is important to know something about inductive logic.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Phil 1102: Critical Thinking September 01, Results ules.php?mod_id=539.
Deductive and Inductive Reasoning. Inductive Reasoning involves an observer to look at the evidence around them and draw a conclusion about said evidence.
Critical Thinking. Critical thinkers use reasons to back up their claims. What is a claim? ◦ A claim is a statement that is either true or false. It must.
Reasoning To understand and analyse how basic philosophical arguments work. Understand basic philosophical terms. Use the terms to identify key features.
Argument Diagramming Part I
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-a What is philosophy? By David Kelsey.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
Validity, Soundness, Strength, Cogency Jason Chang Critical Thinking.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2) By David Kelsey.
09/17/07 BR- What is “logic?” What does it mean to make a logical argument? Today: Logic and How to Argue (Part 1)
Critical Thinking Lecture 10 The Syllogism By David Kelsey.
PHI 103 ASH Courses For more course tutorials visit Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument By David Kelsey.
Types of Arguments Inductive Argument: An argument in which the truth of the premises is supposed to prove that the conclusion is probably true. Strong.
Deductive vs. Inductive Arguments
Chapter 1: Good and Bad Reasoning
What makes a Good Argument?
Introduction to the Religion, Philosophy & Ethics A Level
10/28/09 BR- What is the most important factor in winning an argument
Introduction to Argumentative Writing and Speaking
Distinguish valid from invalid arguments and sound from unsound
Making Sense of Arguments
Logic Problems and Questions
Notes 2.3 Deductive Reasoning.
Introduction to Logic Lecture 1 What is Critical Reasoning?
Introduction to Ethics Lecture 1-b What is Philosophy? (Part 2)
Constructing a Logical Argument
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 1b What is Philosophy? (part 2)
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 3 Formalizing an argument
Induction and deduction
Critical Thinking Lecture 2 Arguments
“Still I Look to Find a Reason to Believe”
Patterns of Informal Non-Deductive Logic (Ch. 6)
INFORMATIVE ABOUTNESS
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 2 A deeper look at arguments By David Kelsey

Conclusions as premises The Margaret example (example 1), 1) Every student who made 90 percent or better on the midterms already has an A. 2) Margaret made a 94 percent on the midterms. Thus, 3) Margaret already has an A. 1) Margaret already has an A. 2) All students who have an A are excused from the final exam. Thus, 3) Margaret is excused from the final exam.

Unstated Conclusions Unstated Conclusions: Conclusions that are entailed by the words of the text. The Republicans example (example 2): 1) The political party that best reflects mainstream opinion will win the most seats in congress. 2) The republicans certainly best reflect mainstream opinion. What is the unstated conclusion?

Independent Premises Independent premises: independently support the conclusion of an argument.

The speed limit example An argument with independent premises: Speed limit example (example 3): 1) Raising the speed limit will wear out the highways faster. 2) Raising the speed limit will result in more highway deaths. Thus, 3) We should not raise the speed limit.

Dependent Premises Dependent premises: support the conclusion of an argument only with the help of some other premise. What if a dependent premise is false? Gas to waste (example 4): 1) Raising the speed limit will waste gas. 2) We don’t have any gas to waste. Thus, 3) We shouldn’t raise the speed limit.

Good arguments A good argument: The premises both support its conclusion and are reasonable Reasonable? Requisite Support?

Valid arguments Valid arguments Necessary connection between premises and conclusion The premises entail the conclusion

Valid arguments: false premises & false conclusions We can have a valid argument with a false premise and a false conclusion. George Bush example (example #5): 1) George Bush is a robot. 2) If George Bush is a robot then he isn’t the president. Thus, 3) George Bush isn’t president. And we can have a valid argument with false premises and a true conclusion: The moon is made of green cheese example (example #6): 1) The moon is made of green cheese. 2) All things made of green cheese orbit the Earth. Thus, 3) The moon orbits the Earth.

A validity metaphor Form: Valid arguments have a certain form to them The link between premises and conclusion The puzzle metaphor:

2 more Validity tricks 2 more tricks: Addition metaphor: Imagine an argument as a mathematical problem of addition. Covering up the conclusion: Cover up the conclusion and ask: what do the premises entail?

Sound Arguments A sound argument: The Giants example (example #7): 1) The Giants won the superbowl. 2) If a team loses a playoff game, then they don’t win the superbowl. Thus, 3) The Giants didn’t lose a playoff game. Dreaming example (example #8): 1) Either I am in class right now or I am dreaming it. 2) I am in class right now. Thus, 3) I am not dreaming it.

Strong Arguments A strong argument April showers example (example #9): 1) Every April we get some rain. Thus, 2) We will get some rain this April.

Strong arguments: false premises & false conclusions A strong argument with a false premise and a false conclusion: Gravity example (example #10): 1) Every time I have ever dropped anything from my hand it floats up to the sky. Thus, 2) if I drop this pencil it will float up to the sky. A strong argument with true premises and a false conclusion. Swans example (#11): 1) Every swan I have ever seen is white. Thus, 2) all swans are white. (All swans are not in fact white as there are black swans in Australia!)

Cogent arguments A cogent argument: 1. 2. The sun will rise & set tomorrow (example #12): 1) Every day of my life the sun has risen in the morning and set in the evening. Thus, 2) Tomorrow the sun will rise in the morning and set in the evening.

Deduction and Induction Deductive arguments: valid or intended to be valid. Necessary conclusions Which of our 12 examples are deductive? Inductive arguments: not valid. Strong? Likely conclusions Which of our 12 examples are inductive?

Unstated Premises again Identifying the unstated Ask: What must be assumed to make it either valid or strong? Add a general claim that connects the premises and conclusion Cheating example (#12): 1) This is the second time you caught her cheating. 2) she shouldn’t pass the class. This argument becomes valid when we add this premise: 1.5)

Determining the Unstated premise Now Ask: Is the assumption reasonable? Yes or No? Determining what must be assumed to make an argument strong

Unstated premises & Strong arguments The bloodhound example (#13): 1) Moore’s dog is a bloodhound. Thus, 2) Moore’s dog has a keen sense of smell. What do we need to add to make this argument valid? What do we need to add to make this argument strong?