LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LHCb-Babar Meeting 8 April Paul Soler University of Glasgow and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory A first look at B s J/ in LHCb.
Advertisements

Prospect for  s measurement at LHC Alessia Satta on behalf of the LHCb collaboration + some Atlas and CMS results Physics at LHC, 3 rd october 2008.
CERN June HERA-LHC Workshop Status and startup for physics with LHCb G. Passaleva (INFN-Firenze) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration.
Title Gabriella Sciolla Massachusetts Institute of Technology Representing the BaBar Collaboration Beauty Assisi, June 20-24, 2005 Searching for.
ICFP 2005, Taiwan Colin Gay, Yale University B Mixing and Lifetimes from CDF Colin Gay, Yale University for the CDF II Collaboration.
1 D 0 -D 0 Mixing at BaBar Charm 2007 August, 2007 Abe Seiden University of California at Santa Cruz for The BaBar Collaboration.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Radiative LHCb Vanya BELYAEVVanya BELYAEV (NIKHEF/Amsterdam & ITEP/Moscow) Vanya BELYAEV On behalf of LHCb Collaboration.
Pakhlov Pavel (ITEP, Moscow) Why B physics is still interesting Belle detector Measurement of sin2  Rare B decays Future plans University of Lausanne.
1 B s  J/  update Lifetime Difference & Mixing phase Avdhesh Chandra for the CDF and DØ collaborations Beauty 2006 University of Oxford, UK.
Fourth Nordic LHC Physics Workshop Stockholm 23 September 2001 P Eerola 1 Investigation of the decays B 0 d,s -> J/  in the ATLAS experiment at the LHC.
BR = ( (stat) ± 2(syst) ± 5 (BR))  From PDG * From MC * BR(  needs to be rescaled for f s /f d From Data b->sss pure penguin amplitude.
Sep 11, 2006SLUO Anual Meeting Search for Super-Penguins: CP Violation in B 0 ->K+K-K 0 D. Dujmic, SLAC For BABAR Collaboration D. Dujmic, SLAC For.
Advanced topics in Particle Physics: LHC physics, 2011 Jeroen van Tilburg 1/38 Recent CP violation measurements.
R.W.L.Jones High Precision Measurements of B s Parameters in B s  J/  1/19 High Precision Measurements of B s Parameters in B s  J/ψ  Roger Jones.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
B 0 s  J/   LHC review Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze For the ATLAS, CMS and LHCb collaborations Oxford, 28 th September 2006 Beauty 2006.
The BaBarians are coming Neil Geddes Standard Model CP violation BaBar Sin2  The future.
Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Beauty 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Physics Performance.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
1 Results on CP Violation in B s Mixing [measurements of ϕ s and ΔΓ s ] Pete Clarke / University of Edinburgh & CERN Presentation on behalf of.
1 Track reconstruction and physics analysis in LHCb Outline Introduction to the LHCb experiment Track reconstruction → finding and fitting Physics analysis.
Jeroen van Hunen The LHCb Tracking System. May 22, 2006 Frontier Detectors for Frontier Physics, Elba, Jeroen van Huenen 2 The LHCb Experiment LHCb.
Wouter Verkerke, UCSB Limits on the Lifetime Difference  of Neutral B Mesons and CP, T, and CPT Violation in B 0 B 0 mixing Wouter Verkerke (UC Santa.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
G. Eigen, LISHEP2011, Rio de Janeiro, July 5 th, Outline Introduction Introduction ATLAS detector and performance Vertex and impact parameter resolution.
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
RooFit toy MC sensitivity studies for  +  s and  m s from B s →D s  /K channels at LHCb Shirit Cohen NIKHEF MSc Colloquium May 11 th 2007.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Pavel Krokovny Heidelberg University on behalf of LHCb collaboration Introduction LHCb experiment Physics results  S measurements  prospects Conclusion.
Beautiful B Physics at the Tevatron IOP HEPP half day meeting Results From the Tevatron Imperial College London, 21 September 2005 Rick Jesik Imperial.
High precision and new CP violation measurements with LHCb Michael Koratzinos, CERN EPS HEP 99 Tampere,15 July 1999.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
INCLUSIVE STANDARD MODEL HIGGS SEARCHES HIGGS SEARCHES WITH ATLAS Francesco Polci LAL Orsay On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration. SUSY08 – Seoul (Korea)
A measurement of the B 0 B 0 oscillation frequency and determination of flavor-tagging efficiency using semileptonic and hadronic B 0 decays S. Bolognesi.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
1 Trees, penguins and boxes at LHCb Prospects for CP violation measurements at LHCb Tristan du Pree (Nikhef) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration 14 th.
Paul Balm - EPS July 17, 2003 Towards CP violation results from DØ Paul Balm, NIKHEF (for the DØ collaboration) EPS meeting July 2003, Aachen This.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
1 EPS03, July 17-23, 2003Lorenzo Vitale Time dependent CP violation studies in D(*)D(*) and J/ψ K* Lorenzo Vitale INFN Trieste On behalf of BaBar and Belle.
B 0 s  J/   with the ATLAS and CMS detectors Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze Nagoya, 15 th December 2006 CKM th International Workshop.
Measurements of sin2  1 in processes at Belle CKM workshop at Nagoya 2006/12/13 Yu Nakahama (University of Tokyo) for the Belle Collaboration Analysis.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Mike HildrethEPS/Aachen, July B Physics Results from DØ Mike Hildreth Université de Notre Dame du Lac DØ Collaboration for the DØ Collaboration.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
DØ Beauty Physics in Run II Rick Jesik Imperial College BEACH 2002 V International Conference on Hyperons, Charm and Beauty Hadrons Vancouver, BC, June.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
3 May 2003, LHC2003 Symposium, FermiLab Tracking Performance in LHCb, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking performance in LHCb Tracking Performance Jeroen van.
2010/09/01cpv from b factories to tevatron and lhcb1 Recent B Physics Results from CDF Tomonobu Tomura (University of Tsukuba)
K. Holubyev HEP2007, Manchester, UK, July 2007 CP asymmetries at D0 Kostyantyn Holubyev (Lancaster University) representing D0 collaboration HEP2007,
1 outline ● Part I: some issues in experimental b physics ● why study b quarks? ● what does it take? ● Part II: LHCb experiment ● Part III: LHCb first.
Latest CMS Results on ϕs
B meson studies - from commissioning to new physics effects.
CP violation and D Physics
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
Heavy Flavor Results from CMS
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
Flavour Tagging performance in LHCb Marc Grabalosa Gándara (14/12/08)
new measurements of sin(2β) & cos(2β) at BaBar
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Overview of LHCb Poland Ukraine Brazil UK Switzerland France Spain
D0 Mixing and CP Violation from Belle
Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003
Presentation transcript:

LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen

July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 2 B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s B d  J/  K s B s  J/    CP violated (interference mixing and decay) } CP eigenstate and a mixture of CP-odd and CP-even states If  fcp  0  no CPV in decay no CPV in mixing } single weak phase CP-symmetry

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 3 CP - Asymmetry CP-eigenstate, | f | = 1 :  = 0 (for B 0 d ) :

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 4   J/  = sin 2  s   J/  K s = sin 2  B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 5 J/    +  - selection Two opposite charged muons with : P t > 0.5 GeV Vertex with a  2 < 9 Invariant mass within 50 MeV/c 2 of m J/   = 10 MeV  +  - mass (GeV)

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 6 Two opposite charged electrons one with P t > 0.8 GeV/c and one with P t > 1.8 GeV/c A vertex  2 < 6 vertex |Z| < 150 mm An invariant mass between 2.7 – 3.2 GeV/c 2 J/   e + e - selection  = 66 MeV e + e - mass (GeV)

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 7   K + K - selection Two opposite charged kaons with P t > 0.5 GeV, giving a vertex with a  2 12 GeV/c 2 Combine the J/  and  if the four tracks form a vertex with  2 < 20, then select the primary vertex with smallest IP (< 4mm) B s  J/   selection

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 8 B s  J/   selection Other constraints on the B s 0 : Proper time (consistency between the B s 0 momentum and the vector between the production and decay vertex) significance > 5 m B s within 50 MeV/c 2 of the nominal B s 0 mass  +  - K + K - Mass  +  - K + K - Mass  residual  =15MeV  = 38 fs bb-incl.

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 9 K s   +  - selection categoryfractionvertex Z res. LL  m LV  m TT  m Two oppositely charged pions, giving a vertex with a z position between meter, invariant mass within 60 (100 for TT) MeV/c 2 of m K s, and a combined P t >200 MeV/c.

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 10 B d  J/  (  +  - )K s selection J/  and K s make a vertex with  2 < 50 IP significance of K s with respect to J/  vtx < 3.5 (< 8 for TT) IP significance of Ks pions with respect to the primary vtx > 4 (2 for TT) significance of the distance between primary and J/  vtx > 1.2(LL), 3.1(LV), 2.4(TT) B d mass window 60 MeV/c 2 B d : combining J/  and K s

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 11 B d  J/  K s selection Results for the B d 0 mass : LL TT  =9 MeV J/  (  +  - ) K s (LL)  =12 MeV J/  (  +  - ) K s (TT) J/  (e + e - ) K s (LL)  =14 MeV LL

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 12 Annual yield and Background estimate for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s Channel Annual yieldB/S B s  J/  (  +  - )  100k <0.3 (bb-incl) <0.7 (prompt J/  ) B s  J/  (  +  - ) K s 166k 0.6  0.1 (bb-incl) <0.4 (prompt J/  ) B s  J/  (e + e - ) K s 21k <0.84 (prompt J/  ) 3.4  0.5 (bb-incl)

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 13 Sensitivity studies for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 14 2  s  0.03 in SM : A(t)  two exponentials with lifetimes 1/  H and 1/  L Extracting  s from B s  J/   B s  J/    B s  J/   A  = odd & A 0,|| = even

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 15 Extracting  s from B s  J/   Extreme CP-Parameters:  s =15 0  s /  s = 0.5 untagged B s tagged  B s tagged  (ps)

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 16 Angular analysis to determine the sensitivity for: R(A  fraction),  s,  s and  s (for  ms and wrong tag fraction: fit D s  simultaneously) One year of LHCb data  s (Deg) R-R-  s (ps)  s /  s -  m s (ps -1 ) used sensitivity R = |A  | 2 /(|A 0 | 2 +|A || | 2 +|A  | 2 )  = 35% &  = 40% Sensitivity for  s from B s  J/  

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 17 Sensitivity for  from B s  J/  K s one year LHCb data |  used sensitivity  = 35%  = 35% Proper time

Jeroen van Hunen July 11, 2003Physics at LHC, Prague 18 Conclusions Sensitivity for  and  s One Year of LHCb Data ss Reconstruction of B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays : Good mass (9-15 MeV/c 2 ) & vertex (  m) resolution  Excellent proper time resolution (38 fs) allows to follow the oscillations of the decay rates accurately. High annual yields with low background rates  Precise determination of CKM angles  and  s