Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport Results of the 2007 survey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Ticket media Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
Advertisements

BEST 2014 BEST special topic 2013 Use of PT information channels Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project Manager 2014.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Copenhagen Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Copyright © D&D Research, 2010 Structured evaluation of the efficiency of POC project Complex quantitative research report March – April 2010.
Prepared by Margo Eyeson-Annan New South Wales Health Survey Program, Centre for Epidemiology and Research New South Wales Department of Health March 2006.
4 Conducting Marketing Research 1. What is Marketing Research? Marketing research is the systematic design, collection, analysis, and reporting of data.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2013.
Measuring nonresponse bias in a cross-country enterprise survey
BOWLING GREEN CITIZEN CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY Fall 2010 – National Citizen Survey.
Survey Design Steps in Conducting a survey.  There are two basic steps for conducting a survey  Design and Planning  Data Collection.
C o n f i d e n c e p e r f o r m a n c e d i s t i n c t i o n q u a l i t y Nursing Facility Family Satisfaction Survey Report Prepared for: Wiley Mission.
Objective quality and customer satisfaction BEST CIG Berlin
Attitudes to the private rented sector in Ireland: Landlord and tenant survey results ENHR, London March 2015 David Duffy, ESRI.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 BEST Survey results 2014.
BEST results 2007 VIENNA City + surrounding areas Berlin, Nov BEST-Seminar 2007 Berlin.
BEST Survey 2009 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
1 1 Copyright Universum 2008 Copyright Universum 2009 University Report Universum Student Survey 2009 Italian Edition Tor Vergata Business.
1 Assessments of the Environment in the European Quality of Life Perception Surveys Klaus Trutzel German KOSIS Association Urban Audit c/o Bureau for Statistics.
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Big Listening 2010 A summary of surveys 13, 14 and 15.
Huntingdonshire District Council Place Survey 2008 Presentation by Sofia Vartsaki mruk research ltd 9 Northburgh Street London EC1V 0AH Tel :
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood Data Collection With Surveys Unit 2: Describing Transit Systems with Data.
Greater Toronto & Hamilton Area School Travel Household Attitudinal Study.
BEST Survey 2011 City report: Stockholm Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Kirsty Wells, Scotland Manager, HouseMark Angela Currie, Director, SHBVN.
BEST 2011 Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport EMTA & BEST – towards a more complete and interactive benchmarking database Birmingham,
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2010 Survey.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2009 Survey.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
MARKETING SURVEYS Constructing the Questionnaire validity  A questionnaire has validity when the questions asked measure what they were intended.
FEST Finans Energi Samferdsel Telekom BEST Survey 2008 City report: Helsinki Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
Per Gellert /Barcelona Quality for Passengers.
Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics Richard Curtin University of Michigan.
Monitoring public satisfaction through user satisfaction surveys Committee for the Coordination of Statistical Activities Helsinki 6-7 May 2010 Steve.
2011 WHITE MOUNTAINS COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=339.
Key Findings from the 2008/9 Place Survey. Purpose of the Place Survey  Captures local people’s views, experiences and perceptions about the local area.
1 BEST results 2007 for Oslo Svein L. Alfheim Manager for Planning and Development SL (Greater Oslo Public Transport)
BEST Survey 2010 City report: Oslo Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city.
BEST 2014 BEST 2011 BEST 2014 Special survey & key figure topic 2014 Tickets and ticket inspections Kjetil Vrenne, BEST Project manager.
Warm-ups September 19-23, Warm-up, Statistics Monday, September 19, 2011 Graph the distribution and calculate the mean, mode, and median of the.
CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY OVERVIEW REPORT PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION 09 APRIL 2003.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Extra report 2007 Based on 600 interviews in Vienna city.
BEST SURVEY 2007 Report Copenhagen BEST 2007 BEST Survey Contents About the survey Participants Sample Method How to read the graphs Overall.
Telephone consultations at Woodlawn medical centre
The monitoring of Customer Satisfaction Customer satisfaction survey of HCT BEST-survey Customer complaints.
BEST 2010 BEST 2010 Results of the survey Kjetil Vrenne BEST Project Manager May 27 th, 2010 BEST Survey 2010 Results & Analyses Page 1.
NEW FOCUS nf nf 1 Research Strategy and Implementation Telephone: Facsimile: ACN: 066.
Coventry Partnership Household Survey Background BMG Research was commissioned to undertake the 2013 Household Survey The survey provides an overview.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST) Main results of the BEST 2008 Survey.
Quality indicators impact on overall citizen satisfaction BEST Survey 2014.
Lesson 4.5 – Conducting a Survey to Collect Two-Variable Data.
TEXT MESSAGING AS A FORM OF COMMUNICATION A presentation about the hypothesis, survey and results.
Local Government and Public Body Analysts Survey Conference Scottish Household Survey Survey Review March 2010 Hugh Munro SHS Project Team.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey September 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office Nov 6, 2003.
© 2015© 2016 Results and Analysis 2016 School Climate Survey: Jenkins Elementary School.
Headline results from residents' survey Areas of personal concern for residents Which of these issues are you most concerned about at the moment?
Citizen Satisfaction Survey February 2006 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office February 10, 2006.
Taxicab regulation and urban residents' perception of taxi services: a survey in eight cities Richard Darbéra CNRS, Latts Scientific director of IVM's.
Introduction to BEST Survey results 2015 Oslo, 8 th of February 2016.
EUROPEAN FORUM FOR GEOGRAPHY AND STATISTICS KRAKOW CONFERENCE October, Krakow, Poland Travel Behaviour in Pristina City Author 1: Naim Kelmendi.
Citizen Satisfaction Survey March 2003 Results Office of the Mayor Program Management Office March 28, 2003.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport BEST BEST Seminar 2006 Main results of the seminar evaluation Helsinki, 16th and 17th of November.
/ København Dok.nr. Nordic Cooperation in Public Transport Per Gellert.
Die Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) - Anstalt des öffentlichen Rechts
Based on 400 interviews in areas surrounding Vienna city
BEST Special topic 2015 What could make PT more interesting for car users? Stockholm, 15th of March 2016.
Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport (BEST)
Survey Design Steps in Conducting a survey
Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking in European Service of public Transport Results of the 2007 survey

BEST Survey Content About the survey Participants Sample Method Questionnaire Results (graphs) How to read the graphs? Each quality dimension Background information

BEST Survey About the survey The following cities participated in the BEST 2007 survey: Stockholm (Extended questionnaire) Oslo (Extended questionnaire) Helsinki (Extended questionnaire, with additional questions) Copenhagen (Extended questionnaire, with additional questions) Vienna (Extended questionnaire) Berlin (Extended questionnaire) Prague (Extended questionnaire) Geneva (Extended questionnaire) – Fieldwork in august/september 2007 For all cities 1000 residents in defined areas have been interviewed. The exception is Helsinki where 150 additional interviews where performed in the Espoo area. All interviews have been done by telephone. The fieldwork for BEST Survey 2007 was conducted between March 5th and March 18th Results from the survey have been weighted with respect to sex and age to match the profile in each area. The Helsinki results are weighted with respect to geography as well, to correct for the uneven distribution of interviews resulting from the extra interviews in Espoo. All 1150 interviews in Helsinki are included in the analysis. The questionnaire used in the survey is an updated version of the 2006 questionnaire. Since 2006 one new statement (‘The information is good in stops and terminals’) and two new background questions (‘region/geography’ and ‘usage of different modes of public transport’) have been added. In Copenhagen the question on ‘usage of PT modes’ have been formulated differently. In Copenhagen respondents were asked how often they used each transport mode. For reporting and comparison purposes these questions have been recoded as follows: If a respondent states that he/she travels with PT on a daily basis, all transport modes which this respondent use on a daily basis is coded as ‘generally uses’. Transport modes who are not used on a daily basis have for this respondent been coded as ‘not used generally’. Response rate Stockholm64 % Oslo28 % Helsinki32 % Copenhagen40 % Vienna54 % Geneva56 % Berlin33 % Prague31 %

BEST Survey How to read the graphs The graphs show the proportion of the respondents who agrees (partially agrees or fully agrees) to the different statements in blue columns. The red columns shows the proportion who disagrees (hardly agrees or not agree at all) to the statements. Respondents with a neutral position are not displayed in the graphs. The graphs also include results from previous surveys, shown in the table to the right as the proportion of the respondents who agrees to the statement in question. Development per index in the different cities are also shown as time lines. All graphs are standard PowerPoint-graphs where different categories can be hidden and value labels displayed at ones own preference.

Overall report – BEST Survey Results 2007

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Best performing city per index TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2006 Best performing city per index TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2005 Best performing city per index TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey 2007 Citizen satisfaction

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Citizen satisfaction TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey Citizen satisfaction TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Traffic supply

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Traffic supply TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Traffic supply TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Reliability

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Reliability TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Reliability TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Information

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Information TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Information TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Staff behaviour

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Staff behaviour TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Staff behaviour TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Security and safety

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Security and safety TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Security and safety TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Comfort

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Comfort TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Comfort TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Social image

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Social image TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Social image TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

BEST Survey 2007 Value for money

BEST Survey BEST Survey 2007 Value for money TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Value for money TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

Loyalty BEST Survey 2007

37 BEST Survey 2007 Loyalty TOTAL BASE: Replied grade

BEST Survey All cities Loyalty TOTAL BASE: Replied grade % satisfied citizens

Background information BEST Survey 2007

40 Gender – All cities 2007

BEST Survey Age – All cities 2007

BEST Survey Life situation – All cities 2007

BEST Survey PT travel frequency – All cities 2007

Further information and other available reports at best2005.net