IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 2B Developing a Capable NEPIO Difficulties and Solutions.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Accreditation of Joint Programmes (JP) is high on the agenda! I want to highlight one specific reason: -In the Bologna Process ministers asked the HEI.

Advertisements

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A4 Issues raised during breakout A Need for more concrete measures and guidance. Can we group similar countries and provide.

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A3- National position - Stakeholders involvement - Legislative framework - Safeguards QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES 1. Difference.

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group A1- National position - Stakeholders involvement - Legislative framework - Safeguards QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES Can nuclear.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency HPS Annual Meeting Current Situation and Future Challenges on Occupational Radiation Protection in Latin America.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA 4th Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies and Seminar on.

International Atomic Energy Agency Workshop on Topical Issues on Infrastructure Development: Managing the Development of a National Infrastructure for.

Submitted to the 4 th Steering Committee Meeting on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies.

Infrastructure Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 2.

INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)

Challenges faced by a newly independent regulatory body in maintaining regulatory independence Presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of NERS September 23-24,

Role of Independent Regulatory Body for Safe Operation of NPPs Zia Hussain Shah Director, Centre for Nuclear Safety Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority.

Protection Against Occupational Exposure

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Human Resources Development for Nuclear Safety J. Bastos NSNI/RAS.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.

Thailand NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAM INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION: Regulatory Body Prof. Dr. Chaivat TOSKULKAO Secretary General Office of Atoms.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.

Tom MAZOUR IAEA, Division of Nuclear Power

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Energy Programme Implementing Organization (NEPIO) Anne Starz Nuclear Power Engineering.

Human Resources Development for Sudan Nuclear Power Programme Presented by Prof. F.I.Habbani Technical Committee For Sudan NPP Ministry of Energy and Mining.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 3A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status Difficulties and Solutions.

RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: ESTONIA.

Human Resources Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 1 Moderator: Mr. Biro Lucian (Romania) Reproter:

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group B1- Management - Human resources development - Financing - Electric grid, industrial inv. and procurement QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES.

TM/WS 9-12 February GROUP 3: Bangladesh, Croatia, Egypt, Jordan, Montenegro, Namibia, Senegal, Syria, Vietnam and Yemen Moderator: Dr. I. Rotaru,

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency School of Drafting Regulations – November 2014 Government and Regulatory Body Functions and Responsibilities IAEA.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 3B Developing a Capable NEPIO Difficulties and Solutions (solutions will follow difficulties)

Technical Meeting on Milestones for nuclear power infrastructure development Radiation Protection Khammar Mrabit Head, Regulatory Infrastructure and Transport.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Technical Meeting/Workshop on: TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT:

TM/WS 9-12 February Group 3 Human Resources Development Break-out Session 1. EXPERIENCES  Core group (NEPIO=Coordination Group) involved in the.

International Atomic Energy Agency Workshop feedback “ Roles & Responsibilities of Vendor Countries and Countries Embarking on Nuclear Power Programmes.

International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.

0 Safety Infrastructure Development for Introduction of Nuclear Power S.K. Sharma Chairman, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, India IAEA Workshop on Evaluation.

International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 1.3. The role.

Summary of Session 6 Long Term Operation 1 Christopher Miller NRC, United States of America IAEA International Conference on Operational Safety Vienna.

INDONESIA NATIONAL STRATEGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME INFRASTRUCTURE AND STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Dr. A. Sarwiyana Sastratenaya Director, Center for.

1 Capacity Building: Concept, Definition and Methodology for Self Assessment 4 th Meeting of Steering Committee on E&T December 4, 2012 Shahid Mallick.

Current Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure and Human Resources Development in the Republic of Belarus TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.

International Atomic Energy Agency Meeting Summary Technical meeting of the International Project on Demonstration of Operational and Long-Term Safety.

JORDAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (JAEC) Building of National Safeguards Capabilities in Jordan IAEA’s Technical Meeting/Workshop on National Infrastructure.

Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.

TM/WSP 5-9 Nov Group D2- Nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear Waste - QUESTIONS / DIFFICULTIES 1. Is it reasonable for a country to build a fuel fabrication.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Presenter Name School of Drafting Regulations for Borehole Disposal of DSRS 2016 Vienna, Austria Program and Quality.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Technical Meeting on Regulatory Oversight of Human and Organizational Factors Vienna, Austria | December.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 4B Developing a Capable NEPIO Difficulties and Solutions.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Authorization Inspection Enforcement 2 Basic IRRS Training - Reviewing.

DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM DEVELOPMENT OF THE NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR POWER IN VIETNAM Vuong Huu.

Comments on the Infrastructure Milestones Ala Alizadeh Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) November 2007 IAECL Vienna.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in Development of a National Infrastructure for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Issue: Management C.R.

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Arusha, Tanzania (NIGERIA) Dr Yau IDRIS 2 – 5 December 2013 RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting.

Jussi helske1 Workshop on the learning of EC approaches and experience in Licensing of New NPP’s Existing in European Union countries procedures.

Infrastructure Development TM/WS Infrastructure Development 9-12 February 2010 Breakout session – Group 4.

Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Co-ordination and Co-operation.

WG1 –On the policy framework

Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs

The role of NEPIO – Operator vs. Government

Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB

Leadership and Management for Safety

الإطار التشريعي والرقابي للمحطات النووية

Working Group 2A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status

Group C4. - Regulatory framework. - Nuclear safety

USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18

Working Group 1B Developing a Capable NEPIO

Group B4. - Management. - Human resources development. - Financing

REGULATORY ASPECTS OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT IN TURKEY Dr

Working Group 4A Self-Evaluation of Infrastructure Development Status

Infrastructure Development

Nuclear Energy Programme Implementing Organisation

Presentation transcript:

IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Working Group 2B Developing a Capable NEPIO Difficulties and Solutions

IAEA Group 2B - 1 Government ministries don’t want to give power away to an organisation like NEPIO. Some ministries (Environment?) may be against nuclear. Several ministries may each want to be the leader.

IAEA Group 2B - 2 Don’t read the NEPIO or Milestone document literally. Design NEPIO to suit your own country.

IAEA Group 2B - 3 The life of NEPIO depends on the long term plans for nuclear. If the country only wants one or two NPPs NEPIO can disappear after milestone 2. With a large nuclear programme, NEPIO needs to continue, perhaps as a nuclear agency. However, assessments should be done in accordance with the IAEA document.

IAEA Group 2B - 4 What does NEPIO do if the government minister has unrealistic expectations? Political expectations can be different from technical reality. Politicians want nuclear now! Show the minister the Milestones document. Involve all the stakeholders. Ask IAEA experts to help explain to the government.

IAEA Group 2B - 5 Before we start we must show a need for additional energy source in 20 years time. How do we prove it? In many countries this is easy – the problem is we need more energy now! In other countries this may be harder.

IAEA Group 2B - 6 After Milestone 1…. If the NEPIO can develop a single nuclear regulatory body, which combines existing regulatory bodies, this would be a great help for simplifying regulation. This is likely to be difficult, but it would be helpful to minimise the number of regulatory bodies.

IAEA Group 2B - 7 In some countries, activities are not done in the correct order. A NEPIO is not established at the beginning. This requires a government decision. Follow the Milestones document

IAEA Group 2B - 8 A NEPIO which does not have the power and authority from the government cannot perform its duties.

IAEA Group 2B - 9 IAEA has estimated the timescales for the NEPIO to do its job. However, the governments may not accept the cost. It would be helpful if the IAEA could give an estimate of the likely cost.

IAEA Group 2B - 10 NEPIO must start public discussions from the beginning. Public acceptance depends strongly on political leaders. A good energy policy study is needed to demonstrate the need to launch a nuclear programme. If people are concerned about energy independence, they are more likely to support nuclear power programme